Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults

Objectives: To verify the validity of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (mBCA) for predicting body fat percentage (BF%) in overweight/obese adults using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. Methods: Forty-eight adults participated (54% women, mean age = 41.0...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/19090
Acceso en línea:
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19090
Palabra clave:
Multi‐Frequency Bioelectrical
Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry
Biología
Composición del cuerpo humano
Peso corporal
Convertidos de corriente eléctrica
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_66ddfe0400d8d8f211392931519379e9
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/19090
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
title Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
spellingShingle Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
Multi‐Frequency Bioelectrical
Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry
Biología
Composición del cuerpo humano
Peso corporal
Convertidos de corriente eléctrica
title_short Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
title_full Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
title_fullStr Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
title_full_unstemmed Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
title_sort Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adults
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Multi‐Frequency Bioelectrical
Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry
topic Multi‐Frequency Bioelectrical
Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry
Biología
Composición del cuerpo humano
Peso corporal
Convertidos de corriente eléctrica
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv Biología
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Composición del cuerpo humano
Peso corporal
Convertidos de corriente eléctrica
description Objectives: To verify the validity of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (mBCA) for predicting body fat percentage (BF%) in overweight/obese adults using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. Methods: Forty-eight adults participated (54% women, mean age = 41.0 ± 7.3 years old). The Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between BIA and BF% assessed by DXA. The concordance between BF% measured by both methods was obtained with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman difference plots. Results: Measures of BF% were estimated as 39.0 (SD = 6.1) and 38.3 (SD = 6.5) using DXA and mBCA, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient reflected a strong correlation (r =.921, P =.001). The paired t-test showed a significant mean difference between these methods for obese men BF% of −0.6 [(SD 1.95; 95% CI = −4.0 to 3.0), P =.037]. Overall, the bias of the mBCA was −0.6 [(SD 2.2; 95% CI = −5.0 to 3.7), P =.041], which indicated that the mBCA method significantly underestimated BF% in comparison to the reference method. Finally, in both genders, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed a strong agreement. More specifically the DXA value was ρc = 0.943 (95% CI = 0.775 to 0.950) and the mBCA value was ρc = 0.948 (95% CI = 0.778 to 0.978). Conclusions: Our analysis showed a strong agreement between the two methods as reflected in the range of BF%. These results show that mBCA and DXA are comparable methods for measuring body composition with higher body fat percentages. However, due to broad limits of agreement, we can only recommend mBCA for groups of populations. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-15T20:01:13Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-15T20:01:13Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/ajhb.23071
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1042-0533
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19090
identifier_str_mv 10.1002/ajhb.23071
1042-0533
url http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19090
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Human Biology
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 30
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv American Journal of Human Biology, ISSN:1042-0533, Vol. 30 (2018)
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajhb.23071
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Aslam, M., Eckhauser, A.W., Dorminy, C.A., Dossett, C.M., Choi, L., Buchowski, M.S., Assessing body fat changes during moderate weight loss with anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (2009) Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 3, pp. 209-219
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f7a86f77-a06a-443d-b84f-e14b5e8a8e3d/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0031c02c-b453-41a3-82c0-6a27245f3d78/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/768793b0-515d-4735-844e-cc5d64f22de4/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 87fc0bdda0af99c17531873d6039ebfc
02be85f7729701bc9370c1abefed5a69
511ed2c42c95983ce19b89e5372e2849
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390592850296832
spelling 9451818360010223828056007913910360032244cce-6b52-494c-b446-49796f584442600eacc214d-ea6d-48f8-aaad-657aff4c079560076b4c587-fbb4-4bb0-b7a1-55f301a1eee5600d1123b4d-11e1-4338-99f1-023fe485bb27600b526c855-7b91-4113-bc39-e1129b1788d86002019-02-15T20:01:13Z2019-02-15T20:01:13Z20182018Objectives: To verify the validity of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (mBCA) for predicting body fat percentage (BF%) in overweight/obese adults using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. Methods: Forty-eight adults participated (54% women, mean age = 41.0 ± 7.3 years old). The Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between BIA and BF% assessed by DXA. The concordance between BF% measured by both methods was obtained with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman difference plots. Results: Measures of BF% were estimated as 39.0 (SD = 6.1) and 38.3 (SD = 6.5) using DXA and mBCA, respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient reflected a strong correlation (r =.921, P =.001). The paired t-test showed a significant mean difference between these methods for obese men BF% of −0.6 [(SD 1.95; 95% CI = −4.0 to 3.0), P =.037]. Overall, the bias of the mBCA was −0.6 [(SD 2.2; 95% CI = −5.0 to 3.7), P =.041], which indicated that the mBCA method significantly underestimated BF% in comparison to the reference method. Finally, in both genders, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed a strong agreement. More specifically the DXA value was ρc = 0.943 (95% CI = 0.775 to 0.950) and the mBCA value was ρc = 0.948 (95% CI = 0.778 to 0.978). Conclusions: Our analysis showed a strong agreement between the two methods as reflected in the range of BF%. These results show that mBCA and DXA are comparable methods for measuring body composition with higher body fat percentages. However, due to broad limits of agreement, we can only recommend mBCA for groups of populations. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.application/pdf10.1002/ajhb.230711042-0533http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19090engAmerican Journal of Human BiologyVol. 30American Journal of Human Biology, ISSN:1042-0533, Vol. 30 (2018)https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajhb.23071Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aslam, M., Eckhauser, A.W., Dorminy, C.A., Dossett, C.M., Choi, L., Buchowski, M.S., Assessing body fat changes during moderate weight loss with anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (2009) Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 3, pp. 209-219instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURMulti‐Frequency BioelectricalDual‐Energy X‐Ray AbsorptiometryBiología574600Composición del cuerpo humanoPeso corporalConvertidos de corriente eléctricaValidation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obeses Colombian adultsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ramírez-Vélez, RobinsonTordecilla Sanders, María AlejandraCorrea Bautista, Jorge EnriqueGonzález Ruíz, KatherineGonzález Jiménez, EmilioTriana-Reina, Hector ReynaldoGarcía-Hermoso, AntonioSchmidt-RioValle, JacquelineRamírez-Vélez, RobinsonTordecilla-Sanders, AlejandraCorrea-Bautista, Jorge EnriqueGonzález Ruíz, KatherineGonzález Jiménez, EmilioTriana-Reina, Hector ReynaldoGarcía-Hermoso, AntonioSchmidt-RioValle, JacquelineORIGINAL114.pdfapplication/pdf619574https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f7a86f77-a06a-443d-b84f-e14b5e8a8e3d/download87fc0bdda0af99c17531873d6039ebfcMD51TEXT114.pdf.txt114.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain22302https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0031c02c-b453-41a3-82c0-6a27245f3d78/download02be85f7729701bc9370c1abefed5a69MD52THUMBNAIL114.pdf.jpg114.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4280https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/768793b0-515d-4735-844e-cc5d64f22de4/download511ed2c42c95983ce19b89e5372e2849MD5310336/19090oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/190902019-09-19 07:37:54.609585https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co