Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment

Methodological evaluations of deliberative mini-publics usually focus on the internal and external validity of experimental designs. Even though such a focus on causal inference and generalization is important, it is incomplete. We argue that the epistemic validity of experimental designs should als...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2012
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18618
Acceso en línea:
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18618
Palabra clave:
deliberative democracy
epistemic proceduralism
experimental methodology
cognitive diversity.
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_199bb3c4c80a7450259337e8f7ee7712
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18618
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling Grupo de Investigación en Derechos HumanosUgarriza Uribe, Juan EstebanCaluwaerts, DidierUgarriza, Juan E.Caluwaerts, Didier71785570600421f5408-9192-44e4-bb9a-fb3dbb3604db-12018-10-05T16:58:07Z2018-10-05T16:58:07Z20122012Methodological evaluations of deliberative mini-publics usually focus on the internal and external validity of experimental designs. Even though such a focus on causal inference and generalization is important, it is incomplete. We argue that the epistemic validity of experimental designs should also be taken into account in order to ensure measuring truly a deliberative exercise rather than just a regular discussion. By ensuring the inclusion and publicity of all arguments, the process of arguing back-and-forth between multiple positions is theoretically claimed to generate better outcomes and should therefore be validated along epistemic lines. Here, we suggest some methodological techniques for enabling the epistemic validity assumption of deliberative experimental designs. These techniques relate to the sampling of the groups and the treatments they receive.application/pdfISSN 1937-2841http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18618spa20No. 11Journal of Public DeliberationVol. 8Journal of Public Deliberation, ISSN 1937-2841, Vol. 8 No.1, Art.6, (2012); pp. 1-20https://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=jpdAbierto (Texto Completo)http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1937-2841/es/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURdeliberative democracyepistemic proceduralismexperimental methodologycognitive diversity.Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesmentarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501ORIGINALPDF52.pdfapplication/pdf186479https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/e67d78e5-9927-457b-a0bd-4153f37c1bae/downloadf20422cb706bc2f0aa31180e71fdf94bMD51TEXTPDF52.pdf.txtPDF52.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain53056https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/55cdf4a3-1915-4ea5-8fae-423229e05f8a/downloadddff4c30e8d3c7c14d9e0c7dca669c7fMD52THUMBNAILPDF52.pdf.jpgPDF52.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2775https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6f0746d0-1e94-4da0-b44c-af7a85820f0a/downloadeab0728ca759d049ebc0f962eb6321c1MD5310336/18618oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/186182021-06-03 00:48:09.353http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1937-2841/es/https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
title Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
spellingShingle Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
deliberative democracy
epistemic proceduralism
experimental methodology
cognitive diversity.
title_short Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
title_full Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
title_fullStr Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
title_full_unstemmed Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
title_sort Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment
dc.contributor.gruplac.spa.fl_str_mv Grupo de Investigación en Derechos Humanos
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv deliberative democracy
epistemic proceduralism
experimental methodology
cognitive diversity.
topic deliberative democracy
epistemic proceduralism
experimental methodology
cognitive diversity.
description Methodological evaluations of deliberative mini-publics usually focus on the internal and external validity of experimental designs. Even though such a focus on causal inference and generalization is important, it is incomplete. We argue that the epistemic validity of experimental designs should also be taken into account in order to ensure measuring truly a deliberative exercise rather than just a regular discussion. By ensuring the inclusion and publicity of all arguments, the process of arguing back-and-forth between multiple positions is theoretically claimed to generate better outcomes and should therefore be validated along epistemic lines. Here, we suggest some methodological techniques for enabling the epistemic validity assumption of deliberative experimental designs. These techniques relate to the sampling of the groups and the treatments they receive.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-05T16:58:07Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-05T16:58:07Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN 1937-2841
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18618
identifier_str_mv ISSN 1937-2841
url http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18618
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 20
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Public Deliberation
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 8
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Public Deliberation, ISSN 1937-2841, Vol. 8 No.1, Art.6, (2012); pp. 1-20
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=jpd
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1937-2841/es/
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1937-2841/es/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/e67d78e5-9927-457b-a0bd-4153f37c1bae/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/55cdf4a3-1915-4ea5-8fae-423229e05f8a/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6f0746d0-1e94-4da0-b44c-af7a85820f0a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f20422cb706bc2f0aa31180e71fdf94b
ddff4c30e8d3c7c14d9e0c7dca669c7f
eab0728ca759d049ebc0f962eb6321c1
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167711740067840