Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion

Introduction and objectives Bladder stones are the most common calculi of the lower genitourinary tract. The most common predisposing factor is the bladder outlet obstruction. The present case concerns a patient who suffered urethral trauma after a pelvis fracture, requiring a Mitrofanoff urinary di...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23428
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uroco.2015.09.010
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23428
Palabra clave:
Article
Bladder obstruction
Bladder stone
Catheterization
Foley balloon catheter
Hospitalization
Human
Lithotomy
Operation duration
Pelvis fracture
Percutaneous cystolithotomy
Treatment outcome
Urinary diversion
Amplatz sheath
Bladder
Bladder stone
Cystolithiasis
Mitrofanoff
Non neurogenic bladder
Percutaneous cystolithotripsy
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_8a83fc1dbe843f39facdad1be445220f
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23428
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 05fce369-c869-4278-bb8a-ca4199f2b8f6-1bd795d5c-148e-4552-a69f-571f43a079f8-12020-05-26T00:01:56Z2020-05-26T00:01:56Z2016Introduction and objectives Bladder stones are the most common calculi of the lower genitourinary tract. The most common predisposing factor is the bladder outlet obstruction. The present case concerns a patient who suffered urethral trauma after a pelvis fracture, requiring a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion, and was diagnosed with multiple cystolithiasis up to 1 cm. The objective of these paper is to show the possibility of performing a percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a complex urinary diversion, being an intervention with low morbidity, and with shorter recovery time and comparable results in terms of stone free percentage rate. Materials y methods The procedure starts with a prior Mitrofanoff catheterisation with a Foley catheter 12. An ultrasound-guided suprapubic left paramedian puncture was performed, followed by Chiba needle hydrophilic guidewire, stiletto, telescoped Alken dilators 9Fr-22Fr, and 28Fr Amplatz sheath. Once the percutaneous tract is established, the nephroscope and foreign body forceps were introduced and complete stone removal was achieved. The procedure ended with the extraction of the Amplatz sheath and occlusion of the wound with gauze dressing, maintaining the bladder diversion with the Foley catheter to a draining collector system. Discharge was given at day 1 post-operative, nad the Foley catheter was removed after 5 days. Results No complications occurred, the operative time was 1 hour, and 1 day of hospital stay. Satisfactory recovery with a successful outcome in terms of complete stone removal in only 1 surgery. Conclusions Percutaneous cystolithotomy is a management option which offers advantages comparable with other techniques. It should not just be considered in patients with urethral restricted access. © 2015 Sociedad Colombiana de Urologíaapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.uroco.2015.09.0100120789Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23428engElsevier Doyma129No. 2126Urologia ColombianaVol. 25Urologia Colombiana, ISSN:0120789X, Vol.25, No.2 (2016); pp. 126-129https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84949293410&doi=10.1016%2fj.uroco.2015.09.010&partnerID=40&md5=af0185f2cb7fad3b422737715c98d98cAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURArticleBladder obstructionBladder stoneCatheterizationFoley balloon catheterHospitalizationHumanLithotomyOperation durationPelvis fracturePercutaneous cystolithotomyTreatment outcomeUrinary diversionAmplatz sheathBladderBladder stoneCystolithiasisMitrofanoffNon neurogenic bladderPercutaneous cystolithotripsyPercutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversionCistolitotomía percutánea en paciente con derivación urinaria compleja tipo MitrofanoffarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ruiz, María Juliana ArcilaBernal, Andrés Felipe Puentes10336/23428oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/234282022-05-02 07:37:20.963288https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Cistolitotomía percutánea en paciente con derivación urinaria compleja tipo Mitrofanoff
title Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
spellingShingle Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
Article
Bladder obstruction
Bladder stone
Catheterization
Foley balloon catheter
Hospitalization
Human
Lithotomy
Operation duration
Pelvis fracture
Percutaneous cystolithotomy
Treatment outcome
Urinary diversion
Amplatz sheath
Bladder
Bladder stone
Cystolithiasis
Mitrofanoff
Non neurogenic bladder
Percutaneous cystolithotripsy
title_short Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
title_full Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
title_fullStr Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
title_sort Percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Article
Bladder obstruction
Bladder stone
Catheterization
Foley balloon catheter
Hospitalization
Human
Lithotomy
Operation duration
Pelvis fracture
Percutaneous cystolithotomy
Treatment outcome
Urinary diversion
Amplatz sheath
Bladder
Bladder stone
Cystolithiasis
Mitrofanoff
Non neurogenic bladder
Percutaneous cystolithotripsy
topic Article
Bladder obstruction
Bladder stone
Catheterization
Foley balloon catheter
Hospitalization
Human
Lithotomy
Operation duration
Pelvis fracture
Percutaneous cystolithotomy
Treatment outcome
Urinary diversion
Amplatz sheath
Bladder
Bladder stone
Cystolithiasis
Mitrofanoff
Non neurogenic bladder
Percutaneous cystolithotripsy
description Introduction and objectives Bladder stones are the most common calculi of the lower genitourinary tract. The most common predisposing factor is the bladder outlet obstruction. The present case concerns a patient who suffered urethral trauma after a pelvis fracture, requiring a Mitrofanoff urinary diversion, and was diagnosed with multiple cystolithiasis up to 1 cm. The objective of these paper is to show the possibility of performing a percutaneous cystolithotomy in a patient with a complex urinary diversion, being an intervention with low morbidity, and with shorter recovery time and comparable results in terms of stone free percentage rate. Materials y methods The procedure starts with a prior Mitrofanoff catheterisation with a Foley catheter 12. An ultrasound-guided suprapubic left paramedian puncture was performed, followed by Chiba needle hydrophilic guidewire, stiletto, telescoped Alken dilators 9Fr-22Fr, and 28Fr Amplatz sheath. Once the percutaneous tract is established, the nephroscope and foreign body forceps were introduced and complete stone removal was achieved. The procedure ended with the extraction of the Amplatz sheath and occlusion of the wound with gauze dressing, maintaining the bladder diversion with the Foley catheter to a draining collector system. Discharge was given at day 1 post-operative, nad the Foley catheter was removed after 5 days. Results No complications occurred, the operative time was 1 hour, and 1 day of hospital stay. Satisfactory recovery with a successful outcome in terms of complete stone removal in only 1 surgery. Conclusions Percutaneous cystolithotomy is a management option which offers advantages comparable with other techniques. It should not just be considered in patients with urethral restricted access. © 2015 Sociedad Colombiana de Urología
publishDate 2016
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:01:56Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:01:56Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uroco.2015.09.010
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120789X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23428
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uroco.2015.09.010
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23428
identifier_str_mv 0120789X
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 129
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 2
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 126
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Urologia Colombiana
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 25
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Urologia Colombiana, ISSN:0120789X, Vol.25, No.2 (2016); pp. 126-129
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84949293410&doi=10.1016%2fj.uroco.2015.09.010&partnerID=40&md5=af0185f2cb7fad3b422737715c98d98c
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Elsevier Doyma
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167490629992448