Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus

Objective. Chronic pain conditions profoundly affect the daily living of a significant number of people and are a major economic and social burden, particularly in developing countries. The Change Pain Latin America (CPLA) advisory panel aimed to identify the most appropriate guidelines for the trea...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22742
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx198
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22742
Palabra clave:
Analgesia
Clinical effectiveness
Clinical practice
Daily life activity
Evaluation study
Evidence based practice
Health care personnel
Health care planning
Human
Low back pain
Medical decision making
Neuropathic pain
Patient safety
Practice guideline
Review
South and central america
Systematic review (topic)
Analgesia
Chronic pain
Consensus
Low back pain
Procedures
Chronic pain
Consensus
Guidelines as topic
Humans
Latin america
Low back pain
Pain management
Best practice
Change pain latin america (cpla)
Chronic low back pain
Consensus guidelines
Latin america
Neuropathic pain
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_5e154c8aa2cce73218461344f9efdd74
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22742
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
title Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
spellingShingle Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
Analgesia
Clinical effectiveness
Clinical practice
Daily life activity
Evaluation study
Evidence based practice
Health care personnel
Health care planning
Human
Low back pain
Medical decision making
Neuropathic pain
Patient safety
Practice guideline
Review
South and central america
Systematic review (topic)
Analgesia
Chronic pain
Consensus
Low back pain
Procedures
Chronic pain
Consensus
Guidelines as topic
Humans
Latin america
Low back pain
Pain management
Best practice
Change pain latin america (cpla)
Chronic low back pain
Consensus guidelines
Latin america
Neuropathic pain
title_short Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
title_full Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
title_fullStr Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
title_full_unstemmed Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
title_sort Most relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensus
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Clinical effectiveness
Clinical practice
Daily life activity
Evaluation study
Evidence based practice
Health care personnel
Health care planning
Human
Low back pain
Medical decision making
Neuropathic pain
Patient safety
Practice guideline
Review
South and central america
Systematic review (topic)
Analgesia
Chronic pain
Consensus
Low back pain
Procedures
Chronic pain
Consensus
Guidelines as topic
Humans
Latin america
Low back pain
Pain management
Best practice
Change pain latin america (cpla)
Chronic low back pain
Consensus guidelines
Latin america
Neuropathic pain
topic Analgesia
Clinical effectiveness
Clinical practice
Daily life activity
Evaluation study
Evidence based practice
Health care personnel
Health care planning
Human
Low back pain
Medical decision making
Neuropathic pain
Patient safety
Practice guideline
Review
South and central america
Systematic review (topic)
Analgesia
Chronic pain
Consensus
Low back pain
Procedures
Chronic pain
Consensus
Guidelines as topic
Humans
Latin america
Low back pain
Pain management
Best practice
Change pain latin america (cpla)
Chronic low back pain
Consensus guidelines
Latin america
Neuropathic pain
description Objective. Chronic pain conditions profoundly affect the daily living of a significant number of people and are a major economic and social burden, particularly in developing countries. The Change Pain Latin America (CPLA) advisory panel aimed to identify the most appropriate guidelines for the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) for use across Latin America. Methods. Published systematic reviews or practice guidelines were identified by a systematic search of PubMed, the Guidelines Clearinghouse, and Google. Articles were screened by an independent reviewer, and potential candidate guidelines were selected for more in-depth review. A shortlist of suitable guidelines was selected and critically evaluated by the CPLA advisory panel. Results. Searches identified 674 and 604 guideline articles for NP and CLBP, respectively. Of these, 14 guidelines were shortlisted for consensus consideration, with the following final selections made: • 'Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain from the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group in 2015-pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.' • 'Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society' (2007). Conclusions. The selected guidelines were endorsed by all members of the CPLA advisory board as the best fit for use across Latin America. In addition, regional considerations were discussed and recorded. We have included this expert local insight and advice to enhance the implementation of each guideline across all Latin American countries. © 2017 American Academy of Pain Medicine.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:47Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:47Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx198
