Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia

La disminución de la natalidad global y el aumento de la expectativa de vida ha ocasionado una inversión de la pirámide poblacional, con una población de adultos mayores de 80 años que se encuentra en constante crecimiento. En este trabajo se describe los desenlaces intrahospitalarios cardiovascular...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/32172
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_32172
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/32172
Palabra clave:
IAMSEST (infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST)
Análisis de desenlaces clínicos de adultos mayores con cardiopatías
Descripción de MACE (Evento adverso cardiovascular mayor) en una corte de pacientes octogenarios en Bogotá
Análisis de mortalidad por cardiopatías en población de pacientes mayores de 80 años en Bogotá
Enfermedades
NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)
Analysis of clinical outcomes in older adults with heart disease
Description of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) in a court of octogenarian patients in Bogotá
Analysis of mortality due to heart disease in a population of patients over 80 years of age in Bogotá
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_8fc63bbf1bd116d7c2cdd2ca64f832ef
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/32172
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv In-hospital outcomes in octogenarians with NSTEMI in a specialized cardiovascular hospital in Bogota, Colombia
title Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
spellingShingle Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
IAMSEST (infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST)
Análisis de desenlaces clínicos de adultos mayores con cardiopatías
Descripción de MACE (Evento adverso cardiovascular mayor) en una corte de pacientes octogenarios en Bogotá
Análisis de mortalidad por cardiopatías en población de pacientes mayores de 80 años en Bogotá
Enfermedades
NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)
Analysis of clinical outcomes in older adults with heart disease
Description of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) in a court of octogenarian patients in Bogotá
Analysis of mortality due to heart disease in a population of patients over 80 years of age in Bogotá
title_short Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
title_full Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
title_fullStr Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
title_sort Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Isaza-Restrepo, Daniel
Cárdenas-Roldán, Jorge
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Garnica Sepúlveda, Diego Eduardo
Navarro-Navajas, Alberto
Vásquez, Juan Felipe
Idrovo Turbay, Carolina Paola
Bonnett, Angélica
Carreño, Marisol
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv IAMSEST (infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST)
Análisis de desenlaces clínicos de adultos mayores con cardiopatías
Descripción de MACE (Evento adverso cardiovascular mayor) en una corte de pacientes octogenarios en Bogotá
Análisis de mortalidad por cardiopatías en población de pacientes mayores de 80 años en Bogotá
topic IAMSEST (infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST)
Análisis de desenlaces clínicos de adultos mayores con cardiopatías
Descripción de MACE (Evento adverso cardiovascular mayor) en una corte de pacientes octogenarios en Bogotá
Análisis de mortalidad por cardiopatías en población de pacientes mayores de 80 años en Bogotá
Enfermedades
NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)
Analysis of clinical outcomes in older adults with heart disease
Description of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) in a court of octogenarian patients in Bogotá
Analysis of mortality due to heart disease in a population of patients over 80 years of age in Bogotá
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv Enfermedades
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)
Analysis of clinical outcomes in older adults with heart disease
Description of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) in a court of octogenarian patients in Bogotá
Analysis of mortality due to heart disease in a population of patients over 80 years of age in Bogotá
description La disminución de la natalidad global y el aumento de la expectativa de vida ha ocasionado una inversión de la pirámide poblacional, con una población de adultos mayores de 80 años que se encuentra en constante crecimiento. En este trabajo se describe los desenlaces intrahospitalarios cardiovasculares de los pacientes mayores de 80 años con diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del ST (IAMSEST), que ingresaron a la Fundación Cardio Infantil entre 2018 y 2020. Se describe las características demográficas y clínicas, y se identifica las enfermedades y factores de riesgo más prevalentes en esta población y se comparan estos datos con los de la población de pacientes menores de esta edad. Este es un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, observacional, con un cálculo de muestra no probabilístico por conveniencia. Los octogenarios son pacientes más comórbidos en comparación con los de menor edad, siendo concordante con lo reportado en la literatura, pero que para algunas patologías tuvo mayor magnitud propio de la distribución geográfica local. Hubo mayor prevalencia de bloqueo AV, falla cardiaca descompensada y fibrilación auricular aguda en el grupo de octogenarios, hallazgos de gran impacto pronóstico a largo plazo. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria, el choque cardiogénico y las arritmias ventriculares tuvieron una prevalencia similar, siendo estos, hallazgos no esperados, pero que se pueden explicar por el seguimiento intrahospitalario y la falta de registro a mediano plazo. Se trata del primer trabajo de desenlaces intrahospitalarios de pacientes colombianos mayores de 80 años con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-06T23:29:02Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-06T23:29:02Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-28
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv bachelorThesis
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.document.spa.fl_str_mv Descriptivo observacional retrospectivo
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_32172
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/32172
url https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_32172
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/32172
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 47 pp.
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Especialización en Cardiología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv 1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD et al. Consenso ESC 2018 sobre la cuarta definición universal del infarto de miocardio. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2019;72 (1): 72. e1-e27.
2. Stone PH, Thompson B, Anderson HV, et al. Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non -Q-wave myocardial infarction: the TIMI III registry. JAMA. 1996; 275 (14): 1104-1112
3. Nawar EW, Niska RW, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2007 (386): 1-32.
4. Gallardo-Solarte K, Acosta FPB, Jiménez RR. Costos de la enfermedad crónica no transmisible: la realidad colombiana. Rev Cienc Salud. 2016; 14 (1): 103-14.
5. Observatorio Nacional de Salud. Quinto Informe ONS: carga de enfermedad por enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles y discapacidad en Colombia. Colombia: ONS; 2015.
6. Observatorio de la Seguridad Social. Grupo de Economía de la Salud GES. Evaluación económica en salud: tópicos teóricos y aplicaciones en Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia. 2006;5 (14): 1-16.
7. Roberts RR, Zalenski RJ, Mensah EK, Rydman RJ, Ciavarella G, Gussow L, et al. Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997; 278 (20): 1670-6.
8. Storrow AB, Gibler WB. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35 (5): 449-61
9. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions:results in 7,472 very elderly patients. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 723-30.
10. Dangas GD, Singh HS. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients: navigate with caution. Heart 2010; 96: 813-4
11. Barón A. Cardiogeriatría: un reto para el siglo XXI. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2019; 26 (6): 305 - 307
12. Kumar s, et al. Contemporary Revascularization Dilemmas in Older Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9: e014477
13. Fanaroff AC, Rymer JA, Goldstein SA, Simel DL, Newby LK. Does This Patient with Chest Pain Have Acute Coronary Syndrome? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA. 2015; 314 (18): 1955-65.
14. Collet M, et al. Guía ESC 2020 sobre el tratamiento de los síndromes coronarios agudos en pacientes sin elevación persistente del segmento ST. European Heart Journal. 2020. 00, 1 - 79.
15. Qiu H, Zhu Y, Sun Z, et al. Short communication: vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness as a mechanism for increased aortic stiffness with aging. Circ Res. 2010; 107:615 - 619.
17. Cheitlin MD. Cardiovascular Physiology - Changes with aging. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003; 12:9- 13.
18. Mari D, et al. Hypercoagulability in centenarians: The paradox of successful aging. Blood. 1995; 86(11): 3144 - 3149
19. Zahavi J, et al. Enhanced in vivo platelet release reaction in old healthy individuals. Thrombosis Research. 1980; 17: 329 - 336
20. Ricci B, Cenko E, Vasiljevic Z. Impact of the age of frailty on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(suppl 11):30752–6.
21. Parnell ST, Smith AT. Acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians: Expect the unexpected. J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):e27-e30.
22. Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG, et al. Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 2004; 126: 461–9.
23. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1144–7.
24. Pfisterer M, et al. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2001; 358 (9286): 951 - 957.
25. Schampaert E, Serruys P, Kappetein AP, et al. TCT-78 outcomes of left main revascularization in the elderly and younger patients: the EXCEL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: B34
26. McKellar SH, et al. Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008; 5 (11): 738 - 746.
27. Ghali WA, Knutson ML. Overview of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. On behalf of the APPROACH investigators. Can J Cardiol. 2000; 16 (10): 1225-30.
28. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105: 2378-84.
29. Tegn N, Abdelnoor M, Aaberge L, Endresen K, Smith P, Aakhus S, et al.; After Eighty study investigators. Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10023): 1057–65
30. Kolte D, Khera S, Palaniswamy C, et al. Early invasive versus initial conservative treatment strategies in octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI. Am J Med. 2013 Dec; 126(12): 1076–83.e1.
31. Kvakkstad KM, Gran JM, Eritsland J, et al. Long-Term Survival after Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Elderly Patients with non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study. Cardiology 2019; 144: 79–89
32. Bauer T, Koeth O, Jünger C, et al. Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry (ACOS) Investigators. Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(23): 2873–8.
33. Kaura A, et al. Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10251): 623 – 634.
34. Devlin G, Gore JM, Elliott J, et al.; GRACE Investigators. Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(10): 1275–82.
35. Kurlansky P. Do octogenarians benefit from coronary artery bypass surgery: a question with a rapidly changing answer? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012; 27: 611 - 619
36. Nicolini F, et al. The Impact of Age on Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Long-Term Results of a Real-World Registry. Biomed Res Int. 2017. 2017: 9829487.
37. Lemaire A, et al. The impact of age on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 15: 158 - 166.
38. Díez-Villanueva P, et al. Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly. J Geriatr Cardiol 2020; 17: 9 -15
39. Bawamia B, et al. Risk scores in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 441–450.
40. Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, Lorente V, et al. Efficacy of bleeding risk scores in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. Rev Esp Card 2014; 67: 463–470.
41. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017; 389: 1025–1034.
42. Kochar A, et al. Long-Term Mortality of Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated in US Clinical Practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7: e007230. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007230
43. Batchelor WB, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36 (3): 723–30
44. Gabet A, et al. Early and late case fatality after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome in France, 2010-2015. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019; 112 (12): 754-764.
45. Jaguszewski M, et al. Acute coronary syndromes in octogenarians referred for invasive evaluation: treatment profile and outcomes. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015; 104 (1): 51- 58.
46. Rubinstein R, et al. Trends in management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome in women ≥80 years versus those <80 years in Israel from 2000-2016. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 281: 22-27.
47. Ardila Arenas CH, et al. Informe comité nacional de expertos para la evaluación del censo nacional de población y vivienda de Colombia - 2018. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018/informacion-tecnica
48. Li S, Barywani SB, Fu ML. Relationship between physical inactivity and long-term outcome in patients aged >80 years with acute coronary syndrome.pdf. Curr Med Sci. 2018;38(2):64–9.
50. Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, Prati G, Spedicato L, Nucifora G, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;249: 112–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.025
50. Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, Prati G, Spedicato L, Nucifora G, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;249: 112–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.025
51. Vicent L, Ariza-Solé A, DÍez-Villanueva P, Alegre O, Sanchís J, López-Palop R, et al. Statin Treatment and Prognosis of Elderly Patients Discharged after Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cardiol. 2019;143(1):14–21.
52. Kea B, Manning V, Alligood T, Raitt M. A Review of the Relationship of Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2016;4(3):107–18.
53. McManus DD, Huang W, Domakonda K V., Ward J, Saczysnki JS, Gore JM, et al. Trends in atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Med [Internet]. 2012;125(11):1076–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.024
54. Kalarus Z, Svendsen JH, Capodanno D, Dan GA, De Maria E, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: An European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA). Europace. 2019;21(10):1603A-1604P.
De Luca L, Rubboli A, Bolognese L, Gonzini L, Urbinati S, Murrone A, et al. Antithrombotic management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting: A prospective, observational, nationwide study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):1–8.
56. Pokorney SD, Radder C, Schulte PJ, et al. High-degree atrioventricular block, asystole, and electro-mechanical dissociation complicating non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2015;171:25-32
57. Aplin M, Engstrom T, Vejlstrup NG, et al. Prognostic importance of complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:853-6.
Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, et al. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19: 893-8.
59. Hreybe H, Saba S. Location of acute myocardial infarction and associated arrhythmias and outcome. Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32: 274-7.
60. Lamas GA, Muller JE, Turi ZG, et al. A simplified method to predict occurrence of complete heart block during acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 1213-9.
61. Rathore SS, Gersh BJ, Berger PB, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart block in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes.Am Heart J 2001;141:47-54.
62. Kleemann T, Juenger C, Kai Gitt A, et al. Incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ST elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2008; 156: 256-61.
63. Wang J, Luo H, Kong C, et al. (2018) Prognostic value of new-onset right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lau D, ed. Peer J 6: e4497.
64. Xiang Lm Zhong A, You T, et al. Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2016; 22: 998–1004.
65. Kalarus Z, Svendsen JH, Capodanno D, Dan GA, De Maria E, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: An European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA). Europace. 2019;21(10):1603A-1604P.
66. Anderson ML, Peterson ED, Peng SA, et al. Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 708–715.
67. Acharya D. Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Cardiology in Review. 2018; 26: 255–266
68. Kapur NK, Thayer KL, Zweck E. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020;16(1):16–21.
69. Bowen RES, Graetz TJ, Emmert DA, Avidan MS. Statistics of heart failure and mechanical circulatory support in 2020. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(13):827–827.
70. Molina EJ, Shah P, Kiernan MS, Cornwell WK, Copeland H, Takeda K, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2021;111(3):778–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038
71. Jurmann MJ, Weng Y, Drews T, Pasic M, Hennig E, Hetzer R. Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2004;25(4):610–8.
72. Rodríguez Padial L, et al. Differences in in-hospital mortality after STEMI versus NSTEMI by sex. Eleven-year trend in the Spanish National Health Service. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020; S1885-5857(20): 30187-0.
73. Movahed MR, et al. NSTEMI mortality trends in the US. Clin. Cardiol. 2011; 34 (11), 689–692.
74. Fox KAA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ. 2006; 333: 1091–1094.
75. García Castillo A, et al. RENASICA II - Registro Mexicano de Síndromes Coronarios Agudos. Arch Cardiol Mex 2005; 75: S6-S19
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/12a8ab81-ca1a-498f-b865-66ccf7995233/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/32fd2bfa-2920-4cfe-ac1b-17391469fd30/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f2c1b940-4766-4cad-b123-f7f79ec50bf4/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/876a0fb6-5860-4657-826b-369c397443ea/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ce8f77032f441b1b3c1c7150920295b3
4130f23c5daf58e23576c7e224a575c9
fab9d9ed61d64f6ac005dee3306ae77e
05ad17d91201821509d65a10285f01e0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390927852503040
spelling Garnica Sepúlveda, Diego EduardoNavarro-Navajas, Alberto28c4f9eb-f693-453c-a509-6b147638e4c8600Vásquez, Juan FelipeIdrovo Turbay, Carolina Paolawill be generated::orcid::0000-0001-5708-918X600Bonnett, AngélicaCarreño, Marisolc1292cf4-4410-4663-a30d-7f878142ae3b600Isaza-Restrepo, Danielfcfec19d-e237-44b2-a419-81e13967bec3600Cárdenas-Roldán, Jorge133c228a-b37e-494d-aaf5-0fa5748cab67600Torralba, FelipeEspecialista en CardiologíaMaestríaFull time75fd4aa3-9f69-409f-ba6c-15ffbf5b78c16002021-08-06T23:29:02Z2021-08-06T23:29:02Z2021-07-28La disminución de la natalidad global y el aumento de la expectativa de vida ha ocasionado una inversión de la pirámide poblacional, con una población de adultos mayores de 80 años que se encuentra en constante crecimiento. En este trabajo se describe los desenlaces intrahospitalarios cardiovasculares de los pacientes mayores de 80 años con diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del ST (IAMSEST), que ingresaron a la Fundación Cardio Infantil entre 2018 y 2020. Se describe las características demográficas y clínicas, y se identifica las enfermedades y factores de riesgo más prevalentes en esta población y se comparan estos datos con los de la población de pacientes menores de esta edad. Este es un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, observacional, con un cálculo de muestra no probabilístico por conveniencia. Los octogenarios son pacientes más comórbidos en comparación con los de menor edad, siendo concordante con lo reportado en la literatura, pero que para algunas patologías tuvo mayor magnitud propio de la distribución geográfica local. Hubo mayor prevalencia de bloqueo AV, falla cardiaca descompensada y fibrilación auricular aguda en el grupo de octogenarios, hallazgos de gran impacto pronóstico a largo plazo. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria, el choque cardiogénico y las arritmias ventriculares tuvieron una prevalencia similar, siendo estos, hallazgos no esperados, pero que se pueden explicar por el seguimiento intrahospitalario y la falta de registro a mediano plazo. Se trata del primer trabajo de desenlaces intrahospitalarios de pacientes colombianos mayores de 80 años con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST.The decline in the global birth rate and the increase in life expectancy have led to a reversal of the population pyramid, showing a constantly growing population of adults over 80. This paper describes the cardiovascular in-hospital outcomes of patients older than 80 years with a diagnosis of NSTEMI, who were admitted to Fundación Cardioinfantil between 2018 and 2020. We describe demographic and clinical characteristics of this population, and also, the most prevalent diseases and risk factors, to be compared with those of the population of patients younger than this age It is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study with a non-probabilistic sample calculation for convenience. Octogenarians are more comorbid patients compared to younger ones, being consistent with what is reported in the literature. There was a higher prevalence of AV block, decompensated heart failure, and acute atrial fibrillation in the octogenarian group, findings with a high long-term prognostic impact. In-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and ventricular arrhythmias had a similar prevalence, being an unexpected finding, which can be explained by the shot in-hospital follow-up and the lack of a mid-term registry. This is the first in-hospital outcomes study of Colombian patients older than 80 years with NSTEMI.47 pp.application/pdfBogotá, Colombiahttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_32172 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/32172spaUniversidad del RosarioEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la SaludEspecialización en CardiologíaAbierto (Texto Completo)EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf21. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD et al. Consenso ESC 2018 sobre la cuarta definición universal del infarto de miocardio. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2019;72 (1): 72. e1-e27.2. Stone PH, Thompson B, Anderson HV, et al. Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non -Q-wave myocardial infarction: the TIMI III registry. JAMA. 1996; 275 (14): 1104-11123. Nawar EW, Niska RW, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2007 (386): 1-32.4. Gallardo-Solarte K, Acosta FPB, Jiménez RR. Costos de la enfermedad crónica no transmisible: la realidad colombiana. Rev Cienc Salud. 2016; 14 (1): 103-14.5. Observatorio Nacional de Salud. Quinto Informe ONS: carga de enfermedad por enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles y discapacidad en Colombia. Colombia: ONS; 2015.6. Observatorio de la Seguridad Social. Grupo de Economía de la Salud GES. Evaluación económica en salud: tópicos teóricos y aplicaciones en Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia. 2006;5 (14): 1-16.7. Roberts RR, Zalenski RJ, Mensah EK, Rydman RJ, Ciavarella G, Gussow L, et al. Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997; 278 (20): 1670-6.8. Storrow AB, Gibler WB. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35 (5): 449-619. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions:results in 7,472 very elderly patients. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 723-30.10. Dangas GD, Singh HS. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients: navigate with caution. Heart 2010; 96: 813-411. Barón A. Cardiogeriatría: un reto para el siglo XXI. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2019; 26 (6): 305 - 30712. Kumar s, et al. Contemporary Revascularization Dilemmas in Older Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9: e01447713. Fanaroff AC, Rymer JA, Goldstein SA, Simel DL, Newby LK. Does This Patient with Chest Pain Have Acute Coronary Syndrome? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA. 2015; 314 (18): 1955-65.14. Collet M, et al. Guía ESC 2020 sobre el tratamiento de los síndromes coronarios agudos en pacientes sin elevación persistente del segmento ST. European Heart Journal. 2020. 00, 1 - 79.15. Qiu H, Zhu Y, Sun Z, et al. Short communication: vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness as a mechanism for increased aortic stiffness with aging. Circ Res. 2010; 107:615 - 619.17. Cheitlin MD. Cardiovascular Physiology - Changes with aging. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003; 12:9- 13.18. Mari D, et al. Hypercoagulability in centenarians: The paradox of successful aging. Blood. 1995; 86(11): 3144 - 314919. Zahavi J, et al. Enhanced in vivo platelet release reaction in old healthy individuals. Thrombosis Research. 1980; 17: 329 - 33620. Ricci B, Cenko E, Vasiljevic Z. Impact of the age of frailty on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(suppl 11):30752–6.21. Parnell ST, Smith AT. Acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians: Expect the unexpected. J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):e27-e30.22. Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG, et al. Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 2004; 126: 461–9.23. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1144–7.24. Pfisterer M, et al. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2001; 358 (9286): 951 - 957.25. Schampaert E, Serruys P, Kappetein AP, et al. TCT-78 outcomes of left main revascularization in the elderly and younger patients: the EXCEL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: B3426. McKellar SH, et al. Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008; 5 (11): 738 - 746.27. Ghali WA, Knutson ML. Overview of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. On behalf of the APPROACH investigators. Can J Cardiol. 2000; 16 (10): 1225-30.28. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105: 2378-84.29. Tegn N, Abdelnoor M, Aaberge L, Endresen K, Smith P, Aakhus S, et al.; After Eighty study investigators. Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10023): 1057–6530. Kolte D, Khera S, Palaniswamy C, et al. Early invasive versus initial conservative treatment strategies in octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI. Am J Med. 2013 Dec; 126(12): 1076–83.e1.31. Kvakkstad KM, Gran JM, Eritsland J, et al. Long-Term Survival after Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Elderly Patients with non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study. Cardiology 2019; 144: 79–8932. Bauer T, Koeth O, Jünger C, et al. Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry (ACOS) Investigators. Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(23): 2873–8.33. Kaura A, et al. Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10251): 623 – 634.34. Devlin G, Gore JM, Elliott J, et al.; GRACE Investigators. Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(10): 1275–82.35. Kurlansky P. Do octogenarians benefit from coronary artery bypass surgery: a question with a rapidly changing answer? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012; 27: 611 - 61936. Nicolini F, et al. The Impact of Age on Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Long-Term Results of a Real-World Registry. Biomed Res Int. 2017. 2017: 9829487.37. Lemaire A, et al. The impact of age on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 15: 158 - 166.38. Díez-Villanueva P, et al. Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly. J Geriatr Cardiol 2020; 17: 9 -1539. Bawamia B, et al. Risk scores in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 441–450.40. Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, Lorente V, et al. Efficacy of bleeding risk scores in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. Rev Esp Card 2014; 67: 463–470.41. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017; 389: 1025–1034.42. Kochar A, et al. Long-Term Mortality of Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated in US Clinical Practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7: e007230. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.00723043. Batchelor WB, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36 (3): 723–3044. Gabet A, et al. Early and late case fatality after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome in France, 2010-2015. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019; 112 (12): 754-764.45. Jaguszewski M, et al. Acute coronary syndromes in octogenarians referred for invasive evaluation: treatment profile and outcomes. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015; 104 (1): 51- 58.46. Rubinstein R, et al. Trends in management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome in women ≥80 years versus those <80 years in Israel from 2000-2016. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 281: 22-27.47. Ardila Arenas CH, et al. Informe comité nacional de expertos para la evaluación del censo nacional de población y vivienda de Colombia - 2018. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018/informacion-tecnica48. Li S, Barywani SB, Fu ML. Relationship between physical inactivity and long-term outcome in patients aged >80 years with acute coronary syndrome.pdf. Curr Med Sci. 2018;38(2):64–9.50. Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, Prati G, Spedicato L, Nucifora G, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;249: 112–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.02550. Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, Prati G, Spedicato L, Nucifora G, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;249: 112–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.02551. Vicent L, Ariza-Solé A, DÍez-Villanueva P, Alegre O, Sanchís J, López-Palop R, et al. Statin Treatment and Prognosis of Elderly Patients Discharged after Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cardiol. 2019;143(1):14–21.52. Kea B, Manning V, Alligood T, Raitt M. A Review of the Relationship of Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2016;4(3):107–18.53. McManus DD, Huang W, Domakonda K V., Ward J, Saczysnki JS, Gore JM, et al. Trends in atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Med [Internet]. 2012;125(11):1076–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.02454. Kalarus Z, Svendsen JH, Capodanno D, Dan GA, De Maria E, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: An European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA). Europace. 2019;21(10):1603A-1604P.De Luca L, Rubboli A, Bolognese L, Gonzini L, Urbinati S, Murrone A, et al. Antithrombotic management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting: A prospective, observational, nationwide study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):1–8.56. Pokorney SD, Radder C, Schulte PJ, et al. High-degree atrioventricular block, asystole, and electro-mechanical dissociation complicating non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2015;171:25-3257. Aplin M, Engstrom T, Vejlstrup NG, et al. Prognostic importance of complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:853-6.Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, et al. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19: 893-8.59. Hreybe H, Saba S. Location of acute myocardial infarction and associated arrhythmias and outcome. Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32: 274-7.60. Lamas GA, Muller JE, Turi ZG, et al. A simplified method to predict occurrence of complete heart block during acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 1213-9.61. Rathore SS, Gersh BJ, Berger PB, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart block in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes.Am Heart J 2001;141:47-54.62. Kleemann T, Juenger C, Kai Gitt A, et al. Incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ST elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2008; 156: 256-61.63. Wang J, Luo H, Kong C, et al. (2018) Prognostic value of new-onset right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lau D, ed. Peer J 6: e4497.64. Xiang Lm Zhong A, You T, et al. Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2016; 22: 998–1004.65. Kalarus Z, Svendsen JH, Capodanno D, Dan GA, De Maria E, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: An European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA). Europace. 2019;21(10):1603A-1604P.66. Anderson ML, Peterson ED, Peng SA, et al. Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 708–715.67. Acharya D. Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Cardiology in Review. 2018; 26: 255–26668. Kapur NK, Thayer KL, Zweck E. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020;16(1):16–21.69. Bowen RES, Graetz TJ, Emmert DA, Avidan MS. Statistics of heart failure and mechanical circulatory support in 2020. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(13):827–827.70. Molina EJ, Shah P, Kiernan MS, Cornwell WK, Copeland H, Takeda K, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2021;111(3):778–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.03871. Jurmann MJ, Weng Y, Drews T, Pasic M, Hennig E, Hetzer R. Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2004;25(4):610–8.72. Rodríguez Padial L, et al. Differences in in-hospital mortality after STEMI versus NSTEMI by sex. Eleven-year trend in the Spanish National Health Service. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020; S1885-5857(20): 30187-0.73. Movahed MR, et al. NSTEMI mortality trends in the US. Clin. Cardiol. 2011; 34 (11), 689–692.74. Fox KAA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ. 2006; 333: 1091–1094.75. García Castillo A, et al. RENASICA II - Registro Mexicano de Síndromes Coronarios Agudos. Arch Cardiol Mex 2005; 75: S6-S19instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURIAMSEST (infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST)Análisis de desenlaces clínicos de adultos mayores con cardiopatíasDescripción de MACE (Evento adverso cardiovascular mayor) en una corte de pacientes octogenarios en BogotáAnálisis de mortalidad por cardiopatías en población de pacientes mayores de 80 años en BogotáEnfermedades616600NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)Analysis of clinical outcomes in older adults with heart diseaseDescription of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) in a court of octogenarian patients in BogotáAnalysis of mortality due to heart disease in a population of patients over 80 years of age in BogotáDesenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, ColombiaIn-hospital outcomes in octogenarians with NSTEMI in a specialized cardiovascular hospital in Bogota, ColombiabachelorThesisDescriptivo observacional retrospectivoTrabajo de gradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la SaludTEXTDESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdf.txtDESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain83734https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/12a8ab81-ca1a-498f-b865-66ccf7995233/downloadce8f77032f441b1b3c1c7150920295b3MD53THUMBNAILDESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdf.jpgDESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2359https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/32fd2bfa-2920-4cfe-ac1b-17391469fd30/download4130f23c5daf58e23576c7e224a575c9MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1475https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f2c1b940-4766-4cad-b123-f7f79ec50bf4/downloadfab9d9ed61d64f6ac005dee3306ae77eMD52ORIGINALDESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdfDESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdfDOCUMENTO FINALapplication/pdf449954https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/876a0fb6-5860-4657-826b-369c397443ea/download05ad17d91201821509d65a10285f01e0MD5110336/32172oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/321722022-02-22 08:54:53.634https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.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