Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers

Cytokines, chemokines, and growth and remodeling factors orchestrate wound healing when skin damage occurs. During early stages, when the wound is still open, detection and quantification of these compounds might provide biomarkers of skin wound healing, which could aid to complete the scenario prov...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23868
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-018-0528-2
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23868
Palabra clave:
Biological marker
Collagen type 1
Biological marker
Chemokine
Cytokine
Signal peptide
Animal cell
Animal experiment
Animal model
Animal tissue
Article
Comparative study
Controlled study
Follow up
Granulation tissue
Histopathology
Lagomorph
Morphometry
Nonhuman
Priority journal
Skin graft
Skin injury
Surface plasmon resonance
Wound closure
Wound fluid
Wound healing
Animal
Artificial skin
Autograft
Disease model
Epidermis
Metabolism
Skin disease
Skin transplantation
Tissue scaffold
Transplantation
Animals
Autografts
Biomarkers
Chemokines
Collagen type i
Cytokines
Epidermis
Intercellular signaling peptides and proteins
Skin diseases
Skin transplantation
Surface plasmon resonance
Tissue scaffolds
Wound healing
Differential delivery of bioactive compounds
Fiber orientation
Healing biomarkers
Healing of full-thickness skin wounds
Multidirectional and unidirectional autologous artificial dermis
Spr quantification
animal
artificial
Disease models
Skin
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_14a10f01e128ad7194681fa120a4fba2
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23868
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling a5e6a69d-21ac-4f5f-8e91-ffee5fcfcca9-1509cbbde-0a2f-4ed2-a9ca-adb930ac86b5-1e8e17c78-759c-4d3e-8104-65baa97cb303-19fc64f6d-a903-48f1-ac2e-4e55fd2ed9af-12020-05-26T00:06:13Z2020-05-26T00:06:13Z2018Cytokines, chemokines, and growth and remodeling factors orchestrate wound healing when skin damage occurs. During early stages, when the wound is still open, detection and quantification of these compounds might provide biomarkers of skin wound healing, which could aid to complete the scenario provided by clinical follow-up data and histological and histomorphometric analyses. This work assessed and compared the healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with artificial dermis made with autologous skin fibroblasts and unidirectional or multidirectional type I collagen scaffolds to test this hypothesis. Biomarkers of healing were detected and quantified in the culture medium of artificial dermis and exudates from the grafted wounds. Clinical follow-up of animals and histological and histomorphometric analysis showed differences in graft integration, wound closure, and histological and histomorphometric parameters. Surface plasmon resonance quantification of 13 healing biomarkers indicated differential secretion of most of the quantified factors in culture medium by the multidirectional and unidirectional artificial dermis. Also, there were significant differences between the concentration of some of the factors analyzed in the exudates of wounds grafted with the evaluated artificial dermis. These findings suggest that differential delivery of healing biomarkers induced by the directionality of the scaffold used to produce the multidirectional and unidirectional dermis was sufficient to create two skin wound microenvironments that determined a different outcome of healing. Overall, data indicate that healing of wounds grafted with multidirectional autologous artificial dermis is better than that of the wounds grafted with the unidirectional one. © 2018, Controlled Release Society.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-018-0528-2219039482190393Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23868engSpringer Verlag1024No. 51014Drug Delivery and Translational ResearchVol. 8Drug Delivery and Translational Research, ISSN:21903948, 2190393X, Vol.8, No.5 (2018); pp. 1014-1024https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052314960&doi=10.1007%2fs13346-018-0528-2&partnerID=40&md5=30520103235de831c9c2ecacfa2270ddAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURBiological markerCollagen type 1Biological markerChemokineCytokineSignal peptideAnimal cellAnimal experimentAnimal modelAnimal tissueArticleComparative studyControlled studyFollow upGranulation tissueHistopathologyLagomorphMorphometryNonhumanPriority journalSkin graftSkin injurySurface plasmon resonanceWound closureWound fluidWound healingAnimalArtificial skinAutograftDisease modelEpidermisMetabolismSkin diseaseSkin transplantationTissue scaffoldTransplantationAnimalsAutograftsBiomarkersChemokinesCollagen type iCytokinesEpidermisIntercellular signaling peptides and proteinsSkin diseasesSkin transplantationSurface plasmon resonanceTissue scaffoldsWound healingDifferential delivery of bioactive compoundsFiber orientationHealing biomarkersHealing of full-thickness skin woundsMultidirectional and unidirectional autologous artificial dermisSpr quantificationanimalartificialDisease modelsSkinComparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkersarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Fontanilla M.R.Casadiegos S.Bustos R.H.Patarroyo M.A.10336/23868oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/238682022-05-02 07:37:14.82169https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
title Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
spellingShingle Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
Biological marker
Collagen type 1
Biological marker
Chemokine
Cytokine
Signal peptide
Animal cell
Animal experiment
Animal model
Animal tissue
Article
Comparative study
Controlled study
Follow up
Granulation tissue
Histopathology
Lagomorph
Morphometry
Nonhuman
Priority journal
Skin graft
Skin injury
Surface plasmon resonance
Wound closure
Wound fluid
Wound healing
Animal
