The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS

In the 2017 Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean Case, the International Court of Justice stated that “in appropriate circumstances” maritime delimitation claims beyond 200 nm may be admitted before the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf issues a recommendation. This is a deviati...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22709
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1397484
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22709
Palabra clave:
Continental shelf
International law
Maritime boundary
Indian ocean
Admissibility
Continental shelf
Maritime delimitation beyond 200 nm
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_6b6a371e9ba4288e7282cfd92c9abb1f
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22709
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling ca0811f2-d5c4-4b84-8563-bef65aedea9d-12020-05-25T23:57:37Z2020-05-25T23:57:37Z2018In the 2017 Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean Case, the International Court of Justice stated that “in appropriate circumstances” maritime delimitation claims beyond 200 nm may be admitted before the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf issues a recommendation. This is a deviation from the Court’s previous approach in the 2016 Nicaragua v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections) Case. This article follows the evolution of the international case law with respect to the admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims absent a final and binding outer limit, and highlights the positive implications of the International Court’s most recent formula. © 2018 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.13974840090832015210642https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22709engTaylor and Francis Ltd.117No. 2103Ocean Development and International LawVol. 49Ocean Development and International Law, ISSN:00908320, 15210642, Vol.49, No.2 (2018); pp. 103-117https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85038079263&doi=10.1080%2f00908320.2018.1397484&partnerID=40&md5=93e872e14059483b4e8adb252b8659e1Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURContinental shelfInternational lawMaritime boundaryIndian oceanAdmissibilityContinental shelfMaritime delimitation beyond 200 nmThe admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCSarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Vega-Barbosa G.10336/22709oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/227092022-05-02 07:37:20.573569https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
title The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
spellingShingle The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
Continental shelf
International law
Maritime boundary
Indian ocean
Admissibility
Continental shelf
Maritime delimitation beyond 200 nm
title_short The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
title_full The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
title_fullStr The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
title_full_unstemmed The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
title_sort The admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims before the ICJ absent a recommendation by the CLCS
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Continental shelf
International law
Maritime boundary
Indian ocean
Admissibility
Continental shelf
Maritime delimitation beyond 200 nm
topic Continental shelf
International law
Maritime boundary
Indian ocean
Admissibility
Continental shelf
Maritime delimitation beyond 200 nm
description In the 2017 Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean Case, the International Court of Justice stated that “in appropriate circumstances” maritime delimitation claims beyond 200 nm may be admitted before the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf issues a recommendation. This is a deviation from the Court’s previous approach in the 2016 Nicaragua v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections) Case. This article follows the evolution of the international case law with respect to the admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims absent a final and binding outer limit, and highlights the positive implications of the International Court’s most recent formula. © 2018 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:37Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:37Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1397484
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 00908320
15210642
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22709
url https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1397484
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22709
identifier_str_mv 00908320
15210642
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 117
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 2
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 103
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Ocean Development and International Law
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 49
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Ocean Development and International Law, ISSN:00908320, 15210642, Vol.49, No.2 (2018); pp. 103-117
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85038079263&doi=10.1080%2f00908320.2018.1397484&partnerID=40&md5=93e872e14059483b4e8adb252b8659e1
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis Ltd.
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167659056463872

Publicaciones similares