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22742
url https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx198
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22742
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 470
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 3
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 460
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Pain Medicine (United States)
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 19
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Pain Medicine (United States), Vol.19, No.3 (2018); pp. 460-470
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050614170&doi=10.1093%2fpm%2fpnx198&partnerID=40&md5=6c0afe8d47d6e7fcd063f1faf45a515a
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167558457131008
spelling df37213f-dffe-4d3e-b14d-8d8605de63d3-181075055-eaf6-4808-9a96-3ebcd470f9dd-12172382f-ef0d-4adf-9caf-d2e7aa23ece3-1ea8c1f0a-c2c5-4cfe-9471-357083230030-157df6567-c480-4b87-8370-2487438c36a9-1e7f38976-45ac-42e3-8056-ac886c98ba92-15809c75c-406b-4386-94a5-6948e28fecae-1083b79d0-acba-4709-943b-3f54a9605b0e-192f6dd40-1959-4f2b-b0b8-c7c15ee01b7a-14ef78c64-9eab-4555-a4c1-d3920b87984f-1b2a49332-ec5f-4d27-bbce-b8a6f26f91b3-143f36682-f7be-4017-a71d-733d477b5574-14bf5f9d4-539a-46d3-bed2-b6618c9b64ac-1385997bf-cebb-4ba8-8e6d-9432ac8618e7-1aa786b98-7b2e-4aaa-9d83-fdc71c285d1e-134461396002020-05-25T23:57:47Z2020-05-25T23:57:47Z2018Objective. Chronic pain conditions profoundly affect the daily living of a significant number of people and are a major economic and social burden, particularly in developing countries. The Change Pain Latin America (CPLA) advisory panel aimed to identify the most appropriate guidelines for the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) for use across Latin America. Methods. Published systematic reviews or practice guidelines were identified by a systematic search of PubMed, the Guidelines Clearinghouse, and Google. Articles were screened by an independent reviewer, and potential candidate guidelines were selected for more in-depth review. A shortlist of suitable guidelines was selected and critically evaluated by the CPLA advisory panel. Results. Searches identified 674 and 604 guideline articles for NP and CLBP, respectively. Of these, 14 guidelines were shortlisted for consensus consideration, with the following final selections made: • 'Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain from the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group in 2015-pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.' • 'Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society' (2007). Conclusions. The selected guidelines were endorsed by all members of the CPLA advisory board as the best fit for use across Latin America. In addition, regional considerations were discussed and recorded. We have included this expert local insight and advice to enhance the implementation of each guideline across all Latin American countries. © 2017 American Academy of Pain Medicine.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx198https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22742engOxford University Press470No. 3460Pain Medicine (United States)Vol. 19Pain Medicine (United States), Vol.19, No.3 (2018); pp. 460-470https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050614170&doi=10.1093%2fpm%2fpnx198&partnerID=40&md5=6c0afe8d47d6e7fcd063f1faf45a515aAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAnalgesiaClinical effectivenessClinical practiceDaily life activityEvaluation studyEvidence based practiceHealth care personnelHealth care planningHumanLow back painMedical decision makingNeuropathic painPatient safetyPractice guidelineReviewSouth and central americaSystematic review (topic)AnalgesiaChronic painConsensusLow back painProceduresChronic painConsensusGuidelines as topicHumansLatin americaLow back painPain managementBest practiceChange pain latin america (cpla)Chronic low back painConsensus guidelinesLatin americaNeuropathic painMost relevant neuropathic pain treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America advisory panel consensusarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Amescua-Garcia, CesarColimon, FrantzGuerrero, CarlosJreige Iskandar, AzizaBerenguel Cook, MariaBonilla, PatriciaCampos Kraychete, DurvalDelgado Barrera, WilliamAlberto Flores Cantisani, JoseLara-Solares, ArgeliaPerez Hernandez, ConcepcionRico, Maria AntonietaDel Rocio Guillen Nunez, MariaSempertegui Gallegos, ManuelGarcia, Joao Batista SantosHernandez-Castro, John-Jairo10336/22742oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/227422022-05-02 07:37:20.580613https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co