Persistence of pentolite (PETN and TNT) in soil microcosms and microbial enrichment cultures

Pentolite is a mixture (1:1) of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), and little is known about its fate in the environment. This study was aimed to determine the dissipation of pentolite in soils under laboratory conditions. Microcosm experiments conducted with two so...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23955
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6133-3
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23955
Palabra clave:
Bacterium
Composite
Constructed wetland
Dissipation
Environmental fate
Microbial community
Microcosm
Nitrogen
Organic compound
Persistence
Pollutant removal
Soil pollution
Trinitrotoluene
Bacteria (microorganisms)
Burkholderiales
Rhodanobacter
Carbon
Explosive
Nitrogen
Pentaerythrityl tetranitrate
Soil
Soil pollutant
Trinitrotoluene
Analysis
Bacterium
Betaproteobacteria
Bioremediation
Chemistry
Microbiology
Soil
Soil pollutant
Bacteria
Betaproteobacteria
Carbon
Explosive agents
Nitrogen
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate
Soil
Soil microbiology
Soil pollutants
Trinitrotoluene
Dissipation rate
Enrichment culture
Environmental fate
Pentolite
Petn
Soil microcosms
Tnt
environmental
Biodegradation
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:Pentolite is a mixture (1:1) of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), and little is known about its fate in the environment. This study was aimed to determine the dissipation of pentolite in soils under laboratory conditions. Microcosm experiments conducted with two soils demonstrated that dissipation rate of PETN was significantly slower than that of TNT. Interestingly, the dissipation of PETN was enhanced by the presence of TNT, while PETN did not enhanced the dissipation of TNT. Pentolite dissipation rate was significantly faster under biostimulation treatment (addition of carbon source) in soil from the artificial wetland, while no such stimulation was observed in soil from detonation field. In addition, the dissipation rate of TNT and PETN in soil from artificial wetland under biostimulation was significantly faster than the equivalent abiotic control, although it seems that non-biological processes might also be important for the dissipation of TNT and PETN. Transformation of PETN was also slower during establishment of enrichment culture using pentolite as the sole nitrogen source. In addition, transformation of these explosives was gradually reduced and practically stopped after the forth cultures transfer (80 days). DGGE analysis of bacterial communities from these cultures indicates that all consortia were dominated by bacteria from the order Burkholderiales and Rhodanobacter. In conclusion, our results suggest that PETN might be more persistent than TNT. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.