Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis

The prevalence of recurrent periapical lesions has been reported between 43 and 65%, endodontic microsurgery (EM) is an alternative treatment option of recurrent periapical lesions. Aim the aim of the present study was to systematically quantify the effects of the association “clinical factors/follo...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18785
Acceso en línea:
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785
Palabra clave:
Clinical Factors
Endodontics
Meta-Analysis
Microsurgery
Periapical Surgery
Bone
Clinical Outcome
Cochrane Library
Confidence Interval
Embase
Endodontics
Follow Up
Height
Human
Medline
Microsurgery
Quantitative Study
Registration
Risk Factor
Scientist
Systematic Review
Endodoncia
Tejido periapical
Microcirugía
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_1f0b764338bad6364d4532ec87095cc5
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18785
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.eng.fl_str_mv Fattori predittivi del risultato clinico in microchirurgia endodontica : una revisione sistematica e meta-analisi
title Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Factors
Endodontics
Meta-Analysis
Microsurgery
Periapical Surgery
Bone
Clinical Outcome
Cochrane Library
Confidence Interval
Embase
Endodontics
Follow Up
Height
Human
Medline
Microsurgery
Quantitative Study
Registration
Risk Factor
Scientist
Systematic Review
Endodoncia
Tejido periapical
Microcirugía
title_short Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Clinical Factors
Endodontics
Meta-Analysis
Microsurgery
Periapical Surgery
topic Clinical Factors
Endodontics
Meta-Analysis
Microsurgery
Periapical Surgery
Bone
Clinical Outcome
Cochrane Library
Confidence Interval
Embase
Endodontics
Follow Up
Height
Human
Medline
Microsurgery
Quantitative Study
Registration
Risk Factor
Scientist
Systematic Review
Endodoncia
Tejido periapical
Microcirugía
dc.subject.decs.spa.fl_str_mv Bone
Clinical Outcome
Cochrane Library
Confidence Interval
Embase
Endodontics
Follow Up
Height
Human
Medline
Microsurgery
Quantitative Study
Registration
Risk Factor
Scientist
Systematic Review
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Endodoncia
Tejido periapical
Microcirugía
description The prevalence of recurrent periapical lesions has been reported between 43 and 65%, endodontic microsurgery (EM) is an alternative treatment option of recurrent periapical lesions. Aim the aim of the present study was to systematically quantify the effects of the association “clinical factors/follow-up period” on EM outcomes. Methodology Two researchers conducted a literature search from 2005 to 2015. Searched databases were MEDLINE, Evidence-based Endodontics, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, SCIELO, Trip-Database. Tables of contents of endodontic journals and references listed on retrieved articles were searched as well. A residual heterogeneity test set at 95% confidence interval controlled sample variability of each study. Meta-regression estimated the factor/follow-up period on the outcomes of the ME. Results 1242 articles were identified, 10 of which were included for meta-regression. On average, EM was 84.13% successful when evaluated from 1 to 6 years. The heterogeneity analysis (P = 0.87) established the total variability of 8% in reference to sample variability. It was determined that a loss of “Crestal Bone Height” >3 mm proportionally predicts, from the second year on, an increased risk of EM failure (OR = 1.33, 90%CI, 1.01–1.77; P = 0.09). Factors such as “retro-filling material” (P = 0.0002), “presurgical clinical signs” (P = 0.0116), and “dentinal root defects” (P = 0.0001) are considered significant risk factors for EM failure without association to time. Conclusions EM could be considered clinically successful over time. The factor “crestal bone height” estimated a predictive and progressive association of healing from the second year on. Different root-end filling materials aside from MTA could be associated with EM failure, without association with follow-up periods. *Registration Code: CRD42015029593, PROSPERO database. © 2017 Società Italiana di Endodonzia
publishDate 2017
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-07T15:00:15Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-07T15:00:15Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN 1121-4171
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785
identifier_str_mv ISSN 1121-4171
url http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 13
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 31
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, ISSN: 1121-4171, Vol. 31/No. 1 (2017) pp. 2-13
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1121417117300055?token=1CD5746204C440D181FA7DC8A0B8F58A6174DFD0D9F1FFE1563E9D49874A99168899B19E008F43A02CAC444747721AA7
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.cc.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/632d43db-84ff-4000-9aa2-3f9a754d0b8e/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/b7f18a34-7b1e-4b25-992a-3d81b66be26a/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/38d4de7d-c53e-4f60-8367-4edd51228e7d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 805c5e7cdfa785c950e7b777e73cf92f
83aede1f630cd313f5b9d59c918cf762
ece0253a7cb33a8c188797a713cb804b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167636135641088
spelling 34429aa6-bc18-4b40-9742-962e866c980460040fc7e60-c307-4faa-82cd-a24fa452287360080873475600187e21ce-e5be-4ac1-8032-22e80b86051560033ea28f2-a35b-4e78-8307-d00406e80015600afe1f2b6-aa8b-48ae-9c44-6a9ac6ce33be6002018-12-07T15:00:15Z2018-12-07T15:00:15Z20172017The prevalence of recurrent periapical lesions has been reported between 43 and 65%, endodontic microsurgery (EM) is an alternative treatment option of recurrent periapical lesions. Aim the aim of the present study was to systematically quantify the effects of the association “clinical factors/follow-up period” on EM outcomes. Methodology Two researchers conducted a literature search from 2005 to 2015. Searched databases were MEDLINE, Evidence-based Endodontics, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, SCIELO, Trip-Database. Tables of contents of endodontic journals and references listed on retrieved articles were searched as well. A residual heterogeneity test set at 95% confidence interval controlled sample variability of each study. Meta-regression estimated the factor/follow-up period on the outcomes of the ME. Results 1242 articles were identified, 10 of which were included for meta-regression. On average, EM was 84.13% successful when evaluated from 1 to 6 years. The heterogeneity analysis (P = 0.87) established the total variability of 8% in reference to sample variability. It was determined that a loss of “Crestal Bone Height” >3 mm proportionally predicts, from the second year on, an increased risk of EM failure (OR = 1.33, 90%CI, 1.01–1.77; P = 0.09). Factors such as “retro-filling material” (P = 0.0002), “presurgical clinical signs” (P = 0.0116), and “dentinal root defects” (P = 0.0001) are considered significant risk factors for EM failure without association to time. Conclusions EM could be considered clinically successful over time. The factor “crestal bone height” estimated a predictive and progressive association of healing from the second year on. Different root-end filling materials aside from MTA could be associated with EM failure, without association with follow-up periods. *Registration Code: CRD42015029593, PROSPERO database. © 2017 Società Italiana di Endodonziaapplication/pdfISSN 1121-4171http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18785eng13No. 12Giornale Italiano di EndodonziaVol. 31Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, ISSN: 1121-4171, Vol. 31/No. 1 (2017) pp. 2-13https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1121417117300055?token=1CD5746204C440D181FA7DC8A0B8F58A6174DFD0D9F1FFE1563E9D49874A99168899B19E008F43A02CAC444747721AA7Abierto (Texto Completo)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURClinical FactorsEndodonticsMeta-AnalysisMicrosurgeryPeriapical SurgeryBoneClinical OutcomeCochrane LibraryConfidence IntervalEmbaseEndodonticsFollow UpHeightHumanMedlineMicrosurgeryQuantitative StudyRegistrationRisk FactorScientistSystematic ReviewEndodonciaTejido periapicalMicrocirugíaPredictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery : a systematic review and meta-analysisFattori predittivi del risultato clinico in microchirurgia endodontica : una revisione sistematica e meta-analisiarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501García-Guerrero, ClaudiaQuijano Guauque, SaraMolano González, NicolásPineda, Gerardo AntonioNino-Barrera, Javier L.Marín-Zuluaga, Dairo JavierGarcía-Guerrero, ClaudiaQuijano Guauque, SaraMolano, NicolásPineda, Gerardo AntonioNino-Barrera, Javier L.Marín-Zuluaga, Dairo JavierORIGINAL25.pdfapplication/pdf1002474https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/632d43db-84ff-4000-9aa2-3f9a754d0b8e/download805c5e7cdfa785c950e7b777e73cf92fMD51TEXT25.pdf.txt25.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain49768https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/b7f18a34-7b1e-4b25-992a-3d81b66be26a/download83aede1f630cd313f5b9d59c918cf762MD52THUMBNAIL25.pdf.jpg25.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4834https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/38d4de7d-c53e-4f60-8367-4edd51228e7d/downloadece0253a7cb33a8c188797a713cb804bMD5310336/18785oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/187852019-09-19 07:37:54.609585https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co