Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?
We read with great interest the article by Álvarez et al. recently published in the Spanish Ophthalmological Society on the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in an immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain.1 It is noteworthy that the authors defined as congenital forms the presentation...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2011
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28417
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417
- Palabra clave:
- Toxoplasmosis
Congenital infections
Ocular toxoplasmosis
Seroconversion
- Rights
- License
- Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id |
EDOCUR2_0bef926a8993a462c2725e332972e716 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28417 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
0f5c2ede-23a0-4a16-b042-e554694c9b25517013556002020-08-28T15:48:09Z2020-08-28T15:48:09Z2011-12-19We read with great interest the article by Álvarez et al. recently published in the Spanish Ophthalmological Society on the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in an immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain.1 It is noteworthy that the authors defined as congenital forms the presentations with a large macular atrophic scar and pigmented edges. Traditionally, the presence of lesions at the macular level has been considered a sign of congenital toxoplasmosis. However, as described by Holland in a recent review on the influence of age in ocular toxoplasmosis,2 more recent studies show that the presence of macular lesions does not differentiate reliably between congenital infections and those acquired after birth. A study carried out by ourselves3 describes the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in a Colombian cohort where the acquisition of the infection was determined in only 30% of patients (20% congenital, 10% acquired), with a large percentage (70%) remaining undetermined precisely because it is not possible to demonstrate whether the infection of a patient was acquired after birth if there is no evidence of seroconversion or serological demonstration of an acute infection (IgM+, IgG?) and subsequent positivization of the IgG antibodies, discarding natural IgM antibodies. Moreover, it is not possible to determine in an adult that the infection was congenital if there is no certainty about the infection being diagnosed at the prenatal level by means of the techniques described in literature, either immunological such as avid IgG, IgA, or through molecular biology with the PCR of gene B1 in amniotic liquid.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005ISSN: 0365-6691EISSN: 2173-5794https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417engSociedad Española de OftalmologíaElsevier225No. 7224Archivos de la Sociedad Española de OftalmologiaVol. 86Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia, ISSN: 0365-6691;EISSN: 2173-5794, Vol. 86, No. 7 (July 2011); pp. 224-225https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-archivos-sociedad-espanola-oftalmologia-296-pdf-S0365669111001870Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecArchivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologiainstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURToxoplasmosisCongenital infectionsOcular toxoplasmosisSeroconversionDefinition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired?Definición de la adquisición de la infección toxoplásmica, ¿cuándo es congénita o adquirida?articleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501López-Castillo, C.A.de-la-Torre, Alejandra10336/28417oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/284172021-08-26 06:15:39.369https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
Definición de la adquisición de la infección toxoplásmica, ¿cuándo es congénita o adquirida? |
title |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
spellingShingle |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? Toxoplasmosis Congenital infections Ocular toxoplasmosis Seroconversion |
title_short |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
title_full |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
title_fullStr |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
title_sort |
Definition of acquired toxoplasmosis infection: When is it congenital or acquired? |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Toxoplasmosis Congenital infections Ocular toxoplasmosis Seroconversion |
topic |
Toxoplasmosis Congenital infections Ocular toxoplasmosis Seroconversion |
description |
We read with great interest the article by Álvarez et al. recently published in the Spanish Ophthalmological Society on the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in an immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain.1 It is noteworthy that the authors defined as congenital forms the presentations with a large macular atrophic scar and pigmented edges. Traditionally, the presence of lesions at the macular level has been considered a sign of congenital toxoplasmosis. However, as described by Holland in a recent review on the influence of age in ocular toxoplasmosis,2 more recent studies show that the presence of macular lesions does not differentiate reliably between congenital infections and those acquired after birth. A study carried out by ourselves3 describes the clinical characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in a Colombian cohort where the acquisition of the infection was determined in only 30% of patients (20% congenital, 10% acquired), with a large percentage (70%) remaining undetermined precisely because it is not possible to demonstrate whether the infection of a patient was acquired after birth if there is no evidence of seroconversion or serological demonstration of an acute infection (IgM+, IgG?) and subsequent positivization of the IgG antibodies, discarding natural IgM antibodies. Moreover, it is not possible to determine in an adult that the infection was congenital if there is no certainty about the infection being diagnosed at the prenatal level by means of the techniques described in literature, either immunological such as avid IgG, IgA, or through molecular biology with the PCR of gene B1 in amniotic liquid. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-19 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-28T15:48:09Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-28T15:48:09Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
ISSN: 0365-6691 EISSN: 2173-5794 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2011.02.005 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28417 |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN: 0365-6691 EISSN: 2173-5794 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
225 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 7 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
224 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 86 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia, ISSN: 0365-6691;EISSN: 2173-5794, Vol. 86, No. 7 (July 2011); pp. 224-225 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-archivos-sociedad-espanola-oftalmologia-296-pdf-S0365669111001870 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Española de Oftalmología Elsevier |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167649293172736 |