Interindividual responses to different exercise stimuli among insulin-resistant women

We aimed to investigate which among 20 cardiometabolic and performance outcomes do and do not respond to high-intensity interval training (HIT), resistance training (RT), or concurrent training (CT) in insulin-resistant adult women. A secondary aim was to report the training-induced changes and the...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23269
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13213
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23269
Palabra clave:
Adult
Blood pressure
Body composition
Body mass
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Comparative study
Controlled study
Exercise
Female
Glucose blood level
High intensity interval training
Human
Insulin resistance
Middle aged
Muscle strength
Physiology
Randomized controlled trial
Resistance training
Adult
Blood glucose
Blood pressure
Body composition
Body mass index
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Exercise
Female
High-intensity interval training
Humans
Insulin resistance
Middle aged
Muscle strength
Resistance training
Exercise
Insulin resistance
Non-responders
Responders
Risk factors
Women
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:We aimed to investigate which among 20 cardiometabolic and performance outcomes do and do not respond to high-intensity interval training (HIT), resistance training (RT), or concurrent training (CT) in insulin-resistant adult women. A secondary aim was to report the training-induced changes and the prevalence of non-responders. Forty-five insulin-resistant adult women were randomly assigned to one of the following 4 groups: HIT (39.2 ± 9.5 years [y]; body mass index [BMI], 29.3 ± 3.3; n = 14), RT (33.9 ± 9.3 y; BMI, 29.4 ± 5.5; n = 8), CT (43.3 ± 8.1 y; BMI, 29.1 ± 2.9; n = 10), and a control group (CG, 40.1 ± 11.4 y; BMI, 28.3 ± 3.5; n = 13). Nine body composition, 3 cardiovascular, 3 metabolic, and 5 performance outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention. Considering all outcomes, the lowest number of total non-responses for one or more variables was found in the RT group, followed by the CT and HIT groups. Individuals in the CG group were classified as non-responders for almost all the variables. Moreover, there were several significant changes in body composition and metabolic parameters, including fasting glucose (HIT: ?5.7, RT ?5.1 mg/d), fasting insulin (HIT: ?0.6, RT ?0.6 ?IU/mL), and HOMA-IR (HIT: ?0.3, RT ?0.4), in addition to improvements in cardiovascular and performance parameters. Also, there were significant differences among groups in the prevalence of non-responders for the variables where a non-response was detected. Overall, the study suggests that independent of the mode of training including volume and frequency, RT has an important ability to reduce the prevalence of non-response to improve the 20 outcomes of health and performance in insulin-resistant adult women. © 2018 John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd