Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes

En la actualidad, los problemas complejos se empiezan a replantear desde las personas y los escenarios donde se generan. El sector público, el sector privado, la academia y la ciudadanía cada vez son más conscientes del grado de importancia de sinergia en la resolución de estos retos. Los laboratori...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/39996
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996
Palabra clave:
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública
Laboratorios de Innovación Social
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
Public Innovation Laboratories
Social Innovation Laboratories
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
id EDOCUR2_3852fd90104955fc572debdfc6a85516
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/39996
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.none.fl_str_mv Public and Social innovation labs: differences and similarities
title Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
spellingShingle Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública
Laboratorios de Innovación Social
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
Public Innovation Laboratories
Social Innovation Laboratories
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
title_short Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
title_full Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
title_fullStr Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
title_full_unstemmed Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
title_sort Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Serrano Cárdenas, Lizeth Fernanda
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Laboratorios de Innovación Pública
Laboratorios de Innovación Social
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
topic Laboratorios de Innovación Pública
Laboratorios de Innovación Social
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
Public Innovation Laboratories
Social Innovation Laboratories
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv Public Innovation Laboratories
Social Innovation Laboratories
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
description En la actualidad, los problemas complejos se empiezan a replantear desde las personas y los escenarios donde se generan. El sector público, el sector privado, la academia y la ciudadanía cada vez son más conscientes del grado de importancia de sinergia en la resolución de estos retos. Los laboratorios se han constituido en escenarios colaborativos para generar propuestas de solución a estos problemas. Son espacios de sinergia entre distintas disciplinas y stakeholders bajo metodologías de experimentación que permiten generar convergencias entre perspectivas de solución heterogéneas. Esta revisión de literatura tiene como propósito conceptualizar los Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social como centros de ideación y creación de soluciones a problemáticas, identificar posibles barreras y/o desafíos que enfrentan y reconocer las metodologías que integran en el desarrollo de su ejercicio, esto, con el fin de evidenciar sus diferencias y similitudes contribuyendo a su comprensión y acelerando los procesos de puesta en marcha. La metodología usada en esta revisión fue la de Tranfield (Tranfield et al., 2003). La información se obtuvo de la base de datos multidisciplinar Web of Science, se utilizó el software de codificación de la información NVIVO y se generaron matrices analíticas para sintetizar los hallazgos del ejercicio de revisión. Los resultados evidencian que tanto los laboratorios públicos y sociales enmarcan sus procesos en el trabajo colaborativo y en la incorporación de metodologías relacionadas a la experimentación. Una de las diferencias entre los dos espacios, está relacionado con el tipo de problemas que resuelven y con la financiación que los sostiene. Mientras los laboratorios sociales resuelven problemáticas ligadas a temas de interés social como: pobreza y desigualdad, los laboratorios públicos atienden problemáticas que se necesitan de un compromiso institucional, y, por ende, tienen alta dependencia de las entidades gubernamentales para cumplir sus propósitos. Las limitaciones de esta revisión consisten en una asimetría en la información, en la literatura se ha investigado más a los Policy labs que a los otros laboratorios del sector público.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-29T18:16:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-29T18:16:31Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv bachelorThesis
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.document.none.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996
url https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 54 pp
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv Escuela de Administración
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Administración de Negocios Internacionales
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.none.fl_str_mv Asenbaum, H., & Hanusch, F. (2021). (De)futuring democracy: Labs, playgrounds, and ateliers as democratic innovations. En FUTURES (Vol. 134). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102836
Asplund, F., Bjork, J., Magnusson, M., & Patrick, A. J. (2021). The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges. En TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (Vol. 162). ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378
