Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22265
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265
Palabra clave:
Article
Chronic pain
Clinical article
Controlled study
Cranio cervical flexion test
Electromyography
Female
Function test
Home exercise therapy
Human
Kinesiotherapy
Male
Manipulative medicine
Neck Disability Index
Neck pain
Pain intensity
Priority journal
Randomized controlled trial
Range of motion
Single blind procedure
Visual analog scale
Adult
Chronic pain
Follow up
Kinesiotherapy
Middle aged
Neck pain
Pain measurement
Pain threshold
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Procedures
Spine manipulation
Time factor
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Adult
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Exercise Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Threshold
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cervical vertebrae
Electromyography
Neck pain
Spinal manipulation
Thoracic vertebrae
Spinal
Manipulation
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_6bc19f90006ebdc8d124c65d888db89e
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22265
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 27afa322-467f-442b-bfc7-529ea1b17ff4-1e6a2f7a7-59fe-4ae2-8c32-73daca3162d1-1feafdc75-369b-4143-90b7-354bc54972e3-1719c9c72-faf7-4de8-9210-c7808bcd4e54-1f6f054cb-3ae1-41c0-b31d-0bb942ff992f-175b6b2fa-230d-4c46-b327-97ca28a5215a-1945181836002020-05-25T23:55:56Z2020-05-25T23:55:56Z2018BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching and low-intensity (10% of max) isometric contractions on pain and function. METHODS: Single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed. A total of 27 asymptomatic subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups: manipulation techniques (MT, n= 13) and home exercise (HE, n= 14). The visual analogue scale (VAS); neck disability index (NDI); pressure pain thresholds; cervical spine range of motion and electromyography during the cranio-cervical flexion test was measured before and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: After the intervention, both groups showed improved (P less than 0.05) NDI and VAS scores and flexion in both rotation ranges compared with the pre-intervention values. For the NDI, pain intensity, and neck flexion, the effects sizes were large; for the majority of the other measurements, the effect sizes were small to moderate. The MT group showed significantly better results than the HE group for 2 out of 17 tests. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions improved function and pain after one week, with only marginal between-group differences in favor of MT. © 2018 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-16972310538127https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265engIOS Press145No. 1133Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationVol. 31Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, ISSN:10538127, Vol.31, No.1 (2018); pp. 133-145https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048121955&doi=10.3233%2fBMR-169723&partnerID=40&md5=981dd003651e15c1f397fbd51bfcfab7Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURArticleChronic painClinical articleControlled studyCranio cervical flexion testElectromyographyFemaleFunction testHome exercise therapyHumanKinesiotherapyMaleManipulative medicineNeck Disability IndexNeck painPain intensityPriority journalRandomized controlled trialRange of motionSingle blind procedureVisual analog scaleAdultChronic painFollow upKinesiotherapyMiddle agedNeck painPain measurementPain thresholdPathophysiologyPhysiologyProceduresSpine manipulationTime factorTreatment outcomeYoung adultAdultChronic PainElectromyographyExercise TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCervical vertebraeElectromyographyNeck painSpinal manipulationThoracic vertebraeSpinalManipulationShort-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trialarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Galindez-Ibarbengoetxea, XabierSetuain, IgorAndersen, Lars LGonzález-Izal, MiriamJauregi, AndoniIzquierdo, MikelRamírez-Vélez, Robinson10336/22265oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/222652022-05-02 07:37:20.299793https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
title Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
Article
Chronic pain
Clinical article
Controlled study
Cranio cervical flexion test
Electromyography
Female
Function test
Home exercise therapy
Human
Kinesiotherapy
Male
Manipulative medicine
Neck Disability Index
Neck pain
Pain intensity
Priority journal
Randomized controlled trial
Range of motion
Single blind procedure
Visual analog scale
Adult
Chronic pain
Follow up
Kinesiotherapy
Middle aged
Neck pain
Pain measurement
Pain threshold
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Procedures
Spine manipulation
Time factor
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Adult
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Exercise Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Threshold
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cervical vertebrae
Electromyography
Neck pain
Spinal manipulation
Thoracic vertebrae
Spinal
Manipulation
title_short Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Article
Chronic pain
Clinical article
Controlled study
Cranio cervical flexion test
Electromyography
Female
Function test
Home exercise therapy
Human
Kinesiotherapy
Male
Manipulative medicine
Neck Disability Index
Neck pain
Pain intensity
Priority journal
Randomized controlled trial
Range of motion
Single blind procedure
Visual analog scale
Adult
Chronic pain
Follow up
Kinesiotherapy
Middle aged
Neck pain
Pain measurement
Pain threshold
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Procedures
Spine manipulation
Time factor
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Adult
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Exercise Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Threshold
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cervical vertebrae
Electromyography
Neck pain
Spinal manipulation
Thoracic vertebrae
topic Article
Chronic pain
Clinical article
Controlled study
Cranio cervical flexion test
Electromyography
Female
Function test
Home exercise therapy
Human
Kinesiotherapy
Male
Manipulative medicine
Neck Disability Index
Neck pain
Pain intensity
Priority journal
Randomized controlled trial
Range of motion
Single blind procedure
Visual analog scale
Adult
Chronic pain
Follow up
Kinesiotherapy
Middle aged
Neck pain
Pain measurement
Pain threshold
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Procedures
Spine manipulation
Time factor
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Adult
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Exercise Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Threshold
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cervical vertebrae
Electromyography
Neck pain
Spinal manipulation
Thoracic vertebrae
Spinal
Manipulation
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv Spinal
Manipulation
description BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching and low-intensity (10% of max) isometric contractions on pain and function. METHODS: Single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed. A total of 27 asymptomatic subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups: manipulation techniques (MT, n= 13) and home exercise (HE, n= 14). The visual analogue scale (VAS); neck disability index (NDI); pressure pain thresholds; cervical spine range of motion and electromyography during the cranio-cervical flexion test was measured before and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: After the intervention, both groups showed improved (P less than 0.05) NDI and VAS scores and flexion in both rotation ranges compared with the pre-intervention values. For the NDI, pain intensity, and neck flexion, the effects sizes were large; for the majority of the other measurements, the effect sizes were small to moderate. The MT group showed significantly better results than the HE group for 2 out of 17 tests. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions improved function and pain after one week, with only marginal between-group differences in favor of MT. © 2018 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:56Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:56Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 10538127
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265
url https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265
identifier_str_mv 10538127
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 145
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 133
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 31
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, ISSN:10538127, Vol.31, No.1 (2018); pp. 133-145
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048121955&doi=10.3233%2fBMR-169723&partnerID=40&md5=981dd003651e15c1f397fbd51bfcfab7
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv IOS Press
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167429321850880