Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion

Introduction: Human gait is the highest point in a person's functional independence; therefore, its importance as a movement pattern has led to the development of measuring tools. Objective: To assess the concordance between 2 measuring tools: computerised gait analysis (CGA) and physical exami...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22918
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918
Palabra clave:
Bone anteversion
Femur
Gait analysis
Physical examination
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_59bb2b0e37b3539e9e561e20c60264d2
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22918
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 01c5f542-2d6f-462d-8975-840130f86a01-12b82a1fa-c0de-4773-b9bb-20c8948bdfb7-12020-05-25T23:58:43Z2020-05-25T23:58:43Z2018Introduction: Human gait is the highest point in a person's functional independence; therefore, its importance as a movement pattern has led to the development of measuring tools. Objective: To assess the concordance between 2 measuring tools: computerised gait analysis (CGA) and physical examination (PE) in patients with increased femoral anteversion without neurological alterations. Methods: We conducted an observational analytic study of concordance. Data were obtained retrospectively from 2010 to 2014 in the gait analysis laboratory of the Roosevelt Children's Orthopaedics Institute through a single application of CGA and PE. Results: There were evident alterations in the PE because, at the hip, the internal-external rotation range decreases in the stance and swing phases. In the knee, there was a decrease in the flexion-extension range during the swing phase and in the ankle there was also a decrease in the dorsiflexion-plantarflexion range in the stance and swing phases. Conclusion: This study found that there was no concordance between PE and CGA. Therefore, these tests are complementary and provide information for a differential approach in clinical decision-making. © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SERMEFapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002487120https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918engEdiciones Doyma, S.L.92No. 285RehabilitacionVol. 52Rehabilitacion, ISSN:487120, Vol.52, No.2 (2018); pp. 85-92https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042647294&doi=10.1016%2fj.rh.2017.11.002&partnerID=40&md5=f5eb408401af72736754c112af10562dAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURBone anteversionFemurGait analysisPhysical examinationConcordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversionConcordancia entre el análisis computarizado de la marcha y el examen físico en pacientes con anteversión femoral aumentada sin alteraciones neurológicasarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501de la Pava I.C.Duplat J.L.10336/22918oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/229182022-05-02 07:37:20.811957https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Concordancia entre el análisis computarizado de la marcha y el examen físico en pacientes con anteversión femoral aumentada sin alteraciones neurológicas
title Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
spellingShingle Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
Bone anteversion
Femur
Gait analysis
Physical examination
title_short Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
title_full Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
title_fullStr Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
title_full_unstemmed Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
title_sort Concordance between computerised gait analysis and physical examination in patients with augmented femoral anteversion
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Bone anteversion
Femur
Gait analysis
Physical examination
topic Bone anteversion
Femur
Gait analysis
Physical examination
description Introduction: Human gait is the highest point in a person's functional independence; therefore, its importance as a movement pattern has led to the development of measuring tools. Objective: To assess the concordance between 2 measuring tools: computerised gait analysis (CGA) and physical examination (PE) in patients with increased femoral anteversion without neurological alterations. Methods: We conducted an observational analytic study of concordance. Data were obtained retrospectively from 2010 to 2014 in the gait analysis laboratory of the Roosevelt Children's Orthopaedics Institute through a single application of CGA and PE. Results: There were evident alterations in the PE because, at the hip, the internal-external rotation range decreases in the stance and swing phases. In the knee, there was a decrease in the flexion-extension range during the swing phase and in the ankle there was also a decrease in the dorsiflexion-plantarflexion range in the stance and swing phases. Conclusion: This study found that there was no concordance between PE and CGA. Therefore, these tests are complementary and provide information for a differential approach in clinical decision-making. © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SERMEF
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:58:43Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:58:43Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 487120
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2017.11.002
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22918
identifier_str_mv 487120
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 92
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 2
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 85
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Rehabilitacion
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 52
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Rehabilitacion, ISSN:487120, Vol.52, No.2 (2018); pp. 85-92
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042647294&doi=10.1016%2fj.rh.2017.11.002&partnerID=40&md5=f5eb408401af72736754c112af10562d
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Ediciones Doyma, S.L.
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167482065223680