Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes
En la actualidad, los problemas complejos se empiezan a replantear desde las personas y los escenarios donde se generan. El sector público, el sector privado, la academia y la ciudadanía cada vez son más conscientes del grado de importancia de sinergia en la resolución de estos retos. Los laboratori...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/39996
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996
- Palabra clave:
- Laboratorios de Innovación Pública
Laboratorios de Innovación Social
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
Public Innovation Laboratories
Social Innovation Laboratories
Gov Labs
Policy Labs
PSI Labs
- Rights
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
id |
EDOCUR2_3852fd90104955fc572debdfc6a85516 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/39996 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Public and Social innovation labs: differences and similarities |
title |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
spellingShingle |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes Laboratorios de Innovación Pública Laboratorios de Innovación Social Gov Labs Policy Labs PSI Labs Public Innovation Laboratories Social Innovation Laboratories Gov Labs Policy Labs PSI Labs |
title_short |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
title_full |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
title_fullStr |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
title_sort |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudes |
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Serrano Cárdenas, Lizeth Fernanda |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública Laboratorios de Innovación Social Gov Labs Policy Labs PSI Labs |
topic |
Laboratorios de Innovación Pública Laboratorios de Innovación Social Gov Labs Policy Labs PSI Labs Public Innovation Laboratories Social Innovation Laboratories Gov Labs Policy Labs PSI Labs |
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Innovation Laboratories Social Innovation Laboratories Gov Labs Policy Labs PSI Labs |
description |
En la actualidad, los problemas complejos se empiezan a replantear desde las personas y los escenarios donde se generan. El sector público, el sector privado, la academia y la ciudadanía cada vez son más conscientes del grado de importancia de sinergia en la resolución de estos retos. Los laboratorios se han constituido en escenarios colaborativos para generar propuestas de solución a estos problemas. Son espacios de sinergia entre distintas disciplinas y stakeholders bajo metodologías de experimentación que permiten generar convergencias entre perspectivas de solución heterogéneas. Esta revisión de literatura tiene como propósito conceptualizar los Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social como centros de ideación y creación de soluciones a problemáticas, identificar posibles barreras y/o desafíos que enfrentan y reconocer las metodologías que integran en el desarrollo de su ejercicio, esto, con el fin de evidenciar sus diferencias y similitudes contribuyendo a su comprensión y acelerando los procesos de puesta en marcha. La metodología usada en esta revisión fue la de Tranfield (Tranfield et al., 2003). La información se obtuvo de la base de datos multidisciplinar Web of Science, se utilizó el software de codificación de la información NVIVO y se generaron matrices analíticas para sintetizar los hallazgos del ejercicio de revisión. Los resultados evidencian que tanto los laboratorios públicos y sociales enmarcan sus procesos en el trabajo colaborativo y en la incorporación de metodologías relacionadas a la experimentación. Una de las diferencias entre los dos espacios, está relacionado con el tipo de problemas que resuelven y con la financiación que los sostiene. Mientras los laboratorios sociales resuelven problemáticas ligadas a temas de interés social como: pobreza y desigualdad, los laboratorios públicos atienden problemáticas que se necesitan de un compromiso institucional, y, por ende, tienen alta dependencia de las entidades gubernamentales para cumplir sus propósitos. Las limitaciones de esta revisión consisten en una asimetría en la información, en la literatura se ha investigado más a los Policy labs que a los otros laboratorios del sector público. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-29T18:16:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-29T18:16:31Z |
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
bachelorThesis |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.type.document.none.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.none.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Abierto (Texto Completo) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
54 pp |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv |
Escuela de Administración |
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv |
Administración de Negocios Internacionales |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad del Rosario |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.none.fl_str_mv |
Asenbaum, H., & Hanusch, F. (2021). (De)futuring democracy: Labs, playgrounds, and ateliers as democratic innovations. En FUTURES (Vol. 134). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102836 Asplund, F., Bjork, J., Magnusson, M., & Patrick, A. J. (2021). The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges. En TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (Vol. 162). ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378 Braun, R., Loeber, A., Christensen, M. V., Cohen, J., Frankus, E., Griessler, E., Hoenigmayer, H., & Starkbaum, J. (s. f.). Social labs as temporary intermediary learning organizations to help implement complex normative policies. The case of Responsible Research and Innovation in European science governance. En LEARNING ORGANIZATION. EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0118 Brock, K. L. (2021). Policy labs, partners and policy effectiveness in Canada. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 228-241). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1880063 Broekema, P. M., Bulder, E. A. M., & Horlings, L. G. (2022). Same same, but different ...? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 344-363). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020 Cole, L. (2022). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 5, Número 2, pp. 164-182). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619 Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martin, F., Silvan, A., & Isidro Filho, A. (2021). Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in post-New Public Management Contexts. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 44, Número 6, pp. 451-464). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181 Dekker, R., Contreras, J. F., & Meijer, A. (2020). The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: A Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 43, Número 14, pp. 1207-1217). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668410 Evans, B., & Cheng, S. M. (2021). Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work? En CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA (Vol. 64, Número 4, pp. 587-610). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12438 Ferrarezi, E., Brandalise, I., & Lemos, J. (2021). Evaluating experimentation in the public sector: Learning from a Brazilian innovation lab. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 292-308). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1930686 Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 3, Números 2, SI, pp. 150-162). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761 Fleischer, J., & Carstens, N. (2022). Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning: Inside the digital transformation in Germany. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 24, Número 8, pp. 1208-1225). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893803 Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 1). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390 Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Rohnebaek, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. En ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES (Vol. 11, Número 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058 Hjelmar, U. (2021). The institutionalization of public sector innovation. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 1, pp. 53-69). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702 Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Gallacher, J., Irwin, T., & James, D. (2019). FE and skills—Is the `UK laboratory’ open for expansive policy learning? En JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK (Vol. 32, Números 3, SI, pp. 277-291). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1621272 Kieboom, Marlieke. (2014). Lab Matters: Challenging the practice of social innovation laboratories. 2–44. Komatsu, T., Salgado, M., Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2021). Policy labs challenges in the public sector: The value of design for more responsive organizations. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 271-291). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1917173 Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2020). The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 281-297). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1668657 Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 242-251). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077 Lewis, J. M., Mcgann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 111-130). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081 Lindquist, E. A., & Buttazzoni, M. (2021). The ecology of open innovation units: Adhocracy and competing values in public service systems. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 212-227). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1941569 Marcelloni, Claudia. (2019). The 3 T’s framework of social innovation labs (edsair.doi.dedup.....89c38d3db3efa46cd51afb5e46a011a2). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2019.872 Marschalek, I., Blok, V., Bernstein, M., Braun, R., Cohen, J., Hofer, M., Seebacher, L. M., Unterfrauner, E., Daimler, S., Nieminen, M., Christensen, M. V., & Thapa, R. K. (2022). The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 9, Número 3, pp. 419-442). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2119003 McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. En POLICY SCIENCES (Vol. 51, Número 3, pp. 249-267). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7 McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 2, pp. 297-316). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946 Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2021). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. En PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 44, Número 1, pp. 136-154). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954 Olavo, A. V. A., Beneyto, G. P., Nebot, C. P., & Emmendoerfer, M. L. (2022). PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION LABORATORIES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS BETWEEN BRAZIL AND SPAIN. En REVISTA DE GESTAO E PROJETOS (Vol. 13, Número 2, pp. 89-115). UNIV NOVE JULHO. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v13i2.21972 Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widla, A., & Park, Y. (2020). Policy labs: The next frontier of policy design and evaluation? En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 89-110). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420108 Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Ismael Pena, J. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. En JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT (Número 31, pp. 69-100). DE BOECK UNIV. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.031.0069 Peters, B. G. (2020). Designing institutions for designing policy. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 131-147). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420090 Polvora, A., & Nascimento, S. (2021). Foresight and design fictions meet at a policy lab: An experimentation approach in public sector innovation. En FUTURES (Vol. 128). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102709 Promsiri, T., Sukavejworakit, K., Keerativutisest, V., Virasa, T., & Kampanthong, K. (2022). Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 14, Número 12). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127427 Rodriguez, L. A., Alejandra Velez, M., & Pfaff, A. (2021). Leaders’ distributional & efficiency effects in collective responses to policy: Lab-in-field experiments with small-scale gold miners in Colombia. En WORLD DEVELOPMENT (Vol. 147). PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105648 Shin, S. R., Lee, J., Jung, Y. R., & Hwang, J. (2022). The diffusion of scientific discoveries in government laboratories: The role of patents filed by government scientists. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 5). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104496 Spaa, A., Spencer, N., Durrant, A., & Vines, J. (2022). Creative and collaborative reflective thinking to support policy deliberation and decision making. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 18, Números 2, SI, pp. 376-390). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16474564583952 Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. O. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: The case of responsible research and innovation. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 7, Número 3, pp. 410-426). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751 Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 Trei, D. T., Hornung, J., Rychlik, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021). From political motivation to scientific knowledge: Classifying policy labs in the science-policy nexus. En EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES (Vol. 29, Número 12, pp. 2340-2356). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785 Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation Labs in the Public Sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939 Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance-The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 11, Número 21). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103 Urmanaviciene, A., Kostalova, J., Baturina, D., Krzyworzeka, P., Budryte, P., & Lepik, K.-L. (2022). Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 381-401). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0022 Valente, A., Tudisca, V., Demurtas, P., Sandu, P., Baba, C. O., Durmishi, E., & Consortium, D. (2018). Actors Engagement and Tailored Methods in Physical Education and Sport Curriculum as a Policy Lab. En RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, GENDER AND ETHICS: CASES AND EXPERIENCES (pp. 9-13). SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_2 Vicens, J., Perello, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. En PLOS ONE (Vol. 13, Número 12). PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219 Wellstead, A. M., & Howlett, M. (2022). (Re)Thinking think tanks in the age of policy labs: The rise of knowledge-based policy influence organisations. En AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 81, Número 1, pp. 224-232). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12528 Williamson, B. (2015). Governing methods: Policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038693 Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 252-270). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834 Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab. En PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT (Vol. 39, Número 4, pp. 290-299). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920 Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2021). Social innovation laboratories for the social construction of knowledge: Systematic review of literature. En TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA (Vol. 14, Número 3). UNIV FED MINAS GERAIS, FAC LETRAS. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33750 Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2022). Measurement of the social construction of knowledge: Validation and reliability of the K-Social-C instrument. En SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING (Vol. 12, Número 1). SPRINGER WIEN. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00868-x Yoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. En JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (Vol. 11, Número 3, pp. 1120-1144). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00595-3 Zeigermann, U., & Ettelt, S. (s. f.). Spanning the boundaries between policy, politics and science to solve wicked problems: Policy pilots, deliberation fora and policy labs. En SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE. SPRINGER JAPAN KK. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01187-y Zhu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Comparison of Policy Experiments: Practices in Asia. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 275-280). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1711059 Zurbriggen, C., & Lago, M. G. (2019). An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 15, Números 3, SI, pp. 437-451). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15537488717501 |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a6573bf4-4485-46b2-ab76-c49d715b87c2/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/db3e8884-087a-4f8c-9dcf-93b17d375c08/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/edaaa651-7ce2-4811-a9ab-3fdf93869345/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/688b6ab3-3079-4111-85f9-2ca6044a4bbe/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f78916ec-415a-4987-b351-d41d2857d54b/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
85d2c1e1c2e72dc92a233859df2492d5 b2825df9f458e9d5d96ee8b7cd74fde6 5643bfd9bcf29d560eeec56d584edaa9 6eb935744a5fb636e461e9be7512eb71 8e90cfb348395dfdfe1668bb041e28c7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167480250138624 |
spelling |
Serrano Cárdenas, Lizeth Fernanda1098706093600Corrales Benavides, Natalia CarolinaAdministrador de Negocios InternacionalesPregradoFull time8eaf88f5-f6b8-4923-ad70-af9032a6ae21-12023-06-29T18:16:31Z2023-06-29T18:16:31Z2023-06-11En la actualidad, los problemas complejos se empiezan a replantear desde las personas y los escenarios donde se generan. El sector público, el sector privado, la academia y la ciudadanía cada vez son más conscientes del grado de importancia de sinergia en la resolución de estos retos. Los laboratorios se han constituido en escenarios colaborativos para generar propuestas de solución a estos problemas. Son espacios de sinergia entre distintas disciplinas y stakeholders bajo metodologías de experimentación que permiten generar convergencias entre perspectivas de solución heterogéneas. Esta revisión de literatura tiene como propósito conceptualizar los Laboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social como centros de ideación y creación de soluciones a problemáticas, identificar posibles barreras y/o desafíos que enfrentan y reconocer las metodologías que integran en el desarrollo de su ejercicio, esto, con el fin de evidenciar sus diferencias y similitudes contribuyendo a su comprensión y acelerando los procesos de puesta en marcha. La metodología usada en esta revisión fue la de Tranfield (Tranfield et al., 2003). La información se obtuvo de la base de datos multidisciplinar Web of Science, se utilizó el software de codificación de la información NVIVO y se generaron matrices analíticas para sintetizar los hallazgos del ejercicio de revisión. Los resultados evidencian que tanto los laboratorios públicos y sociales enmarcan sus procesos en el trabajo colaborativo y en la incorporación de metodologías relacionadas a la experimentación. Una de las diferencias entre los dos espacios, está relacionado con el tipo de problemas que resuelven y con la financiación que los sostiene. Mientras los laboratorios sociales resuelven problemáticas ligadas a temas de interés social como: pobreza y desigualdad, los laboratorios públicos atienden problemáticas que se necesitan de un compromiso institucional, y, por ende, tienen alta dependencia de las entidades gubernamentales para cumplir sus propósitos. Las limitaciones de esta revisión consisten en una asimetría en la información, en la literatura se ha investigado más a los Policy labs que a los otros laboratorios del sector público.Today, complex problems are beginning to be rethought from the perspective of the people and the scenarios where they are generated. The public sector, the private sector, academia, and citizens are increasingly aware of the importance of synergy in the resolution of these challenges. Laboratories have become collaborative scenarios to generate proper solutions to complex problems. These labs are synergy spaces capable of gathering different stakeholders from distinct disciplines under experimentation methodologies that allow heterogeneous solution perspectives. The purpose of this literature review is to conceptualize Public and Social Innovation Labs as centers of ideation and creation of solutions to problems, to identify possible barriers and/or challenges they face and to recognize the methodologies they integrate in the development of their exercise to highlight their differences and similarities. Contributing to their understanding and accelerating the implementation processes. The methodology used in this review was that of Tranfield (Tranfield et al., 2003). The information was obtained from the Web of Science multidisciplinary database. NVIVO information coding software was used, and analytical matrices were generated to synthesize the findings of the review exercise. The results show that both public and social laboratories frame their processes in collaborative work and in the incorporation of methodologies related to experimentation. One of the differences between the two laboratories is related to the type of problems they solve and the funding that supports them. While social laboratories solve problems linked to issues of social interest such as poverty and inequality, public laboratories address problems that require institutional commitment and, therefore, are highly dependent on governmental entities to fulfill their purposes. The limitations of this review consist of an asymmetry in the information, as Policy labs have been investigated more in the literature than other public sector laboratories.54 ppapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_39996 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/39996spaUniversidad del RosarioEscuela de AdministraciónAdministración de Negocios InternacionalesAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 InternationalAbierto (Texto Completo)EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Asenbaum, H., & Hanusch, F. (2021). (De)futuring democracy: Labs, playgrounds, and ateliers as democratic innovations. En FUTURES (Vol. 134). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102836Asplund, F., Bjork, J., Magnusson, M., & Patrick, A. J. (2021). The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges. En TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE (Vol. 162). ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378Braun, R., Loeber, A., Christensen, M. V., Cohen, J., Frankus, E., Griessler, E., Hoenigmayer, H., & Starkbaum, J. (s. f.). Social labs as temporary intermediary learning organizations to help implement complex normative policies. The case of Responsible Research and Innovation in European science governance. En LEARNING ORGANIZATION. EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0118Brock, K. L. (2021). Policy labs, partners and policy effectiveness in Canada. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 228-241). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1880063Broekema, P. M., Bulder, E. A. M., & Horlings, L. G. (2022). Same same, but different ...? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 344-363). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020Cole, L. (2022). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 5, Número 2, pp. 164-182). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martin, F., Silvan, A., & Isidro Filho, A. (2021). Public Innovation and Living Labs in Action: A Comparative Analysis in post-New Public Management Contexts. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 44, Número 6, pp. 451-464). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181Dekker, R., Contreras, J. F., & Meijer, A. (2020). The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: A Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences. En INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 43, Número 14, pp. 1207-1217). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668410Evans, B., & Cheng, S. M. (2021). Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work? En CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA (Vol. 64, Número 4, pp. 587-610). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12438Ferrarezi, E., Brandalise, I., & Lemos, J. (2021). Evaluating experimentation in the public sector: Learning from a Brazilian innovation lab. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 292-308). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1930686Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 3, Números 2, SI, pp. 150-162). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761Fleischer, J., & Carstens, N. (2022). Policy labs as arenas for boundary spanning: Inside the digital transformation in Germany. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 24, Número 8, pp. 1208-1225). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893803Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 1). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Rohnebaek, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. En ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES (Vol. 11, Número 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058Hjelmar, U. (2021). The institutionalization of public sector innovation. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 1, pp. 53-69). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Gallacher, J., Irwin, T., & James, D. (2019). FE and skills—Is the `UK laboratory’ open for expansive policy learning? En JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK (Vol. 32, Números 3, SI, pp. 277-291). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1621272Kieboom, Marlieke. (2014). Lab Matters: Challenging the practice of social innovation laboratories. 2–44.Komatsu, T., Salgado, M., Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2021). Policy labs challenges in the public sector: The value of design for more responsive organizations. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 271-291). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1917173Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2020). The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 281-297). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1668657Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 242-251). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077Lewis, J. M., Mcgann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 111-130). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081Lindquist, E. A., & Buttazzoni, M. (2021). The ecology of open innovation units: Adhocracy and competing values in public service systems. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 212-227). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1941569Marcelloni, Claudia. (2019). The 3 T’s framework of social innovation labs (edsair.doi.dedup.....89c38d3db3efa46cd51afb5e46a011a2). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2019.872Marschalek, I., Blok, V., Bernstein, M., Braun, R., Cohen, J., Hofer, M., Seebacher, L. M., Unterfrauner, E., Daimler, S., Nieminen, M., Christensen, M. V., & Thapa, R. K. (2022). The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 9, Número 3, pp. 419-442). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2119003McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. En POLICY SCIENCES (Vol. 51, Número 3, pp. 249-267). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. En PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 23, Número 2, pp. 297-316). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2021). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. En PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 44, Número 1, pp. 136-154). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954Olavo, A. V. A., Beneyto, G. P., Nebot, C. P., & Emmendoerfer, M. L. (2022). PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION LABORATORIES IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS BETWEEN BRAZIL AND SPAIN. En REVISTA DE GESTAO E PROJETOS (Vol. 13, Número 2, pp. 89-115). UNIV NOVE JULHO. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v13i2.21972Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widla, A., & Park, Y. (2020). Policy labs: The next frontier of policy design and evaluation? En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 89-110). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420108Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Ismael Pena, J. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. En JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT (Número 31, pp. 69-100). DE BOECK UNIV. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.031.0069Peters, B. G. (2020). Designing institutions for designing policy. En POLICY AND POLITICS (Vol. 48, Números 1, SI, pp. 131-147). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420090Polvora, A., & Nascimento, S. (2021). Foresight and design fictions meet at a policy lab: An experimentation approach in public sector innovation. En FUTURES (Vol. 128). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102709Promsiri, T., Sukavejworakit, K., Keerativutisest, V., Virasa, T., & Kampanthong, K. (2022). Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 14, Número 12). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127427Rodriguez, L. A., Alejandra Velez, M., & Pfaff, A. (2021). Leaders’ distributional & efficiency effects in collective responses to policy: Lab-in-field experiments with small-scale gold miners in Colombia. En WORLD DEVELOPMENT (Vol. 147). PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105648Shin, S. R., Lee, J., Jung, Y. R., & Hwang, J. (2022). The diffusion of scientific discoveries in government laboratories: The role of patents filed by government scientists. En RESEARCH POLICY (Vol. 51, Número 5). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104496Spaa, A., Spencer, N., Durrant, A., & Vines, J. (2022). Creative and collaborative reflective thinking to support policy deliberation and decision making. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 18, Números 2, SI, pp. 376-390). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16474564583952Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R., & Nielsen, R. O. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: The case of responsible research and innovation. En JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION (Vol. 7, Número 3, pp. 410-426). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375Trei, D. T., Hornung, J., Rychlik, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2021). From political motivation to scientific knowledge: Classifying policy labs in the science-policy nexus. En EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES (Vol. 29, Número 12, pp. 2340-2356). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation Labs in the Public Sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance-The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. En SUSTAINABILITY (Vol. 11, Número 21). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103Urmanaviciene, A., Kostalova, J., Baturina, D., Krzyworzeka, P., Budryte, P., & Lepik, K.-L. (2022). Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits. En MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY (Vol. 17, Número 1, pp. 381-401). SCIENDO. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0022Valente, A., Tudisca, V., Demurtas, P., Sandu, P., Baba, C. O., Durmishi, E., & Consortium, D. (2018). Actors Engagement and Tailored Methods in Physical Education and Sport Curriculum as a Policy Lab. En RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ACTIONS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, GENDER AND ETHICS: CASES AND EXPERIENCES (pp. 9-13). SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73207-7_2Vicens, J., Perello, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. En PLOS ONE (Vol. 13, Número 12). PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219Wellstead, A. M., & Howlett, M. (2022). (Re)Thinking think tanks in the age of policy labs: The rise of knowledge-based policy influence organisations. En AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (Vol. 81, Número 1, pp. 224-232). WILEY. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12528Williamson, B. (2015). Governing methods: Policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038693Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government. En POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE (Vol. 4, Números 2, SI, pp. 252-270). TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab. En PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT (Vol. 39, Número 4, pp. 290-299). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2021). Social innovation laboratories for the social construction of knowledge: Systematic review of literature. En TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA (Vol. 14, Número 3). UNIV FED MINAS GERAIS, FAC LETRAS. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33750Yanez-Figueroa, J.-A., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S., & Garcia-Penalvo, F.-J. (2022). Measurement of the social construction of knowledge: Validation and reliability of the K-Social-C instrument. En SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING (Vol. 12, Número 1). SPRINGER WIEN. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00868-xYoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. En JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (Vol. 11, Número 3, pp. 1120-1144). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00595-3Zeigermann, U., & Ettelt, S. (s. f.). Spanning the boundaries between policy, politics and science to solve wicked problems: Policy pilots, deliberation fora and policy labs. En SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE. SPRINGER JAPAN KK. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01187-yZhu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Comparison of Policy Experiments: Practices in Asia. En JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS (Vol. 22, Números 4, SI, pp. 275-280). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1711059Zurbriggen, C., & Lago, M. G. (2019). An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government. En EVIDENCE & POLICY (Vol. 15, Números 3, SI, pp. 437-451). POLICY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15537488717501instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURLaboratorios de Innovación PúblicaLaboratorios de Innovación SocialGov LabsPolicy LabsPSI LabsPublic Innovation LaboratoriesSocial Innovation LaboratoriesGov LabsPolicy LabsPSI LabsLaboratorios de Innovación Pública y Social: diferencias y similitudesPublic and Social innovation labs: differences and similaritiesbachelorThesisTrabajo de gradoTrabajo de gradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fEscuela de AdministraciónORIGINALLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdfLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdfapplication/pdf583668https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a6573bf4-4485-46b2-ab76-c49d715b87c2/download85d2c1e1c2e72dc92a233859df2492d5MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1483https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/db3e8884-087a-4f8c-9dcf-93b17d375c08/downloadb2825df9f458e9d5d96ee8b7cd74fde6MD52CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81160https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/edaaa651-7ce2-4811-a9ab-3fdf93869345/download5643bfd9bcf29d560eeec56d584edaa9MD53TEXTLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.txtLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain72455https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/688b6ab3-3079-4111-85f9-2ca6044a4bbe/download6eb935744a5fb636e461e9be7512eb71MD54THUMBNAILLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.jpgLaboratorios_de_Innovacion_Publica_y_Social_Corrales_Natalia_2023.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2191https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f78916ec-415a-4987-b351-d41d2857d54b/download8e90cfb348395dfdfe1668bb041e28c7MD5510336/39996oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/399962024-09-09 14:58:14.979http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.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 |