La dimensión normativa de la justicia transicional, el Sistema Interamericano y la negociación con los grupos armados en Colombia
This paper discusses the normative or juridical dimension of transitional justice in Latin America and Colombia, and more precisely the challenge of having one of its legal components, the one related to the rules and standards on victims’ rights as established by the Inter-American Court of Human R...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/15655
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/15655
- Palabra clave:
- Transitional justice
transition
protection standards
victims’ rights
impunity
paramilitary groups
guerrilla groups
Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
Justicia transicional
transición
estándares de protección
derechos de las víctimas
impunidad
grupos paramilitares
grupos guerrilleros
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.
Justice transitionnelle
transition
standards de protection
droits des victimes
impunité
groupes paramilitaires
groupes de guérilla
Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme.
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2014 Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI
Summary: | This paper discusses the normative or juridical dimension of transitional justice in Latin America and Colombia, and more precisely the challenge of having one of its legal components, the one related to the rules and standards on victims’ rights as established by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, effectively enforced and guaranteed by the Colombian authorities. The thesis is based on the assumption that the incorporation of these rules and standards is mandatory for Colombia and for the States of the American Convention, both in normal situations and in the framework of transitional processes, as the one initiated in this country, first with the paramilitaries, and currently with the guerrillas. The paper additionally shows that the adoption of these standards originating in International Human Rights Law seems unclear, which leads us to question the consistency of the process and to point out the risk of future prosecution by international courts |
---|