Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests

Multi-scale forest inventory and monitoring data are increasingly being used in studies assessing forest diversity, structure, disturbance, and carbon dynamics. Also, local-level urban forest inventories are providing plot data and protocols to study tree diversity and ecosystem services in urban fo...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/19154
Acceso en línea:
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19154
Palabra clave:
Specie Richness
Plot Datar
Datar Sources
Biología
Ecosistemas
Árboles en ciudades
Bosques
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_726ac37d5e142954edeea4520106a9a4
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/19154
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 812c0f82-84d9-4303-94e2-ac6bad7008e4600571091600d0eb1f30-5bc2-4e8d-8f7c-56d93483db446002019-02-28T20:44:39Z2019-02-28T20:44:39Z20182018Multi-scale forest inventory and monitoring data are increasingly being used in studies assessing forest diversity, structure, disturbance, and carbon dynamics. Also, local-level urban forest inventories are providing plot data and protocols to study tree diversity and ecosystem services in urban forests worldwide. But, differences in the sampling methods underlying these disparate protocols and data sources is a non-trivial concern in formulating comparative analyses. We assess commonly used methods for comparing tree diversity in peri-urban and urban forests when available data have different sample sizes, plot sizes, and sampling intensities. We present methods for appropriately evaluating species richness, as well as methods for comparing species distributions via community data matrices. Using permanent plot data from the southeastern United States, we present a case study comparing urban and peri-urban forests along a north–south gradient, and assessing species richness and the ecological homogenization hypothesis. Our findings indicate that comparisons of tree species richness among communities, or forest types, are often inconclusive since commonly used sample sizes do not provide precise estimates of the number of species present. While the ecological homogenization hypotheses can be tested under conditions of unequal sampling effort, we suggest robust methods such as PERMANOVA and the Raup-Crick dissimilarity index. A framework for selecting appropriate methods is also discussed. As forests are increasingly being altered by anthropogenic drivers, future studies using disparate data sources must account for differences in measurements and sampling protocols in order to produce results that are both statistically defensible and useful for science-based management. © 2018 The Authors.application/pdf10.1002/ecs2.24502150-8925http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19154engEcosphereVol. 9Ecosphere, ISSN:2150-8925, Vol. 9 (2018)https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.2450Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Abele, L.G., Walters, K., The stability-time hypothesis: reevaluation of the data (1979) American Naturalist, 114, pp. 559-568instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURSpecie RichnessPlot DatarDatar SourcesBiología574600EcosistemasÁrboles en ciudadesBosquesAssessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forestsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Staudhammer, Christina L.Escobedo, Francisco JBlood, AmyStaudhammer, Christina L.Escobedo, Francisco J.Blood, AmyORIGINAL12.pdfapplication/pdf3508460https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6bb96eb0-0db8-4a97-8bff-648e5b7e929c/download7c87da183f172982115cb1daa579a1d7MD51TEXT12.pdf.txt12.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain81831https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a4016f3c-5d4e-4626-866c-2fe084cec0d3/downloadae844e9602c530c3a48451cdf85ca388MD52THUMBNAIL12.pdf.jpg12.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3905https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d8cd6ecb-d2a0-4de6-902e-5ec78b8d4231/downloadf3c339dd0b9a77c08e20acc816e9f862MD5310336/19154oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/191542019-09-19 07:37:54.609585https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
title Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
spellingShingle Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
Specie Richness
Plot Datar
Datar Sources
Biología
Ecosistemas
Árboles en ciudades
Bosques
title_short Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
title_full Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
title_fullStr Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
title_full_unstemmed Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
title_sort Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Specie Richness
Plot Datar
Datar Sources
topic Specie Richness
Plot Datar
Datar Sources
Biología
Ecosistemas
Árboles en ciudades
Bosques
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv Biología
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Ecosistemas
Árboles en ciudades
Bosques
description Multi-scale forest inventory and monitoring data are increasingly being used in studies assessing forest diversity, structure, disturbance, and carbon dynamics. Also, local-level urban forest inventories are providing plot data and protocols to study tree diversity and ecosystem services in urban forests worldwide. But, differences in the sampling methods underlying these disparate protocols and data sources is a non-trivial concern in formulating comparative analyses. We assess commonly used methods for comparing tree diversity in peri-urban and urban forests when available data have different sample sizes, plot sizes, and sampling intensities. We present methods for appropriately evaluating species richness, as well as methods for comparing species distributions via community data matrices. Using permanent plot data from the southeastern United States, we present a case study comparing urban and peri-urban forests along a north–south gradient, and assessing species richness and the ecological homogenization hypothesis. Our findings indicate that comparisons of tree species richness among communities, or forest types, are often inconclusive since commonly used sample sizes do not provide precise estimates of the number of species present. While the ecological homogenization hypotheses can be tested under conditions of unequal sampling effort, we suggest robust methods such as PERMANOVA and the Raup-Crick dissimilarity index. A framework for selecting appropriate methods is also discussed. As forests are increasingly being altered by anthropogenic drivers, future studies using disparate data sources must account for differences in measurements and sampling protocols in order to produce results that are both statistically defensible and useful for science-based management. © 2018 The Authors.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-28T20:44:39Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-28T20:44:39Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/ecs2.2450
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2150-8925
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19154
identifier_str_mv 10.1002/ecs2.2450
2150-8925
url http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19154
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Ecosphere
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 9
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Ecosphere, ISSN:2150-8925, Vol. 9 (2018)
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.2450
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Abele, L.G., Walters, K., The stability-time hypothesis: reevaluation of the data (1979) American Naturalist, 114, pp. 559-568
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6bb96eb0-0db8-4a97-8bff-648e5b7e929c/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a4016f3c-5d4e-4626-866c-2fe084cec0d3/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d8cd6ecb-d2a0-4de6-902e-5ec78b8d4231/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7c87da183f172982115cb1daa579a1d7
ae844e9602c530c3a48451cdf85ca388
f3c339dd0b9a77c08e20acc816e9f862
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167434846797824