Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia

The goal of the Dialysis Outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study was to compare the survival of patients on hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a network of renal units in Colombia. The DOC study examined a historical cohort of incident patients starting dialysis therapy between 1 January 2001...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2008
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22502
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002619
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22502
Palabra clave:
Adult
Age distribution
Aged
Article
Cardiovascular disease
Colombia
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Diabetes mellitus
Disease severity
Female
Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis patient
Human
Intermethod comparison
Kidney function
Major clinical study
Male
Mortality
Patient education
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphate blood level
Priority journal
Small for date infant
Socioeconomics
Survival
Adolescent
Blood
Chronic kidney failure
Clinical trial
Comparative study
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Diabetes mellitus
Follow up
Kaplan meier method
Methodology
Middle aged
Multicenter study
Proportional hazards model
Treatment outcome
Phosphorus
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colombia
Diabetes complications
Female
Follow-up studies
Humans
Kaplan-meiers estimate
Male
Middle aged
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphorus
Proportional hazards models
Socioeconomic factors
Treatment outcome
Colombia
Dialysis
Hemodialysis
Mortality
Outcome
Peritoneal dialysis
Survival
continuous ambulatory
chronic
Kidney failure
Peritoneal dialysis
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_4ca5a21a8cc59fb8727e7b8e0574250d
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22502
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
title Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
spellingShingle Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
Adult
Age distribution
Aged
Article
Cardiovascular disease
Colombia
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Diabetes mellitus
Disease severity
Female
Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis patient
Human
Intermethod comparison
Kidney function
Major clinical study
Male
Mortality
Patient education
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphate blood level
Priority journal
Small for date infant
Socioeconomics
Survival
Adolescent
Blood
Chronic kidney failure
Clinical trial
Comparative study
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Diabetes mellitus
Follow up
Kaplan meier method
Methodology
Middle aged
Multicenter study
Proportional hazards model
Treatment outcome
Phosphorus
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colombia
Diabetes complications
Female
Follow-up studies
Humans
Kaplan-meiers estimate
Male
Middle aged
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphorus
Proportional hazards models
Socioeconomic factors
Treatment outcome
Colombia
Dialysis
Hemodialysis
Mortality
Outcome
Peritoneal dialysis
Survival
continuous ambulatory
chronic
Kidney failure
Peritoneal dialysis
title_short Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
title_full Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
title_fullStr Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
title_sort Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Adult
Age distribution
Aged
Article
Cardiovascular disease
Colombia
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Diabetes mellitus
Disease severity
Female
Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis patient
Human
Intermethod comparison
Kidney function
Major clinical study
Male
Mortality
Patient education
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphate blood level
Priority journal
Small for date infant
Socioeconomics
Survival
Adolescent
Blood
Chronic kidney failure
Clinical trial
Comparative study
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Diabetes mellitus
Follow up
Kaplan meier method
Methodology
Middle aged
Multicenter study
Proportional hazards model
Treatment outcome
Phosphorus
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colombia
Diabetes complications
Female
Follow-up studies
Humans
Kaplan-meiers estimate
Male
Middle aged
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphorus
Proportional hazards models
Socioeconomic factors
Treatment outcome
Colombia
Dialysis
Hemodialysis
Mortality
Outcome
Peritoneal dialysis
Survival
topic Adult
Age distribution
Aged
Article
Cardiovascular disease
Colombia
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Diabetes mellitus
Disease severity
Female
Hemodialysis
Hemodialysis patient
Human
Intermethod comparison
Kidney function
Major clinical study
Male
Mortality
Patient education
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphate blood level
Priority journal
Small for date infant
Socioeconomics
Survival
Adolescent
Blood
Chronic kidney failure
Clinical trial
Comparative study
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Diabetes mellitus
Follow up
Kaplan meier method
Methodology
Middle aged
Multicenter study
Proportional hazards model
Treatment outcome
Phosphorus
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colombia
Diabetes complications
Female
Follow-up studies
Humans
Kaplan-meiers estimate
Male
Middle aged
Peritoneal dialysis
Phosphorus
Proportional hazards models
Socioeconomic factors
Treatment outcome
Colombia
Dialysis
Hemodialysis
Mortality
Outcome
Peritoneal dialysis
Survival
continuous ambulatory
chronic
Kidney failure
Peritoneal dialysis
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv continuous ambulatory
chronic
Kidney failure
Peritoneal dialysis