Braun, R., Loeber, A., Christensen, M. V., Cohen, J., Frankus, E., Griessler, E., Hoenigmayer, H., & Starkbaum, J. (s. f.). Social labs as temporary intermediary learning organizations to help implement complex normative policies. The case of Responsible Research and Innovation in European science governance. En LEARNING ORGANIZATION. EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0118
Brock, K. L. (2021). Policy labs, partners and policy effectiveness in Canada. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 228-241). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1880063
Broekema, P. M., Bulder, E. A. M., & Horlings, L. G. (2022). Same same, but different ...? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 344-363). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020
Cole, L. (2022). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 5, Número 2, pp. 164-182). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619
Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martin, F., Silvan, A., & Isidro Filho, A. (2021). Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in post-New Public Management Contexts. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 44, Número 6, pp. 451-464). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181
Dekker, R., Contreras, J. F., & Meijer, A. (2020). The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: A Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 43, Número 14, pp. 1207-1217). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668410
Evans, B., & Cheng, S. M. (2021). Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work? En CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA (Vol. 64, Número 4, pp. 587-610). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12438
Ferrarezi, E., Brandalise, I., & Lemos, J. (2021). Evaluating experimentation in the public sector: Learning from a Brazilian innovation lab. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 292-308). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1930686
Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 3, Números 2, SI, pp. 150-162). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761
Fleischer, J., & Carstens, N. (2022). Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning: Inside the digital transformation in Germany. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 24, Número 8, pp. 1208-1225). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893803
Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 1). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390
Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Rohnebaek, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. En ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES (Vol. 11, Número 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058
Hjelmar, U. (2021). The institutionalization of public sector innovation. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 1, pp. 53-69). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702
Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Gallacher, J., Irwin, T., & James, D. (2019). FE and skills—Is the `UK laboratory’ open for expansive policy learning? En JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK (Vol. 32, Números 3, SI, pp. 277-291). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1621272
Kieboom, Marlieke. (2014). Lab Matters: Challenging the practice of social innovation laboratories. 2–44.
Komatsu, T., Salgado, M., Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2021). Policy labs challenges in the public sector: The value of design for more responsive organizations. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 271-291). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1917173
Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2020). The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 281-297). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1668657
Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 242-251). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077
Lewis, J. M., Mcgann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 111-130). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081
Lindquist, E. A., & Buttazzoni, M. (2021). The ecology of open innovation units: Adhocracy and competing values in public service systems. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 212-227). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1941569
Marcelloni, Claudia. (2019). The 3 T’s framework of social innovation labs (edsair.doi.dedup.....89c38d3db3efa46cd51afb5e46a011a2). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2019.872
Marschalek, I., Blok, V., Bernstein, M., Braun, R., Cohen, J., Hofer, M., Seebacher, L. M., Unterfrauner, E., Daimler, S., Nieminen, M., Christensen, M. V., & Thapa, R. K. (2022). The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 9, Número 3, pp. 419-442). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2119003
McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. En POLICY SCIENCES (Vol. 51, Número 3, pp. 249-267). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 2, pp. 297-316). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2021). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. En PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 44, Número 1, pp. 136-154). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954
Olavo, A. V. A., Beneyto, G. P., Nebot, C. P., & Emmendoerfer, M. L. (2022). PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION LABORATORIES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS BETWEEN BRAZIL AND SPAIN. En REVISTA DE GESTAO E PROJETOS (Vol. 13, Número 2, pp. 89-115). UNIV NOVE JULHO. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v13i2.21972
Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widla, A., & Park, Y. (2020). Policy labs: The next frontier of policy design and evaluation? En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 89-110). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420108
Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Ismael Pena, J. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. En JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT (Número 31, pp. 69-100). DE BOECK UNIV. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.031.0069
Peters, B. G. (2020). Designing institutions for designing policy. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 131-147). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420090
Polvora, A., & Nascimento, S. (2021). Foresight and design fictions meet at a policy lab: An experimentation approach in public sector innovation. En FUTURES (Vol. 128). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102709
Promsiri, T., Sukavejworakit, K., Keerativutisest, V., Virasa, T., & Kampanthong, K. (2022). Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 14, Número 12). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127427
Rodriguez, L. A., Alejandra Velez, M., & Pfaff, A. (2021). Leaders’ distributional & efficiency effects in collective responses to policy: Lab-in-field experiments with small-scale gold miners in Colombia. En WORLD DEVELOPMENT (Vol. 147). PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105648
Shin, S. R., Lee, J., Jung, Y. R., & Hwang, J. (2022). The diffusion of scientific discoveries in government laboratories: The role of patents filed by government scientists. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 5). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104496
Spaa, A., Spencer, N., Durrant, A., & Vines, J. (2022). Creative and collaborative reflective thinking to support policy deliberation and decision making. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 18, Números 2, SI, pp. 376-390). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16474564583952
Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. O. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: The case of responsible research and innovation. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 7, Número 3, pp. 410-426). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Trei, D. T., Hornung, J., Rychlik, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021). From political motivation to scientific knowledge: Classifying policy labs in the science-policy nexus. En EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES (Vol. 29, Número 12, pp. 2340-2356). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785
Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation Labs in the Public Sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance-The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 11, Número 21). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103
Urmanaviciene, A., Kostalova, J., Baturina, D., Krzyworzeka, P., Budryte, P., & Lepik, K.-L. (2022). Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 381-401). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0022
Valente, A., Tudisca, V., Demurtas, P., Sandu, P., Baba, C. O., Durmishi, E., & Consortium, D. (2018). Actors Engagement and Tailored Methods in Physical Education and Sport Curriculum as a Policy Lab. En RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, GENDER AND ETHICS: CASES AND EXPERIENCES (pp. 9-13). SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_2
Vicens, J., Perello, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. En PLOS ONE (Vol. 13, Número 12). PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219
Wellstead, A. M., & Howlett, M. (2022). (Re)Thinking think tanks in the age of policy labs: The rise of knowledge-based policy influence organisations. En AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 81, Número 1, pp. 224-232). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12528
Williamson, B. (2015). Governing methods: Policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038693
Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 252-270). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834
Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab. En PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT (Vol. 39, Número 4, pp. 290-299). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920
Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2021). Social innovation laboratories for the social construction of knowledge: Systematic review of literature. En TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA (Vol. 14, Número 3). UNIV FED MINAS GERAIS, FAC LETRAS. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33750
Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2022). Measurement of the social construction of knowledge: Validation and reliability of the K-Social-C instrument. En SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING (Vol. 12, Número 1). SPRINGER WIEN. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00868-x
Yoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. En JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (Vol. 11, Número 3, pp. 1120-1144). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00595-3
