The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization

While virtually all elements of the original agenda of the ‘Washington Consensus’ have become global policy norms over the course of the past twenty years, the case of free capital mobility stands out as an outlier. In his original formulation of the ‘to-do-list’ for economic reformers, John William...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28924
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762710.009
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28924
Palabra clave:
Economics
Politics and international relations
International relations and international organisations
Economic development and growth
Rights
License
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id EDOCUR2_2418805a21336d5058739f13a096a48e
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28924
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 325696600e9831e74-fcc7-4a01-861e-4adc70504f9e2020-08-28T15:50:08Z2020-08-28T15:50:08Z2010While virtually all elements of the original agenda of the ‘Washington Consensus’ have become global policy norms over the course of the past twenty years, the case of free capital mobility stands out as an outlier. In his original formulation of the ‘to-do-list’ for economic reformers, John Williamson deliberately did not include capital account liberalization since he felt that no consensus could be reached in the late 1980s regarding its inclusion in the neoliberal reform package for developing countries (Williamson 1990). Yet capital account liberalization did become associated with the original Washington Consensus and even without formal validity reached the stage of norm emergence. A major driving force behind making capital mobility a policy norm was the International Monetary Fund (henceforth, the IMF or the Fund). However, despite strong support among the international financial institutions and the major powers in the global economic system, the unrestricted movement of international capital failed to leave the stage of norm emergence and to become a stabilized norm in the international financial system. In order to account for this outcome, we trace the evolution of the IMF's thinking on capital account liberalization from the early 1990s to the present. Specifically, we review the Fund's initial position on the benefits of liberalization, defined in terms of economic growth and market discipline. In doing so, we argue that the IMF has progressively reinterpreted the norm in terms of its allegedly welfare-enhancing effects, shifting from considering capital account liberalization as one of the essential variables that explain economic growth, to questioning this logic, to then highlight the positive alongside the negative effects of free capital mobility for developing countries.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762710.009ISBN: 9780511762710https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28924engCambridge University Press180163Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World BankOwning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank, ISBN: 9780511762710 (2010); pp. 163-180https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/owning-development/imf-and-capital-account-liberalization-a-case-of-failed-norm-institutionalization/89ED0B7B09B4F5F689F29B7EFB19B547Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecOwning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bankinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUREconomicsPolitics and international relationsInternational relations and international organisationsEconomic development and growthThe IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalizationEl FMI y la liberalización de la cuenta de capital: un caso de institucionalización normativa fallidabookPartParte de librohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248Leiteritz, Ralf JuanMoschella, Manuela10336/28924oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/289242021-09-07 07:08:32.283https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv El FMI y la liberalización de la cuenta de capital: un caso de institucionalización normativa fallida
title The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
spellingShingle The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
Economics
Politics and international relations
International relations and international organisations
Economic development and growth
title_short The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
title_full The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
title_fullStr The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
title_full_unstemmed The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
title_sort The IMF and capital account liberalization: a case of failed norm institutionalization
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Economics
Politics and international relations
International relations and international organisations
Economic development and growth
topic Economics
Politics and international relations
International relations and international organisations
Economic development and growth
description While virtually all elements of the original agenda of the ‘Washington Consensus’ have become global policy norms over the course of the past twenty years, the case of free capital mobility stands out as an outlier. In his original formulation of the ‘to-do-list’ for economic reformers, John Williamson deliberately did not include capital account liberalization since he felt that no consensus could be reached in the late 1980s regarding its inclusion in the neoliberal reform package for developing countries (Williamson 1990). Yet capital account liberalization did become associated with the original Washington Consensus and even without formal validity reached the stage of norm emergence. A major driving force behind making capital mobility a policy norm was the International Monetary Fund (henceforth, the IMF or the Fund). However, despite strong support among the international financial institutions and the major powers in the global economic system, the unrestricted movement of international capital failed to leave the stage of norm emergence and to become a stabilized norm in the international financial system. In order to account for this outcome, we trace the evolution of the IMF's thinking on capital account liberalization from the early 1990s to the present. Specifically, we review the Fund's initial position on the benefits of liberalization, defined in terms of economic growth and market discipline. In doing so, we argue that the IMF has progressively reinterpreted the norm in terms of its allegedly welfare-enhancing effects, shifting from considering capital account liberalization as one of the essential variables that explain economic growth, to questioning this logic, to then highlight the positive alongside the negative effects of free capital mobility for developing countries.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T15:50:08Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T15:50:08Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv bookPart
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Parte de libro
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762710.009
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISBN: 9780511762710
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28924
url https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762710.009
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28924
identifier_str_mv ISBN: 9780511762710
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 180
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 163
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank, ISBN: 9780511762710 (2010); pp. 163-180
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/owning-development/imf-and-capital-account-liberalization-a-case-of-failed-norm-institutionalization/89ED0B7B09B4F5F689F29B7EFB19B547
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
rights_invalid_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167594154852352