Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the results of controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) in children. METHODS: Eleven databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement recommendations, and references fro...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22325
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000594
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22325
Palabra clave:
Analgesia
Animal assisted therapy
Autism
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Human
Meta analysis
Outcome assessment
Animal assisted therapy
Autism spectrum disorder
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Humans
Outcome assessment (health care)
Pain management
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_260ce747a8aecc2069d774ff721c8ee5
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22325
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 0fddde6e-dcfb-446c-bbe7-922f7d45e067ca6d2578-ccb6-4ba5-9e0a-732af4061b60414551556002020-05-25T23:56:06Z2020-05-25T23:56:06Z2018OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the results of controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) in children. METHODS: Eleven databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement recommendations, and references from included studies and previous reviews were examined. No date or language filters were applied. Only controlled study designs, including those using wait-list controls, that studied a specific condition or illness were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved. Nine were conducted in children with autism spectrum disorders, 10 in cerebral palsy (CP), 2 in Down syndrome, 3 in pain, and 2 in other conditions. Qualitative synthesis showed a small but significant contribution of AAT to the management of these conditions. Meta-analysis showed a mean difference in improvement in the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 scale in children with CP of 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.00 to 5.23) and a mean difference for 5-point pain scales of -0.81 (95% CI -1.32 to 0.30), both favoring AAT. CONCLUSION: Animal-assisted therapy may be useful as a complementary intervention in the management of children with CP and pain. Although results are in general positive for the management of children with Down syndrome and autism, the diversity of scales used to measure outcomes makes it difficult to establish true effectiveness. The application of simple corrective measures in the randomization process would greatly improve the quality of evidence. It is necessary to reach a consensus between AAT researchers regarding appropriate instruments to provide higher-quality evidence in further studies.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000594https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22325engNLM (Medline)590No. 7580Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBPVol. 39Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP, Vol.39, No.7 (2018); pp. 580-590https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056738237&doi=10.1097%2fDBP.0000000000000594&partnerID=40&md5=5bdd50ad3797539b06b541d34419cc02Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAnalgesiaAnimal assisted therapyAutismCerebral palsyChildDown syndromeHumanMeta analysisOutcome assessmentAnimal assisted therapyAutism spectrum disorderCerebral palsyChildDown syndromeHumansOutcome assessment (health care)Pain managementEffectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled StudiesarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Charry-Sánchez J.D.Pradilla I.Talero Gutiérrez, Claudia10336/22325oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/223252022-05-02 07:37:17.398247https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
title Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
spellingShingle Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
Analgesia
Animal assisted therapy
Autism
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Human
Meta analysis
Outcome assessment
Animal assisted therapy
Autism spectrum disorder
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Humans
Outcome assessment (health care)
Pain management
title_short Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
title_full Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
title_sort Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Pediatric Population: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Animal assisted therapy
Autism
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Human
Meta analysis
Outcome assessment
Animal assisted therapy
Autism spectrum disorder
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Humans
Outcome assessment (health care)
Pain management
topic Analgesia
Animal assisted therapy
Autism
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Human
Meta analysis
Outcome assessment
Animal assisted therapy
Autism spectrum disorder
Cerebral palsy
Child
Down syndrome
Humans
Outcome assessment (health care)
Pain management
description OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the results of controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) in children. METHODS: Eleven databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement recommendations, and references from included studies and previous reviews were examined. No date or language filters were applied. Only controlled study designs, including those using wait-list controls, that studied a specific condition or illness were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved. Nine were conducted in children with autism spectrum disorders, 10 in cerebral palsy (CP), 2 in Down syndrome, 3 in pain, and 2 in other conditions. Qualitative synthesis showed a small but significant contribution of AAT to the management of these conditions. Meta-analysis showed a mean difference in improvement in the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 scale in children with CP of 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.00 to 5.23) and a mean difference for 5-point pain scales of -0.81 (95% CI -1.32 to 0.30), both favoring AAT. CONCLUSION: Animal-assisted therapy may be useful as a complementary intervention in the management of children with CP and pain. Although results are in general positive for the management of children with Down syndrome and autism, the diversity of scales used to measure outcomes makes it difficult to establish true effectiveness. The application of simple corrective measures in the randomization process would greatly improve the quality of evidence. It is necessary to reach a consensus between AAT researchers regarding appropriate instruments to provide higher-quality evidence in further studies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:06Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:06Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000594
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22325
url https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000594
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22325
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 590
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 7
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 580
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 39
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP, Vol.39, No.7 (2018); pp. 580-590
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056738237&doi=10.1097%2fDBP.0000000000000594&partnerID=40&md5=5bdd50ad3797539b06b541d34419cc02
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv NLM (Medline)
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167599261417472