description The goal of the Dialysis Outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study was to compare the survival of patients on hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a network of renal units in Colombia. The DOC study examined a historical cohort of incident patients starting dialysis therapy between 1 January 2001 and 1 December 2003 and followed until 1 December 2005, measuring demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables. Only patients older than 18 years were included. As-treated and intention-to-treat statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. There were 1094 eligible patients in total and 923 were actually enrolled: 47.3% started HD therapy and 52.7% started PD therapy. Of the patients studied, 751 (81.3%) remained in their initial therapy until the end of the follow-up period, death, or censorship. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, creatinine, calcium, and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) variables did not show statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups. Diabetes, socioeconomic level, educational level, phosphorus, Charlson Co-morbidity Index, and cardiovascular history did show a difference, and were less favorable for patients on PD. Residual renal function was greater for PD patients. Also, there were differences in the median survival time between groups: 27.2 months for PD vs 23.1 months for HD (P less than 0.001) by the intention-to-treat approach; and 24.5 months for PD vs 16.7 months for HD (P less than 0.001) by the as-treated approach. When performing univariate Cox analyses using the intention-to-treat approach, associations were with age ?65 years (hazard ratio (HR)=2.21; confidence interval (CI) 95% (1.77-2.755); P less than 0.001); history of cardiovascular disease (HR=1.96; CI 95% (1.58-2.90); P less than 0.001); diabetes (HR=2.34; CI 95% (1.88-2.90); P less than 0.001); and SGA (mild or moderate-severe malnutrition) (HR=1.47; CI 95% (1.17-1.79); P=0.001); but no association was found with gender (HR=1.03, CI 95% 0.83-1.27; P=0.786). Similar results were found with the as-treated approach, with additional associations found with Charlson Index (0-2) (HR=0.29; Cl 95% (0.22-0.38); P less than 0.001); Charlson Index (3-4) (HR=0.61; Cl 95% (0.48-0.79); P less than 0.001); and SGA (mild-severe malnutrition) (HR=1.43; Cl 95% (1.15-1.77); P less than 0.001). Similarly, the multivariate Cox model was run with the variables that had shown association in previous analyses, and it was found that the variables explaining the survival of patients with end-stage renal disease in our study were age, SGA, Charlson Comorbidity Index 5 and above, diabetes, healthcare regimes I and II, and socioeconomic level 2. The results of Cox proportional risk model in both the as-treated and intention-to-treat analyses showed that there were no statistically significant differences in survival of PD and HD patients: intention-to-treat HD/PD (HR 1.127; CI 95%: 0.855-1.484) and as-treated HD/PD (HR 1.231; CI 95%: 0.976-1.553). In this historical cohort of incident patients, there was a trend, although not statistically significant, for a higher (12.7%) adjusted mortality risk associated with HD when compared to PD, even though the PD patients were poorer, were more likely to be diabetic, and had higher co-morbidity scores than the HD patients. The variables that most influenced survival were age, diabetes, comorbidity, healthcare regime, socioeconomic level, nutrition, and education. © 2008 International Society of Nephrology.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2008
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:44Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:44Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002619
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 00852538
15231755
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22502
url https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002619
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22502
identifier_str_mv 00852538
15231755
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv S172
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. SUPPL. 108
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv S165
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Kidney International
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 73
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Kidney International, ISSN:00852538, 15231755, Vol.73, No.SUPPL. 108 (2008); pp. S165-S172
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-44449095268&doi=10.1038%2fsj.ki.5002619&partnerID=40&md5=bdd523c35c06d1f1e4e7ed41408dff04
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6377bc78-c537-4fb3-b49b-20729ac14283/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8ae8db42-1986-46b2-b098-f7eb27563ab9/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/121d0c50-d243-4aae-934e-bdaa086b1b5c/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 651ef1f3a04a98551da4ce369499e7f4
c2462b67cfeebfd24d56d41bc10221ae
817c89eb53d2890ce68a19f216225382
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1818106422265643008
spelling 9bcd494e-c735-4933-9bee-a0a1f4c410b4a9cfa202-369a-4d07-a417-507bf89e834379297795600ee90f2f1-8962-412f-a6c5-9857eaf3f67a39694049600e9785381-ac4e-4396-b9f4-d81226e76a6248358298-4f45-4744-9d81-c07d9c302c068e949816-58c8-4523-921f-cbc0a507a9ff9891c6ea-d1ee-4670-89a2-ce809e3b5db5cb017820-d724-4020-bb4e-e0a8e2120caa86f159f6-fdbc-423c-8b63-164647892c2421e3cc2b-385f-4821-a9ca-d9d7303f84ce61d4607d-716f-4977-84f2-81574329112eb4d126e7-2311-4f37-9367-4616d1eb8512ea26bdee-bdd7-4a2e-87b6-1af2e36b178f517c2a3a-71ed-4779-b6ca-39c22eafbc8487929377-53a2-4f6e-81a5-81d9ad5669fba4196283-2578-46fd-a9be-d3a596450c048ac751c6-decf-44e4-a429-c08cae2efd56bc713e03-9e8a-4cb5-97d4-aaef7017d4912020-05-25T23:56:44Z2020-05-25T23:56:44Z2008The goal of the Dialysis Outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study was to compare the survival of patients on hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a network of renal units in Colombia. The DOC study examined a historical cohort of incident patients starting dialysis therapy between 1 January 2001 and 1 December 2003 and followed until 1 December 2005, measuring demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables. Only patients older than 18 years were included. As-treated and intention-to-treat statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. There were 1094 eligible patients in total and 923 were actually enrolled: 47.3% started HD therapy and 52.7% started PD therapy. Of the patients studied, 751 (81.3%) remained in their initial therapy until the end of the follow-up period, death, or censorship. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, creatinine, calcium, and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) variables did not show statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups. Diabetes, socioeconomic level, educational level, phosphorus, Charlson Co-morbidity Index, and cardiovascular history did show a difference, and were less favorable for patients on PD. Residual renal function was greater for PD patients. Also, there were differences in the median survival time between groups: 27.2 months for PD vs 23.1 months for HD (P less than 0.001) by the intention-to-treat approach; and 24.5 months for PD vs 16.7 months for HD (P less than 0.001) by the as-treated approach. When performing univariate Cox analyses using the intention-to-treat approach, associations were with age ?65 years (hazard ratio (HR)=2.21; confidence interval (CI) 95% (1.77-2.755); P less than 0.001); history of cardiovascular disease (HR=1.96; CI 95% (1.58-2.90); P less than 0.001); diabetes (HR=2.34; CI 95% (1.88-2.90); P less than 0.001); and SGA (mild or moderate-severe malnutrition) (HR=1.47; CI 95% (1.17-1.79); P=0.001); but no association was found with gender (HR=1.03, CI 95% 0.83-1.27; P=0.786). Similar results were found with the as-treated approach, with additional associations found with Charlson Index (0-2) (HR=0.29; Cl 95% (0.22-0.38); P less than 0.001); Charlson Index (3-4) (HR=0.61; Cl 95% (0.48-0.79); P less than 0.001); and SGA (mild-severe malnutrition) (HR=1.43; Cl 95% (1.15-1.77); P less than 0.001). Similarly, the multivariate Cox model was run with the variables that had shown association in previous analyses, and it was found that the variables explaining the survival of patients with end-stage renal disease in our study were age, SGA, Charlson Comorbidity Index 5 and above, diabetes, healthcare regimes I and II, and socioeconomic level 2. The results of Cox proportional risk model in both the as-treated and intention-to-treat analyses showed that there were no statistically significant differences in survival of PD and HD patients: intention-to-treat HD/PD (HR 1.127; CI 95%: 0.855-1.484) and as-treated HD/PD (HR 1.231; CI 95%: 0.976-1.553). In this historical cohort of incident patients, there was a trend, although not statistically significant, for a higher (12.7%) adjusted mortality risk associated with HD when compared to PD, even though the PD patients were poorer, were more likely to be diabetic, and had higher co-morbidity scores than the HD patients. The variables that most influenced survival were age, diabetes, comorbidity, healthcare regime, socioeconomic level, nutrition, and education. © 2008 International Society of Nephrology.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.50026190085253815231755https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22502engNature Publishing GroupS172No. SUPPL. 108S165Kidney InternationalVol. 73Kidney International, ISSN:00852538, 15231755, Vol.73, No.SUPPL. 108 (2008); pp. S165-S172https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-44449095268&doi=10.1038%2fsj.ki.5002619&partnerID=40&md5=bdd523c35c06d1f1e4e7ed41408dff04Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAdultAge distributionAgedArticleCardiovascular diseaseColombiaComorbidityControlled studyDiabetes mellitusDisease severityFemaleHemodialysisHemodialysis patientHumanIntermethod comparisonKidney functionMajor clinical studyMaleMortalityPatient educationPeritoneal dialysisPhosphate blood levelPriority journalSmall for date infantSocioeconomicsSurvivalAdolescentBloodChronic kidney failureClinical trialComparative studyContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisDiabetes mellitusFollow upKaplan meier methodMethodologyMiddle agedMulticenter studyProportional hazards modelTreatment outcomePhosphorusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColombiaDiabetes complicationsFemaleFollow-up studiesHumansKaplan-meiers estimateMaleMiddle agedPeritoneal dialysisPhosphorusProportional hazards modelsSocioeconomic factorsTreatment outcomeColombiaDialysisHemodialysisMortalityOutcomePeritoneal dialysisSurvivalcontinuous ambulatorychronicKidney failurePeritoneal dialysisDialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in ColombiaarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Sanabria, M.Muñoz, J.Trillos Peña, Carlos EnriqueHernández, G.Latorre Santos, CatalinaDíaz, C.S.Murad, S.Rodríguez, K.Rivera, ÁAmador, A.Ardila, F.Caicedo, A.Camargo, D.Díaz, A.González, J.Leguizamón, H.Lopera, P.Marín, L.Nieto, I.Vargas, E.ORIGINALPIIS0085253815528779.pdfapplication/pdf214545https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6377bc78-c537-4fb3-b49b-20729ac14283/download651ef1f3a04a98551da4ce369499e7f4MD51TEXTPIIS0085253815528779.pdf.txtPIIS0085253815528779.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain37165https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8ae8db42-1986-46b2-b098-f7eb27563ab9/downloadc2462b67cfeebfd24d56d41bc10221aeMD52THUMBNAILPIIS0085253815528779.pdf.jpgPIIS0085253815528779.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5457https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/121d0c50-d243-4aae-934e-bdaa086b1b5c/download817c89eb53d2890ce68a19f216225382MD5310336/22502oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/225022022-05-02 07:37:17.467997https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co