Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
Introduction: Adequate nutrition-support clinical practice requires recommendations based on the best available evidence, in order to help health professionals making decisions concerning the management of enteral nutritional support in pathologies of interest. Objective: To identify the key factors...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22665
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665
- Palabra clave:
- Enteral nutrition
Malnutrition
Nutritional support
Patient care management
Practice guidelines as topic
Protein-energy malnutrition
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_321285f4a63a2029d302e23b4da5fae6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22665 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gestión de la nutrición enteral: Factores clave en las mejores guías de práctica clínica y brechas en su aplicación |
title |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
spellingShingle |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines Enteral nutrition Malnutrition Nutritional support Patient care management Practice guidelines as topic Protein-energy malnutrition |
title_short |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
title_full |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
title_fullStr |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
title_sort |
Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Enteral nutrition Malnutrition Nutritional support Patient care management Practice guidelines as topic Protein-energy malnutrition |
topic |
Enteral nutrition Malnutrition Nutritional support Patient care management Practice guidelines as topic Protein-energy malnutrition |
description |
Introduction: Adequate nutrition-support clinical practice requires recommendations based on the best available evidence, in order to help health professionals making decisions concerning the management of enteral nutritional support in pathologies of interest. Objective: To identify the key factors in the management of enteral nutrition, in order to prevent and treat malnutrition based upon the recommendations made in the best Practice Guidelines (CPG). Methods: A structured search of nutritional support in CPG was performed. Five referees independently selected the CPG among those published between 2005 and 2015. They used AGREE II in order assess quality and selected those CPG with a score no lower than 60% in the domains of methodological rigor and editorial independence. The findings were compared to the Colombian clinical practice. Results: 24 GPC were evaluated, of which 79.1% (n = 19) were developed by scientific societies, 12.6% (n = 3) by government agencies and 8.3% (n = 2) by CPG developing bodies. Selected CPG were those produced by NICE (global score 92%), and those developed by CENETEC, which scored 70.89% and 87.2%.8. Discussion: In order to decrease clinical-practice heterogeneity, take into account new therapeutic options and provide quality care, it is suggested to adopt the best CPG, such as those developed by governmental institutions and CPG developing agencies like CENETEC and NICE. Attention and implementation of their recommendations in Colombia has been poor, as the most consulted CPG are the ASPEN and ESPEN ones. Conclusion: Key elements recommended in the best nutrition CPG, are: income nutritional screening, nutritional risk monitoring, nutritional support for malnourished patients, nutritional support for patients with limiting food intake, specialized nutritional support, nutrition education, and creation of institutional nutrition committees. These elements would be useful to build societal trust in clinical practice. Encouraging consultation of high quality nutrition CPG would help to optimize capacities in the face of technical limitations in the health sector. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:57:25Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:57:25Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
02116057 1989208X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665 |
identifier_str_mv |
02116057 1989208X |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
103 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 1 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
94 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 36 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria, ISSN:02116057, 1989208X, Vol.36, No.1 (2016); pp. 94-103 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962537308&partnerID=40&md5=db05a0d2068fbe435393983844630165 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad espanola de dietetica |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d1029449-63da-4ce3-a535-4b9c729e4a9c/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/eb136e3f-4c10-4ae6-a9a2-46c8a7146d30/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f7277e92-3cc8-4239-988a-5ef63bce6891/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c7221f03cce7040dc8ec33696c6f6114 52463a1054a7ec539d294663a760d35b 2cd6b293c5c133d6e2c46fd713f66df1 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167559450132480 |
spelling |
74591435-e25e-4da5-974e-e08f2d87afce-16487482d-757f-4361-a5f5-5f6968b74769-13b1d3ec6-dc44-4c6b-a825-e2d1fd1667bb-16758056600120dee8f-f816-4abf-ac17-3b898a27aaac-12020-05-25T23:57:25Z2020-05-25T23:57:25Z2016Introduction: Adequate nutrition-support clinical practice requires recommendations based on the best available evidence, in order to help health professionals making decisions concerning the management of enteral nutritional support in pathologies of interest. Objective: To identify the key factors in the management of enteral nutrition, in order to prevent and treat malnutrition based upon the recommendations made in the best Practice Guidelines (CPG). Methods: A structured search of nutritional support in CPG was performed. Five referees independently selected the CPG among those published between 2005 and 2015. They used AGREE II in order assess quality and selected those CPG with a score no lower than 60% in the domains of methodological rigor and editorial independence. The findings were compared to the Colombian clinical practice. Results: 24 GPC were evaluated, of which 79.1% (n = 19) were developed by scientific societies, 12.6% (n = 3) by government agencies and 8.3% (n = 2) by CPG developing bodies. Selected CPG were those produced by NICE (global score 92%), and those developed by CENETEC, which scored 70.89% and 87.2%.8. Discussion: In order to decrease clinical-practice heterogeneity, take into account new therapeutic options and provide quality care, it is suggested to adopt the best CPG, such as those developed by governmental institutions and CPG developing agencies like CENETEC and NICE. Attention and implementation of their recommendations in Colombia has been poor, as the most consulted CPG are the ASPEN and ESPEN ones. Conclusion: Key elements recommended in the best nutrition CPG, are: income nutritional screening, nutritional risk monitoring, nutritional support for malnourished patients, nutritional support for patients with limiting food intake, specialized nutritional support, nutrition education, and creation of institutional nutrition committees. These elements would be useful to build societal trust in clinical practice. Encouraging consultation of high quality nutrition CPG would help to optimize capacities in the face of technical limitations in the health sector.application/pdf021160571989208Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665engSociedad espanola de dietetica103No. 194Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica HospitalariaVol. 36Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria, ISSN:02116057, 1989208X, Vol.36, No.1 (2016); pp. 94-103https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962537308&partnerID=40&md5=db05a0d2068fbe435393983844630165Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUREnteral nutritionMalnutritionNutritional supportPatient care managementPractice guidelines as topicProtein-energy malnutritionEnteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelinesGestión de la nutrición enteral: Factores clave en las mejores guías de práctica clínica y brechas en su aplicaciónarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Pinzón Espitia O.L.Chicaíza Becerra L.A.García Molina M.González Rodríguez, Javier LeonardoManrique Hernández R.D.ORIGINAL361pinzon.pdfapplication/pdf81963https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d1029449-63da-4ce3-a535-4b9c729e4a9c/downloadc7221f03cce7040dc8ec33696c6f6114MD51TEXT361pinzon.pdf.txt361pinzon.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain42925https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/eb136e3f-4c10-4ae6-a9a2-46c8a7146d30/download52463a1054a7ec539d294663a760d35bMD52THUMBNAIL361pinzon.pdf.jpg361pinzon.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4720https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f7277e92-3cc8-4239-988a-5ef63bce6891/download2cd6b293c5c133d6e2c46fd713f66df1MD5310336/22665oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/226652022-05-02 07:37:20.563685https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |