Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines

Introduction: Adequate nutrition-support clinical practice requires recommendations based on the best available evidence, in order to help health professionals making decisions concerning the management of enteral nutritional support in pathologies of interest. Objective: To identify the key factors...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22665
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665
Palabra clave:
Enteral nutrition
Malnutrition
Nutritional support
Patient care management
Practice guidelines as topic
Protein-energy malnutrition
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_321285f4a63a2029d302e23b4da5fae6
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22665
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Gestión de la nutrición enteral: Factores clave en las mejores guías de práctica clínica y brechas en su aplicación
title Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
spellingShingle Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
Enteral nutrition
Malnutrition
Nutritional support
Patient care management
Practice guidelines as topic
Protein-energy malnutrition
title_short Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
title_full Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
title_fullStr Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
title_sort Enteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelines
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Enteral nutrition
Malnutrition
Nutritional support
Patient care management
Practice guidelines as topic
Protein-energy malnutrition
topic Enteral nutrition
Malnutrition
Nutritional support
Patient care management
Practice guidelines as topic
Protein-energy malnutrition
description Introduction: Adequate nutrition-support clinical practice requires recommendations based on the best available evidence, in order to help health professionals making decisions concerning the management of enteral nutritional support in pathologies of interest. Objective: To identify the key factors in the management of enteral nutrition, in order to prevent and treat malnutrition based upon the recommendations made in the best Practice Guidelines (CPG). Methods: A structured search of nutritional support in CPG was performed. Five referees independently selected the CPG among those published between 2005 and 2015. They used AGREE II in order assess quality and selected those CPG with a score no lower than 60% in the domains of methodological rigor and editorial independence. The findings were compared to the Colombian clinical practice. Results: 24 GPC were evaluated, of which 79.1% (n = 19) were developed by scientific societies, 12.6% (n = 3) by government agencies and 8.3% (n = 2) by CPG developing bodies. Selected CPG were those produced by NICE (global score 92%), and those developed by CENETEC, which scored 70.89% and 87.2%.8. Discussion: In order to decrease clinical-practice heterogeneity, take into account new therapeutic options and provide quality care, it is suggested to adopt the best CPG, such as those developed by governmental institutions and CPG developing agencies like CENETEC and NICE. Attention and implementation of their recommendations in Colombia has been poor, as the most consulted CPG are the ASPEN and ESPEN ones. Conclusion: Key elements recommended in the best nutrition CPG, are: income nutritional screening, nutritional risk monitoring, nutritional support for malnourished patients, nutritional support for patients with limiting food intake, specialized nutritional support, nutrition education, and creation of institutional nutrition committees. These elements would be useful to build societal trust in clinical practice. Encouraging consultation of high quality nutrition CPG would help to optimize capacities in the face of technical limitations in the health sector.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:25Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:25Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 02116057
1989208X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665
identifier_str_mv 02116057
1989208X
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 103
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 94
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 36
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria, ISSN:02116057, 1989208X, Vol.36, No.1 (2016); pp. 94-103
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962537308&partnerID=40&md5=db05a0d2068fbe435393983844630165
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Sociedad espanola de dietetica
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d1029449-63da-4ce3-a535-4b9c729e4a9c/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/eb136e3f-4c10-4ae6-a9a2-46c8a7146d30/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f7277e92-3cc8-4239-988a-5ef63bce6891/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c7221f03cce7040dc8ec33696c6f6114
52463a1054a7ec539d294663a760d35b
2cd6b293c5c133d6e2c46fd713f66df1
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167559450132480
spelling 74591435-e25e-4da5-974e-e08f2d87afce-16487482d-757f-4361-a5f5-5f6968b74769-13b1d3ec6-dc44-4c6b-a825-e2d1fd1667bb-16758056600120dee8f-f816-4abf-ac17-3b898a27aaac-12020-05-25T23:57:25Z2020-05-25T23:57:25Z2016Introduction: Adequate nutrition-support clinical practice requires recommendations based on the best available evidence, in order to help health professionals making decisions concerning the management of enteral nutritional support in pathologies of interest. Objective: To identify the key factors in the management of enteral nutrition, in order to prevent and treat malnutrition based upon the recommendations made in the best Practice Guidelines (CPG). Methods: A structured search of nutritional support in CPG was performed. Five referees independently selected the CPG among those published between 2005 and 2015. They used AGREE II in order assess quality and selected those CPG with a score no lower than 60% in the domains of methodological rigor and editorial independence. The findings were compared to the Colombian clinical practice. Results: 24 GPC were evaluated, of which 79.1% (n = 19) were developed by scientific societies, 12.6% (n = 3) by government agencies and 8.3% (n = 2) by CPG developing bodies. Selected CPG were those produced by NICE (global score 92%), and those developed by CENETEC, which scored 70.89% and 87.2%.8. Discussion: In order to decrease clinical-practice heterogeneity, take into account new therapeutic options and provide quality care, it is suggested to adopt the best CPG, such as those developed by governmental institutions and CPG developing agencies like CENETEC and NICE. Attention and implementation of their recommendations in Colombia has been poor, as the most consulted CPG are the ASPEN and ESPEN ones. Conclusion: Key elements recommended in the best nutrition CPG, are: income nutritional screening, nutritional risk monitoring, nutritional support for malnourished patients, nutritional support for patients with limiting food intake, specialized nutritional support, nutrition education, and creation of institutional nutrition committees. These elements would be useful to build societal trust in clinical practice. Encouraging consultation of high quality nutrition CPG would help to optimize capacities in the face of technical limitations in the health sector.application/pdf021160571989208Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22665engSociedad espanola de dietetica103No. 194Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica HospitalariaVol. 36Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria, ISSN:02116057, 1989208X, Vol.36, No.1 (2016); pp. 94-103https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962537308&partnerID=40&md5=db05a0d2068fbe435393983844630165Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUREnteral nutritionMalnutritionNutritional supportPatient care managementPractice guidelines as topicProtein-energy malnutritionEnteral nutrition management: Key factors and application gaps in the best clinical practice guidelinesGestión de la nutrición enteral: Factores clave en las mejores guías de práctica clínica y brechas en su aplicaciónarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Pinzón Espitia O.L.Chicaíza Becerra L.A.García Molina M.González Rodríguez, Javier LeonardoManrique Hernández R.D.ORIGINAL361pinzon.pdfapplication/pdf81963https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/d1029449-63da-4ce3-a535-4b9c729e4a9c/downloadc7221f03cce7040dc8ec33696c6f6114MD51TEXT361pinzon.pdf.txt361pinzon.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain42925https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/eb136e3f-4c10-4ae6-a9a2-46c8a7146d30/download52463a1054a7ec539d294663a760d35bMD52THUMBNAIL361pinzon.pdf.jpg361pinzon.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4720https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f7277e92-3cc8-4239-988a-5ef63bce6891/download2cd6b293c5c133d6e2c46fd713f66df1MD5310336/22665oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/226652022-05-02 07:37:20.563685https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co