Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture

Objective: To improve susceptibility profiles of nosocomial bacteria, identifying the difference between infectious complications in patients undergoing endoscopic flexible ureterolithotomy (fURS) with negative urine culture (UC) that received extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EP) compared with stand...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/42092
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42092
Palabra clave:
Nosocomial bacteria
Infectious complications
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
id EDOCUR2_8819a7c35d161c2c1ef244af0a522948
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/42092
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 3167a640-a186-46b1-b8b8-d29522b8e963e8bf5455-8ba2-4812-94c1-53f6fba465c4fa53db66-3fbe-43e2-a90a-5886a54165f104f1f88e-d803-4bc9-bf05-efedbc6efdb989b807b6-6ee9-4c2e-8eda-870e90a04ab6400438474cc-70d2-452e-8258-d14ec800aad50c38cb07-2e72-4e30-bffa-7aaa35031f985dbd7ff8-2967-499e-a8fc-e099d1a028cde61608cf-0776-4fe3-86cf-6c323dd22ef39936880b-e525-4f87-a0d2-51fa2c0f6286549b77d2-ace8-4f8f-9b81-df2a66fa2b159f084e8c-5c4a-4535-a4a8-f65a4b12a67d2024-01-31T18:20:02Z2024-01-31T18:20:02Z2023-11-012023Objective: To improve susceptibility profiles of nosocomial bacteria, identifying the difference between infectious complications in patients undergoing endoscopic flexible ureterolithotomy (fURS) with negative urine culture (UC) that received extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EP) compared with standard antibiotic prophylaxis (SP).Methodology: This is a retrospective, observational, analytical cohort study, comparing infectious complications between patients undergoing fURS with negative UC who received EP versus SP. We include patients with susccessfull fURS, 20-mm stones and complete information.Results: Overall, 10.3% of patients had complications, 7.2% of patients had postoperative urinary infection, 1.8% had upper urinary tract infection (UTI) and 1.4% had urinary sepsis. Lower UTI were significantly more likely in the extended prophylaxis group with 6.8% versus 2.7% (RR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.10-7.37, p = 0.030). The risk of upper UTI and sepsis did not show significant differences. A total of 69% patients with postoperative infection had isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in the UC, with a higher risk in patients with extended prophylaxis (RR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.33-7.59, p = 0.009).Conclusions: Patients with negative UC who underwent fURS using extended prophylaxis have two times higher risk of low UTI than patients with standard prophylaxis, without differences in the incidence of upper UTI or urinary sepsis. The risk of MDRB isolation in the postoperative UC is higher in the extended prophylaxis group, therefore we recommend the standard 60-min preoperative prophylaxis.Keywords: antibiotics; bacteria; infections; sepsis; urolithiasis.application/pdf10.1002/bco2.2422688-4526https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42092engUniversidad del Rosariohttps://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bco2.242Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 InternationalAbierto (Texto Completo)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2BJUI compassinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURNosocomial bacteriaInfectious complicationsAntibiotic prophylaxisAntibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culturearticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Méndez-Guerrero, Daniela MaríaBuitrago-Carrascal, ChristianPuentes-Bernal, Andrés FelipeCruz-Arévalo, Dilma AlexandraCalderón, Marcelo AndrésÁlvarez-Restrepo, Juan CamiloBrijaldo-Carvajal, Mayra AlejandraPerdomo-Bernal, NataliaMoreno-Matson, María CarolinaIbañez Pinilla, MilciadesVergara, José DazaORIGINALAntibiotic prophylaxis in flexible.pdfapplication/pdf262926https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a8330137-ad80-4d63-b916-43832ac3654b/downloadb83fc8265f3c16abf614242a119d29ddMD51TEXTAntibiotic prophylaxis in flexible.pdf.txtAntibiotic prophylaxis in flexible.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain37009https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/afcc3d84-7be9-4699-81df-0708da5220e6/download951deb6c9e9af2dd86189946076c64b7MD52THUMBNAILAntibiotic prophylaxis in flexible.pdf.jpgAntibiotic prophylaxis in flexible.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4482https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/97c84192-be9e-4510-a4c9-6c7cf131f738/download2f522c1ace12f10a77d5a59285483440MD5310336/42092oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/420922024-02-01 03:00:39.025https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
title Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
spellingShingle Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture

Nosocomial bacteria
Infectious complications
Antibiotic prophylaxis
title_short Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
title_full Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
title_fullStr Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
title_sort Antibiotic prophylaxis in flexible ureterorenoscopy with negative urine culture
dc.creator.spa.fl_str_mv
author
author_facet
author_role author
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Nosocomial bacteria
Infectious complications
Antibiotic prophylaxis
topic Nosocomial bacteria
Infectious complications
Antibiotic prophylaxis
description Objective: To improve susceptibility profiles of nosocomial bacteria, identifying the difference between infectious complications in patients undergoing endoscopic flexible ureterolithotomy (fURS) with negative urine culture (UC) that received extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EP) compared with standard antibiotic prophylaxis (SP).Methodology: This is a retrospective, observational, analytical cohort study, comparing infectious complications between patients undergoing fURS with negative UC who received EP versus SP. We include patients with susccessfull fURS, 20-mm stones and complete information.Results: Overall, 10.3% of patients had complications, 7.2% of patients had postoperative urinary infection, 1.8% had upper urinary tract infection (UTI) and 1.4% had urinary sepsis. Lower UTI were significantly more likely in the extended prophylaxis group with 6.8% versus 2.7% (RR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.10-7.37, p = 0.030). The risk of upper UTI and sepsis did not show significant differences. A total of 69% patients with postoperative infection had isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) in the UC, with a higher risk in patients with extended prophylaxis (RR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.33-7.59, p = 0.009).Conclusions: Patients with negative UC who underwent fURS using extended prophylaxis have two times higher risk of low UTI than patients with standard prophylaxis, without differences in the incidence of upper UTI or urinary sepsis. The risk of MDRB isolation in the postoperative UC is higher in the extended prophylaxis group, therefore we recommend the standard 60-min preoperative prophylaxis.Keywords: antibiotics; bacteria; infections; sepsis; urolithiasis.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2023-11-01
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-31T18:20:02Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-31T18:20:02Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.242
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 2688-4526
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42092
identifier_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.242
2688-4526
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42092
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bco2.242
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Abierto (Texto Completo)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv BJUI compass
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a8330137-ad80-4d63-b916-43832ac3654b/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/afcc3d84-7be9-4699-81df-0708da5220e6/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/97c84192-be9e-4510-a4c9-6c7cf131f738/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b83fc8265f3c16abf614242a119d29dd
951deb6c9e9af2dd86189946076c64b7
2f522c1ace12f10a77d5a59285483440
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167457095483392