The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation

BACKGROUND: The strong relationship between motor and cognitive development suggests that the limited motor experience of children with physical disabilities can impact their cognitive and perceptual development. The assessment of their cognitive skills is also compromised due to limited verbal comm...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2014
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23366
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140410
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23366
Palabra clave:
Adult
Article
Artifact
Assistive technology
Cognition
Computer interface
Controlled study
Electrode
Electroencephalogram
Electroencephalography
Event related potential
Feasibility study
Female
Human
Independent component analysis
Male
Manipulative medicine
Methodology
Motor performance
Neurophysiology
Object manipulation
Perception
Right handedness
Robotics
Signal processing
Task performance
Waveform
Augmentative manipulation
Neurophysiology
Robots
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_1456838497a9359a67ce251f4018fa23
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23366
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling d30678ea-83ad-4697-b0cc-9c0a71c16ea0-1aa85bd21-7fe9-4233-8fc2-f1f1b694c5b0-12df30e43-f2b5-4bbd-b925-a1e4a8a4b1b7-1974f2622-c84c-435e-9306-7d579a6c691c-1e5a954d5-c16d-483e-a7b4-dab5e33b9094-12020-05-26T00:01:26Z2020-05-26T00:01:26Z2014BACKGROUND: The strong relationship between motor and cognitive development suggests that the limited motor experience of children with physical disabilities can impact their cognitive and perceptual development. The assessment of their cognitive skills is also compromised due to limited verbal communication and motor gestures. Robots have been used to give children with disabilities an opportunity to independently manipulate objects and to reveal their cognitive skills when they use the robots. Little is known about the neural correlates that subtend robotic augmentative manipulation and the ways in which using a robot to manipulate objects may change the task's cognitive and perceptual demands. Several technical considerations pose a challenge to such studies.OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a methodology for the technical implementation of neurophysiological exploration of robot-augmented manipulation and presents an evaluation of the technical feasibility of performing a comparison between augmented manipulation and direct manipulation as response modalities in a cognitive task.METHODS: A costume made interface was designed that would allow the interfacing of the EGI NetStation® Electroencephalographic (EEG) signal acquisition system, the E-Prime® stimulus presentation system, and a 3-Dimensional task performed with either a robot or through typical direct manipulation. The technical feasibility and the stability of the designed technical implementation was tested with 10 adult participants.RESULTS: Initial analysis revealed specific robot control interface related artefacts. Further testing confirmed the source of artefact. Independent component Analysis was successfully used to separate this artefact component. Advantages, disadvantages, and results obtained from this method for technical implementation are presented. Implications for the study of neural correlates of augmentative manipulation are discussed. © 2014 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-14041010554181https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23366engIOS Press77No. 4389265Technology and DisabilityVol. 26Technology and Disability, ISSN:10554181, Vol.26, No.43892 (2014); pp. 65-77https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84913527694&doi=10.3233%2fTAD-140410&partnerID=40&md5=a29b3ad89511726dd641873403cb1452Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAdultArticleArtifactAssistive technologyCognitionComputer interfaceControlled studyElectrodeElectroencephalogramElectroencephalographyEvent related potentialFeasibility studyFemaleHumanIndependent component analysisMaleManipulative medicineMethodologyMotor performanceNeurophysiologyObject manipulationPerceptionRight handednessRoboticsSignal processingTask performanceWaveformAugmentative manipulationNeurophysiologyRobotsThe neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementationarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Alvarez, LilianaWiebe, Sandra A.Adams, KimHope, AlexCook, Albert10336/23366oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/233662022-05-02 07:37:21.471955https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
title The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
spellingShingle The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
Adult
Article
Artifact
Assistive technology
Cognition
Computer interface
Controlled study
Electrode
Electroencephalogram
Electroencephalography
Event related potential
Feasibility study
Female
Human
Independent component analysis
Male
Manipulative medicine
Methodology
Motor performance
Neurophysiology
Object manipulation
Perception
Right handedness
Robotics
Signal processing
Task performance
Waveform
Augmentative manipulation
Neurophysiology
Robots
title_short The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
title_full The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
title_fullStr The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
title_full_unstemmed The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
title_sort The neurophysiology of augmentative manipulation: A method for technical implementation
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Adult
Article
Artifact
Assistive technology
Cognition
Computer interface
Controlled study
Electrode
Electroencephalogram
Electroencephalography
Event related potential
Feasibility study
Female
Human
Independent component analysis
Male
Manipulative medicine
Methodology
Motor performance
Neurophysiology
Object manipulation
Perception
Right handedness
Robotics
Signal processing
Task performance
Waveform
Augmentative manipulation
Neurophysiology
Robots
topic Adult
Article
Artifact
Assistive technology
Cognition
Computer interface
Controlled study
Electrode
Electroencephalogram
Electroencephalography
Event related potential
Feasibility study
Female
Human
Independent component analysis
Male
Manipulative medicine
Methodology
Motor performance
Neurophysiology
Object manipulation
Perception
Right handedness
Robotics
Signal processing
Task performance
Waveform
Augmentative manipulation
Neurophysiology
Robots
description BACKGROUND: The strong relationship between motor and cognitive development suggests that the limited motor experience of children with physical disabilities can impact their cognitive and perceptual development. The assessment of their cognitive skills is also compromised due to limited verbal communication and motor gestures. Robots have been used to give children with disabilities an opportunity to independently manipulate objects and to reveal their cognitive skills when they use the robots. Little is known about the neural correlates that subtend robotic augmentative manipulation and the ways in which using a robot to manipulate objects may change the task's cognitive and perceptual demands. Several technical considerations pose a challenge to such studies.OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a methodology for the technical implementation of neurophysiological exploration of robot-augmented manipulation and presents an evaluation of the technical feasibility of performing a comparison between augmented manipulation and direct manipulation as response modalities in a cognitive task.METHODS: A costume made interface was designed that would allow the interfacing of the EGI NetStation® Electroencephalographic (EEG) signal acquisition system, the E-Prime® stimulus presentation system, and a 3-Dimensional task performed with either a robot or through typical direct manipulation. The technical feasibility and the stability of the designed technical implementation was tested with 10 adult participants.RESULTS: Initial analysis revealed specific robot control interface related artefacts. Further testing confirmed the source of artefact. Independent component Analysis was successfully used to separate this artefact component. Advantages, disadvantages, and results obtained from this method for technical implementation are presented. Implications for the study of neural correlates of augmentative manipulation are discussed. © 2014 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:01:26Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:01:26Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140410
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 10554181
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23366
url https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140410
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23366
identifier_str_mv 10554181
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 77
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 43892
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 65
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Technology and Disability
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 26
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Technology and Disability, ISSN:10554181, Vol.26, No.43892 (2014); pp. 65-77
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84913527694&doi=10.3233%2fTAD-140410&partnerID=40&md5=a29b3ad89511726dd641873403cb1452
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv IOS Press
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167666021105664