Alternativas de reparación en el arbitraje internacional de inversiones —Un debate entre la teoría y la práctica—

An analysis of the alternatives of compensation in relation to international investment disputes is relevant, because a pecuniary award is not always the appropriate remedy to solve disputes arising between investors and States. This is the case because States may be incre...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/15720
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/15720
Palabra clave:
Alternativas de reparación en arbitraje internacional de inversiones
Non pecuniary remedies in international investment arbitration
Alternatives (options) de réparation
arbitrage international d’investissements
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2014 Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI
Description
Summary:An analysis of the alternatives of compensation in relation to international investment disputes is relevant, because a pecuniary award is not always the appropriate remedy to solve disputes arising between investors and States. This is the case because States may be increasingly interested in opting for a different type of compensation. Furthermore, it is still not clear whether arbitral tribunals have recognised alternative types of awarding damages in respect of international investments disputes. This analysis comprises two principal components, the first, is to identify whether or not the tribunals may render an award that not only demands the payment of a sum of money but also considers some other means of compensation. The second, centres on how compliance with these non-pecuniary awards may be demanded. Our approach to these two principal components will always revolve around the idea of respecting the sovereignty of the State, bearing in mind that the execution of an arbitral award, which obliges the State to refrain from or to perform an act in its territory, relies precisely on the sovereignty of the State to execute it.