The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients

Objective The aim was to determine the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitalized patients in a university hospital. Methods ADRs were identified by two evaluators, who reviewed the clinical histories of all patients admitted between 24 April and 24 May 2006. Patients with suspected...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22143
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00039.x
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22143
Palabra clave:
Antiinfective agent
Adult
Adverse drug reaction
Aged
Article
Autonomic neuropathy
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Disease classification
Disease predisposition
Dose time susceptibility classification
Female
Hospital patient
Human
Major clinical study
Male
Prevalence
Priority journal
Risk factor
University hospital
World health organization
Adverse drug reaction reporting systems
Age factors
Aged
Colombia
Comorbidity
Cross-sectional studies
Drug interactions
Female
Humans
Male
Middle aged
Pharmaceutical preparations
Risk factors
Time factors
Adverse effects
Drug utilization
Hospitalization
Internal medicine
Pharmacoepidemiology
Postmarketing
Product surveillance
drug
university
Dose-response relationship
Hospitals
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_0b3e0f4a910b5957a6f8953707a27246
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22143
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 79733068600a00c82d4-8329-4ad1-921b-48149f384501-12020-05-25T23:55:36Z2020-05-25T23:55:36Z2010Objective The aim was to determine the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitalized patients in a university hospital. Methods ADRs were identified by two evaluators, who reviewed the clinical histories of all patients admitted between 24 April and 24 May 2006. Patients with suspected ADRs were contacted. Three different investigators evaluated causality, the degree of preventability, and the mechanism producing the ADR. Causality was assessed using the scale proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), and preventability was assessed using the modified Schumock and Thornton criteria. Key findings There were 32 ADRs in 104 hospitalized patients. Effects on the autonomic nervous system were the most common (13%) and the drugs most frequently implicated were systemic antimicrobial drugs (19%). Fifty-four per cent of the ADRs were classified as possible. Using the Dose, Time and Susceptibility (DoTS) classification, 77% of the ADRs were classified as being of collateral dose-responsiveness (i.e. they occurred within the range of therapeutic doses), and 65% were classified as intermediate reactions. The susceptibility factors associated most frequently with ADRs were comorbidities (i.e. the presence of diseases that were considered as risk factors to developing an ADR; 36%), age (26%) and exogenous factors (i.e. the presence of drug interactions that were involved in the occurrence of ADRs; 17%). Fifty per cent of the ADRs could have been prevented. Conclusions ADRs are very frequent in hospitalized patients and a significant proportion of them is preventable. The DoTS classification allowed complete evaluation of the types of ADR encountered. We are currently carrying out a much larger prospective study. © 2010 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00039.x9617671https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22143eng235No. 4230International Journal of Pharmacy PracticeVol. 18International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, ISSN:9617671, Vol.18, No.4 (2010); pp. 230-235https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77954709557&doi=10.1111%2fj.2042-7174.2010.00039.x&partnerID=40&md5=c7068666e9b7d36ac839df7e6ce28b33Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAntiinfective agentAdultAdverse drug reactionAgedArticleAutonomic neuropathyComorbidityControlled studyDisease classificationDisease predispositionDose time susceptibility classificationFemaleHospital patientHumanMajor clinical studyMalePrevalencePriority journalRisk factorUniversity hospitalWorld health organizationAdverse drug reaction reporting systemsAge factorsAgedColombiaComorbidityCross-sectional studiesDrug interactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle agedPharmaceutical preparationsRisk factorsTime factorsAdverse effectsDrug utilizationHospitalizationInternal medicinePharmacoepidemiologyPostmarketingProduct surveillancedruguniversityDose-response relationshipHospitalsThe DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patientsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Calderón Ospina, Carlos AlbertoBustamante?Rojas, Carlos10336/22143oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/221432022-05-02 07:37:13.929285https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
title The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
spellingShingle The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
Antiinfective agent
Adult
Adverse drug reaction
Aged
Article
Autonomic neuropathy
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Disease classification
Disease predisposition
Dose time susceptibility classification
Female
Hospital patient
Human
Major clinical study
Male
Prevalence
Priority journal
Risk factor
University hospital
World health organization
Adverse drug reaction reporting systems
Age factors
Aged
Colombia
Comorbidity
Cross-sectional studies
Drug interactions
Female
Humans
Male
Middle aged
Pharmaceutical preparations
Risk factors
Time factors
Adverse effects
Drug utilization
Hospitalization
Internal medicine
Pharmacoepidemiology
Postmarketing
Product surveillance
drug
university
Dose-response relationship
Hospitals
title_short The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
title_full The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
title_fullStr The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
title_full_unstemmed The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
title_sort The DoTS classification is a useful way to classify adverse drug reactions: A preliminary study in hospitalized patients
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Antiinfective agent
Adult
Adverse drug reaction
Aged
Article
Autonomic neuropathy
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Disease classification
Disease predisposition
Dose time susceptibility classification
Female
Hospital patient
Human
Major clinical study
Male
Prevalence
Priority journal
Risk factor
University hospital
World health organization
Adverse drug reaction reporting systems
Age factors
Aged
Colombia
Comorbidity
Cross-sectional studies
Drug interactions
Female
Humans
Male
Middle aged
Pharmaceutical preparations
Risk factors
Time factors
Adverse effects
Drug utilization
Hospitalization
Internal medicine
Pharmacoepidemiology
Postmarketing
Product surveillance
topic Antiinfective agent
Adult
Adverse drug reaction
Aged
Article
Autonomic neuropathy
Comorbidity
Controlled study
Disease classification
Disease predisposition
Dose time susceptibility classification
Female
Hospital patient
Human
Major clinical study
Male
Prevalence
Priority journal
Risk factor
University hospital
World health organization
Adverse drug reaction reporting systems
Age factors
Aged
Colombia
Comorbidity
Cross-sectional studies
Drug interactions
Female
Humans
Male
Middle aged
Pharmaceutical preparations
Risk factors
Time factors
Adverse effects
Drug utilization
Hospitalization
Internal medicine
Pharmacoepidemiology
Postmarketing
Product surveillance
drug
university
Dose-response relationship
Hospitals
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv drug
university
Dose-response relationship
Hospitals
description Objective The aim was to determine the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitalized patients in a university hospital. Methods ADRs were identified by two evaluators, who reviewed the clinical histories of all patients admitted between 24 April and 24 May 2006. Patients with suspected ADRs were contacted. Three different investigators evaluated causality, the degree of preventability, and the mechanism producing the ADR. Causality was assessed using the scale proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), and preventability was assessed using the modified Schumock and Thornton criteria. Key findings There were 32 ADRs in 104 hospitalized patients. Effects on the autonomic nervous system were the most common (13%) and the drugs most frequently implicated were systemic antimicrobial drugs (19%). Fifty-four per cent of the ADRs were classified as possible. Using the Dose, Time and Susceptibility (DoTS) classification, 77% of the ADRs were classified as being of collateral dose-responsiveness (i.e. they occurred within the range of therapeutic doses), and 65% were classified as intermediate reactions. The susceptibility factors associated most frequently with ADRs were comorbidities (i.e. the presence of diseases that were considered as risk factors to developing an ADR; 36%), age (26%) and exogenous factors (i.e. the presence of drug interactions that were involved in the occurrence of ADRs; 17%). Fifty per cent of the ADRs could have been prevented. Conclusions ADRs are very frequent in hospitalized patients and a significant proportion of them is preventable. The DoTS classification allowed complete evaluation of the types of ADR encountered. We are currently carrying out a much larger prospective study. © 2010 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:36Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:36Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00039.x
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 9617671
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22143
url https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00039.x
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22143
identifier_str_mv 9617671
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 235
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 4
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 230
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 18
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, ISSN:9617671, Vol.18, No.4 (2010); pp. 230-235
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77954709557&doi=10.1111%2fj.2042-7174.2010.00039.x&partnerID=40&md5=c7068666e9b7d36ac839df7e6ce28b33
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167723529207808