Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits

The tempo of evolutionary change through time is among the most heavily studied dimensions of macroevolution using phylogenies. Here, we present a simple, likelihood-based method for comparing the rate of phenotypic evolution for continuous characters between trees. Our method is derived from a prev...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22593
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12977
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22593
Palabra clave:
Comparative methods
Maximum likelihood
Phylogeny
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_7f0f1206bd772ad6f991ec50e6119fa7
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22593
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling bbb09b41-14c2-48c8-b66a-ad0b5264e025-190fface0-885b-4329-b4a3-6858ddef1cdf-1845b59b5-8952-4571-b858-3eb2a1c0646f-12aeb6570-adc9-4cf6-bf95-8f1e3694496b-1a02777fc-0cab-4552-8e20-25e6f3b99899-15ffb4c32-b64a-47c6-a904-0519f655c0b5-12020-05-25T23:57:03Z2020-05-25T23:57:03Z2018The tempo of evolutionary change through time is among the most heavily studied dimensions of macroevolution using phylogenies. Here, we present a simple, likelihood-based method for comparing the rate of phenotypic evolution for continuous characters between trees. Our method is derived from a previous approach published by Brian O'Meara and colleagues in 2006. We examine the statistical performance of the method and find that it suffers from the typical downward bias expected for maximum likelihood estimates of the variance, but only for very small trees. We find that evolutionary rates are estimated with minimal bias for trees of even relatively modest size. We also find that type I error rates based on a likelihood-ratio test are minimally elevated above the nominal level, even for small phylogenies. The type I error rate can be reduced to a level at or below its nominal value by substituting a test-statistic distribution obtained via simulation under the null hypothesis of no difference in evolutionary rate among trees. We discuss the consequences of failing to account for uncertainty in the estimation of species means or in the phylogeny, and describe strategies for taking this uncertainty into consideration during estimation. We also identify how our approach is related to previous methods for comparing the rate of evolution among different clades of a single tree or between different phenotypic traits. Finally, we describe how the method can be applied to different evolutionary models and to discrete characters—options that are already implemented in software. Evolutionary biologists continue to be intrigued by changes in the tempo of phenotypic evolution across the tree of life. The method described herein should be useful for contexts in which changes in the evolutionary rate or process between two or more clades of distant or unknown relationship are of interest. © 2018 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Societyapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.129772041210Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22593engBritish Ecological Society1005No. 4994Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 9Methods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2041210X, Vol.9, No.4 (2018); pp. 994-1005https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042135541&doi=10.1111%2f2041-210X.12977&partnerID=40&md5=a0831e8acf3aa0dfb3dc2ed4cf7aa8fbAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURComparative methodsMaximum likelihoodPhylogenyComparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traitsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Revell L.J.González-Valenzuela L.E.Alfonso A.Castellanos-García L.A.Guarnizo C.E.Crawford A.J.10336/22593oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/225932022-05-02 07:37:19.337808https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
title Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
spellingShingle Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
Comparative methods
Maximum likelihood
Phylogeny
title_short Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
title_full Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
title_fullStr Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
title_full_unstemmed Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
title_sort Comparing evolutionary rates between trees, clades and traits
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Comparative methods
Maximum likelihood
Phylogeny
topic Comparative methods
Maximum likelihood
Phylogeny
description The tempo of evolutionary change through time is among the most heavily studied dimensions of macroevolution using phylogenies. Here, we present a simple, likelihood-based method for comparing the rate of phenotypic evolution for continuous characters between trees. Our method is derived from a previous approach published by Brian O'Meara and colleagues in 2006. We examine the statistical performance of the method and find that it suffers from the typical downward bias expected for maximum likelihood estimates of the variance, but only for very small trees. We find that evolutionary rates are estimated with minimal bias for trees of even relatively modest size. We also find that type I error rates based on a likelihood-ratio test are minimally elevated above the nominal level, even for small phylogenies. The type I error rate can be reduced to a level at or below its nominal value by substituting a test-statistic distribution obtained via simulation under the null hypothesis of no difference in evolutionary rate among trees. We discuss the consequences of failing to account for uncertainty in the estimation of species means or in the phylogeny, and describe strategies for taking this uncertainty into consideration during estimation. We also identify how our approach is related to previous methods for comparing the rate of evolution among different clades of a single tree or between different phenotypic traits. Finally, we describe how the method can be applied to different evolutionary models and to discrete characters—options that are already implemented in software. Evolutionary biologists continue to be intrigued by changes in the tempo of phenotypic evolution across the tree of life. The method described herein should be useful for contexts in which changes in the evolutionary rate or process between two or more clades of distant or unknown relationship are of interest. © 2018 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:03Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:03Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12977
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2041210X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22593
url https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12977
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22593
identifier_str_mv 2041210X
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 1005
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 4
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 994
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Methods in Ecology and Evolution
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 9
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Methods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2041210X, Vol.9, No.4 (2018); pp. 994-1005
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042135541&doi=10.1111%2f2041-210X.12977&partnerID=40&md5=a0831e8acf3aa0dfb3dc2ed4cf7aa8fb
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv British Ecological Society
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167536342663168