The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue
This paper argues that the evaluation of religious truth claims is one of the conditions for the possibility of interreligious dialogue. This thesis takes distance from the theories that, bracketing the truth of religious claims, suggest that it is enough with argumentative, pragmatic or ethical cri...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23377
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx68-185.dvdi
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23377
- Palabra clave:
- Criterios para el diálogo interreligioso
Diversidad religiosa
Normative elements of interreligious dialogue
Religious diversity
Religious truth
Verdad religiosa
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_4985633c495a6a65141c17bfdefb486a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23377 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
796915496002020-05-26T00:01:31Z2020-05-26T00:01:31Z2018This paper argues that the evaluation of religious truth claims is one of the conditions for the possibility of interreligious dialogue. This thesis takes distance from the theories that, bracketing the truth of religious claims, suggest that it is enough with argumentative, pragmatic or ethical criteria for making dialogue possible. Firstly, it explores the role of truth in dialogue; then it analyses the features and functions of religious truth claims, showing its differences with regard to other types of truth. The last part presents two criteria to evaluate the truth of religious claims in dialogue-one based on the meaning-giving function of religion, and the other on the historical and relational character of religious truth. © 2018, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.Este artículo defiende la posibilidad de evaluar la verdad de las posturas presentadas en el diálogo interreligioso como una de sus condiciones de posibilidad. Con esto se separa de las teorías del diálogo que pretenden formular criterios argumentativos, pragmáticos o éticos dejando en suspenso la pretensión de verdad de las religiones. En la primera parte se explora el lugar de la verdad en el diálogo; en la segunda se analizan las características de las pretensiones de verdad religiosa y sus diferencias con otros tipos de verdad; finalmente, se proponen dos criterios para evaluar la verdad en un diálogo interreligioso basados en la función dadora de sentido de las religiones y en el carácter relacional e histórico de la verdad religiosa. © 2018, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx68-185.dvdi2011219Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23377spaPontificia Universidad JaverianaNo. 185Theologica XaverianaVol. 68Theologica Xaveriana, ISSN:2011219X, Vol.68, No.185 (2018)https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056768450&doi=10.11144%2fjaveriana.tx68-185.dvdi&partnerID=40&md5=487416c49377c28e6224e173b9eefc68Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCriterios para el diálogo interreligiosoDiversidad religiosaNormative elements of interreligious dialogueReligious diversityReligious truthVerdad religiosaThe challenge of truth to interreligious dialogueEl desafío de la verdad al diálogo interreligiosoarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Gómez Rincón, Carlos MiguelORIGINAL21274-Texto-del-articulo-81307-1-10-20180213.pdfapplication/pdf346542https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/071c6dae-4d1f-4a33-845a-6b4c7816f94c/downloade49a56b01664119f16bf42e08fb3f8c0MD51TEXT21274-Texto-del-articulo-81307-1-10-20180213.pdf.txt21274-Texto-del-articulo-81307-1-10-20180213.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain66523https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8271ce65-38ef-438f-8b52-c98ad85b4cd2/downloade460c5fea00cef36940b8003ce5ab3ebMD52THUMBNAIL21274-Texto-del-articulo-81307-1-10-20180213.pdf.jpg21274-Texto-del-articulo-81307-1-10-20180213.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3934https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8cb0f5e2-8273-4ef0-8a87-310d1f9ea3b1/downloaddfa8f46a142bd3926e7ba07fafc69fddMD5310336/23377oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/233772022-05-02 07:37:17.87104https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
El desafío de la verdad al diálogo interreligioso |
title |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
spellingShingle |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue Criterios para el diálogo interreligioso Diversidad religiosa Normative elements of interreligious dialogue Religious diversity Religious truth Verdad religiosa |
title_short |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
title_full |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
title_fullStr |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
title_full_unstemmed |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
title_sort |
The challenge of truth to interreligious dialogue |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Criterios para el diálogo interreligioso Diversidad religiosa Normative elements of interreligious dialogue Religious diversity Religious truth Verdad religiosa |
topic |
Criterios para el diálogo interreligioso Diversidad religiosa Normative elements of interreligious dialogue Religious diversity Religious truth Verdad religiosa |
description |
This paper argues that the evaluation of religious truth claims is one of the conditions for the possibility of interreligious dialogue. This thesis takes distance from the theories that, bracketing the truth of religious claims, suggest that it is enough with argumentative, pragmatic or ethical criteria for making dialogue possible. Firstly, it explores the role of truth in dialogue; then it analyses the features and functions of religious truth claims, showing its differences with regard to other types of truth. The last part presents two criteria to evaluate the truth of religious claims in dialogue-one based on the meaning-giving function of religion, and the other on the historical and relational character of religious truth. © 2018, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.Este artículo defiende la posibilidad de evaluar la verdad de las posturas presentadas en el diálogo interreligioso como una de sus condiciones de posibilidad. Con esto se separa de las teorías del diálogo que pretenden formular criterios argumentativos, pragmáticos o éticos dejando en suspenso la pretensión de verdad de las religiones. En la primera parte se explora el lugar de la verdad en el diálogo; en la segunda se analizan las características de las pretensiones de verdad religiosa y sus diferencias con otros tipos de verdad; finalmente, se proponen dos criterios para evaluar la verdad en un diálogo interreligioso basados en la función dadora de sentido de las religiones y en el carácter relacional e histórico de la verdad religiosa. © 2018, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:01:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:01:31Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx68-185.dvdi |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011219X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23377 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.tx68-185.dvdi https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23377 |
identifier_str_mv |
2011219X |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 185 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Theologica Xaveriana |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 68 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Theologica Xaveriana, ISSN:2011219X, Vol.68, No.185 (2018) |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056768450&doi=10.11144%2fjaveriana.tx68-185.dvdi&partnerID=40&md5=487416c49377c28e6224e173b9eefc68 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/071c6dae-4d1f-4a33-845a-6b4c7816f94c/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8271ce65-38ef-438f-8b52-c98ad85b4cd2/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8cb0f5e2-8273-4ef0-8a87-310d1f9ea3b1/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e49a56b01664119f16bf42e08fb3f8c0 e460c5fea00cef36940b8003ce5ab3eb dfa8f46a142bd3926e7ba07fafc69fdd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167546118537216 |