Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?

We read with great interest the article by Álvarez et al. recently published in the Spanish Ophthalmological Society on the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in an immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain.1 It is noteworthy that the authors defined as congenital forms the presentation...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28417
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417
Palabra clave:
Toxoplasmosis
Congenital infections
Ocular toxoplasmosis
Seroconversion
Rights
License
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id EDOCUR2_0bef926a8993a462c2725e332972e716
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28417
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 0f5c2ede-23a0-4a16-b042-e554694c9b25517013556002020-08-28T15:48:09Z2020-08-28T15:48:09Z2011-12-19We read with great interest the article by Álvarez et al. recently published in the Spanish Ophthalmological Society on the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in an immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain.1 It is noteworthy that the authors defined as congenital forms the presentations with a large macular atrophic scar and pigmented edges. Traditionally, the presence of lesions at the macular level has been considered a sign of congenital toxoplasmosis. However, as described by Holland in a recent review on the influence of age in ocular toxoplasmosis,2 more recent studies show that the presence of macular lesions does not differentiate reliably between congenital infections and those acquired after birth. A study carried out by ourselves3 describes the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in a Colombian cohort where the acquisition of the infection was determined in only 30% of patients (20% congenital, 10% acquired), with a large percentage (70%) remaining undetermined precisely because it is not possible to demonstrate whether the infection of a patient was acquired after birth if there is no evidence of seroconversion or serological demonstration of an acute infection (IgM+, IgG?) and subsequent positivization of the IgG antibodies, discarding natural IgM antibodies. Moreover, it is not possible to determine in an adult that the infection was congenital if there is no certainty about the infection being diagnosed at the prenatal level by means of the techniques described in literature, either immunological such as avid IgG, IgA, or through molecular biology with the PCR of gene B1 in amniotic liquid.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005ISSN: 0365-6691EISSN: 2173-5794https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417engSociedad Española de OftalmologíaElsevier225No. 7224Archivos de la Sociedad Española de OftalmologiaVol. 86Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia, ISSN: 0365-6691;EISSN: 2173-5794, Vol. 86, No. 7 (July 2011); pp. 224-225https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-archivos-sociedad-espanola-oftalmologia-296-pdf-S0365669111001870Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecArchivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologiainstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURToxoplasmosisCongenital infectionsOcular toxoplasmosisSeroconversionDefinition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?Definición de la adquisición de la infección toxoplásmica, ¿cuándo es congénita o adquirida?articleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501López-Castillo, C.A.de-la-Torre, Alejandra10336/28417oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/284172021-08-26 06:15:39.369https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Definición de la adquisición de la infección toxoplásmica, ¿cuándo es congénita o adquirida?
title Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
spellingShingle Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
Toxoplasmosis
Congenital infections
Ocular toxoplasmosis
Seroconversion
title_short Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
title_full Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
title_fullStr Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
title_full_unstemmed Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
title_sort Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Toxoplasmosis
Congenital infections
Ocular toxoplasmosis
Seroconversion
topic Toxoplasmosis
Congenital infections
Ocular toxoplasmosis
Seroconversion
description We read with great interest the article by Álvarez et al. recently published in the Spanish Ophthalmological Society on the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in an immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain.1 It is noteworthy that the authors defined as congenital forms the presentations with a large macular atrophic scar and pigmented edges. Traditionally, the presence of lesions at the macular level has been considered a sign of congenital toxoplasmosis. However, as described by Holland in a recent review on the influence of age in ocular toxoplasmosis,2 more recent studies show that the presence of macular lesions does not differentiate reliably between congenital infections and those acquired after birth. A study carried out by ourselves3 describes the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in a Colombian cohort where the acquisition of the infection was determined in only 30% of patients (20% congenital, 10% acquired), with a large percentage (70%) remaining undetermined precisely because it is not possible to demonstrate whether the infection of a patient was acquired after birth if there is no evidence of seroconversion or serological demonstration of an acute infection (IgM+, IgG?) and subsequent positivization of the IgG antibodies, discarding natural IgM antibodies. Moreover, it is not possible to determine in an adult that the infection was congenital if there is no certainty about the infection being diagnosed at the prenatal level by means of the techniques described in literature, either immunological such as avid IgG, IgA, or through molecular biology with the PCR of gene B1 in amniotic liquid.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2011-12-19
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T15:48:09Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T15:48:09Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN: 0365-6691
EISSN: 2173-5794
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 0365-6691
EISSN: 2173-5794
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 225
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 7
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 224
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 86
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia, ISSN: 0365-6691;EISSN: 2173-5794, Vol. 86, No. 7 (July 2011); pp. 224-225
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-archivos-sociedad-espanola-oftalmologia-296-pdf-S0365669111001870
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
rights_invalid_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Sociedad Española de Oftalmología
Elsevier
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167649293172736