History, literature, and narration

In the second half of the twentieth century, the philosophy of history came to recognize the irreducibly narrative character of history. This underlined the differences between history and science and highlighted its affinities with literature. This article suggests some criteria by which history ca...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2008
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24204
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24204
Palabra clave:
Literature
Narration
Philosophy of History
Temporality
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_6738b89acc678b07a78705b2723feec4
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24204
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 796512646002020-05-26T00:10:03Z2020-05-26T00:10:03Z2008In the second half of the twentieth century, the philosophy of history came to recognize the irreducibly narrative character of history. This underlined the differences between history and science and highlighted its affinities with literature. This article suggests some criteria by which history can be distinguished from literature without undermining the narrative character of the former and recognizing that both are deeply anchored in the structures of the consciousness of time. The text has three parts. The first reconstructs Danto's argument in favor of the narrative character of history. The second critiques White's position regarding the problematic border between history and literature. With the assistance of Gadamer and Koselleck, the final section shows how the reconstruction of historical facts and the literary exploration of the human condition are two modalities of a wider task related to the study of the structures of temporality.application/pdf1211617https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24204engUniversidad de los Andes, Bogota Colombia222194Historia CriticaVol. 36Historia Critica, ISSN:1211617, Vol.36,(2008); pp. 194-222https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1107142250Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURLiteratureNarrationPhilosophy of HistoryTemporalityHistory, literature, and narrationHistoria, literatura y narraciónarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ordóñez Díaz, Leonardo10336/24204oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/242042022-05-02 07:37:17.760875https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv History, literature, and narration
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Historia, literatura y narración
title History, literature, and narration
spellingShingle History, literature, and narration
Literature
Narration
Philosophy of History
Temporality
title_short History, literature, and narration
title_full History, literature, and narration
title_fullStr History, literature, and narration
title_full_unstemmed History, literature, and narration
title_sort History, literature, and narration
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Literature
Narration
Philosophy of History
Temporality
topic Literature
Narration
Philosophy of History
Temporality
description In the second half of the twentieth century, the philosophy of history came to recognize the irreducibly narrative character of history. This underlined the differences between history and science and highlighted its affinities with literature. This article suggests some criteria by which history can be distinguished from literature without undermining the narrative character of the former and recognizing that both are deeply anchored in the structures of the consciousness of time. The text has three parts. The first reconstructs Danto's argument in favor of the narrative character of history. The second critiques White's position regarding the problematic border between history and literature. With the assistance of Gadamer and Koselleck, the final section shows how the reconstruction of historical facts and the literary exploration of the human condition are two modalities of a wider task related to the study of the structures of temporality.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2008
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:10:03Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:10:03Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1211617
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24204
identifier_str_mv 1211617
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24204
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 222
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 194
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Historia Critica
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 36
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Historia Critica, ISSN:1211617, Vol.36,(2008); pp. 194-222
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1107142250
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes, Bogota Colombia
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167574546481152

Publicaciones similares