Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries
We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22320
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320
- Palabra clave:
- Agreeableness
Authoritarianism
Construct validation
Religiosity
Welfare state
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_722a2b16a0898ac7f0e1c29e2f754e36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22320 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
title |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
spellingShingle |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries Agreeableness Authoritarianism Construct validation Religiosity Welfare state |
title_short |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
title_full |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
title_fullStr |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
title_sort |
Humane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 Countries |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Agreeableness Authoritarianism Construct validation Religiosity Welfare state |
topic |
Agreeableness Authoritarianism Construct validation Religiosity Welfare state |
description |
We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation. © The Author(s) 2012. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:56:06Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:56:06Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
220221 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320 |
identifier_str_mv |
220221 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
551 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 4 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
535 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 44 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, ISSN:220221, Vol.44, No.4 (2013); pp. 535-551 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84875771370&doi=10.1177%2f0022022112465671&partnerID=40&md5=73c2b2a37d38e308036dbabcc17a4cfb |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1818106611312361472 |
spelling |
5ebc5072-a334-4e74-bd2b-5293129f1131bafb3ad3-45a9-4be5-9ac2-ea055ce41fa6138b5b08-008f-4cf6-995a-1fec35c13da8c92852f1-2434-4c41-90cb-5a98f9928d1e958f6088-e81c-4b9d-8f2f-aa2e7ae250d5c761d781-a9e5-4bba-a173-9b3812efaf8313c89eab-ceeb-426e-8b7f-294a64ea10e506ae5db6-6475-4166-8994-3915b2014d2d7bd3c1d1-5e1f-4194-88b7-fb549ad83d63048fbe9f-bf92-43f2-9443-91f6ff5433388fed4858-7ef1-4c19-9c84-d1e4deece978b13aea83-50aa-4da5-bf72-033dd2f53ee0a517a1b5-abbb-4285-9f3b-42311021f1edbaf5a84f-810f-4f02-b72a-03d3a5a828140356c415-ed04-4350-a0fd-ef59d3c41922382fc83c-6b11-482f-85e4-8b113df3b321778a525d-98e7-4740-ba13-cf579efcef5a5c429f57-da71-4429-acd7-9f06f9874c40ca01bb70-26f4-4b08-b870-15f2172fc29695f9b256-c56c-420c-9c1c-0dda25c19e6deaea4b8b-3e28-4b59-b20e-a0dd33a18b452f6f5a19-aee3-48d7-a88c-5809f6d82ddffcc7f899-3129-4422-841a-1d57d300ff94b2b95554-a061-4959-97fd-348204adc8ee84d7587e-ab71-49ba-b3d7-a72b27ee0f76325430416001ceddd5e-13f0-49b8-85d3-869bd79fe5bd1d628db6-0d2a-4db5-91e0-0b944c15c18adca4b6e9-07fb-4fb6-87b0-bf887ec3814ccdb78098-05f4-4cab-9e84-888ed86a5cba72502fc3-8041-4901-b83e-a12ba5c9dfc42020-05-25T23:56:06Z2020-05-25T23:56:06Z2013We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one's society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation. © The Author(s) 2012.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465671220221https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22320eng551No. 4535Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyVol. 44Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, ISSN:220221, Vol.44, No.4 (2013); pp. 535-551https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84875771370&doi=10.1177%2f0022022112465671&partnerID=40&md5=73c2b2a37d38e308036dbabcc17a4cfbAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAgreeablenessAuthoritarianismConstruct validationReligiosityWelfare stateHumane Orientation as a New Cultural Dimension of the GLOBE Project: A Validation Study of the GLOBE Scale and Out-Group Humane Orientation in 25 CountriesarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Schlösser, OliverFrese, MichaelHeintze, Anna-MariaAl-Najjar, MusaedArciszewski, ThomasBesevegis, EliasBishop, George D.Bonnes, MiriliaClegg, Chris W.Drozda-Senkowska, EwaGaborit, MauricioGarzon, DayraHansen, Tia G. B.Heszen, IrenaJuhasz, MartaKeating, Mary A.Mangundjaya, WustariMansor, NormaMitchelson, Jacqueline K.Ortiz-Reynoso, AlejandraPandey, JanakPavakanun, UbolwannaPavlopoulos, VassilisPeiro, Jose M.Potocnik, KristinaRestrepo-Espinosa, Maria HelenaSemmer, NorbertTupinamba, Antonio C.Ventura, Elizabeth R.Whoolery, MatthewZhang, Kan10336/22320oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/223202022-05-02 07:37:17.080917https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |