Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services

Se sabe poco sobre cómo influye la alfabetización espacial en la elaboración de mapas y la toma de decisiones relacionadas con la gestión medioambiental y los servicios ecosistémicos. Evaluamos el papel de la alfabetización espacial del paisaje en la gestión ambiental participativa y las evaluacione...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad del Rosario

Repositorio:: Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario

Idioma:: spa

id	EDOCUR2_67eba7f3d31cacaab9735e6455de77f1
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/37692
network_acronym_str	EDOCUR2
network_name_str	Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.es.fl_str_mv	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
title	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
spellingShingle	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services SIG público participativo Planificación del paisaje Gestión medioambiental Alfabetización espacial Bogotá Colombia Alfabetización espacial Educación, investigación, temas relacionados Public Participatory GIS Landscape planning Environmental management Spatial literacy Bogota Colombia Spatial literacy
title_short	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
title_full	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
title_fullStr	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
title_sort	Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services
dc.subject.es.fl_str_mv	SIG público participativo Planificación del paisaje Gestión medioambiental Alfabetización espacial Bogotá Colombia Alfabetización espacial
topic	SIG público participativo Planificación del paisaje Gestión medioambiental Alfabetización espacial Bogotá Colombia Alfabetización espacial Educación, investigación, temas relacionados Public Participatory GIS Landscape planning Environmental management Spatial literacy Bogota Colombia Spatial literacy
dc.subject.ddc.es.fl_str_mv	Educación, investigación, temas relacionados
dc.subject.keyword.es.fl_str_mv	Public Participatory GIS Landscape planning Environmental management Spatial literacy Bogota Colombia Spatial literacy
description	Se sabe poco sobre cómo influye la alfabetización espacial en la elaboración de mapas y la toma de decisiones relacionadas con la gestión medioambiental y los servicios ecosistémicos. Evaluamos el papel de la alfabetización espacial del paisaje en la gestión ambiental participativa y las evaluaciones de los servicios ecosistémicos en la Bogotá periurbana, Colombia. La alfabetización paisajística espacial se evaluó poniendo a prueba la capacidad de las partes interesadas para localizar paisajes y puntos de referencia específicos. A continuación, se evaluó si las opiniones sobre las decisiones medioambientales y los servicios ecosistémicos guardaban una relación significativa con la alfabetización paisajística. Se utilizó un instrumento en línea para recoger las características socioeconómicas de 2.397 encuestados, sus conocimientos sobre el paisaje espacial, sus percepciones de los servicios ecosistémicos y sus opiniones sobre cuestiones medioambientales relevantes. Evaluamos y medimos la SL autopercibida de los encuestados y su capacidad para localizar cuatro paisajes en un mapa integrado en línea. La precisión posicional se calculó utilizando un índice de alfabetización espacial del paisaje (SLI). A continuación, se comprobaron los efectos de los datos sociodemográficos en el SLI, se modeló la relación entre los datos sociodemográficos y la SL, y se comprobó la relación entre la SL de los encuestados y sus opiniones sobre cuestiones medioambientales relevantes y servicios ecosistémicos. Descubrimos que alrededor del 75% de los encuestados localizaron correctamente 2 de los 4 paisajes. Las variables sociodemográficas tampoco predijeron bien el modelo SLI. Sin embargo, encontramos relaciones significativas entre el SLI y las opiniones relativas al medio ambiente. No se encontró ninguna relación entre los niveles de participación activa de los encuestados en la gobernanza local y el SLI. En general, la SL se vio poco afectada por los niveles educativos. Lo ideal sería que los procesos participativos que utilizan mapas midieran la LS y no asumieran a priori que los participantes tienen conocimientos espaciales. Es necesario seguir investigando para evaluar cómo las tecnologías espaciales y la comprensión de los valores de las partes interesadas hacia el medio ambiente pueden democratizar la toma de decisiones participativa.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-12-14T16:59:24Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-12-14T16:59:24Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-13
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-13
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv	article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.es.fl_str_mv	Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.es.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01591-7
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37692
