Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries

We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22320
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320
Palabra clave:
Agreeableness
Authoritarianism
Construct validation
Religiosity
Welfare state
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_722a2b16a0898ac7f0e1c29e2f754e36
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22320
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
title Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
spellingShingle Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
Agreeableness
Authoritarianism
Construct validation
Religiosity
Welfare state
title_short Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
title_full Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
title_fullStr Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
title_full_unstemmed Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
title_sort Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Agreeableness
Authoritarianism
Construct validation
Religiosity
Welfare state
topic Agreeableness
Authoritarianism
Construct validation
Religiosity
Welfare state
description We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation. © The Author(s) 2012.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:06Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:06Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 220221
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320
url https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320
identifier_str_mv 220221
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 551
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 4
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 535
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 44
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, ISSN:220221, Vol.44, No.4 (2013); pp. 535-551
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84875771370&doi=10.1177%2f0022022112465671&partnerID=40&md5=73c2b2a37d38e308036dbabcc17a4cfb
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390737064099840
spelling 5ebc5072-a334-4e74-bd2b-5293129f1131bafb3ad3-45a9-4be5-9ac2-ea055ce41fa6138b5b08-008f-4cf6-995a-1fec35c13da8c92852f1-2434-4c41-90cb-5a98f9928d1e958f6088-e81c-4b9d-8f2f-aa2e7ae250d5c761d781-a9e5-4bba-a173-9b3812efaf8313c89eab-ceeb-426e-8b7f-294a64ea10e506ae5db6-6475-4166-8994-3915b2014d2d7bd3c1d1-5e1f-4194-88b7-fb549ad83d63048fbe9f-bf92-43f2-9443-91f6ff5433388fed4858-7ef1-4c19-9c84-d1e4deece978b13aea83-50aa-4da5-bf72-033dd2f53ee0a517a1b5-abbb-4285-9f3b-42311021f1edbaf5a84f-810f-4f02-b72a-03d3a5a828140356c415-ed04-4350-a0fd-ef59d3c41922382fc83c-6b11-482f-85e4-8b113df3b321778a525d-98e7-4740-ba13-cf579efcef5a5c429f57-da71-4429-acd7-9f06f9874c40ca01bb70-26f4-4b08-b870-15f2172fc29695f9b256-c56c-420c-9c1c-0dda25c19e6deaea4b8b-3e28-4b59-b20e-a0dd33a18b452f6f5a19-aee3-48d7-a88c-5809f6d82ddffcc7f899-3129-4422-841a-1d57d300ff94b2b95554-a061-4959-97fd-348204adc8ee84d7587e-ab71-49ba-b3d7-a72b27ee0f76325430416001ceddd5e-13f0-49b8-85d3-869bd79fe5bd1d628db6-0d2a-4db5-91e0-0b944c15c18adca4b6e9-07fb-4fb6-87b0-bf887ec3814ccdb78098-05f4-4cab-9e84-888ed86a5cba72502fc3-8041-4901-b83e-a12ba5c9dfc42020-05-25T23:56:06Z2020-05-25T23:56:06Z2013We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation. © The Author(s) 2012.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671220221https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320eng551No. 4535Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyVol. 44Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, ISSN:220221, Vol.44, No.4 (2013); pp. 535-551https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84875771370&doi=10.1177%2f0022022112465671&partnerID=40&md5=73c2b2a37d38e308036dbabcc17a4cfbAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAgreeablenessAuthoritarianismConstruct validationReligiosityWelfare stateHumane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 CountriesarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Schlösser, OliverFrese, MichaelHeintze, Anna-MariaAl-Najjar, MusaedArciszewski, ThomasBesevegis, EliasBishop, George D.Bonnes, MiriliaClegg, Chris W.Drozda-Senkowska, EwaGaborit, MauricioGarzon, DayraHansen, Tia G. B.Heszen, IrenaJuhasz, MartaKeating, Mary A.Mangundjaya, WustariMansor, NormaMitchelson, Jacqueline K.Ortiz-Reynoso, AlejandraPandey, JanakPavakanun, UbolwannaPavlopoulos, VassilisPeiro, Jose M.Potocnik, KristinaRestrepo-Espinosa, Maria HelenaSemmer, NorbertTupinamba, Antonio C.Ventura, Elizabeth R.Whoolery, MatthewZhang, Kan10336/22320oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/223202022-05-02 07:37:17.080917https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co