Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia
Between 2007 and 2013, we were part of the Historical Memory Group (GMH), a research group comprising researchers and experts working under the auspices of the National Commission for Reparation and Reconciliation of Colombia. The GMH was tasked under Law 975 with producing a report on the origins a...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22158
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv036
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22158
- Palabra clave:
- Colombia
Historical memory
Human rights discourse
Plural narratives
Victims' discourses
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_6381530240259e39657148ec104e3285 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22158 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
41a4df08-c124-4856-8404-53b7c916efb2414186056002020-05-25T23:55:38Z2020-05-25T23:55:38Z2016Between 2007 and 2013, we were part of the Historical Memory Group (GMH), a research group comprising researchers and experts working under the auspices of the National Commission for Reparation and Reconciliation of Colombia. The GMH was tasked under Law 975 with producing a report on the origins and causes of the armed conflict in Colombia. Despite the dominant right-wing political context and the ongoing armed conflict, the GMH enjoyed intellectual and operative autonomy in its research. This article interrogates the dynamics and reasons that served as the basis for the GMH's special sensitivity towards victims; the notion of victim implicit in the research work, with its inclusions and exclusions; and the dilemmas that arose in the group's work. We argue that the GMH can be characterized as an agent of knowledge production about a violent past that was able to articulate comprehensive and plural narratives about violence in Colombia. However, this work was limited by state and institutional dynamics that sought to domesticate and instrumentalize the voices of those who had been systematically silenced. A review of the GMH's work suggests three critical dilemmas that constrain truth-telling mechanisms: the dilemma between opening spaces for truth telling and the safety of those providing testimony; the dilemma around whose victims' voices gain authority in the documentation process; and the risks of institutionalizing a discourse around victims that bestows narrative capital to state and societal institutions. © The Author (2015).application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv036https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22158engOxford University Press24No. 16International Journal of Transitional JusticeVol. 10International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol.10, No.1 (2016); pp. 6-24https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84960355122&doi=10.1093%2fijtj%2fijv036&partnerID=40&md5=7dd6731c7f6532c7ed03e6cbbb2ada27Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURColombiaHistorical memoryHuman rights discoursePlural narrativesVictims' discoursesConstructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of ColombiaarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Alcalá P.R.Uribe Alarcon, Maria VictoriaORIGINALConstructing_memory_amidst_war_The_Histo.pdfapplication/pdf180982https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/731330c8-8822-4baf-8044-b23c738effb6/download25b4063b0887562742aa7b0a5b5ade7cMD51TEXTConstructing_memory_amidst_war_The_Histo.pdf.txtConstructing_memory_amidst_war_The_Histo.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain69610https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8a79cbe6-8754-4d92-8b2c-8b0619ed01a4/downloadc7052b395fb6953044ba4c3acd271ac4MD52THUMBNAILConstructing_memory_amidst_war_The_Histo.pdf.jpgConstructing_memory_amidst_war_The_Histo.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4413https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/62c39ff4-9930-4d31-ac12-f9459e62ce9f/download699f9e3dd1802bc4466b71fdd886b53bMD5310336/22158oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/221582022-05-02 07:37:17.513875https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
title |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
spellingShingle |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia Colombia Historical memory Human rights discourse Plural narratives Victims' discourses |
title_short |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
title_full |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
title_fullStr |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
title_sort |
Constructing memory amidst war: The historical memory group of Colombia |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colombia Historical memory Human rights discourse Plural narratives Victims' discourses |
topic |
Colombia Historical memory Human rights discourse Plural narratives Victims' discourses |
description |
Between 2007 and 2013, we were part of the Historical Memory Group (GMH), a research group comprising researchers and experts working under the auspices of the National Commission for Reparation and Reconciliation of Colombia. The GMH was tasked under Law 975 with producing a report on the origins and causes of the armed conflict in Colombia. Despite the dominant right-wing political context and the ongoing armed conflict, the GMH enjoyed intellectual and operative autonomy in its research. This article interrogates the dynamics and reasons that served as the basis for the GMH's special sensitivity towards victims; the notion of victim implicit in the research work, with its inclusions and exclusions; and the dilemmas that arose in the group's work. We argue that the GMH can be characterized as an agent of knowledge production about a violent past that was able to articulate comprehensive and plural narratives about violence in Colombia. However, this work was limited by state and institutional dynamics that sought to domesticate and instrumentalize the voices of those who had been systematically silenced. A review of the GMH's work suggests three critical dilemmas that constrain truth-telling mechanisms: the dilemma between opening spaces for truth telling and the safety of those providing testimony; the dilemma around whose victims' voices gain authority in the documentation process; and the risks of institutionalizing a discourse around victims that bestows narrative capital to state and societal institutions. © The Author (2015). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:55:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:55:38Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv036 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22158 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv036 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22158 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
24 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 1 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
6 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Transitional Justice |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 10 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol.10, No.1 (2016); pp. 6-24 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84960355122&doi=10.1093%2fijtj%2fijv036&partnerID=40&md5=7dd6731c7f6532c7ed03e6cbbb2ada27 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/731330c8-8822-4baf-8044-b23c738effb6/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8a79cbe6-8754-4d92-8b2c-8b0619ed01a4/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/62c39ff4-9930-4d31-ac12-f9459e62ce9f/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
25b4063b0887562742aa7b0a5b5ade7c c7052b395fb6953044ba4c3acd271ac4 699f9e3dd1802bc4466b71fdd886b53b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167550250975232 |