The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach
Discussion groups are a promising tool for bridging the divide between former conflict antagonists. However, such groups do not always produce the desired outcome of improved attitudes, even when they meet the conditions generally seen as favoring positive interaction. In this article, we examine sp...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22846
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12324
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22846
- Palabra clave:
- Colombia
Conflict
Ex-combatants
Experiment
Perspective-giving
Postconflict
Reconciliation
Victims
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_69f728eaeb46b1b1e119031cfebfb901 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22846 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
7178557060001e8c37f-0196-4081-8e15-22a3a435696e2020-05-25T23:58:21Z2020-05-25T23:58:21Z2017Discussion groups are a promising tool for bridging the divide between former conflict antagonists. However, such groups do not always produce the desired outcome of improved attitudes, even when they meet the conditions generally seen as favoring positive interaction. In this article, we examine specific discussion protocols that mitigate polarization risks while fostering reconciliation. Using a randomized, controlled design, we formed a pool of 429 ex-combatants and members of conflict-affected communities in Colombia. Participants were asked to join heterogeneous groups and discuss their proposals for the future of Colombia. Overall, community members improved their attitudes towards ex-combatants significantly, while ex-combatants’ attitudes toward community members do not tend to polarize. Those participants who were randomly assigned to a perspective-giving treatment protocol (where they were asked to refer to their personal experience and perspective) consistently improved their intergroup attitudes towards ex-combatants, and by a proportionally higher percentage than those taking part under argumentation and no-treatment control conditions. © 2016 International Society of Political Psychologyapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.123240162895X14679221https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22846engBlackwell Publishing Ltd19No. 13Political PsychologyVol. 38Political Psychology, ISSN:0162895X, 14679221, Vol.38, No.1 (2017); pp. 3-19https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958093040&doi=10.1111%2fpops.12324&partnerID=40&md5=e22d41522f928ba84ffebb8116b3536eAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURColombiaConflictEx-combatantsExperimentPerspective-givingPostconflictReconciliationVictimsThe Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental ApproacharticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ugarriza Uribe, Juan EstebanNussio E.10336/22846oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/228462022-05-02 07:37:17.472491https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
title |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
spellingShingle |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach Colombia Conflict Ex-combatants Experiment Perspective-giving Postconflict Reconciliation Victims |
title_short |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
title_full |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
title_fullStr |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
title_sort |
The Effect of Perspective-Giving on Postconflict Reconciliation. An Experimental Approach |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colombia Conflict Ex-combatants Experiment Perspective-giving Postconflict Reconciliation Victims |
topic |
Colombia Conflict Ex-combatants Experiment Perspective-giving Postconflict Reconciliation Victims |
description |
Discussion groups are a promising tool for bridging the divide between former conflict antagonists. However, such groups do not always produce the desired outcome of improved attitudes, even when they meet the conditions generally seen as favoring positive interaction. In this article, we examine specific discussion protocols that mitigate polarization risks while fostering reconciliation. Using a randomized, controlled design, we formed a pool of 429 ex-combatants and members of conflict-affected communities in Colombia. Participants were asked to join heterogeneous groups and discuss their proposals for the future of Colombia. Overall, community members improved their attitudes towards ex-combatants significantly, while ex-combatants’ attitudes toward community members do not tend to polarize. Those participants who were randomly assigned to a perspective-giving treatment protocol (where they were asked to refer to their personal experience and perspective) consistently improved their intergroup attitudes towards ex-combatants, and by a proportionally higher percentage than those taking part under argumentation and no-treatment control conditions. © 2016 International Society of Political Psychology |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:58:21Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:58:21Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12324 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0162895X 14679221 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22846 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12324 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22846 |
identifier_str_mv |
0162895X 14679221 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
19 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 1 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
3 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Political Psychology |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 38 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Political Psychology, ISSN:0162895X, 14679221, Vol.38, No.1 (2017); pp. 3-19 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958093040&doi=10.1111%2fpops.12324&partnerID=40&md5=e22d41522f928ba84ffebb8116b3536e |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167691567562752 |