Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition

Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are becoming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets appropriate to describe composition gradients and ?-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in te...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22491
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12825
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491
Palabra clave:
Community composition
Complementarity
Herbarium
Phytosociology
Species diversity
Species occurrence
Species richness
Taxonomy
Aveiro [portugal]
Colombia
Paramos
Portugal
Additive partitioning
Beta-diversity
Composition gradients
Gbif
Occurrence data
Phytosociological relevés
Páramo
Richness
Taxonomic bias
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_16bc18bd503162c0244a39eb92bb3ace
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22491
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 665908600526995856003cb94e68-4527-446f-996f-bd5d1cb0e32596bd19e2-66c9-4675-aa2f-3c934be79ff4c7498203-3696-4fdf-bcf7-bdddb5448af43593286002020-05-25T23:56:42Z2020-05-25T23:56:42Z2020Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are becoming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets appropriate to describe composition gradients and ?-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in terms of composition (co-occurrence) gradients depending on the considered scale?. Location: Páramos (Neo-tropical alpine ecosystems) of Colombia. Methods: We compared vegetation patterns from phytosociological relevés and reconstructed pseudo-communities from herbarium collections in the Colombian high elevation páramo ecosystem using diversity partitioning and Mantel correlations. Results: Species composition differed in the two data sets, which could be explained by taxonomic bias towards charismatic species and overrepresentation of rare species in the herbarium data set, whereas common species were more frequently represented in the phytosociological data set. The two data sets showed a similarly preponderant importance of large-scale differences when we looked at species accumulation across different scales. Small-scale richness contributed more to total richness for the phytosociological data set, while richness at intermediate scales was more important in the herbarium data set. Finally, pairwise ?-diversity analyses did not show correlations between data sets, and common species showed similar ecological distribution patterns. Conclusions: We recommend caution to researchers who wish to describe ?-diversity patterns in local communities using only herbarium data. However, since the two data sets showed some complementarity in their composition patterns, we suggest that combining data from relevés (or plots) and occurrence data (herbarium records, citizen science, etc.) could be an efficient strategy for describing broader diversity patterns. We discuss the circumstances under which it could be advantageous to work with such combined data sets, in particular in relation to conservation issues. © 2019 International Association for Vegetation Scienceapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.1282511009233https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491engWiley-Blackwell219No. 1208Journal of Vegetation ScienceVol. 31Journal of Vegetation Science, ISSN:11009233, Vol.31, No.1 (2020); pp. 208-219https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075720810&doi=10.1111%2fjvs.12825&partnerID=40&md5=898f8ded6e25b01c0313453f12aa49bfAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCommunity compositionComplementarityHerbariumPhytosociologySpecies diversitySpecies occurrenceSpecies richnessTaxonomyAveiro [portugal]ColombiaParamosPortugalAdditive partitioningBeta-diversityComposition gradientsGbifOccurrence dataPhytosociological relevésPáramoRichnessTaxonomic biasPhytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community compositionarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Bottin, MariusSánchez Andrade, AdrianaPeyre, GwendolynVargas, CarlosRaz, LaurenRichardson, James-Edward10336/22491oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/224912022-05-02 07:37:17.1401https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
title Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
spellingShingle Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
Community composition
Complementarity
Herbarium
Phytosociology
Species diversity
Species occurrence
Species richness
Taxonomy
Aveiro [portugal]
Colombia
Paramos
Portugal
Additive partitioning
Beta-diversity
Composition gradients
Gbif
Occurrence data
Phytosociological relevés
Páramo
Richness
Taxonomic bias
title_short Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
title_full Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
title_fullStr Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
title_full_unstemmed Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
title_sort Phytosociological data and herbarium collections show congruent large-scale patterns but differ in their local descriptions of community composition
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Community composition
Complementarity
Herbarium
Phytosociology
Species diversity
Species occurrence
Species richness
Taxonomy
Aveiro [portugal]
Colombia
Paramos
Portugal
Additive partitioning
Beta-diversity
Composition gradients
Gbif
Occurrence data
Phytosociological relevés
Páramo
Richness
Taxonomic bias
topic Community composition
Complementarity
Herbarium
Phytosociology
Species diversity
Species occurrence
Species richness
Taxonomy
Aveiro [portugal]
Colombia
Paramos
Portugal
Additive partitioning
Beta-diversity
Composition gradients
Gbif
Occurrence data
Phytosociological relevés
Páramo
Richness
Taxonomic bias
description Question: As a result of recent and substantial digitization efforts, herbaria are becoming important sources of data for vegetation scientists. Are such data sets appropriate to describe composition gradients and ?-diversity? When compared with phytosociological data, what are the differences in terms of composition (co-occurrence) gradients depending on the considered scale?. Location: Páramos (Neo-tropical alpine ecosystems) of Colombia. Methods: We compared vegetation patterns from phytosociological relevés and reconstructed pseudo-communities from herbarium collections in the Colombian high elevation páramo ecosystem using diversity partitioning and Mantel correlations. Results: Species composition differed in the two data sets, which could be explained by taxonomic bias towards charismatic species and overrepresentation of rare species in the herbarium data set, whereas common species were more frequently represented in the phytosociological data set. The two data sets showed a similarly preponderant importance of large-scale differences when we looked at species accumulation across different scales. Small-scale richness contributed more to total richness for the phytosociological data set, while richness at intermediate scales was more important in the herbarium data set. Finally, pairwise ?-diversity analyses did not show correlations between data sets, and common species showed similar ecological distribution patterns. Conclusions: We recommend caution to researchers who wish to describe ?-diversity patterns in local communities using only herbarium data. However, since the two data sets showed some complementarity in their composition patterns, we suggest that combining data from relevés (or plots) and occurrence data (herbarium records, citizen science, etc.) could be an efficient strategy for describing broader diversity patterns. We discuss the circumstances under which it could be advantageous to work with such combined data sets, in particular in relation to conservation issues. © 2019 International Association for Vegetation Science
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:42Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:42Z
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12825
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 11009233
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12825
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22491
identifier_str_mv 11009233
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 219
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 208
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Vegetation Science
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 31
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Vegetation Science, ISSN:11009233, Vol.31, No.1 (2020); pp. 208-219
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075720810&doi=10.1111%2fjvs.12825&partnerID=40&md5=898f8ded6e25b01c0313453f12aa49bf
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167539920404480