url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01591-7 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37692
dc.language.iso.es.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage.es.fl_str_mv	257 pp
dc.relation.citationStartPage.es.fl_str_mv	244 pp
dc.relation.citationTitle.es.fl_str_mv	Environmental Management
dc.relation.citationVolume.es.fl_str_mv	69
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.es.fl_str_mv	Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia Abierto (Texto Completo) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv	14 pp
dc.format.mimetype.es.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
institution	Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.es.fl_str_mv	Aggrey JJ, Ros-Tonen MA, Asubonteng KO (2021) Using participatory spatial tools to unravel community perceptions of land-use dynamics in a mine-expanding landscape in Ghana. Environ Manage 68:1–18. Agresti A (2013) Categorical data analysis, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, United States Bagstad KJ, Reed JM, Semmens DJ, Sherrouse BC, Troy A (2016) Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: A case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Chang 16(7):2005–2018 Brown, G (2012) An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Appl Geogr 34:289–294 Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K (2012) Public Participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour 25:633–651 Brown G, Kangas K, Juutinen A, Tolvanen A (2017) Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Soc Nat Resour 30(12):1458–1475 Brown G, Kyttä M (2018) Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Appl Geogr 95:1–8 Brown G, Weber D, De Bie K (2014) Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Appl Geogr 53:77–89 Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29 CAR (2017) Evaluación Regional del Agua Cuenca Alta río Bogotá. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca. https://www.car.gov.co/uploads/files/5ae21dac0e581.pdf (Accessed: June 2020) Clerici N, Cote-Navarro F, Escobedo F, Rubiano K, Villegas JC (2019) Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Sci Total Environ 685:1181–1192 Cortés-S SP, Van der Hammen T, Rangel-Ch JO (1999) Comunidades vegetales y patrones de degradación y sucesión en la vegetación de los Cerros Occidentales de Chía-Cundinamarca-Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc 23:529–554 Damastuti E, de Groot R (2019) Participatory ecosystem service mapping to enhance community-based mangrove rehabilitation and management in Demak, Indonesia. Reg Environ Change 19:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1378-7 DANE Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística de Colombia (2018). Censo Nacional 2018. https://sitios.dane.gov. co/cnpv/app/views/informacion/perfiles/11_infografia.pdf (Accessed: May 2020) Darvill R, Lindo Z (2015) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values. Ecosyst Serv 13:153–161 Do TH, Vu TP, Catacutan D, Nguyen VT (2020). Governing Landscapes for Ecosystem Services: A Participatory Land-Use Scenario Development in the Northwest Montane Region of Vietnam. Environ Manage 68(5):1–18 Ernst A (2019) How participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis. J Environ Manag 238:368–381 Escobedo FJ, Bottin M, Cala D, Montoya DLS (2020) Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 23:1039–1049 Ernstson H (2013) The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 109 (1):7–17 Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N (2009) Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in coastal Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia 187:43–60 Fagerholm N, Eilola S, Kisanga D, Arki V, Käyhkö N (2019a) Placebased landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania. Landsc Ecol 34(7):1769–1787 Fagerholm N, Torralba M, Moreno G, Girardello M, Herzog F, Aviron S, Burgess P, Crous-Duran J, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Graves A, Hartel T (2019b) Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes. Glob Environ Chan 56:134–147 Gaillard JC, Monteil C, Perrillat-Collomb A, Chaudhary S, Chaudhary M, Chaudhary O et al. (2013) Participatory 3-dimension mapping: A tool for encouraging multi-caste collaboration to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Appl Geogr 45:158–166 García-Díez V, García-Llorente M, González JA (2020) Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Madrid: Insights for landscape planning. Land 9:244 Graham M (2014) Inequitable distributions in internet geographies: The global south is gaining access but lags in local content. Innovations 9(3–4):17–34 Golledge RG (1993): Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In: Gärling T, Golledge RG (eds) Behaviour and environment: psychological and geographical approaches, Elsevier Press, North Holland, 16–46 Hair J, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn. Pearson Education International, Upper saddle River, New Jersey Heikinheimo V, Tenkanen H, Bergroth C, Järv O, Hiippala T, Toivonen T (2020) Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landsc Urban Plan 201:103845 Hui R, Wescoat Jr JL (2019) Visualizing peri-urban and rurban water conditions in Pune district, Maharashtra, India. Geoforum 102:255–266 Hunt LM (2015) Monitoring changes in forest resource advisory groups’ composition and evaluations of perceptions of public participation effectiveness: A case of Ontario’s Local Citizens Committees. Can J For Res 45(12):1866–1872 Kahriman-Ozturk D, Olgan R, Tuncer G (2012) A qualitative study on Turkish preschool children’s environmental attitudes through ecocentrism and anthropocentrism. Int J Sci Educ 34(4):629–650 Liu J, Opdam P (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in communitybased landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landsc Ecol 29(8):1347–1360 Mendoza JE, Etter A (2002) Multitemporal analysis (1940–1996) of land cover changes in the southwestern Bogotá High-plain. Landsc Urban Plan 59:147–158 McCall MK, Dunn CE (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum 43(1):81–94 Mosso CE, Hostetler M, Ecobedo FJ (2020). Urban expansion into native forests in Patagonia, Argentina: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions regarding spatial planning. J Environ Plann Man 64:1–22 Ooms K, De Maeyer P, Dupont L, Van der Veken N, Van de Weghe N, Verplaetse S (2016) Education in cartography: what is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 43(2):134–153 Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, Del Amo DG, Montes C (2014) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Chang 14(1):237–251 Perez A (2019). Landscape Literacy: Teaching to Read the World through a Curricular-Spatial Analysis. Int. J. Crit. Pedagogy, 10(1):141–158 Priego C, Breuste JH, Rojas J (2008) Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: A comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile, and Spain. Landsc Online 7(1):22 R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria Ramadier T, Bronner AC (2006) Knowledge of the environment and spatial cognition: JRS as a technique for improving comparisons between social groups. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 33(2):285–299 Rambaldi G, Kyem PAK, McCall M, Weiner D (2006) Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electron J Inf Syst Developing Ctries 25(1):1–9 Reilly K, Adamowski J, John K (2018) Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders’ perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosyst Serv 30:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.002 Rubiano K, Clerici N, Norden N, Etter A (2017) Secondary forest and shrubland dynamics in a highly transformed landscape in the Northern Andes of Colombia (1985–2015). Forests 8:216 Sironen S, Leskinen P, Kangas A, Hujala T (2014) Variation of preference inconsistency when applying ratio and interval scale pairwise comparisons. J Multi‐Crit Decis Anal 21:183–195 Shim D (2014) Remote sensing place: Satellite images as visual spatial imaginaries. Geoforum 51:152–160 Trimble M, Lázaro M (2014) Evaluation criteria for participatory research: Insights from coastal Uruguay. Environ Manag 54 (1):122–137 Tu Huynh N, Doherty ST (2007) Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. Cartographica: Int J Geographic Inf Geovisualization 42(4):285–296 Vlami V, Zogaris S, Djuma H, Kokkoris IP, Kehayias G, Dimopoulos PA (2019) Field method for landscape conservation surveying: The landscape assessment protocol (LAP). Sustainability 11(7) Whiston Spirn A (2005) Restoring mill creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice, and city planning and design. Land Res 30(3):395–413 Willock J, Deary IJ, Edwards‐Jones G, Gibson GJ, McGregor MJ, Sutherland A et al. (1999) The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: business and environmentally‐oriented behaviour in Scotland. J Agr Econ 50(2):286–303 Xie M, Vacher HL, Reader S, Walton E (2018) Quantitative map literacy: A cross between map literacy and quantitative literacy. Numeracy 11(1):4 Yu-Jen H (2010) Understanding anthropocentric/biocentric orientations toward natural parks. A survey of student at Oklahoma State University (Master dissertation), Oklahoma State University, USA
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/88f827cc-79b2-4bb8-a579-6a6a2d2824e0/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/5569caeb-1058-4242-8d75-73594b729214/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d602121c-8e45-41db-9183-7b2a57f39ee4/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7e0f862d-cd18-4cf7-91c5-22ab7ded3699/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/69b7a237-3d51-48ab-9086-301d6551cbf1/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	1487462a1490a8fc01f5999ce7b3b9cc 4e13f50163063389850aa0f898079442 fab9d9ed61d64f6ac005dee3306ae77e fd6a5890b4e1b595772e5e2aa7727e0e ce5595dfb1b9c44d1718caaff1f56916
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_	1814167696780034048
