Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26913
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913
Palabra clave:
Randomization
Hypertension
Diabetes
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_2fc36d207fa6917cb0da26be1d1c9c5f
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26913
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling dfab9aaf-1bb4-485b-9b25-92e3df8cf8d0-19d6eaa21-6305-4384-8e6e-11b07c2d56a3-1cb843f11-60c6-46a0-9383-31ec9caf7899-1c1f4de9a-c2e3-4fec-8897-95875172f448-1ae9351fb-010e-4b53-a50a-1161cb499e42-1085c0231-654c-462f-a1bc-1b727a40b85c-1bcf8ab16-c33f-4af0-bb67-75acf183c32e-16b997d4d-bf1a-431a-a60a-b8bfb2866afc-1e9bd8b5c-d4eb-4a0f-be4f-4ba478545ffa-1450d91bb-00dd-452e-9840-78f6600ffbde-189b5814f-6ca7-441f-8779-d7f22eabe202-11b0e618e-8478-4ccf-a7cc-5fc45bb9e6ce-12020-08-19T14:40:31Z2020-08-19T14:40:31Z2011-09-08BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767. opens in new tab.)application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638ISSN: 0028-4793https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913engMassachusetts Medical Society891No. 10883The New England Journal of MedicineVol. 365The New England Journal of Medicine, ISSN: 0028-4793, Vol.365, No.10 (2011);pp. 883-891https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638?articleTools=trueAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2The New England Journal of Medicineinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURRandomizationHypertensionDiabetesRivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillationRivaroxabán versus warfarina en la fibrilación auricular no valvulararticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Patel, ManeshMahaffey, KennethGarg, JyotsnaPan, GuohuaSinger, DanielHacke, WernerBreithardt, GunterHalperin, JonathanHankey, GraemePiccini, JonathanBecker, RichardNessel, Christopher10336/26913oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/269132022-05-02 07:37:21.864196https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Rivaroxabán versus warfarina en la fibrilación auricular no valvular
title Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
spellingShingle Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
Randomization
Hypertension
Diabetes
title_short Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_full Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_sort Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Randomization
Hypertension
Diabetes
topic Randomization
Hypertension
Diabetes
description BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767. opens in new tab.)
publishDate 2011
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2011-09-08
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-19T14:40:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-19T14:40:31Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN: 0028-4793
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913
url https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 0028-4793
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 891
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 10
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 883
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv The New England Journal of Medicine
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 365
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv The New England Journal of Medicine, ISSN: 0028-4793, Vol.365, No.10 (2011);pp. 883-891
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638?articleTools=true
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Massachusetts Medical Society
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv The New England Journal of Medicine
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1818107022710669312