Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26913
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913
- Palabra clave:
- Randomization
Hypertension
Diabetes
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_2fc36d207fa6917cb0da26be1d1c9c5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26913 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
dfab9aaf-1bb4-485b-9b25-92e3df8cf8d0-19d6eaa21-6305-4384-8e6e-11b07c2d56a3-1cb843f11-60c6-46a0-9383-31ec9caf7899-1c1f4de9a-c2e3-4fec-8897-95875172f448-1ae9351fb-010e-4b53-a50a-1161cb499e42-1085c0231-654c-462f-a1bc-1b727a40b85c-1bcf8ab16-c33f-4af0-bb67-75acf183c32e-16b997d4d-bf1a-431a-a60a-b8bfb2866afc-1e9bd8b5c-d4eb-4a0f-be4f-4ba478545ffa-1450d91bb-00dd-452e-9840-78f6600ffbde-189b5814f-6ca7-441f-8779-d7f22eabe202-11b0e618e-8478-4ccf-a7cc-5fc45bb9e6ce-12020-08-19T14:40:31Z2020-08-19T14:40:31Z2011-09-08BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767. opens in new tab.)application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638ISSN: 0028-4793https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913engMassachusetts Medical Society891No. 10883The New England Journal of MedicineVol. 365The New England Journal of Medicine, ISSN: 0028-4793, Vol.365, No.10 (2011);pp. 883-891https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638?articleTools=trueAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2The New England Journal of Medicineinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURRandomizationHypertensionDiabetesRivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillationRivaroxabán versus warfarina en la fibrilación auricular no valvulararticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Patel, ManeshMahaffey, KennethGarg, JyotsnaPan, GuohuaSinger, DanielHacke, WernerBreithardt, GunterHalperin, JonathanHankey, GraemePiccini, JonathanBecker, RichardNessel, Christopher10336/26913oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/269132022-05-02 07:37:21.864196https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
Rivaroxabán versus warfarina en la fibrilación auricular no valvular |
title |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
spellingShingle |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Randomization Hypertension Diabetes |
title_short |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_full |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_sort |
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Randomization Hypertension Diabetes |
topic |
Randomization Hypertension Diabetes |
description |
BACKGROUND The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. METHODS In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767. opens in new tab.) |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2011-09-08 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-19T14:40:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-19T14:40:31Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
ISSN: 0028-4793 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26913 |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN: 0028-4793 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
891 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 10 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
883 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
The New England Journal of Medicine |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 365 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
The New England Journal of Medicine, ISSN: 0028-4793, Vol.365, No.10 (2011);pp. 883-891 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638?articleTools=true |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Massachusetts Medical Society |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
The New England Journal of Medicine |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1818107022710669312 |