Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China

This paper analyzes increasingly individualized herding behavior after the implementation of a grazing ban policy in northern China based on empirical research in 12 pastoralist villages. The findings reveal that de-collectivization of pastureland has not necessarily led to direct changes in individ...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/25912
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9580-1
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25912
Palabra clave:
Herding behavior
Property right
Pastureland use
Individualized activities
China
Rights
License
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id EDOCUR2_2ee8817bce2f1f5d9de57e0a97ce8442
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/25912
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 784589fa-8c93-4250-99ae-796b347cdb38-1d4aabb29-c933-43a4-9c5b-0e2ff6d7b299-12020-08-06T16:20:11Z2020-08-06T16:20:11Z2013-10-01This paper analyzes increasingly individualized herding behavior after the implementation of a grazing ban policy in northern China based on empirical research in 12 pastoralist villages. The findings reveal that de-collectivization of pastureland has not necessarily led to direct changes in individual land use strategies. Instead, a wider institutional context influenced by the implementation of a grazing ban has led to more individualized herding and increased short-term considerations of profit maximization in the study area, both of which are seen to undermine the sustainable use of pastureland. Based on our observations of herder responses to privatization, the grazing ban and a short experiment with lifting the grazing ban, we propose that the special characteristics of grassland and pastoralism call for institutions that facilitate locally originated pasture land use practice (e.g., co-operative herding, self-organized management) instead of exclusive reliance on a rigidly defined private property regime focused on fixed property boundaries.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9580-1ISSN: 0300-7839EISSN: 1572-9915https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25912engSpringer Nature771No. 41759Human EcologyHuman Ecology, ISSN:0300-7839;EISSN:1572-9915, No.41 (2013);pp.759-771https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10745-013-9580-1Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecHuman Ecologyinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURHerding behaviorProperty rightPastureland useIndividualized activitiesChinaIndividualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral ChinaUso individualizado de los pastizales: respuestas de los pastores a los arreglos institucionales en la pastoral chinaarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Lu, YuFarrell,Katharine Nora10336/25912oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/259122021-06-03 00:50:20.648https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Uso individualizado de los pastizales: respuestas de los pastores a los arreglos institucionales en la pastoral china
title Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
spellingShingle Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
Herding behavior
Property right
Pastureland use
Individualized activities
China
title_short Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
title_full Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
title_fullStr Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
title_full_unstemmed Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
title_sort Individualized Pastureland Use: Responses of Herders to Institutional Arrangements in Pastoral China
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Herding behavior
Property right
Pastureland use
Individualized activities
China
topic Herding behavior
Property right
Pastureland use
Individualized activities
China
description This paper analyzes increasingly individualized herding behavior after the implementation of a grazing ban policy in northern China based on empirical research in 12 pastoralist villages. The findings reveal that de-collectivization of pastureland has not necessarily led to direct changes in individual land use strategies. Instead, a wider institutional context influenced by the implementation of a grazing ban has led to more individualized herding and increased short-term considerations of profit maximization in the study area, both of which are seen to undermine the sustainable use of pastureland. Based on our observations of herder responses to privatization, the grazing ban and a short experiment with lifting the grazing ban, we propose that the special characteristics of grassland and pastoralism call for institutions that facilitate locally originated pasture land use practice (e.g., co-operative herding, self-organized management) instead of exclusive reliance on a rigidly defined private property regime focused on fixed property boundaries.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2013-10-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06T16:20:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06T16:20:11Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9580-1
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN: 0300-7839
EISSN: 1572-9915
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25912
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9580-1
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25912
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 0300-7839
EISSN: 1572-9915
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 771
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 41
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 759
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Human Ecology
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Human Ecology, ISSN:0300-7839;EISSN:1572-9915, No.41 (2013);pp.759-771
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10745-013-9580-1
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
rights_invalid_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Human Ecology
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390740557955072