Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD m...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/42138
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138
Palabra clave:
Elderly
cholecystostomy
cholecystectomy
complications
Rights
License
Attribution 4.0 International
id EDOCUR2_8d555bbd7551f687e1955280c990ecc1
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/42138
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 26d66ab9-0a02-4f2c-9a75-38d30d666c26400e7ca8e5d-2874-44f1-8e53-8acfbd82ce7520bd8a88-91a1-4bff-979a-db8167bb3d112d01fbbd-48e2-45fb-8b65-2cfe0941cbca4004dd6d20c-1369-4e9f-9536-4505a2fa6b6d4002024-01-31T18:28:01Z2024-01-31T18:28:01Z2023-12-012023Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD may have less favorable outcomes than LC, but also that LC-associated complications increase in direct relation to patient age. There is no recommendation supported by robust evidence to decide between one or the other procedure in super elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed to analyze the surgical outcomes of super elderly patients with cholecystitis who underwent LC versus PCD for treatment. The surgical outcomes of a subgroup of high-risk patients were also analyzed. Results: A total of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2021 were included. The median age of patients were 92 years (IQR: 4.00) with a female predominance (58.33%). The overall morbidity rate in the series was 36.45% and mortality rate was 7.29%. There was no statistically significant difference when compared to the associated morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent LC versus those who underwent PCD, neither in the analysis of the complete series or in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality associated with the two most frequently recommended therapeutic options for operating super elderly patients with acute cholecystitis are high. We found no evidence of superiority in outcomes for either of the two procedures in this age group.application/pdf10.1007/s00423-023-02903-71435-2443https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138engUniversidad del Rosariohttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7.pdfAttribution 4.0 InternationalAbierto (Texto Completo)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Langenbeck's Archives of Surgeryinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURElderlycholecystostomycholecystectomycomplicationsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of agearticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Isaza-Restrepo, AndrésRico-Rivera, XimenaORIGINALLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdfapplication/pdf549422https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/133fb027-e975-49c9-8a2b-c989e994e071/download8b0cca0eb482be10b6f02ad9a41f34deMD51TEXTLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.txtLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain33925https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0d4da4b3-d04c-4c11-ab2f-10732a4cbe41/downloadeb6ca69fdd0f4768da4d8d1b2f1f53bcMD52THUMBNAILLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.jpgLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4622https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/419b831f-3501-44ac-8a73-01ffd18f659d/download052e69c5e9f05d518f4bd074f3512762MD5310336/42138oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/421382024-02-01 03:01:37.293https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
spellingShingle Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age

Elderly
cholecystostomy
cholecystectomy
complications
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
title_sort Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age
dc.creator.spa.fl_str_mv


author
author_facet
author_role author
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Elderly
cholecystostomy
cholecystectomy
complications
topic Elderly
cholecystostomy
cholecystectomy
complications
description Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD may have less favorable outcomes than LC, but also that LC-associated complications increase in direct relation to patient age. There is no recommendation supported by robust evidence to decide between one or the other procedure in super elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed to analyze the surgical outcomes of super elderly patients with cholecystitis who underwent LC versus PCD for treatment. The surgical outcomes of a subgroup of high-risk patients were also analyzed. Results: A total of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2021 were included. The median age of patients were 92 years (IQR: 4.00) with a female predominance (58.33%). The overall morbidity rate in the series was 36.45% and mortality rate was 7.29%. There was no statistically significant difference when compared to the associated morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent LC versus those who underwent PCD, neither in the analysis of the complete series or in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality associated with the two most frequently recommended therapeutic options for operating super elderly patients with acute cholecystitis are high. We found no evidence of superiority in outcomes for either of the two procedures in this age group.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2023-12-01
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-31T18:28:01Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-31T18:28:01Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv 10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 1435-2443
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138
identifier_str_mv 10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7
1435-2443
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7.pdf
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
Abierto (Texto Completo)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/133fb027-e975-49c9-8a2b-c989e994e071/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0d4da4b3-d04c-4c11-ab2f-10732a4cbe41/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/419b831f-3501-44ac-8a73-01ffd18f659d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8b0cca0eb482be10b6f02ad9a41f34de
eb6ca69fdd0f4768da4d8d1b2f1f53bc
052e69c5e9f05d518f4bd074f3512762
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167525640896512