Zeigermann, U., & Ettelt, S. (s. f.). Spanning the boundaries between policy, politics and science to solve wicked problems: Policy pilots, deliberation fora and policy labs. En SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE. SPRINGER JAPAN KK. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01187-y
Zhu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Comparison of Policy Experiments: Practices in Asia. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 275-280). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1711059
Zurbriggen, C., & Lago, M. G. (2019). An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 15, Números 3, SI, pp. 437-451). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15537488717501
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a6573bf4-4485-46b2-ab76-c49d715b87c2/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/db3e8884-087a-4f8c-9dcf-93b17d375c08/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/edaaa651-7ce2-4811-a9ab-3fdf93869345/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/688b6ab3-3079-4111-85f9-2ca6044a4bbe/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f78916ec-415a-4987-b351-d41d2857d54b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 85d2c1e1c2e72dc92a233859df2492d5
b2825df9f458e9d5d96ee8b7cd74fde6
5643bfd9bcf29d560eeec56d584edaa9
6eb935744a5fb636e461e9be7512eb71
8e90cfb348395dfdfe1668bb041e28c7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390657088159744
spelling Serrano Cárdenas, Lizeth Fernanda1098706093600Corrales Benavides, Natalia CarolinaAdministrador de Negocios InternacionalesPregradoFull time8eaf88f5-f6b8-4923-ad70-af9032a6ae21-12023-06-29T18:16:31Z2023-06-29T18:16:31Z2023-06-11En la actualidad, los problemas complejos se empiezan a replantear desde las personas y los escenarios donde se generan. El sector público, el sector privado, la academia y la ciudadanía cada vez son más conscientes del grado de importancia de sinergia en la resolución de estos retos. Los laboratorios se han constituido en escenarios colaborativos para generar propuestas de solución a estos problemas. Son espacios de sinergia entre distintas disciplinas y stakeholders bajo metodologías de experimentación que permiten generar convergencias entre perspectivas de solución heterogéneas. Esta revisión de literatura tiene como propósito conceptualizar los Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social como centros de ideación y creación de soluciones a problemáticas, identificar posibles barreras y/o desafíos que enfrentan y reconocer las metodologías que integran en el desarrollo de su ejercicio, esto, con el fin de evidenciar sus diferencias y similitudes contribuyendo a su comprensión y acelerando los procesos de puesta en marcha. La metodología usada en esta revisión fue la de Tranfield (Tranfield et al., 2003). La información se obtuvo de la base de datos multidisciplinar Web of Science, se utilizó el software de codificación de la información NVIVO y se generaron matrices analíticas para sintetizar los hallazgos del ejercicio de revisión. Los resultados evidencian que tanto los laboratorios públicos y sociales enmarcan sus procesos en el trabajo colaborativo y en la incorporación de metodologías relacionadas a la experimentación. Una de las diferencias entre los dos espacios, está relacionado con el tipo de problemas que resuelven y con la financiación que los sostiene. Mientras los laboratorios sociales resuelven problemáticas ligadas a temas de interés social como: pobreza y desigualdad, los laboratorios públicos atienden problemáticas que se necesitan de un compromiso institucional, y, por ende, tienen alta dependencia de las entidades gubernamentales para cumplir sus propósitos. Las limitaciones de esta revisión consisten en una asimetría en la información, en la literatura se ha investigado más a los Policy labs que a los otros laboratorios del sector público.Today, complex problems are beginning to be rethought from the perspective of the people and the scenarios where they are generated. The public sector, the private sector, academia, and citizens are increasingly aware of the importance of synergy in the resolution of these challenges. Laboratories have become collaborative scenarios to generate proper solutions to complex problems. These labs are synergy spaces capable of gathering different stakeholders from distinct disciplines under experimentation methodologies that allow heterogeneous solution perspectives. The purpose of this literature review is to conceptualize Public and Social Innovation Labs as centers of ideation and creation of solutions to problems, to identify possible barriers and/or challenges they face and to recognize the methodologies they integrate in the development of their exercise to highlight their differences and similarities. Contributing to their understanding and accelerating the implementation processes. The methodology used in this review was that of Tranfield (Tranfield et al., 2003). The information was obtained from the Web of Science multidisciplinary database. NVIVO information coding software was used, and analytical matrices were generated to synthesize the findings of the review exercise. The results show that both public and social laboratories frame their processes in collaborative work and in the incorporation of methodologies related to experimentation. One of the differences between the two laboratories is related to the type of problems they solve and the funding that supports them. While social laboratories solve problems linked to issues of social interest such as poverty and inequality, public laboratories address problems that require institutional commitment and, therefore, are highly dependent on governmental entities to fulfill their purposes. The limitations of this review consist of an asymmetry in the information, as Policy labs have been investigated more in the literature than other public sector laboratories.54 ppapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996spaUniversidad del RosarioEscuela de AdministraciónAdministración de Negocios InternacionalesAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 InternationalEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Asenbaum, H., & Hanusch, F. (2021). (De)futuring democracy: Labs, playgrounds, and ateliers as democratic innovations. En FUTURES (Vol. 134). