A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia

Aim: This study aimed to assess patients' preferences for HIV treatment in an urban Colombian population. Methods: A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted. Urban Colombian HIV patients were asked to repetitively choose between two hypothetical treatments that differ in regard to five a...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24661
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24661
Palabra clave:
Discrete choice experiment
patient preference
human immunodeficiency virus treatment
urban population
Colombia
Bogota
conjoint analysis
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_4e3594fad828bb0d61d6bae821f8bf0f
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24661
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling a34ccc44-ad89-4da4-b5d1-579cc254955a475bf4ec-6baa-4d3c-8019-ee4fd971ddd86c2b68cd-8631-4356-b6b8-11b6f1c75764e19d8072-4e9c-4350-9626-4656e13e8ca967580566000717be58-4a4b-4d81-9aa2-fbf36ccdd17e2020-06-11T13:20:59Z2020-06-11T13:20:59Z2020-04-06Aim: This study aimed to assess patients' preferences for HIV treatment in an urban Colombian population. Methods: A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted. Urban Colombian HIV patients were asked to repetitively choose between two hypothetical treatments that differ in regard to five attributes 'effect on life expectancy', 'effect on physical activity', 'risk of moderate side effects, 'accessibility to clinic' and 'economic cost to access controls'. Twelve choice sets were made using an efficient design. A Mixed Logit Panel Model was used for the analysis and subgroup analyses were performed according to age, gender, education level and sexual preference. Results: A total of 224 HIV patients were included. All attributes were significant, indicating that there were differences between at least two levels of each attribute. Patients preferred to be able to perform all physical activity without difficulty, to have large positive effects on life expectancy, to travel less than 2 h, to have lower risk of side-effects and to have subsidized travel costs. The attributes 'effect on physical activity' and 'effects on life expectancy' were deemed the most important. Sub-analyses showed that higher educated patients placed more importance on the large positive effects of HIV treatment, and a more negative preference for subsidized travel cost (5% level). Limitations: A potential limitation is selection bias as it is difficult to make a systematic urban/rural division of respondents. Additional, questionnaires were partly administered in the waiting rooms, which potentially led to some noise in the data. Conclusions: Findings suggests that short-term efficacy (i.e. effect on physical activity) and long-term efficacy (i.e. effect on life expectancy) are the most important treatment characteristics for HIV urban patients in Colombia. Preference data could provide relevant information for clinical and policy decision-making to optimize HIV care.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.17353991369-69981941-837Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24661engJournal of Medical Economics11Journal of Medical EconomicsJournal of Medical Economics, ISSN: 1369-6998;1941-837X, No. (2020-04-06); pp. 1-1https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399?needAccess=trueAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURDiscrete choice experimentpatient preferencehuman immunodeficiency virus treatmenturban populationColombiaBogotaconjoint analysisA discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in ColombiaarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Sijstermans, EricCheung, Kei LongGoossens, Anne J MConde, RafaelGonzález Rodríguez, Javier LeonardoHiligsmann, Mickael10336/24661oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/246612021-09-01 12:45:40.926https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
title A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
spellingShingle A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
Discrete choice experiment
patient preference
human immunodeficiency virus treatment
urban population
Colombia
Bogota
conjoint analysis
title_short A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
title_full A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
title_fullStr A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
title_full_unstemmed A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
title_sort A discrete choice experiment to assess patients’ preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Discrete choice experiment
patient preference
human immunodeficiency virus treatment
urban population
Colombia
Bogota
conjoint analysis
topic Discrete choice experiment
patient preference
human immunodeficiency virus treatment
urban population
Colombia
Bogota
conjoint analysis
description Aim: This study aimed to assess patients' preferences for HIV treatment in an urban Colombian population. Methods: A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted. Urban Colombian HIV patients were asked to repetitively choose between two hypothetical treatments that differ in regard to five attributes 'effect on life expectancy', 'effect on physical activity', 'risk of moderate side effects, 'accessibility to clinic' and 'economic cost to access controls'. Twelve choice sets were made using an efficient design. A Mixed Logit Panel Model was used for the analysis and subgroup analyses were performed according to age, gender, education level and sexual preference. Results: A total of 224 HIV patients were included. All attributes were significant, indicating that there were differences between at least two levels of each attribute. Patients preferred to be able to perform all physical activity without difficulty, to have large positive effects on life expectancy, to travel less than 2 h, to have lower risk of side-effects and to have subsidized travel costs. The attributes 'effect on physical activity' and 'effects on life expectancy' were deemed the most important. Sub-analyses showed that higher educated patients placed more importance on the large positive effects of HIV treatment, and a more negative preference for subsidized travel cost (5% level). Limitations: A potential limitation is selection bias as it is difficult to make a systematic urban/rural division of respondents. Additional, questionnaires were partly administered in the waiting rooms, which potentially led to some noise in the data. Conclusions: Findings suggests that short-term efficacy (i.e. effect on physical activity) and long-term efficacy (i.e. effect on life expectancy) are the most important treatment characteristics for HIV urban patients in Colombia. Preference data could provide relevant information for clinical and policy decision-making to optimize HIV care.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-11T13:20:59Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-11T13:20:59Z
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-04-06
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1369-6998
1941-837X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24661
url https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24661
identifier_str_mv 1369-6998
1941-837X
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Medical Economics
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Medical Economics, ISSN: 1369-6998;1941-837X, No. (2020-04-06); pp. 1-1
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399?needAccess=true
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Medical Economics
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167491627188224