Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano
Objective/context: This article analyzes of ethnographic, geographical and cartographic discourses around transportation infrastructure plans and projects in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of southern Colombia. Specifically, it shows how the colonial and postcolonial vision of the foothills as a phy...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24201
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.04
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24201
- Palabra clave:
- Amazonian region
Colombia
Development
Frontiers
Infrastructure
State-building
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_2250b6856998f58a3f9781d1523d6ce8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24201 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
804069746002020-05-26T00:10:02Z2020-05-26T00:10:02Z2019Objective/context: This article analyzes of ethnographic, geographical and cartographic discourses around transportation infrastructure plans and projects in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of southern Colombia. Specifically, it shows how the colonial and postcolonial vision of the foothills as a physical and symbolic frontier between a “civilized” and a “savage” world has been instrumental in the conception and execution of such plans and projects, and, more broadly, in the control and appropriation of the Amazonian region. Originality: Usually, historical works on the Colombian nation-building have adopted a monolithic and centric vision of infrastructure because development has historically been confined to a limited portion of the national territory. On the contrary, this article focuses on the role of regions considered “frontiers”, “peripheries” or “margins” in the construction and legitimation of a hegemonic state project. Methodology: The research is based on the analysis and contrasting of primary sources such as travelers’ accounts, cartographic representations, and missionary and government archives. Conclusions: By establishing historical continuity in the discourses and infrastructure practices of the Andean-Amazonian foothills, we can conclude that these are part of a long-standing tradition in which the foothills is seen as a frontier, and roads and highways are viewed as “civilizing” infrastructure of the Amazonian space. © 2019, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota Colombia. All rights reserved.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.041211617https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24201engUniversidad de los Andes, Bogota Colombia92No. 7269Historia CriticaVol. 2019Historia Critica, ISSN:1211617, Vol.2019, No.72 (2019); pp. 69-92https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066505577&doi=10.7440%2fhistcrit72.2019.04&partnerID=40&md5=bbeff576c8f1a89029355bd102a19451Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAmazonian regionColombiaDevelopmentFrontiersInfrastructureState-buildingCaminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombianoCaminhos de fronteira: Espaço e poder na história do contraforte Amazônico colombianoFrontier roads: Space and power in the history of the Amazonian foothills of colombiaarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Uribe Martínez, SimónORIGINALUribe-2019-Historia_Cr-tica.pdfapplication/pdf2177761https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7799e7fe-d10e-463a-bdf5-9198290f33f9/downloadd08039a3d135f1898cd117a38cf06ca4MD51TEXTUribe-2019-Historia_Cr-tica.pdf.txtUribe-2019-Historia_Cr-tica.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain84333https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/32db4e60-c4d4-43d7-a168-95d143cee1b2/download6953b0b606382afdb8fcc1470ca7abe6MD52THUMBNAILUribe-2019-Historia_Cr-tica.pdf.jpgUribe-2019-Historia_Cr-tica.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3983https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/54caec32-8366-4262-800c-a10ae23b983c/download45006d833a827e7d6d9f158938e3ca9bMD5310336/24201oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/242012022-12-05 16:54:16.348https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.por.fl_str_mv |
Caminhos de fronteira: Espaço e poder na história do contraforte Amazônico colombiano |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.eng.fl_str_mv |
Frontier roads: Space and power in the history of the Amazonian foothills of colombia |
title |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
spellingShingle |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano Amazonian region Colombia Development Frontiers Infrastructure State-building |
title_short |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
title_full |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
title_fullStr |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
title_full_unstemmed |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
title_sort |
Caminos de frontera: Espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte Amazónico colombiano |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Amazonian region Colombia Development Frontiers Infrastructure State-building |
topic |
Amazonian region Colombia Development Frontiers Infrastructure State-building |
description |
Objective/context: This article analyzes of ethnographic, geographical and cartographic discourses around transportation infrastructure plans and projects in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of southern Colombia. Specifically, it shows how the colonial and postcolonial vision of the foothills as a physical and symbolic frontier between a “civilized” and a “savage” world has been instrumental in the conception and execution of such plans and projects, and, more broadly, in the control and appropriation of the Amazonian region. Originality: Usually, historical works on the Colombian nation-building have adopted a monolithic and centric vision of infrastructure because development has historically been confined to a limited portion of the national territory. On the contrary, this article focuses on the role of regions considered “frontiers”, “peripheries” or “margins” in the construction and legitimation of a hegemonic state project. Methodology: The research is based on the analysis and contrasting of primary sources such as travelers’ accounts, cartographic representations, and missionary and government archives. Conclusions: By establishing historical continuity in the discourses and infrastructure practices of the Andean-Amazonian foothills, we can conclude that these are part of a long-standing tradition in which the foothills is seen as a frontier, and roads and highways are viewed as “civilizing” infrastructure of the Amazonian space. © 2019, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota Colombia. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:10:02Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:10:02Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.04 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1211617 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24201 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.04 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24201 |
identifier_str_mv |
1211617 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
92 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 72 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
69 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Historia Critica |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 2019 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Historia Critica, ISSN:1211617, Vol.2019, No.72 (2019); pp. 69-92 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066505577&doi=10.7440%2fhistcrit72.2019.04&partnerID=40&md5=bbeff576c8f1a89029355bd102a19451 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de los Andes, Bogota Colombia |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7799e7fe-d10e-463a-bdf5-9198290f33f9/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/32db4e60-c4d4-43d7-a168-95d143cee1b2/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/54caec32-8366-4262-800c-a10ae23b983c/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d08039a3d135f1898cd117a38cf06ca4 6953b0b606382afdb8fcc1470ca7abe6 45006d833a827e7d6d9f158938e3ca9b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167689240772608 |