A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation

La proximidad espacial es un factor que puede promover la formación de relaciones sociales. En esta investigación plantee un experimento en el que se evaluó si la proximidad espacial puede promover la formación de relaciones sociales de bajo costo, y favorecer la formación de relaciones de cooperaci...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2023

Institución:: Universidad del Rosario

Repositorio:: Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario

Idioma:: spa

id	EDOCUR2_92b3556e2bf661414fb5fd139729d409
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/38846
network_acronym_str	EDOCUR2
network_name_str	Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.none.fl_str_mv	Prueba de proximidad espacial como conductor de la formación de relaciones sociales
title	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
spellingShingle	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation Acicalamiento Cuys Relaciones cooperativas Relaciones de forrajeo Redes sociales Saludos Cooperative relationships Foraging relationships Greeting Guinea Pigs Social networks
title_short	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
title_full	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
title_fullStr	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
title_full_unstemmed	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
title_sort	A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv	Maldonado Chaparro, Adriana Alexandra
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Acicalamiento Cuys Relaciones cooperativas Relaciones de forrajeo Redes sociales Saludos
topic	Acicalamiento Cuys Relaciones cooperativas Relaciones de forrajeo Redes sociales Saludos Cooperative relationships Foraging relationships Greeting Guinea Pigs Social networks
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv	Cooperative relationships Foraging relationships Greeting Guinea Pigs Social networks
description	La proximidad espacial es un factor que puede promover la formación de relaciones sociales. En esta investigación plantee un experimento en el que se evaluó si la proximidad espacial puede promover la formación de relaciones sociales de bajo costo, y favorecer la formación de relaciones de cooperación (relaciones de alto costo). Para esto se usaron 23 curíes divididos en grupos de cuatro individuos en seis encierros diferentes, en los cuales controlé la familiaridad entre ellos. El experimento consistió en tres tratamientos que fueron evaluados en tres fases. En el tratamiento A los individuos podían interactuar libremente, En el tratamiento B los individuos fueron forzados a compartir un espacio y en el control, los individuos no tenían oportunidad de compartir. Los resultados sugieren que la proximidad espacial promueve la formación de relaciones sociales. Este fenómeno es más evidente cuando los individuos pueden decidir libremente si compartir el espacio con otros. Adicionalmente, las parejas de individuos que forman relaciones de forrajeo tienen mayor opción de desarrollar relaciones de alto costo. En conclusión, la proximidad espacial, especialmente la voluntaria, promueve la formación de relaciones sociales de bajo costo, y estas a su vez favorecen la formación de relaciones de cooperación.
publishDate	2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2023-05-18T19:30:09Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2023-05-18T19:30:09Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv	2023-03-06
dc.date.embargoEnd.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2025-05-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	bachelorThesis
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.document.none.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/38846
url	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/38846
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.rights.acceso.none.fl_str_mv	Restringido (Temporalmente bloqueado)
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Restringido (Temporalmente bloqueado) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv	21 pp
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Ciencias Naturales
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv	Biología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad del Rosario
institution	Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.none.fl_str_mv	Ancillotto, L., Serangeli, M. T., & Russo, D. (2012). Spatial proximity between newborns influences the development of social relationships in bats. Ethology, 118(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.02016.x Aschwanden, J., Gygax, L., Wechsler, B., & Keil, N. M. (2008). Social distances of goats at the feeding rack: Influence of the quality of social bonds, rank differences, grouping age and presence of horns. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114(1–2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.002 Asher, M., de Oliveira, E. S., & Sachser, N. (2004). Social system and spatial organization of wild guinea pigs (Cavia aperea) in a natural population. Journal of Mammalogy, 85(4), 788– 796. https://doi.org/10.1644/BNS-012 Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. December 2006, 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0209 Berghänel, A., Ostner, J., Schröder, U., & Schülke, O. (2011). Social bonds predict future cooperation in male Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Animal Behaviour, 81(6), 1109– 1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.009 Byrne, N., Heinonen, K., & Jussila, I. (2015). The role of proximity in value preferences: A study of consumer co-operatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(2), 339– 361. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12079 Carter, G. G., Farine, D. R., Crisp, R. J., Vrtilek, J. K., Ripperger, S. P., & Page, R. A. (2020). Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats. Current Biology, 30(7), 1275-1279.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.055 Dal Pesco, F., & Fischer, J. (2018). Greetings in male Guinea baboons and the function of rituals in complex social groups. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.007 Di Bitetti, M. S. (1997). Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate. Animal Behaviour, 54(1), 199–211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9268450 Firth, J. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2015). Experimental manipulation of avian social structure reveals segregation is carried over across contexts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1802). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2350 Gable, S. L., & Bromberg, C. (2018). Healthy social bonds: A necessary condition for wellbeing. Handbook of Well-Being, 15. Retrieved from https://nobascholar.com/chapters/65/download.pdf Hinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure. 70(1), 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2800384 Kaburu, S. S. K., & Newton-Fisher, N. E. (2013). Social instability raises the stakes during social grooming among wild male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 86(3), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.003 Kajokaite, K., Whalen, A., Koster, J., & Perry, S. (2022). Social integration predicts survival in female white-faced capuchin monkeys. Behavioral Ecology, 33(4), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac043 Kern, J. M., & Radford, A. N. (2021). Strongly bonded individuals prefer to forage together in cooperatively breeding dwarf mongoose groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03025-0 Kirk, J., & Wascher, C. A. F. (2018). Temporal modification of social interactions in response to changing group demographics and offspring maturation in African lions (Panthera leo). Behavioural Processes, 157, 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.06.006 Kutsukake, N., Suetsugu, N., & Hasegawa, T. (2006). Pattern, distribution, and function of greeting behavior among black-and-white colobus. International Journal of Primatology, 27(5), 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-006-9072-x Lee, N. S., & Beery, A. K. (2022). Selectivity and Sociality: Aggression and Affiliation Shape Vole Social Relationships. In Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (Vol. 16). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.826831 Majolo, B., Schino, G., & Aureli, F. (2012). The relative prevalence of direct, indirect and generalized reciprocity in macaque grooming exchanges. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.026 Mercier, S., Neumann, C., van de Waal, E., Chollet, E., Meric de Bellefon, J., & Zuberbühler, K. (2017). Vervet monkeys greet adult males during high-risk situations. Animal Behaviour, 132, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.07.021 Molm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119– 131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369079 Nishida, T. (1970). Social behavior and relationship among wild chimpanzees of the Mahali mountains. Primates, 11(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730675 Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O'Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista H, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill M, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak C, Weedon J (2022). _vegan: Community Ecology Package_. R package version 2.6-4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan Ostner, J., & Schülke, O. (2014). The evolution of social bonds in primate males. Behaviour, 151(7), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003191 Ottoni, E. B., Izar, P., & Resende, B. D. (2004). Social Play and Spatial Tolerance in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella). Revista de Etologia, 6(1), 55–61. Ramos, A., Bousquet, C. A. H., & Sueur, C. (2021). How leadership could be used to manage domestic and wild ungulate herds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 239(April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105326 Rands, S. A., Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R. A., Rowcliffe, J. M., & Johnstone, R. A. (2003). Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature, 423(6938), 432– 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01630 Razik, I., Brown, B. K. G., & Carter, G. G. (2022). Forced proximity promotes the formation of enduring cooperative relationships in vampire bats. Biology Letters, 0–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0056 Roberts, G., & Sherratt, T. N. (1998). Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature, 394(6689), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/28160 Salvador, C. H., & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2008). Population dynamics and conservation status of the insular cavy Cavia intermedia (Rodentia: Caviidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 89(3), 721– 729. https://doi.org/10.1644/07-MAMM-A-0088R1.1 Santos-Silva, B., Hanazaki, N., Daura-Jorge, F. G., & Cantor, M. (2022). Social foraging can benefit artisanal fishers who interact with wild dolphins. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03152-2 Schülke, O., Bhagavatula, J., Vigilant, L., & Ostner, J. (2010). Social bonds enhance reproductive success in male macaques. Current Biology, 20(24), 2207–2210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.058 Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2003). Social Bonds of Female Baboons Enhance Infant Survival. Science, 302(5648), 1231–1234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088580 Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2009). The benefits of social capital: Close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1670), 3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0681 Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2010). Strong and consistent social bonds enhance the longevity of female baboons. Current Biology, 20(15), 1359–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.067 Smith, J. E., Powning, K. S., Dawes, S. E., Estrada, J. R., Hopper, A. L., Piotrowski, S. L., & Holekamp, K. E. (2011). Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spottedhyaenas. AnimalBehaviour, 81(2), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.007 Stopka, P., & Graciasová, R. (2001). Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse. Behavioral Ecology, 12(5), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.5.584 Trillmich, F., Sötemann, C., & Clara, M. (2007). Age at maturity in cavies: Are precocial mammals different? Ecoscience, 14(3), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.2980/1195- 6860(2007)14[300:AAMICA]2.0.CO;2 Willis, F. N., Levinson, D. M., & Buchanan, D. R. (1977). Development of Social Behavior in the Guinea Pig. The Psychological Record, 27(3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0339447
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/2661e1b4-f1d9-427f-9148-cb3b9e255264/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a4a67ff0-d967-481d-a5c1-55df174c4692/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/5cf90c28-2155-492d-b115-dffa47037026/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7da69e50-92dc-494f-b35f-93a7b19f6793/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/e4ee7f66-b45e-4d36-b3ad-9460facd577f/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	5a839810f337eaf303bbfbc51efd3a26 b2825df9f458e9d5d96ee8b7cd74fde6 3b6ce8e9e36c89875e8cf39962fe8920 0be48a48e0a005db765899c0ed41ba01 59a932aab08513ce1c1a574a9dbf79cf
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_	1818106526700666880
spelling	Maldonado Chaparro, Adriana Alexandra37861034600Cardona-Restrepo, Manuela CardonaBiólogoPregradoPart time7b8f35e1-75a7-41e2-acce-113581827a5c-12023-05-18T19:30:09Z2023-05-18T19:30:09Z2023-03-06info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2025-05-19La proximidad espacial es un factor que puede promover la formación de relaciones sociales. En esta investigación plantee un experimento en el que se evaluó si la proximidad espacial puede promover la formación de relaciones sociales de bajo costo, y favorecer la formación de relaciones de cooperación (relaciones de alto costo). Para esto se usaron 23 curíes divididos en grupos de cuatro individuos en seis encierros diferentes, en los cuales controlé la familiaridad entre ellos. El experimento consistió en tres tratamientos que fueron evaluados en tres fases. En el tratamiento A los individuos podían interactuar libremente, En el tratamiento B los individuos fueron forzados a compartir un espacio y en el control, los individuos no tenían oportunidad de compartir. Los resultados sugieren que la proximidad espacial promueve la formación de relaciones sociales. Este fenómeno es más evidente cuando los individuos pueden decidir libremente si compartir el espacio con otros. Adicionalmente, las parejas de individuos que forman relaciones de forrajeo tienen mayor opción de desarrollar relaciones de alto costo. En conclusión, la proximidad espacial, especialmente la voluntaria, promueve la formación de relaciones sociales de bajo costo, y estas a su vez favorecen la formación de relaciones de cooperación.Spatial proximity is a factor that facilitates the formation of social relationships. Here, I evaluated whether spatial proximity promotes the development of low-cost relationships and whether these favor the formation of cooperative relationships (high-cost relationships). To do this, I used 23 guinea pigs distributed in six enclosures controlling for familiarity between group members. The experiment consisted of three treatments that were evaluated in three phases.In treatment A individuals could freely interact in a shared foraging arena;In treatment B individuals were forced to share the foraging arena and in the control group, individuals were not allowed to share. The results suggest that spatial proximity facilitates the development of low-cost foraging relationships. The strength of foraging relationships increased over time, a phenomenon that was more evident when individuals were allowed to freely decide whether toshare space with other individuals. Additionally, pairs that form strong foraging relationships were more likely to develop high-cost relationships. In conclusion, spatial proximity, especially