Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22265
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265
- Palabra clave:
- Article
Chronic pain
Clinical article
Controlled study
Cranio cervical flexion test
Electromyography
Female
Function test
Home exercise therapy
Human
Kinesiotherapy
Male
Manipulative medicine
Neck Disability Index
Neck pain
Pain intensity
Priority journal
Randomized controlled trial
Range of motion
Single blind procedure
Visual analog scale
Adult
Chronic pain
Follow up
Kinesiotherapy
Middle aged
Neck pain
Pain measurement
Pain threshold
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Procedures
Spine manipulation
Time factor
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Adult
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Exercise Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Threshold
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cervical vertebrae
Electromyography
Neck pain
Spinal manipulation
Thoracic vertebrae
Spinal
Manipulation
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_6bc19f90006ebdc8d124c65d888db89e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22265 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
27afa322-467f-442b-bfc7-529ea1b17ff4-1e6a2f7a7-59fe-4ae2-8c32-73daca3162d1-1feafdc75-369b-4143-90b7-354bc54972e3-1719c9c72-faf7-4de8-9210-c7808bcd4e54-1f6f054cb-3ae1-41c0-b31d-0bb942ff992f-175b6b2fa-230d-4c46-b327-97ca28a5215a-1945181836002020-05-25T23:55:56Z2020-05-25T23:55:56Z2018BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching and low-intensity (10% of max) isometric contractions on pain and function. METHODS: Single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed. A total of 27 asymptomatic subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups: manipulation techniques (MT, n= 13) and home exercise (HE, n= 14). The visual analogue scale (VAS); neck disability index (NDI); pressure pain thresholds; cervical spine range of motion and electromyography during the cranio-cervical flexion test was measured before and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: After the intervention, both groups showed improved (P less than 0.05) NDI and VAS scores and flexion in both rotation ranges compared with the pre-intervention values. For the NDI, pain intensity, and neck flexion, the effects sizes were large; for the majority of the other measurements, the effect sizes were small to moderate. The MT group showed significantly better results than the HE group for 2 out of 17 tests. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions improved function and pain after one week, with only marginal between-group differences in favor of MT. © 2018 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-16972310538127https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265engIOS Press145No. 1133Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationVol. 31Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, ISSN:10538127, Vol.31, No.1 (2018); pp. 133-145https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048121955&doi=10.3233%2fBMR-169723&partnerID=40&md5=981dd003651e15c1f397fbd51bfcfab7Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURArticleChronic painClinical articleControlled studyCranio cervical flexion testElectromyographyFemaleFunction testHome exercise therapyHumanKinesiotherapyMaleManipulative medicineNeck Disability IndexNeck painPain intensityPriority journalRandomized controlled trialRange of motionSingle blind procedureVisual analog scaleAdultChronic painFollow upKinesiotherapyMiddle agedNeck painPain measurementPain thresholdPathophysiologyPhysiologyProceduresSpine manipulationTime factorTreatment outcomeYoung adultAdultChronic PainElectromyographyExercise TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCervical vertebraeElectromyographyNeck painSpinal manipulationThoracic vertebraeSpinalManipulationShort-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trialarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Galindez-Ibarbengoetxea, XabierSetuain, IgorAndersen, Lars LGonzález-Izal, MiriamJauregi, AndoniIzquierdo, MikelRamírez-Vélez, Robinson10336/22265oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/222652022-05-02 07:37:20.299793https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
title |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial Article Chronic pain Clinical article Controlled study Cranio cervical flexion test Electromyography Female Function test Home exercise therapy Human Kinesiotherapy Male Manipulative medicine Neck Disability Index Neck pain Pain intensity Priority journal Randomized controlled trial Range of motion Single blind procedure Visual analog scale Adult Chronic pain Follow up Kinesiotherapy Middle aged Neck pain Pain measurement Pain threshold Pathophysiology Physiology Procedures Spine manipulation Time factor Treatment outcome Young adult Adult Chronic Pain Electromyography Exercise Therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Neck Pain Pain Measurement Pain Threshold Single-Blind Method Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult Cervical vertebrae Electromyography Neck pain Spinal manipulation Thoracic vertebrae Spinal Manipulation |
title_short |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Article Chronic pain Clinical article Controlled study Cranio cervical flexion test Electromyography Female Function test Home exercise therapy Human Kinesiotherapy Male Manipulative medicine Neck Disability Index Neck pain Pain intensity Priority journal Randomized controlled trial Range of motion Single blind procedure Visual analog scale Adult Chronic pain Follow up Kinesiotherapy Middle aged Neck pain Pain measurement Pain threshold Pathophysiology Physiology Procedures Spine manipulation Time factor Treatment outcome Young adult Adult Chronic Pain Electromyography Exercise Therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Neck Pain Pain Measurement Pain Threshold Single-Blind Method Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult Cervical vertebrae Electromyography Neck pain Spinal manipulation Thoracic vertebrae |
topic |
Article Chronic pain Clinical article Controlled study Cranio cervical flexion test Electromyography Female Function test Home exercise therapy Human Kinesiotherapy Male Manipulative medicine Neck Disability Index Neck pain Pain intensity Priority journal Randomized controlled trial Range of motion Single blind procedure Visual analog scale Adult Chronic pain Follow up Kinesiotherapy Middle aged Neck pain Pain measurement Pain threshold Pathophysiology Physiology Procedures Spine manipulation Time factor Treatment outcome Young adult Adult Chronic Pain Electromyography Exercise Therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Neck Pain Pain Measurement Pain Threshold Single-Blind Method Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult Cervical vertebrae Electromyography Neck pain Spinal manipulation Thoracic vertebrae Spinal Manipulation |
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
Spinal Manipulation |
description |
BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching and low-intensity (10% of max) isometric contractions on pain and function. METHODS: Single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed. A total of 27 asymptomatic subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups: manipulation techniques (MT, n= 13) and home exercise (HE, n= 14). The visual analogue scale (VAS); neck disability index (NDI); pressure pain thresholds; cervical spine range of motion and electromyography during the cranio-cervical flexion test was measured before and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: After the intervention, both groups showed improved (P less than 0.05) NDI and VAS scores and flexion in both rotation ranges compared with the pre-intervention values. For the NDI, pain intensity, and neck flexion, the effects sizes were large; for the majority of the other measurements, the effect sizes were small to moderate. The MT group showed significantly better results than the HE group for 2 out of 17 tests. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions improved function and pain after one week, with only marginal between-group differences in favor of MT. © 2018 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:55:56Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:55:56Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
10538127 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265 |
identifier_str_mv |
10538127 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
145 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 1 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
133 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 31 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, ISSN:10538127, Vol.31, No.1 (2018); pp. 133-145 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048121955&doi=10.3233%2fBMR-169723&partnerID=40&md5=981dd003651e15c1f397fbd51bfcfab7 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
IOS Press |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167429321850880 |