Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD m...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/42138
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138
- Palabra clave:
- Elderly
cholecystostomy
cholecystectomy
complications
- Rights
- License
- Attribution 4.0 International
id |
EDOCUR2_8d555bbd7551f687e1955280c990ecc1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/42138 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
26d66ab9-0a02-4f2c-9a75-38d30d666c26400e7ca8e5d-2874-44f1-8e53-8acfbd82ce7520bd8a88-91a1-4bff-979a-db8167bb3d112d01fbbd-48e2-45fb-8b65-2cfe0941cbca4004dd6d20c-1369-4e9f-9536-4505a2fa6b6d4002024-01-31T18:28:01Z2024-01-31T18:28:01Z2023-12-012023Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD may have less favorable outcomes than LC, but also that LC-associated complications increase in direct relation to patient age. There is no recommendation supported by robust evidence to decide between one or the other procedure in super elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed to analyze the surgical outcomes of super elderly patients with cholecystitis who underwent LC versus PCD for treatment. The surgical outcomes of a subgroup of high-risk patients were also analyzed. Results: A total of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2021 were included. The median age of patients were 92 years (IQR: 4.00) with a female predominance (58.33%). The overall morbidity rate in the series was 36.45% and mortality rate was 7.29%. There was no statistically significant difference when compared to the associated morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent LC versus those who underwent PCD, neither in the analysis of the complete series or in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality associated with the two most frequently recommended therapeutic options for operating super elderly patients with acute cholecystitis are high. We found no evidence of superiority in outcomes for either of the two procedures in this age group.application/pdf10.1007/s00423-023-02903-71435-2443https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138engUniversidad del Rosariohttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7.pdfAttribution 4.0 InternationalAbierto (Texto Completo)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Langenbeck's Archives of Surgeryinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURElderlycholecystostomycholecystectomycomplicationsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of agearticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Isaza-Restrepo, AndrésRico-Rivera, XimenaORIGINALLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdfapplication/pdf549422https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/133fb027-e975-49c9-8a2b-c989e994e071/download8b0cca0eb482be10b6f02ad9a41f34deMD51TEXTLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.txtLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain33925https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0d4da4b3-d04c-4c11-ab2f-10732a4cbe41/downloadeb6ca69fdd0f4768da4d8d1b2f1f53bcMD52THUMBNAILLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.jpgLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4622https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/419b831f-3501-44ac-8a73-01ffd18f659d/download052e69c5e9f05d518f4bd074f3512762MD5310336/42138oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/421382024-02-01 03:01:37.293https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
title |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
spellingShingle |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age Elderly cholecystostomy cholecystectomy complications |
title_short |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
title_full |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
title_fullStr |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
title_sort |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age |
dc.creator.spa.fl_str_mv |
|
author |
|
author_facet |
|
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Elderly cholecystostomy cholecystectomy complications |
topic |
Elderly cholecystostomy cholecystectomy complications |
description |
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD may have less favorable outcomes than LC, but also that LC-associated complications increase in direct relation to patient age. There is no recommendation supported by robust evidence to decide between one or the other procedure in super elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed to analyze the surgical outcomes of super elderly patients with cholecystitis who underwent LC versus PCD for treatment. The surgical outcomes of a subgroup of high-risk patients were also analyzed. Results: A total of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2021 were included. The median age of patients were 92 years (IQR: 4.00) with a female predominance (58.33%). The overall morbidity rate in the series was 36.45% and mortality rate was 7.29%. There was no statistically significant difference when compared to the associated morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent LC versus those who underwent PCD, neither in the analysis of the complete series or in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality associated with the two most frequently recommended therapeutic options for operating super elderly patients with acute cholecystitis are high. We found no evidence of superiority in outcomes for either of the two procedures in this age group. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-01 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-31T18:28:01Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-31T18:28:01Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv |
10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7 |
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
1435-2443 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7 1435-2443 |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7.pdf |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Attribution 4.0 International |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution 4.0 International Abierto (Texto Completo) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/133fb027-e975-49c9-8a2b-c989e994e071/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0d4da4b3-d04c-4c11-ab2f-10732a4cbe41/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/419b831f-3501-44ac-8a73-01ffd18f659d/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8b0cca0eb482be10b6f02ad9a41f34de eb6ca69fdd0f4768da4d8d1b2f1f53bc 052e69c5e9f05d518f4bd074f3512762 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167525640896512 |