Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
The prevalence of recurrent periapical lesions has been reported between 43 and 65%, endodontic microsurgery (EM) is an alternative treatment option of recurrent periapical lesions. Aim the aim of the present study was to systematically quantify the effects of the association “clinical factors/follo...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18785
- Acceso en línea:
- http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785
- Palabra clave:
- Clinical Factors
Endodontics
Meta-Analysis
Microsurgery
Periapical Surgery
Bone
Clinical Outcome
Cochrane Library
Confidence Interval
Embase
Endodontics
Follow Up
Height
Human
Medline
Microsurgery
Quantitative Study
Registration
Risk Factor
Scientist
Systematic Review
Endodoncia
Tejido periapical
Microcirugía
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_1f0b764338bad6364d4532ec87095cc5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18785 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.eng.fl_str_mv |
Fattori predittivi del risultato clinico in microchirurgia endodontica : una revisione sistematica e meta-analisi |
title |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Factors Endodontics Meta-Analysis Microsurgery Periapical Surgery Bone Clinical Outcome Cochrane Library Confidence Interval Embase Endodontics Follow Up Height Human Medline Microsurgery Quantitative Study Registration Risk Factor Scientist Systematic Review Endodoncia Tejido periapical Microcirugía |
title_short |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Factors Endodontics Meta-Analysis Microsurgery Periapical Surgery |
topic |
Clinical Factors Endodontics Meta-Analysis Microsurgery Periapical Surgery Bone Clinical Outcome Cochrane Library Confidence Interval Embase Endodontics Follow Up Height Human Medline Microsurgery Quantitative Study Registration Risk Factor Scientist Systematic Review Endodoncia Tejido periapical Microcirugía |
dc.subject.decs.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bone Clinical Outcome Cochrane Library Confidence Interval Embase Endodontics Follow Up Height Human Medline Microsurgery Quantitative Study Registration Risk Factor Scientist Systematic Review |
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Endodoncia Tejido periapical Microcirugía |
description |
The prevalence of recurrent periapical lesions has been reported between 43 and 65%, endodontic microsurgery (EM) is an alternative treatment option of recurrent periapical lesions. Aim the aim of the present study was to systematically quantify the effects of the association “clinical factors/follow-up period” on EM outcomes. Methodology Two researchers conducted a literature search from 2005 to 2015. Searched databases were MEDLINE, Evidence-based Endodontics, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, SCIELO, Trip-Database. Tables of contents of endodontic journals and references listed on retrieved articles were searched as well. A residual heterogeneity test set at 95% confidence interval controlled sample variability of each study. Meta-regression estimated the factor/follow-up period on the outcomes of the ME. Results 1242 articles were identified, 10 of which were included for meta-regression. On average, EM was 84.13% successful when evaluated from 1 to 6 years. The heterogeneity analysis (P = 0.87) established the total variability of 8% in reference to sample variability. It was determined that a loss of “Crestal Bone Height” >3 mm proportionally predicts, from the second year on, an increased risk of EM failure (OR = 1.33, 90%CI, 1.01–1.77; P = 0.09). Factors such as “retro-filling material” (P = 0.0002), “presurgical clinical signs” (P = 0.0116), and “dentinal root defects” (P = 0.0001) are considered significant risk factors for EM failure without association to time. Conclusions EM could be considered clinically successful over time. The factor “crestal bone height” estimated a predictive and progressive association of healing from the second year on. Different root-end filling materials aside from MTA could be associated with EM failure, without association with follow-up periods. *Registration Code: CRD42015029593, PROSPERO database. © 2017 Società Italiana di Endodonzia |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-07T15:00:15Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-07T15:00:15Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
ISSN 1121-4171 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785 |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN 1121-4171 |
url |
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
13 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 1 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
2 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 31 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, ISSN: 1121-4171, Vol. 31/No. 1 (2017) pp. 2-13 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1121417117300055?token=1CD5746204C440D181FA7DC8A0B8F58A6174DFD0D9F1FFE1563E9D49874A99168899B19E008F43A02CAC444747721AA7 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
dc.rights.cc.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/632d43db-84ff-4000-9aa2-3f9a754d0b8e/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/b7f18a34-7b1e-4b25-992a-3d81b66be26a/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/38d4de7d-c53e-4f60-8367-4edd51228e7d/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
805c5e7cdfa785c950e7b777e73cf92f 83aede1f630cd313f5b9d59c918cf762 ece0253a7cb33a8c188797a713cb804b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167636135641088 |
spelling |
34429aa6-bc18-4b40-9742-962e866c980460040fc7e60-c307-4faa-82cd-a24fa452287360080873475600187e21ce-e5be-4ac1-8032-22e80b86051560033ea28f2-a35b-4e78-8307-d00406e80015600afe1f2b6-aa8b-48ae-9c44-6a9ac6ce33be6002018-12-07T15:00:15Z2018-12-07T15:00:15Z20172017The prevalence of recurrent periapical lesions has been reported between 43 and 65%, endodontic microsurgery (EM) is an alternative treatment option of recurrent periapical lesions. Aim the aim of the present study was to systematically quantify the effects of the association “clinical factors/follow-up period” on EM outcomes. Methodology Two researchers conducted a literature search from 2005 to 2015. Searched databases were MEDLINE, Evidence-based Endodontics, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, SCIELO, Trip-Database. Tables of contents of endodontic journals and references listed on retrieved articles were searched as well. A residual heterogeneity test set at 95% confidence interval controlled sample variability of each study. Meta-regression estimated the factor/follow-up period on the outcomes of the ME. Results 1242 articles were identified, 10 of which were included for meta-regression. On average, EM was 84.13% successful when evaluated from 1 to 6 years. The heterogeneity analysis (P = 0.87) established the total variability of 8% in reference to sample variability. It was determined that a loss of “Crestal Bone Height” >3 mm proportionally predicts, from the second year on, an increased risk of EM failure (OR = 1.33, 90%CI, 1.01–1.77; P = 0.09). Factors such as “retro-filling material” (P = 0.0002), “presurgical clinical signs” (P = 0.0116), and “dentinal root defects” (P = 0.0001) are considered significant risk factors for EM failure without association to time. Conclusions EM could be considered clinically successful over time. The factor “crestal bone height” estimated a predictive and progressive association of healing from the second year on. Different root-end filling materials aside from MTA could be associated with EM failure, without association with follow-up periods. *Registration Code: CRD42015029593, PROSPERO database. © 2017 Società Italiana di Endodonziaapplication/pdfISSN 1121-4171http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785eng13No. 12Giornale Italiano di EndodonziaVol. 31Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, ISSN: 1121-4171, Vol. 31/No. 1 (2017) pp. 2-13https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1121417117300055?token=1CD5746204C440D181FA7DC8A0B8F58A6174DFD0D9F1FFE1563E9D49874A99168899B19E008F43A02CAC444747721AA7Abierto (Texto Completo)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURClinical FactorsEndodonticsMeta-AnalysisMicrosurgeryPeriapical SurgeryBoneClinical OutcomeCochrane LibraryConfidence IntervalEmbaseEndodonticsFollow UpHeightHumanMedlineMicrosurgeryQuantitative StudyRegistrationRisk FactorScientistSystematic ReviewEndodonciaTejido periapicalMicrocirugíaPredictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysisFattori predittivi del risultato clinico in microchirurgia endodontica : una revisione sistematica e meta-analisiarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501García-Guerrero, ClaudiaQuijano Guauque, SaraMolano González, NicolásPineda, Gerardo AntonioNino-Barrera, Javier L.Marín-Zuluaga, Dairo JavierGarcía-Guerrero, ClaudiaQuijano Guauque, SaraMolano, NicolásPineda, Gerardo AntonioNino-Barrera, Javier L.Marín-Zuluaga, Dairo JavierORIGINAL25.pdfapplication/pdf1002474https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/632d43db-84ff-4000-9aa2-3f9a754d0b8e/download805c5e7cdfa785c950e7b777e73cf92fMD51TEXT25.pdf.txt25.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain49768https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/b7f18a34-7b1e-4b25-992a-3d81b66be26a/download83aede1f630cd313f5b9d59c918cf762MD52THUMBNAIL25.pdf.jpg25.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4834https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/38d4de7d-c53e-4f60-8367-4edd51228e7d/downloadece0253a7cb33a8c188797a713cb804bMD5310336/18785oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/187852019-09-19 07:37:54.609585https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |