What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to answer two research questions: (1) What is the clinical evidence for the reported outcomes in studies on electronic pillboxes for older adults? and (2) What is the technology readiness level (TRL) of the electronic pillboxes used, or intended to be used, for...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23856
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1508514
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23856
Palabra clave:
Centered design approach
Electronic pillbox
Older adults
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_0ee2cad729a8e60661973831b87bf699
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23856
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling dc42dfaf-7fb2-4603-9516-001a56e2500b-12df40c86-f4f0-4b9f-bfeb-607ed7a8df01-1fd94beae-2e30-4284-9e77-399dd5245e76-12020-05-26T00:06:05Z2020-05-26T00:06:05Z2019Purpose: The purpose of this study is to answer two research questions: (1) What is the clinical evidence for the reported outcomes in studies on electronic pillboxes for older adults? and (2) What is the technology readiness level (TRL) of the electronic pillboxes used, or intended to be used, for older adults? Methods: The scholarly literature was systematically searched and analyzed. Articles were included if they reported results about electronic pillboxes that were used or intended to be used for older adults’ medication. Results: Clinical studies used commercially well-established electronic pillboxes with a high TRL. New electronic pillboxes in development had a low TRL. The discovered outcome was mainly adherence to medication. The overall mean adherence to medication regimens for all the studies using an electronic pillbox was higher than the gold standard of a good adherence level cut-off point (mean adherence 88.8%>80%). However, we found a large variation in this variable (SD = 10.7). With regard to an older adult population’s adherence to medication regimens, for the outcome variable of those who had undergone a kidney transplant, the clinical evidence that electronic pillboxes have a positive impact was strong (1b); for those with a chronic hepatitis C medical condition, the clinical evidence was medium (3), and for those with arterial hypertension and multiple chronic (diabetes and hypertension) medical conditions, the clinical evidence was weak (5). Conclusion: More research is needed in this area using designs that provide greater validity.Implications for Rehabilitation Electronic pillboxes with multiple reminders such as the “voice of a friend” or relative, which implies that electronic pillboxes which adopt “a social role” are advisable. An unequal level of clinical evidence that electronic pillboxes have a positive impact on the adherence outcome variable was found. For new electronic pillboxes still in development that specifically take into account older adults’ needs, the TRL is still low; as a result, they could not be tested in real settings. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1508514https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23856engTaylor and Francis Ltd787No. 8776Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive TechnologyVol. 14Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol.14, No.8 (2019); pp. 776-787https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075498039&doi=10.1080%2f17483107.2018.1508514&partnerID=40&md5=6f2011075d3c29944a8b68d1bfa45cf3Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCentered design approachElectronic pillboxOlder adultsWhat does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature reviewarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Miguel-Cruz A.Felipe Bohórquez A.Aya Parra P.A.10336/23856oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/238562022-05-02 07:37:21.238189https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
title What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
spellingShingle What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
Centered design approach
Electronic pillbox
Older adults
title_short What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
title_full What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
title_fullStr What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
title_sort What does the literature say about using electronic pillboxes for older adults? A systematic literature review
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Centered design approach
Electronic pillbox
Older adults
topic Centered design approach
Electronic pillbox
Older adults
description Purpose: The purpose of this study is to answer two research questions: (1) What is the clinical evidence for the reported outcomes in studies on electronic pillboxes for older adults? and (2) What is the technology readiness level (TRL) of the electronic pillboxes used, or intended to be used, for older adults? Methods: The scholarly literature was systematically searched and analyzed. Articles were included if they reported results about electronic pillboxes that were used or intended to be used for older adults’ medication. Results: Clinical studies used commercially well-established electronic pillboxes with a high TRL. New electronic pillboxes in development had a low TRL. The discovered outcome was mainly adherence to medication. The overall mean adherence to medication regimens for all the studies using an electronic pillbox was higher than the gold standard of a good adherence level cut-off point (mean adherence 88.8%>80%). However, we found a large variation in this variable (SD = 10.7). With regard to an older adult population’s adherence to medication regimens, for the outcome variable of those who had undergone a kidney transplant, the clinical evidence that electronic pillboxes have a positive impact was strong (1b); for those with a chronic hepatitis C medical condition, the clinical evidence was medium (3), and for those with arterial hypertension and multiple chronic (diabetes and hypertension) medical conditions, the clinical evidence was weak (5). Conclusion: More research is needed in this area using designs that provide greater validity.Implications for Rehabilitation Electronic pillboxes with multiple reminders such as the “voice of a friend” or relative, which implies that electronic pillboxes which adopt “a social role” are advisable. An unequal level of clinical evidence that electronic pillboxes have a positive impact on the adherence outcome variable was found. For new electronic pillboxes still in development that specifically take into account older adults’ needs, the TRL is still low; as a result, they could not be tested in real settings. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:06:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:06:05Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1508514
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23856
url https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1508514
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23856
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 787
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 8
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 776
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 14
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol.14, No.8 (2019); pp. 776-787
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075498039&doi=10.1080%2f17483107.2018.1508514&partnerID=40&md5=6f2011075d3c29944a8b68d1bfa45cf3
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis Ltd
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167554613051392