spelling	d4c47fc5-06ce-47d2-9cd5-b0bde3028081600665908600450811600701089b2-3f09-49bd-a789-b9166f989391600799820916002022-12-14T16:59:24Z2022-12-14T16:59:24Z2022-01-132022-01-13Se sabe poco sobre cómo influye la alfabetización espacial en la elaboración de mapas y la toma de decisiones relacionadas con la gestión medioambiental y los servicios ecosistémicos. Evaluamos el papel de la alfabetización espacial del paisaje en la gestión ambiental participativa y las evaluaciones de los servicios ecosistémicos en la Bogotá periurbana, Colombia. La alfabetización paisajística espacial se evaluó poniendo a prueba la capacidad de las partes interesadas para localizar paisajes y puntos de referencia específicos. A continuación, se evaluó si las opiniones sobre las decisiones medioambientales y los servicios ecosistémicos guardaban una relación significativa con la alfabetización paisajística. Se utilizó un instrumento en línea para recoger las características socioeconómicas de 2.397 encuestados, sus conocimientos sobre el paisaje espacial, sus percepciones de los servicios ecosistémicos y sus opiniones sobre cuestiones medioambientales relevantes. Evaluamos y medimos la SL autopercibida de los encuestados y su capacidad para localizar cuatro paisajes en un mapa integrado en línea. La precisión posicional se calculó utilizando un índice de alfabetización espacial del paisaje (SLI). A continuación, se comprobaron los efectos de los datos sociodemográficos en el SLI, se modeló la relación entre los datos sociodemográficos y la SL, y se comprobó la relación entre la SL de los encuestados y sus opiniones sobre cuestiones medioambientales relevantes y servicios ecosistémicos. Descubrimos que alrededor del 75% de los encuestados localizaron correctamente 2 de los 4 paisajes. Las variables sociodemográficas tampoco predijeron bien el modelo SLI. Sin embargo, encontramos relaciones significativas entre el SLI y las opiniones relativas al medio ambiente. No se encontró ninguna relación entre los niveles de participación activa de los encuestados en la gobernanza local y el SLI. En general, la SL se vio poco afectada por los niveles educativos. Lo ideal sería que los procesos participativos que utilizan mapas midieran la LS y no asumieran a priori que los participantes tienen conocimientos espaciales. Es necesario seguir investigando para evaluar cómo las tecnologías espaciales y la comprensión de los valores de las partes interesadas hacia el medio ambiente pueden democratizar la toma de decisiones participativa.Little is known about how spatial literacy influences mapping and decision-making related to environmental management and ecosystem services. We assessed the role of spatial landscape literacy in participatory environmental management and ecosystem service assessments in peri-urban Bogota, Colombia. Spatial landscape literacy (SL) was evaluated by testing stakeholder’s ability to locate specific landscapes and landmarks. We then assessed if opinions on environmental decisions and ecosystem services were significantly related to SL. We used an online instrument to capture 2,397 respondent’s socioeconomic characteristics, SL, ecosystem service perceptions, and opinions concerning relevant environmental issues. We evaluated and measured respondents’ self-perceived SL and ability to locate four landscapes in an integrated online map. Positional accuracy was calculated using a Spatial Landscape Literacy Index (SLI). We then tested for effects of socio-demographics on SLI, modeled the relationship between socio-demographics and SL, and tested the relationship between respondents’ SL and their opinions on relevant environmental issues and ecosystem services. We found that about 75% of the respondents correctly located 2 of the 4 landscapes. The SLI model was also poorly predicted by socio-demographic variables. However, we found significant relationships between SLI and opinions concerning the environment. No relationship was found between respondents’ levels of active participation in local governance and SLI. Overall, SL was little affected by education levels. Participatory processes using maps should ideally measure SL and not assume a priori that participants are spatially literate. Further research is needed to evaluate how spatial technologies and understanding stakeholder’s values towards the environment can democratize participatory-based decision-making.14 ppapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01591-7https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37692spa257 pp244 ppEnvironmental Management69Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 ColombiaAbierto (Texto Completo)EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aggrey JJ, Ros-Tonen MA, Asubonteng KO (2021) Using participatory spatial tools to unravel community perceptions of land-use dynamics in a mine-expanding landscape in Ghana. Environ Manage 68:1–18.Agresti A (2013) Categorical data analysis, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, United StatesBagstad KJ, Reed JM, Semmens DJ, Sherrouse BC, Troy A (2016) Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystemservice assessments: A case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Chang 16(7):2005–2018Brown, G (2012) An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Appl Geogr 34:289–294Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K (2012) Public Participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour 25:633–651Brown G, Kangas K, Juutinen A, Tolvanen A (2017) Identifying environmental and natural resource management conflict potential using participatory mapping. Soc Nat Resour 30(12):1458–1475Brown G, Kyttä M (2018) Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Appl Geogr 95:1–8Brown G, Weber D, De Bie K (2014) Assessing the value of public lands using public participation GIS (PPGIS) and social landscape metrics. Appl Geogr 53:77–89Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29CAR (2017) Evaluación Regional del Agua Cuenca Alta río Bogotá. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca. https://www.car.gov.co/uploads/files/5ae21dac0e581.pdf (Accessed: June 2020)Clerici N, Cote-Navarro F, Escobedo F, Rubiano K, Villegas JC (2019) Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Sci Total Environ 685:1181–1192Cortés-S SP, Van der Hammen T, Rangel-Ch JO (1999) Comunidades vegetales y patrones de degradación y sucesión en la vegetación de los Cerros Occidentales de Chía-Cundinamarca-Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc 23:529–554Damastuti E, de Groot R (2019) Participatory ecosystem service mapping to enhance community-based mangrove rehabilitation and management in Demak, Indonesia. Reg Environ Change 19:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1378-7DANE Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística de Colombia (2018). Censo Nacional 2018. https://sitios.dane.gov. co/cnpv/app/views/informacion/perfiles/11_infografia.pdf (Accessed: May 2020)Darvill R, Lindo Z (2015) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values. Ecosyst Serv 13:153–161Do TH, Vu TP, Catacutan D, Nguyen VT (2020). Governing Landscapes for Ecosystem Services: A Participatory Land-Use Scenario Development in the Northwest Montane Region of Vietnam. Environ Manage 68(5):1–18Ernst A (2019) How participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis. J Environ Manag 238:368–381Escobedo FJ, Bottin M, Cala D, Montoya DLS (2020) Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 23:1039–1049Ernstson H (2013) The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 109 (1):7–17Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N (2009) Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in coastal Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia 187:43–60Fagerholm N, Eilola S, Kisanga D, Arki V, Käyhkö N (2019a) Placebased landscape services and potential of participatory spatial planning in multifunctional rural landscapes in Southern highlands, Tanzania. Landsc Ecol 34(7):1769–1787Fagerholm N, Torralba M, Moreno G, Girardello M, Herzog F, Aviron S, Burgess P, Crous-Duran J, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Graves A, Hartel T (2019b) Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes. Glob Environ Chan 56:134–147Gaillard JC, Monteil C, Perrillat-Collomb A, Chaudhary S, Chaudhary M, Chaudhary O et al. (2013) Participatory 3-dimension mapping: A tool for encouraging multi-caste collaboration to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Appl Geogr 45:158–166García-Díez V, García-Llorente M, González JA (2020) Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Madrid: Insights for landscape planning. Land 9:244Graham M (2014) Inequitable distributions in internet geographies: The global south is gaining access but lags in local content. Innovations 9(3–4):17–34Golledge RG (1993): Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In: Gärling T, Golledge RG (eds) Behaviour and environment: psychological and geographical approaches, Elsevier Press, North Holland, 16–46Hair J, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn. Pearson Education International, Upper saddle River, New JerseyHeikinheimo V, Tenkanen H, Bergroth C, Järv O, Hiippala T, Toivonen T (2020) Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landsc Urban Plan 201:103845Hui R, Wescoat Jr JL (2019) Visualizing peri-urban and rurban water conditions in Pune district, Maharashtra, India. Geoforum 102:255–266Hunt LM (2015) Monitoring changes in forest resource advisory groups’ composition and evaluations of perceptions of public participation effectiveness: A case of Ontario’s Local Citizens Committees. Can J For Res 45(12):1866–1872Kahriman-Ozturk D, Olgan R, Tuncer G (2012) A qualitative study on Turkish preschool children’s environmental attitudes through ecocentrism and anthropocentrism. Int J Sci Educ 34(4):629–650Liu J, Opdam P (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in communitybased landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landsc Ecol 29(8):1347–1360Mendoza JE, Etter A (2002) Multitemporal analysis (1940–1996) of land cover changes in the southwestern Bogotá High-plain. Landsc Urban Plan 59:147–158McCall MK, Dunn CE (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum 43(1):81–94Mosso CE, Hostetler M, Ecobedo FJ (2020). Urban expansion into native forests in Patagonia, Argentina: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions regarding spatial planning. J Environ Plann Man 64:1–22Ooms K, De Maeyer P, Dupont L, Van der Veken N, Van de Weghe N, Verplaetse S (2016) Education in cartography: what is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 43(2):134–153Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, Del Amo DG, Montes C (2014) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Chang 14(1):237–251Perez A (2019). Landscape Literacy: Teaching to Read the World through a Curricular-Spatial Analysis. Int. J. Crit. Pedagogy, 10(1):141–158Priego C, Breuste JH, Rojas J (2008) Perception and value of nature in urban landscapes: A comparative analysis of cities in Germany, Chile, and Spain. Landsc Online 7(1):22R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaRamadier T, Bronner AC (2006) Knowledge of the environment and spatial cognition: JRS as a technique for improving comparisons between social groups. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 33(2):285–299Rambaldi G, Kyem PAK, McCall M, Weiner D (2006) Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electron J Inf Syst Developing Ctries 25(1):1–9Reilly K, Adamowski J, John K (2018) Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders’ perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosyst Serv 30:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.002Rubiano K, Clerici N, Norden N, Etter A (2017) Secondary forest and shrubland dynamics in a highly transformed landscape in the Northern Andes of Colombia (1985–2015). Forests 8:216Sironen S, Leskinen P, Kangas A, Hujala T (2014) Variation of preference inconsistency when applying ratio and interval scale pairwise comparisons. J Multi‐Crit Decis Anal 21:183–195Shim D (2014) Remote sensing place: Satellite images as visual spatial imaginaries. Geoforum 51:152–160Trimble M, Lázaro M (2014) Evaluation criteria for participatory research: Insights from coastal Uruguay. Environ Manag 54 (1):122–137Tu Huynh N, Doherty ST (2007) Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. Cartographica: Int J Geographic Inf Geovisualization 42(4):285–296Vlami V, Zogaris S, Djuma H, Kokkoris IP, Kehayias G, Dimopoulos PA (2019) Field method for landscape conservation surveying: The landscape assessment protocol (LAP). Sustainability 11(7)Whiston Spirn A (2005) Restoring mill creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice, and city planning and design. Land Res 30(3):395–413Willock J, Deary IJ, Edwards‐Jones G, Gibson GJ, McGregor MJ, Sutherland A et al. (1999) The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: business and environmentally‐oriented behaviour in Scotland. J Agr Econ 50(2):286–303Xie M, Vacher HL, Reader S, Walton E (2018) Quantitative map literacy: A cross between map literacy and quantitative literacy. Numeracy 11(1):4Yu-Jen H (2010) Understanding anthropocentric/biocentric orientations toward natural parks. A survey of student at Oklahoma State University (Master dissertation), Oklahoma State University, USAinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURSIG público participativoPlanificación del paisajeGestión medioambientalAlfabetización espacialBogotáColombiaAlfabetización espacialEducación, investigación, temas relacionados607600Public Participatory GISLandscape planningEnvironmental managementSpatial literacyBogotaColombiaSpatial literacyEvaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem servicesarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Escobedo, Francisco JBottin, MariusClerici, NicolaCamargo, GuiborFeged Rivadeneira, AlejandroFacultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y UrbanosCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81037https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/88f827cc-79b2-4bb8-a579-6a6a2d2824e0/download1487462a1490a8fc01f5999ce7b3b9ccMD53ORIGINALs00267-021-01591-7.pdfs00267-021-01591-7.pdfapplication/pdf8115063https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/5569caeb-1058-4242-8d75-73594b729214/download4e13f50163063389850aa0f898079442MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1475https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d602121c-8e45-41db-9183-7b2a57f39ee4/downloadfab9d9ed61d64f6ac005dee3306ae77eMD52TEXTs00267-021-01591-7.pdf.txts00267-021-01591-7.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain53466https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7e0f862d-cd18-4cf7-91c5-22ab7ded3699/downloadfd6a5890b4e1b595772e5e2aa7727e0eMD54THUMBNAILs00267-021-01591-7.pdf.jpgs00267-021-01591-7.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4839https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/69b7a237-3d51-48ab-9086-301d6551cbf1/downloadce5595dfb1b9c44d1718caaff1f56916MD5510336/37692oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/376922022-12-15 03:06:21.441http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiahttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.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

Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services

Publicaciones similares