voluntary proximity, promotes the formation of low-cost social relationships, and these in turn favor the formation of cooperative relationships.Universidad del RosarioInstituto Max Plank21 ppapplication/pdfhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/38846spaUniversidad del RosarioFacultad de Ciencias NaturalesBiologíaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalRestringido (Temporalmente bloqueado)EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfAncillotto, L., Serangeli, M. T., & Russo, D. (2012). Spatial proximity between newborns influences the development of social relationships in bats. Ethology, 118(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.02016.xAschwanden, J., Gygax, L., Wechsler, B., & Keil, N. M. (2008). Social distances of goats at the feeding rack: Influence of the quality of social bonds, rank differences, grouping age and presence of horns. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114(1–2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.002Asher, M., de Oliveira, E. S., & Sachser, N. (2004). Social system and spatial organization of wild guinea pigs (Cavia aperea) in a natural population. Journal of Mammalogy, 85(4), 788– 796. https://doi.org/10.1644/BNS-012Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. December 2006, 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0209Berghänel, A., Ostner, J., Schröder, U., & Schülke, O. (2011). Social bonds predict future cooperation in male Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Animal Behaviour, 81(6), 1109– 1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.009Byrne, N., Heinonen, K., & Jussila, I. (2015). The role of proximity in value preferences: A study of consumer co-operatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(2), 339– 361. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12079Carter, G. G., Farine, D. R., Crisp, R. J., Vrtilek, J. K., Ripperger, S. P., & Page, R. A. (2020). Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats. Current Biology, 30(7), 1275-1279.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.055Dal Pesco, F., & Fischer, J. (2018). Greetings in male Guinea baboons and the function of rituals in complex social groups. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.007Di Bitetti, M. S. (1997). Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate. Animal Behaviour, 54(1), 199–211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9268450Firth, J. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2015). Experimental manipulation of avian social structure reveals segregation is carried over across contexts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1802). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2350Gable, S. L., & Bromberg, C. (2018). Healthy social bonds: A necessary condition for wellbeing. Handbook of Well-Being, 15. Retrieved from https://nobascholar.com/chapters/65/download.pdfHinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure. 70(1), 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2800384Kaburu, S. S. K., & Newton-Fisher, N. E. (2013). Social instability raises the stakes during social grooming among wild male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 86(3), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.003Kajokaite, K., Whalen, A., Koster, J., & Perry, S. (2022). Social integration predicts survival in female white-faced capuchin monkeys. Behavioral Ecology, 33(4), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac043Kern, J. M., & Radford, A. N. (2021). Strongly bonded individuals prefer to forage together in cooperatively breeding dwarf mongoose groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03025-0Kirk, J., & Wascher, C. A. F. (2018). Temporal modification of social interactions in response to changing group demographics and offspring maturation in African lions (Panthera leo). Behavioural Processes, 157, 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.06.006Kutsukake, N., Suetsugu, N., & Hasegawa, T. (2006). Pattern, distribution, and function of greeting behavior among black-and-white colobus. International Journal of Primatology, 27(5), 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-006-9072-xLee, N. S., & Beery, A. K. (2022). Selectivity and Sociality: Aggression and Affiliation Shape Vole Social Relationships. In Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (Vol. 16). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.826831Majolo, B., Schino, G., & Aureli, F. (2012). The relative prevalence of direct, indirect and generalized reciprocity in macaque grooming exchanges. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.026Mercier, S., Neumann, C., van de Waal, E., Chollet, E., Meric de Bellefon, J., & Zuberbühler, K. (2017). Vervet monkeys greet adult males during high-risk situations. Animal Behaviour, 132, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.07.021Molm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119– 131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369079Nishida, T. (1970). Social behavior and relationship among wild chimpanzees of the Mahali mountains. Primates, 11(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730675Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O'Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista H, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill M, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak C, Weedon J (2022). _vegan: Community Ecology Package_. R package version 2.6-4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=veganOstner, J., & Schülke, O. (2014). The evolution of social bonds in primate males. Behaviour, 151(7), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003191Ottoni, E. B., Izar, P., & Resende, B. D. (2004). Social Play and Spatial Tolerance in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella). Revista de Etologia, 6(1), 55–61.Ramos, A., Bousquet, C. A. H., & Sueur, C. (2021). How leadership could be used to manage domestic and wild ungulate herds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 239(April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105326Rands, S. A., Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R. A., Rowcliffe, J. M., & Johnstone, R. A. (2003). Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature, 423(6938), 432– 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01630Razik, I., Brown, B. K. G., & Carter, G. G. (2022). Forced proximity promotes the formation of enduring cooperative relationships in vampire bats. Biology Letters, 0–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0056Roberts, G., & Sherratt, T. N. (1998). Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature, 394(6689), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/28160Salvador, C. H., & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2008). Population dynamics and conservation status of the insular cavy Cavia intermedia (Rodentia: Caviidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 89(3), 721– 729. https://doi.org/10.1644/07-MAMM-A-0088R1.1Santos-Silva, B., Hanazaki, N., Daura-Jorge, F. G., & Cantor, M. (2022). Social foraging can benefit artisanal fishers who interact with wild dolphins. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03152-2Schülke, O., Bhagavatula, J., Vigilant, L., & Ostner, J. (2010). Social bonds enhance reproductive success in male macaques. Current Biology, 20(24), 2207–2210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.058Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2003). Social Bonds of Female Baboons Enhance Infant Survival. Science, 302(5648), 1231–1234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088580Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2009). The benefits of social capital: Close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1670), 3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0681Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2010). Strong and consistent social bonds enhance the longevity of female baboons. Current Biology, 20(15), 1359–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.067Smith, J. E., Powning, K. S., Dawes, S. E., Estrada, J. R., Hopper, A. L., Piotrowski, S. L., & Holekamp, K. E. (2011). Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spottedhyaenas. AnimalBehaviour, 81(2), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.007Stopka, P., & Graciasová, R. (2001). Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse. Behavioral Ecology, 12(5), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.5.584Trillmich, F., Sötemann, C., & Clara, M. (2007). Age at maturity in cavies: Are precocial mammals different? Ecoscience, 14(3), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.2980/1195- 6860(2007)14[300:AAMICA]2.0.CO;2Willis, F. N., Levinson, D. M., & Buchanan, D. R. (1977). Development of Social Behavior in the Guinea Pig. The Psychological Record, 27(3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0339447instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAcicalamientoCuysRelaciones cooperativasRelaciones de forrajeoRedes socialesSaludosCooperative relationshipsForaging relationshipsGreetingGuinea PigsSocial networksA test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formationPrueba de proximidad espacial como conductor de la formación de relaciones socialesbachelorThesisTrabajo de gradoTrabajo de gradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fFacultad de Ciencias NaturalesORIGINALA-test-of-spatial-proximity.pdfA-test-of-spatial-proximity.pdfapplication/pdf732307https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/2661e1b4-f1d9-427f-9148-cb3b9e255264/download5a839810f337eaf303bbfbc51efd3a26MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1483https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a4a67ff0-d967-481d-a5c1-55df174c4692/downloadb2825df9f458e9d5d96ee8b7cd74fde6MD53CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8899https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/5cf90c28-2155-492d-b115-dffa47037026/download3b6ce8e9e36c89875e8cf39962fe8920MD54TEXTA-test-of-spatial-proximity.pdf.txtA-test-of-spatial-proximity.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain36177https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7da69e50-92dc-494f-b35f-93a7b19f6793/download0be48a48e0a005db765899c0ed41ba01MD55THUMBNAILA-test-of-spatial-proximity.pdf.jpgA-test-of-spatial-proximity.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2344https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/e4ee7f66-b45e-4d36-b3ad-9460facd577f/download59a932aab08513ce1c1a574a9dbf79cfMD5610336/38846oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/388462023-12-01 16:40:35.582http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.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

A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation

Publicaciones similares