Wealth, Social Protection Programs, and Child Labor in Colombia: A Cross-sectional Study

This article has 3 main objectives: (1) to assess the prevalence of child labor in Colombia, (2) to identify factors associated with child labor, and (3) to determine whether social protection programs have an association with the prevalence of child labor in the country. Using a cross-sectional stu...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24360
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731417747421
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24360
Palabra clave:
Adolescence
Child health
Child labor
Demographic survey
Disease prevalence
Employment
Government
Health survey
Social security
Socioeconomic conditions
Welfare reform
Colombia
Adolescent
Age
Child
Colombia
Cross-sectional study
Female
Human
Male
Prevalence
Public policy
Sex factor
Socioeconomics
Statistics and numerical data
Adolescent
Age factors
Child
Child labor
Colombia
Cross-sectional studies
Female
Humans
Male
Prevalence
Public policy
Sex factors
Socioeconomic factors
Adolescent
Child
Child labor
Colombia
Employment
Government
Social protection
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:This article has 3 main objectives: (1) to assess the prevalence of child labor in Colombia, (2) to identify factors associated with child labor, and (3) to determine whether social protection programs have an association with the prevalence of child labor in the country. Using a cross-sectional study with data from the Colombian Demographic and Health Survey 2010, a working child was defined as a child who worked during the week prior to the survey in an activity other than household chores. Through descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariate regressions, it was found that child labor was associated with gender (boys were more likely to work), older age, ethnicity (children from indigenous communities were more likely to be workers), school dropout, disability (children with disabilities were less likely to be working), subsidized health social security system membership, and lower number of years of mother’s schooling. Furthermore, the results of this study suggest that children beneficiaries of the subsidy Familias en Acción were less likely to be working and that social protection programs were more effective to reduce child labor when targeting the lowest wealth quintiles of the Colombian population. © The Author(s) 2018.