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102836Asplund, F., Bjork, J., Magnusson, M., & Patrick, A. J. (2021). The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges. En TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (Vol. 162). ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378Braun, R., Loeber, A., Christensen, M. V., Cohen, J., Frankus, E., Griessler, E., Hoenigmayer, H., & Starkbaum, J. (s. f.). Social labs as temporary intermediary learning organizations to help implement complex normative policies. The case of Responsible Research and Innovation in European science governance. En LEARNING ORGANIZATION. EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0118Brock, K. L. (2021). Policy labs, partners and policy effectiveness in Canada. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 228-241). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1880063Broekema, P. M., Bulder, E. A. M., & Horlings, L. G. (2022). Same same, but different ...? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 344-363). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020Cole, L. (2022). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 5, Número 2, pp. 164-182). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martin, F., Silvan, A., & Isidro Filho, A. (2021). Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in post-New Public Management Contexts. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 44, Número 6, pp. 451-464). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181Dekker, R., Contreras, J. F., & Meijer, A. (2020). The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: A Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 43, Número 14, pp. 1207-1217). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668410Evans, B., & Cheng, S. M. (2021). Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work? En CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA (Vol. 64, Número 4, pp. 587-610). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12438Ferrarezi, E., Brandalise, I., & Lemos, J. (2021). Evaluating experimentation in the public sector: Learning from a Brazilian innovation lab. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 292-308). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1930686Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 3, Números 2, SI, pp. 150-162). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761Fleischer, J., & Carstens, N. (2022). Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning: Inside the digital transformation in Germany. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 24, Número 8, pp. 1208-1225). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893803Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 1). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Rohnebaek, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. En ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES (Vol. 11, Número 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058Hjelmar, U. (2021). The institutionalization of public sector innovation. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 1, pp. 53-69). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Gallacher, J., Irwin, T., & James, D. (2019). FE and skills—Is the `UK laboratory’ open for expansive policy learning? En JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK (Vol. 32, Números 3, SI, pp. 277-291). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1621272Kieboom, Marlieke. (2014). Lab Matters: Challenging the practice of social innovation laboratories. 2–44.Komatsu, T., Salgado, M., Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2021). Policy labs challenges in the public sector: The value of design for more responsive organizations. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 271-291). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1917173Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2020). The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 281-297). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1668657Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 242-251). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077Lewis, J. M., Mcgann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 111-130). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081Lindquist, E. A., & Buttazzoni, M. (2021). The ecology of open innovation units: Adhocracy and competing values in public service systems. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 212-227). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1941569Marcelloni, Claudia. (2019). The 3 T’s framework of social innovation labs (edsair.doi.dedup.....89c38d3db3efa46cd51afb5e46a011a2). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2019.872Marschalek, I., Blok, V., Bernstein, M., Braun, R., Cohen, J., Hofer, M., Seebacher, L. M., Unterfrauner, E., Daimler, S., Nieminen, M., Christensen, M. V., & Thapa, R. K. (2022). The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 9, Número 3, pp. 419-442). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2119003McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. En POLICY SCIENCES (Vol. 51, Número 3, pp. 249-267). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 2, pp. 297-316). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2021). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. En PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 44, Número 1, pp. 136-154). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954Olavo, A. V. A., Beneyto, G. P., Nebot, C. P., & Emmendoerfer, M. L. (2022). PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION LABORATORIES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS BETWEEN BRAZIL AND SPAIN. En REVISTA DE GESTAO E PROJETOS (Vol. 13, Número 2, pp. 89-115). UNIV NOVE JULHO. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v13i2.21972Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widla, A., & Park, Y. (2020). Policy labs: The next frontier of policy design and evaluation? En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 89-110). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420108Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Ismael Pena, J. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. En JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT (Número 31, pp. 69-100). DE BOECK UNIV. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.031.0069Peters, B. G. (2020). Designing institutions for designing policy. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 131-147). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420090Polvora, A., & Nascimento, S. (2021). Foresight and design fictions meet at a policy lab: An experimentation approach in public sector innovation. En FUTURES (Vol. 128). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102709Promsiri, T., Sukavejworakit, K., Keerativutisest, V., Virasa, T., & Kampanthong, K. (2022). Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 14, Número 12). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127427Rodriguez, L. A., Alejandra Velez, M., & Pfaff, A. (2021). Leaders’ distributional & efficiency effects in collective responses to policy: Lab-in-field experiments with small-scale gold miners in Colombia. En WORLD DEVELOPMENT (Vol. 147). PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105648Shin, S. R., Lee, J., Jung, Y. R., & Hwang, J. (2022). The diffusion of scientific discoveries in government laboratories: The role of patents filed by government scientists. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 5). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104496Spaa, A., Spencer, N., Durrant, A., & Vines, J. (2022). Creative and collaborative reflective thinking to support policy deliberation and decision making. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 18, Números 2, SI, pp. 376-390). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16474564583952Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. O. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: The case of responsible research and innovation. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 7, Número 3, pp. 410-426). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375Trei, D. T., Hornung, J., Rychlik, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021). From political motivation to scientific knowledge: Classifying policy labs in the science-policy nexus. En EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES (Vol. 29, Número 12, pp. 2340-2356). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation Labs in the Public Sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance-The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 11, Número 21). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103Urmanaviciene, A., Kostalova, J., Baturina, D., Krzyworzeka, P., Budryte, P., & Lepik, K.-L. (2022). Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 381-401). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0022Valente, A., Tudisca, V., Demurtas, P., Sandu, P., Baba, C. O., Durmishi, E., & Consortium, D. (2018). Actors Engagement and Tailored Methods in Physical Education and Sport Curriculum as a Policy Lab. En RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, GENDER AND ETHICS: CASES AND EXPERIENCES (pp. 9-13). SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_2Vicens, J., Perello, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. En PLOS ONE (Vol. 13, Número 12). PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219Wellstead, A. M., & Howlett, M. (2022). (Re)Thinking think tanks in the age of policy labs: The rise of knowledge-based policy influence organisations. En AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 81, Número 1, pp. 224-232). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12528Williamson, B. (2015). Governing methods: Policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038693Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 252-270). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab. En PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT (Vol. 39, Número 4, pp. 290-299). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2021). Social innovation laboratories for the social construction of knowledge: Systematic review of literature. En TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA (Vol. 14, Número 3). UNIV FED MINAS GERAIS, FAC LETRAS. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33750Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2022). Measurement of the social construction of knowledge: Validation and reliability of the K-Social-C instrument. En SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING (Vol. 12, Número 1). SPRINGER WIEN. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00868-xYoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. En JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (Vol. 11, Número 3, pp. 1120-1144). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00595-3Zeigermann, U., & Ettelt, S. (s. f.). Spanning the boundaries between policy, politics and science to solve wicked problems: Policy pilots, deliberation fora and policy labs. En SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE. SPRINGER JAPAN KK. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01187-yZhu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Comparison of Policy Experiments: Practices in Asia. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 275-280). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1711059Zurbriggen, C., & Lago, M. G. (2019). An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 15, Números 3, SI, pp. 437-451). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15537488717501instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURLaboratorios de Innovación PúblicaLaboratorios de Innovación SocialGov LabsPolicy LabsPSI LabsPublic Innovation LaboratoriesSocial Innovation LaboratoriesGov LabsPolicy LabsPSI LabsLaboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudesPublic and Social innovation labs: differences and similaritiesbachelorThesisTrabajo de gradoTrabajo de gradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fEscuela de AdministraciónORIGINALLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdfLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdfapplication/pdf583668https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a6573bf4-4485-46b2-ab76-c49d715b87c2/download85d2c1e1c2e72dc92a233859df2492d5MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1483https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/db3e8884-087a-4f8c-9dcf-93b17d375c08/downloadb2825df9f458e9d5d96ee8b7cd74fde6MD52CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81160https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/edaaa651-7ce2-4811-a9ab-3fdf93869345/download5643bfd9bcf29d560eeec56d584edaa9MD53TEXTLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.txtLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain72455https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/688b6ab3-3079-4111-85f9-2ca6044a4bbe/download6eb935744a5fb636e461e9be7512eb71MD54THUMBNAILLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.jpgLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2191https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f78916ec-415a-4987-b351-d41d2857d54b/download8e90cfb348395dfdfe1668bb041e28c7MD5510336/39996oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/399962023-10-18 09:26:16.749http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.coRUwoTE9TKSBBVVRPUihFUyksIG1hbmlmaWVzdGEobWFuaWZlc3RhbW9zKSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBvYmpldG8gZGUgbGEgcHJlc2VudGUgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBlcyBvcmlnaW5hbCB5IGxhIHJlYWxpesOzIHNpbiB2aW9sYXIgbyB1c3VycGFyIGRlcmVjaG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yIGRlIHRlcmNlcm9zLCBwb3IgbG8gdGFudG8gbGEgb2JyYSBlcyBkZSBleGNsdXNpdmEgYXV0b3LDrWEgeSB0aWVuZSBsYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZCBzb2JyZSBsYSBtaXNtYS4KPGJyLz4KUEFSQUdSQUZPOiBFbiBjYXNvIGRlIHByZXNlbnRhcnNlIGN1YWxxdWllciByZWNsYW1hY2nDs24gbyBhY2Npw7NuIHBvciBwYXJ0ZSBkZSB1biB0ZXJjZXJvIGVuIGN1YW50byBhIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciBzb2JyZSBsYSBvYnJhIGVuIGN1ZXN0acOzbiwgRUwgQVVUT1IsIGFzdW1pcsOhIHRvZGEgbGEgcmVzcG9uc2FiaWxpZGFkLCB5IHNhbGRyw6EgZW4gZGVmZW5zYSBkZSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgYXF1w60gYXV0b3JpemFkb3M7IHBhcmEgdG9kb3MgbG9zIGVmZWN0b3MgbGEgdW5pdmVyc2lkYWQgYWN0w7phIGNvbW8gdW4gdGVyY2VybyBkZSBidWVuYSBmZS4KPGhyLz4KRUwgQVVUT1IsIGF1dG9yaXphIGEgTEEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgREVMIFJPU0FSSU8sICBwYXJhIHF1ZSBlbiBsb3MgdMOpcm1pbm9zIGVzdGFibGVjaWRvcyBlbiBsYSBMZXkgMjMgZGUgMTk4MiwgTGV5IDQ0IGRlIDE5OTMsIERlY2lzacOzbiBhbmRpbmEgMzUxIGRlIDE5OTMsIERlY3JldG8gNDYwIGRlIDE5OTUgeSBkZW3DoXMgbm9ybWFzIGdlbmVyYWxlcyBzb2JyZSBsYSBtYXRlcmlhLCAgdXRpbGljZSB5IHVzZSBsYSBvYnJhIG9iamV0byBkZSBsYSBwcmVzZW50ZSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuLgoKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KClBPTElUSUNBIERFIFRSQVRBTUlFTlRPIERFIERBVE9TIFBFUlNPTkFMRVMuIERlY2xhcm8gcXVlIGF1dG9yaXpvIHByZXZpYSB5IGRlIGZvcm1hIGluZm9ybWFkYSBlbCB0cmF0YW1pZW50byBkZSBtaXMgZGF0b3MgcGVyc29uYWxlcyBwb3IgcGFydGUgZGUgTEEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgREVMIFJPU0FSSU8gIHBhcmEgZmluZXMgYWNhZMOpbWljb3MgeSBlbiBhcGxpY2FjacOzbiBkZSBjb252ZW5pb3MgY29uIHRlcmNlcm9zIG8gc2VydmljaW9zIGNvbmV4b3MgY29uIGFjdGl2aWRhZGVzIHByb3BpYXMgZGUgbGEgYWNhZGVtaWEsIGNvbiBlc3RyaWN0byBjdW1wbGltaWVudG8gZGUgbG9zIHByaW5jaXBpb3MgZGUgbGV5LiBQYXJhIGVsIGNvcnJlY3RvIGVqZXJjaWNpbyBkZSBtaSBkZXJlY2hvIGRlIGhhYmVhcyBkYXRhICBjdWVudG8gY29uIGxhIGN1ZW50YSBkZSBjb3JyZW8gaGFiZWFzZGF0YUB1cm9zYXJpby5lZHUuY28sIGRvbmRlIHByZXZpYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhY2nDs24gIHBvZHLDqSBzb2xpY2l0YXIgbGEgY29uc3VsdGEsIGNvcnJlY2Npw7NuIHkgc3VwcmVzacOzbiBkZSBtaXMgZGF0b3MuCg==

Publicaciones similares