Artificial skin
Autograft
Disease model
Epidermis
Metabolism
Skin disease
Skin transplantation
Tissue scaffold
Transplantation
Animals
Autografts
Biomarkers
Chemokines
Collagen type i
Cytokines
Epidermis
Intercellular signaling peptides and proteins
Skin diseases
Skin transplantation
Surface plasmon resonance
Tissue scaffolds
Wound healing
Differential delivery of bioactive compounds
Fiber orientation
Healing biomarkers
Healing of full-thickness skin wounds
Multidirectional and unidirectional autologous artificial dermis
Spr quantification
animal
artificial
Disease models
Skin
title_short Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
title_full Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
title_fullStr Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
title_sort Comparison of healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with multidirectional or unidirectional autologous artificial dermis: differential delivery of healing biomarkers
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Biological marker
Collagen type 1
Biological marker
Chemokine
Cytokine
Signal peptide
Animal cell
Animal experiment
Animal model
Animal tissue
Article
Comparative study
Controlled study
Follow up
Granulation tissue
Histopathology
Lagomorph
Morphometry
Nonhuman
Priority journal
Skin graft
Skin injury
Surface plasmon resonance
Wound closure
Wound fluid
Wound healing
Animal
Artificial skin
Autograft
Disease model
Epidermis
Metabolism
Skin disease
Skin transplantation
Tissue scaffold
Transplantation
Animals
Autografts
Biomarkers
Chemokines
Collagen type i
Cytokines
Epidermis
Intercellular signaling peptides and proteins
Skin diseases
Skin transplantation
Surface plasmon resonance
Tissue scaffolds
Wound healing
Differential delivery of bioactive compounds
Fiber orientation
Healing biomarkers
Healing of full-thickness skin wounds
Multidirectional and unidirectional autologous artificial dermis
Spr quantification
topic Biological marker
Collagen type 1
Biological marker
Chemokine
Cytokine
Signal peptide
Animal cell
Animal experiment
Animal model
Animal tissue
Article
Comparative study
Controlled study
Follow up
Granulation tissue
Histopathology
Lagomorph
Morphometry
Nonhuman
Priority journal
Skin graft
Skin injury
Surface plasmon resonance
Wound closure
Wound fluid
Wound healing
Animal
Artificial skin
Autograft
Disease model
Epidermis
Metabolism
Skin disease
Skin transplantation
Tissue scaffold
Transplantation
Animals
Autografts
Biomarkers
Chemokines
Collagen type i
Cytokines
Epidermis
Intercellular signaling peptides and proteins
Skin diseases
Skin transplantation
Surface plasmon resonance
Tissue scaffolds
Wound healing
Differential delivery of bioactive compounds
Fiber orientation
Healing biomarkers
Healing of full-thickness skin wounds
Multidirectional and unidirectional autologous artificial dermis
Spr quantification
animal
artificial
Disease models
Skin
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv animal
artificial
Disease models
Skin
description Cytokines, chemokines, and growth and remodeling factors orchestrate wound healing when skin damage occurs. During early stages, when the wound is still open, detection and quantification of these compounds might provide biomarkers of skin wound healing, which could aid to complete the scenario provided by clinical follow-up data and histological and histomorphometric analyses. This work assessed and compared the healing of full-thickness skin wounds grafted with artificial dermis made with autologous skin fibroblasts and unidirectional or multidirectional type I collagen scaffolds to test this hypothesis. Biomarkers of healing were detected and quantified in the culture medium of artificial dermis and exudates from the grafted wounds. Clinical follow-up of animals and histological and histomorphometric analysis showed differences in graft integration, wound closure, and histological and histomorphometric parameters. Surface plasmon resonance quantification of 13 healing biomarkers indicated differential secretion of most of the quantified factors in culture medium by the multidirectional and unidirectional artificial dermis. Also, there were significant differences between the concentration of some of the factors analyzed in the exudates of wounds grafted with the evaluated artificial dermis. These findings suggest that differential delivery of healing biomarkers induced by the directionality of the scaffold used to produce the multidirectional and unidirectional dermis was sufficient to create two skin wound microenvironments that determined a different outcome of healing. Overall, data indicate that healing of wounds grafted with multidirectional autologous artificial dermis is better than that of the wounds grafted with the unidirectional one. © 2018, Controlled Release Society.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:06:13Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:06:13Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-018-0528-2
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 21903948
2190393X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23868
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-018-0528-2
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23868
identifier_str_mv 21903948
2190393X
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 1024
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 5
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 1014
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Drug Delivery and Translational Research
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 8
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Drug Delivery and Translational Research, ISSN:21903948, 2190393X, Vol.8, No.5 (2018); pp. 1014-1024
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052314960&doi=10.1007%2fs13346-018-0528-2&partnerID=40&md5=30520103235de831c9c2ecacfa2270dd
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390744993431552