Short-term effects of manipulative treatment versus a therapeutic home exercise protocol for chronic cervical pain: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22265
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169723
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22265
Palabra clave:
Article
Chronic pain
Clinical article
Controlled study
Cranio cervical flexion test
Electromyography
Female
Function test
Home exercise therapy
Human
Kinesiotherapy
Male
Manipulative medicine
Neck Disability Index
Neck pain
Pain intensity
Priority journal
Randomized controlled trial
Range of motion
Single blind procedure
Visual analog scale
Adult
Chronic pain
Follow up
Kinesiotherapy
Middle aged
Neck pain
Pain measurement
Pain threshold
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Procedures
Spine manipulation
Time factor
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Adult
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Exercise Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Threshold
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cervical vertebrae
Electromyography
Neck pain
Spinal manipulation
Thoracic vertebrae
Spinal
Manipulation
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND: While both manipulative treatment and physical exercises are used to treat cervical pain, it remains unclear which is most effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation techniques (MT) with those of home-exercise (HE) with stretching and low-intensity (10% of max) isometric contractions on pain and function. METHODS: Single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed. A total of 27 asymptomatic subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups: manipulation techniques (MT, n= 13) and home exercise (HE, n= 14). The visual analogue scale (VAS); neck disability index (NDI); pressure pain thresholds; cervical spine range of motion and electromyography during the cranio-cervical flexion test was measured before and one week after the intervention. RESULTS: After the intervention, both groups showed improved (P less than 0.05) NDI and VAS scores and flexion in both rotation ranges compared with the pre-intervention values. For the NDI, pain intensity, and neck flexion, the effects sizes were large; for the majority of the other measurements, the effect sizes were small to moderate. The MT group showed significantly better results than the HE group for 2 out of 17 tests. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions improved function and pain after one week, with only marginal between-group differences in favor of MT. © 2018 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.