Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are becoming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets appropriate to describe composition gradients and ?-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in te...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22491
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12825
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491
- Palabra clave:
- Community composition
Complementarity
Herbarium
Phytosociology
Species diversity
Species occurrence
Species richness
Taxonomy
Aveiro [portugal]
Colombia
Paramos
Portugal
Additive partitioning
Beta-diversity
Composition gradients
Gbif
Occurrence data
Phytosociological relevés
Páramo
Richness
Taxonomic bias
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_16bc18bd503162c0244a39eb92bb3ace |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22491 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
665908600526995856003cb94e68-4527-446f-996f-bd5d1cb0e32596bd19e2-66c9-4675-aa2f-3c934be79ff4c7498203-3696-4fdf-bcf7-bdddb5448af43593286002020-05-25T23:56:42Z2020-05-25T23:56:42Z2020Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are becoming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets appropriate to describe composition gradients and ?-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in terms of composition (co-occurrence) gradients depending on the considered scale?. Location: Páramos (Neo-tropical alpine ecosystems) of Colombia. Methods: We compared vegetation patterns from phytosociological relevés and reconstructed pseudo-communities from herbarium collections in the Colombian high elevation páramo ecosystem using diversity partitioning and Mantel correlations. Results: Species composition differed in the two data sets, which could be explained by taxonomic bias towards charismatic species and overrepresentation of rare species in the herbarium data set, whereas common species were more frequently represented in the phytosociological data set. The two data sets showed a similarly preponderant importance of large-scale differences when we looked at species accumulation across different scales. Small-scale richness contributed more to total richness for the phytosociological data set, while richness at intermediate scales was more important in the herbarium data set. Finally, pairwise ?-diversity analyses did not show correlations between data sets, and common species showed similar ecological distribution patterns. Conclusions: We recommend caution to researchers who wish to describe ?-diversity patterns in local communities using only herbarium data. However, since the two data sets showed some complementarity in their composition patterns, we suggest that combining data from relevés (or plots) and occurrence data (herbarium records, citizen science, etc.) could be an efficient strategy for describing broader diversity patterns. We discuss the circumstances under which it could be advantageous to work with such combined data sets, in particular in relation to conservation issues. © 2019 International Association for Vegetation Scienceapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.1282511009233https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491engWiley-Blackwell219No. 1208Journal of Vegetation ScienceVol. 31Journal of Vegetation Science, ISSN:11009233, Vol.31, No.1 (2020); pp. 208-219https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075720810&doi=10.1111%2fjvs.12825&partnerID=40&md5=898f8ded6e25b01c0313453f12aa49bfAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCommunity compositionComplementarityHerbariumPhytosociologySpecies diversitySpecies occurrenceSpecies richnessTaxonomyAveiro [portugal]ColombiaParamosPortugalAdditive partitioningBeta-diversityComposition gradientsGbifOccurrence dataPhytosociological relevésPáramoRichnessTaxonomic biasPhytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community compositionarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Bottin, MariusSánchez Andrade, AdrianaPeyre, GwendolynVargas, CarlosRaz, LaurenRichardson, James-Edward10336/22491oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/224912022-05-02 07:37:17.1401https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
title |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
spellingShingle |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition Community composition Complementarity Herbarium Phytosociology Species diversity Species occurrence Species richness Taxonomy Aveiro [portugal] Colombia Paramos Portugal Additive partitioning Beta-diversity Composition gradients Gbif Occurrence data Phytosociological relevés Páramo Richness Taxonomic bias |
title_short |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
title_full |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
title_fullStr |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
title_sort |
Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Community composition Complementarity Herbarium Phytosociology Species diversity Species occurrence Species richness Taxonomy Aveiro [portugal] Colombia Paramos Portugal Additive partitioning Beta-diversity Composition gradients Gbif Occurrence data Phytosociological relevés Páramo Richness Taxonomic bias |
topic |
Community composition Complementarity Herbarium Phytosociology Species diversity Species occurrence Species richness Taxonomy Aveiro [portugal] Colombia Paramos Portugal Additive partitioning Beta-diversity Composition gradients Gbif Occurrence data Phytosociological relevés Páramo Richness Taxonomic bias |
description |
Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are becoming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets appropriate to describe composition gradients and ?-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in terms of composition (co-occurrence) gradients depending on the considered scale?. Location: Páramos (Neo-tropical alpine ecosystems) of Colombia. Methods: We compared vegetation patterns from phytosociological relevés and reconstructed pseudo-communities from herbarium collections in the Colombian high elevation páramo ecosystem using diversity partitioning and Mantel correlations. Results: Species composition differed in the two data sets, which could be explained by taxonomic bias towards charismatic species and overrepresentation of rare species in the herbarium data set, whereas common species were more frequently represented in the phytosociological data set. The two data sets showed a similarly preponderant importance of large-scale differences when we looked at species accumulation across different scales. Small-scale richness contributed more to total richness for the phytosociological data set, while richness at intermediate scales was more important in the herbarium data set. Finally, pairwise ?-diversity analyses did not show correlations between data sets, and common species showed similar ecological distribution patterns. Conclusions: We recommend caution to researchers who wish to describe ?-diversity patterns in local communities using only herbarium data. However, since the two data sets showed some complementarity in their composition patterns, we suggest that combining data from relevés (or plots) and occurrence data (herbarium records, citizen science, etc.) could be an efficient strategy for describing broader diversity patterns. We discuss the circumstances under which it could be advantageous to work with such combined data sets, in particular in relation to conservation issues. © 2019 International Association for Vegetation Science |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:56:42Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:56:42Z |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12825 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
11009233 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12825 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491 |
identifier_str_mv |
11009233 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
219 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 1 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
208 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Vegetation Science |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 31 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Vegetation Science, ISSN:11009233, Vol.31, No.1 (2020); pp. 208-219 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075720810&doi=10.1111%2fjvs.12825&partnerID=40&md5=898f8ded6e25b01c0313453f12aa49bf |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167539920404480 |