Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study
Objective: To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design: We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptiv...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23776
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23776
- Palabra clave:
- Adult
Article
Body mass
Colombia
Comparative study
Controlled clinical trial
Controlled study
Descriptive research
Excision
Fascia
Human
Ligation
Local anesthesia
Longitudinal study
Male
Observational study
Percutaneous no scalpel vasectomy
Prospective study
Prostate
Semen analysis
Sperm
Spermatozoon count
Spermatozoon motility
Testis
Treatment failure
Urologist
Vas deferens
Vasectomy
Effectiveness
Excision
Failure risk
Fascial interposition
Ligation
Vasectomy
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_79bd0da3ce75803dcb5d9657784d0410 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23776 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
8dde94e3-5dbb-48a0-96a3-a15841c43bfe-1759092a4-7951-4f37-8888-c19387108069-176ae6686-b40e-4e9f-9373-65316a5c7d8a-17945739760029de9593-0bb1-4384-bab3-f988135a2111-16213f723-54e0-417a-937c-e752b08af97f-12020-05-26T00:05:17Z2020-05-26T00:05:17Z2020Objective: To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design: We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogotá, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1–4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results: Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%–7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%–3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%–5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. Implications: Surgeons who use the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique and countries with large vasectomy programs in Asia and Latin America that still recommend this technique should consider adopting alternatives to reduce the failure risk to below 1% as recommended by the American Urological Association. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001107824https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23776engElsevier USA349No. 5342ContraceptionVol. 101Contraception, ISSN:107824, Vol.101, No.5 (2020); pp. 342-349https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081211530&doi=10.1016%2fj.contraception.2020.02.001&partnerID=40&md5=24e1679115828c31e5139435838d8442Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAdultArticleBody massColombiaComparative studyControlled clinical trialControlled studyDescriptive researchExcisionFasciaHumanLigationLocal anesthesiaLongitudinal studyMaleObservational studyPercutaneous no scalpel vasectomyProspective studyProstateSemen analysisSpermSpermatozoon countSpermatozoon motilityTestisTreatment failureUrologistVas deferensVasectomyEffectivenessExcisionFailure riskFascial interpositionLigationVasectomyRisk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive studyarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Claro, Silvia Juliana MirandaLaverde, Jonathan VargasSamper, Elsa MariñoIbáñez Pinilla, MilcíadesQuiroz, Diana Soraya TorresLabrecque, Michel10336/23776oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/237762022-05-02 07:37:14.658301https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
title |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
spellingShingle |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study Adult Article Body mass Colombia Comparative study Controlled clinical trial Controlled study Descriptive research Excision Fascia Human Ligation Local anesthesia Longitudinal study Male Observational study Percutaneous no scalpel vasectomy Prospective study Prostate Semen analysis Sperm Spermatozoon count Spermatozoon motility Testis Treatment failure Urologist Vas deferens Vasectomy Effectiveness Excision Failure risk Fascial interposition Ligation Vasectomy |
title_short |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
title_full |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
title_fullStr |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
title_sort |
Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Adult Article Body mass Colombia Comparative study Controlled clinical trial Controlled study Descriptive research Excision Fascia Human Ligation Local anesthesia Longitudinal study Male Observational study Percutaneous no scalpel vasectomy Prospective study Prostate Semen analysis Sperm Spermatozoon count Spermatozoon motility Testis Treatment failure Urologist Vas deferens Vasectomy Effectiveness Excision Failure risk Fascial interposition Ligation Vasectomy |
topic |
Adult Article Body mass Colombia Comparative study Controlled clinical trial Controlled study Descriptive research Excision Fascia Human Ligation Local anesthesia Longitudinal study Male Observational study Percutaneous no scalpel vasectomy Prospective study Prostate Semen analysis Sperm Spermatozoon count Spermatozoon motility Testis Treatment failure Urologist Vas deferens Vasectomy Effectiveness Excision Failure risk Fascial interposition Ligation Vasectomy |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design: We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogotá, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1–4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results: Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%–7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%–3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%–5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. Implications: Surgeons who use the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique and countries with large vasectomy programs in Asia and Latin America that still recommend this technique should consider adopting alternatives to reduce the failure risk to below 1% as recommended by the American Urological Association. © 2020 Elsevier Inc. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:05:17Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:05:17Z |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
107824 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23776 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.001 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23776 |
identifier_str_mv |
107824 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
349 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 5 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
342 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Contraception |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 101 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Contraception, ISSN:107824, Vol.101, No.5 (2020); pp. 342-349 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081211530&doi=10.1016%2fj.contraception.2020.02.001&partnerID=40&md5=24e1679115828c31e5139435838d8442 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier USA |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167693186564096 |