Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and arthritis in Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: The presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) ranges from 3% to 9.9%; however, there is no agreement about their clinical significance. Our aim was to systematically review the literature regarding the association of arthritis and ACPAs...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23271
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2018.1469164
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23271
Palabra clave:
Cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody
Immunoglobulin g
Cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody
Arthritis
Arthropathy
Article
Cochrane library
Human
Medline
Priority journal
Rheumatoid arthritis
Sjoegren syndrome
Synovitis
Systematic review
Web of science
Complication
Immunology
Meta analysis
Sjoegren syndrome
Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies
Humans
Sjogren's syndrome
rheumatoid
Arthritis
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:Objective: The presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) ranges from 3% to 9.9%; however, there is no agreement about their clinical significance. Our aim was to systematically review the literature regarding the association of arthritis and ACPAs in pSS and their role in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library from inception until June 2016 was undertaken using the combination of two or three of the keywords: primary Sjögren’s syndrome, Sjögren’s syndrome, arthritis, synovitis, arthropathy, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody–ACPA. No language restriction was used. Studies were included if they: assessed the association of arthritis and ACPAs, had sufficient data to construct a two-by-two table, tested immunoglobulin G ACPA by any method, and included patients with pSS according to a validated set of classification criteria. We used a random effects model and evaluated the heterogeneity and publication bias. Results: Ten studies were included (involving 1322 patients). We found a pooled odds ratio of 4.42 (95% confidence interval 1.15–16.94, p = 0.03). The test for heterogeneity was I 2  = 0.87. Publication bias was not observed. Based on data from three studies, 33 of 58 pSS patients with ACPAs (57%) developed RA compared with none of 598 pSS patients with negative ACPA (p  and lt; 0.000001). Conclusion: Patients with pSS disclosing ACPAs are prone to arthritis as part of the clinical spectrum of the disease, but are also at risk of developing RA. © 2019, © 2019 Informa Healthcare on license from Scandinavian Rheumatology Research Foundation.