Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice
There is resistance to policies that would reduce overall consumption levels to promote sustainability. In part, this resistance is aided by the economic concept of consumer sovereignty (CS) and its presumption that choice promotes wellbeing. We investigate the concept of consumer sovereignty in the...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26977
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13528328798273
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26977
- Palabra clave:
- Consumer sovereignty
Decision-making traits
Deliberative decision-making
Human impact on ecosystems
Ignorance
Uncertainty
- Rights
- License
- Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id |
EDOCUR2_40e7001d998c5b517009beddfc11a251 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26977 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
5f0e40e2-f818-477d-843f-a5e4c2d9ef07-16675616002020-08-19T14:40:39Z2020-08-19T14:40:39Z2013-02-01There is resistance to policies that would reduce overall consumption levels to promote sustainability. In part, this resistance is aided by the economic concept of consumer sovereignty (CS) and its presumption that choice promotes wellbeing. We investigate the concept of consumer sovereignty in the context of deepening concerns about sustainability and scrutinise whether the two concepts are compatible. We draw on new findings in psychology on human decision-making traits; we take into account increasing awareness about human dependencies on 'functioning' ecosystems and uncertainties on how ecosystems, human activities and human wellbeing are interlinked. We conclude that commitment to the concept of consumer sovereignty is incompatible with sustainability due to human characteristics, the difficult-to-predict behaviour of ecological systems and ignorance about the impact of human action on natural systems. We propose that the choice-set of available goods and services on markets should be constrained when consumption patterns can be linked to degradation of services provided by nature when those services are seen as crucial for human wellbeing. We advocate constraining the available choice-set through established governmental institutions aided by deliberative processes that engage members of the general public. Finally, we acknowledge that such processes are imperfect; nevertheless, we foresee that they will be essential for fostering wise decision-making and moving towards sustainability.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13528328798273ISSN: 0963-2719EISSN: 1752-7015https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26977engWhite Horse Press79No. 559Environmental ValuesVol. 22Environmental Values, ISSN: 0963-2719; EISSN: 1752-7015, Vol.22, No.5 (2013); pp. 59-79https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2013/00000022/00000001/art00007;jsessionid=2mrkd2fqdfees.x-ic-live-02Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecEnvironmental Valuesinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURConsumer sovereigntyDecision-making traitsDeliberative decision-makingHuman impact on ecosystemsIgnoranceUncertaintySovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on ChoiceCiudadanos soberanos y consumidores restringidos: por qué la sostenibilidad requiere límites en la elecciónarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Menzel, SusanneGreen , Tom L.10336/26977oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/269772022-05-02 07:37:21.868887https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ciudadanos soberanos y consumidores restringidos: por qué la sostenibilidad requiere límites en la elección |
title |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
spellingShingle |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice Consumer sovereignty Decision-making traits Deliberative decision-making Human impact on ecosystems Ignorance Uncertainty |
title_short |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
title_full |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
title_fullStr |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
title_sort |
Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Consumer sovereignty Decision-making traits Deliberative decision-making Human impact on ecosystems Ignorance Uncertainty |
topic |
Consumer sovereignty Decision-making traits Deliberative decision-making Human impact on ecosystems Ignorance Uncertainty |
description |
There is resistance to policies that would reduce overall consumption levels to promote sustainability. In part, this resistance is aided by the economic concept of consumer sovereignty (CS) and its presumption that choice promotes wellbeing. We investigate the concept of consumer sovereignty in the context of deepening concerns about sustainability and scrutinise whether the two concepts are compatible. We draw on new findings in psychology on human decision-making traits; we take into account increasing awareness about human dependencies on 'functioning' ecosystems and uncertainties on how ecosystems, human activities and human wellbeing are interlinked. We conclude that commitment to the concept of consumer sovereignty is incompatible with sustainability due to human characteristics, the difficult-to-predict behaviour of ecological systems and ignorance about the impact of human action on natural systems. We propose that the choice-set of available goods and services on markets should be constrained when consumption patterns can be linked to degradation of services provided by nature when those services are seen as crucial for human wellbeing. We advocate constraining the available choice-set through established governmental institutions aided by deliberative processes that engage members of the general public. Finally, we acknowledge that such processes are imperfect; nevertheless, we foresee that they will be essential for fostering wise decision-making and moving towards sustainability. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-19T14:40:39Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-19T14:40:39Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13528328798273 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
ISSN: 0963-2719 EISSN: 1752-7015 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26977 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13528328798273 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26977 |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN: 0963-2719 EISSN: 1752-7015 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
79 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 5 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
59 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Values |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 22 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Values, ISSN: 0963-2719; EISSN: 1752-7015, Vol.22, No.5 (2013); pp. 59-79 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2013/00000022/00000001/art00007;jsessionid=2mrkd2fqdfees.x-ic-live-02 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
White Horse Press |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Values |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1818106582647439360 |