Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)

The extent to which males and females of monomorphic species differ from each other is still an ecological and evolutionary puzzle. In these species it has been proposed that slight differences in selection pressures can result in phenotypic differences between sexes. However, such differences may b...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/34812
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_34812
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34812
Palabra clave:
Selección sexual
Especies monomórficas
Sexado molecular
Biología
Sexual selection
Monomorphic species
Molecular sexing
Rights
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
id EDOCUR2_0630c2370120397406be2b17fdcf9600
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/34812
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.es.fl_str_mv Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.es.fl_str_mv Caracterización del dimorfismo sexual en guácharos (Steatornis caripensis)
title Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
spellingShingle Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
Selección sexual
Especies monomórficas
Sexado molecular
Biología
Sexual selection
Monomorphic species
Molecular sexing
title_short Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
title_full Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
title_fullStr Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
title_sort Characterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Maldonado Chaparro, Adriana Alexandra
dc.subject.es.fl_str_mv Selección sexual
Especies monomórficas
Sexado molecular
topic Selección sexual
Especies monomórficas
Sexado molecular
Biología
Sexual selection
Monomorphic species
Molecular sexing
dc.subject.ddc.es.fl_str_mv Biología
dc.subject.keyword.es.fl_str_mv Sexual selection
Monomorphic species
Molecular sexing
description The extent to which males and females of monomorphic species differ from each other is still an ecological and evolutionary puzzle. In these species it has been proposed that slight differences in selection pressures can result in phenotypic differences between sexes. However, such differences may be very subtle or may be exhibited in traits that are not perceived by humans, such as coloration. For example, in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) males differ from females in the UV reflection of the crown patch. Here, I aimed to identify the morphological differences between sexes in a monomorphic specie, the oilbird (Steatornis caripensis). In this species, males are slightly larger and grayish than females, making it difficult to determine the sex of individuals by means other than molecular sexing, an invasive technique. To characterize phenotypic differences between males and females, I measured five morphological traits on 75 museum individuals and 16 wild individuals, and the feather coloration in 33 museum individuals and 11 wild individuals. I used these measures to quantify the degree of sexual dimorphism and identify the traits that differentiate males from females. I found that S. caripensis is mostly monomorphic showing subtle differences in the width and the length of the bill, which is larger in males compared to females. I also found subtle differences in plumage coloration suggesting that color may play an important role in the differentiation of the sexes, and possibly in mate choice. My results indicate that despite the slight differences in beak shape between males and females, the sexes in oilbirds seem to be indistinguishable.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-26T22:24:53Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-26T22:24:53Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv bachelorThesis
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.document.es.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.spa.es.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_34812
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34812
url https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_34812
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34812
dc.language.iso.es.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.es.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv 22 pp
dc.format.mimetype.es.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ciencias Naturales
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Biología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.es.fl_str_mv Amadon, D. (1959). The Significance of Sexual Differences in Size among Birds. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103(4), 531-536.
Andersson, S., örnborg, J., & Andersson, M. (1998a). Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1395), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0315
Andersson, S., örnborg, J., & Andersson, M. (1998b). Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1395), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0315
Badyaev, A. V., & Hill, G. E. (2003). Avian Sexual Dichromatism in Relation to Phylogeny and Ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132441
Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C., & Norris, K. J. (1994). Sexual Selection and the Mismeasure of Color. The American Naturalist, 144(5), 848-860. https://doi.org/10.1086/285711
Bergeron, Z. T., & Fuller, R. C. (2018). Using Human Vision to Detect Variation in Avian Coloration: How Bad Is It? The American Naturalist, 191(2), 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1086/695282
Biagolini-Jr, C., & Perrella, D. F. (2020). Bright coloration of male blue manakin is not connected to higher rates of nest predation. Acta Ethologica, 23(3), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00352-9
Birkhead, T. R. (1998). Sexual selection in the zebra ®nch Taeniopygia guttata: Condition, sex traits and immune capacity. 13
Björklund, M. (1984). The Adaptive Significance of Sexual Indistinguishability in Birds: A Critique of a Recent Hypothesis. Oikos, 43(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544167
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6723de91-9370-498b-a933-813e3aa53158/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/917fccc5-7ff5-4ccf-914d-a644d5826542/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/3e8be56d-c626-43e2-b1be-aea5d81c6055/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/61f0cfb1-7a52-4185-9fe9-0696d3ee1dc7/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/162245e7-7537-481d-98b6-acf79e4d0c18/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6cc6f3dc-e5fe-4ac8-bcaa-93c97e2ac4e5/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/b34869a4-fa66-43f3-969c-76fe24083030/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/bc9ef0fe-8d25-41ea-a08c-f7982eb5e33d/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/2c99149a-5d98-4c7c-9c72-94e1580eed28/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6633a98c-12a1-4bec-a3bf-74c40cc7a600/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/3eae7522-0946-42b8-90d6-05b7289f2f5b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1088990d8361f2273d14aa6e276fe1ea
fbe05654b97c4bdedff1100aae7c9819
31b4682e075e146f548407fedd76a078
217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06
fab9d9ed61d64f6ac005dee3306ae77e
f87c83698d457589580513b6281076ac
606560e1dafeef009916077f0c4a53dd
6bd2b4dbee3ae3c421073a7c2abb4a7a
d1c58dd44ddd524a61ce1a259dee55c4
f4776d7fabc4338173a2722130b566e4
2f6bb7cfd241ff20def9e69c27d16824
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1818106782309941248
spelling Maldonado Chaparro, Adriana Alexandra37861034600Robayo Salek, Andrés FelipeBiólogoPregradoFull time42878a47-839c-4b35-aa71-cfa0a2b5749b6002022-08-26T22:24:53Z2022-08-26T22:24:53Z2022-08The extent to which males and females of monomorphic species differ from each other is still an ecological and evolutionary puzzle. In these species it has been proposed that slight differences in selection pressures can result in phenotypic differences between sexes. However, such differences may be very subtle or may be exhibited in traits that are not perceived by humans, such as coloration. For example, in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) males differ from females in the UV reflection of the crown patch. Here, I aimed to identify the morphological differences between sexes in a monomorphic specie, the oilbird (Steatornis caripensis). In this species, males are slightly larger and grayish than females, making it difficult to determine the sex of individuals by means other than molecular sexing, an invasive technique. To characterize phenotypic differences between males and females, I measured five morphological traits on 75 museum individuals and 16 wild individuals, and the feather coloration in 33 museum individuals and 11 wild individuals. I used these measures to quantify the degree of sexual dimorphism and identify the traits that differentiate males from females. I found that S. caripensis is mostly monomorphic showing subtle differences in the width and the length of the bill, which is larger in males compared to females. I also found subtle differences in plumage coloration suggesting that color may play an important role in the differentiation of the sexes, and possibly in mate choice. My results indicate that despite the slight differences in beak shape between males and females, the sexes in oilbirds seem to be indistinguishable.The extent to which males and females of monomorphic species differ from each other is still an ecological and evolutionary puzzle. In these species it has been proposed that slight differences in selection pressures can result in phenotypic differences between sexes. However, such differences may be very subtle or may be exhibited in traits that are not perceived by humans, such as coloration. For example, in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) males differ from females in the UV reflection of the crown patch. Here, I aimed to identify the morphological differences between sexes in a monomorphic specie, the oilbird (Steatornis caripensis). In this species, males are slightly larger and grayish than females, making it difficult to determine the sex of individuals by means other than molecular sexing, an invasive technique. To characterize phenotypic differences between males and females, I measured five morphological traits on 75 museum individuals and 16 wild individuals, and the feather coloration in 33 museum individuals and 11 wild individuals. I used these measures to quantify the degree of sexual dimorphism and identify the traits that differentiate males from females. I found that S. caripensis is mostly monomorphic showing subtle differences in the width and the length of the bill, which is larger in males compared to females. I also found subtle differences in plumage coloration suggesting that color may play an important role in the differentiation of the sexes, and possibly in mate choice. My results indicate that despite the slight differences in beak shape between males and females, the sexes in oilbirds seem to be indistinguishable.Universidad del Rosario22 ppapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_34812https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34812engUniversidad del RosarioFacultad de Ciencias NaturalesBiologíaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 ColombiaAbierto (Texto Completo)EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Amadon, D. (1959). The Significance of Sexual Differences in Size among Birds. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 103(4), 531-536.Andersson, S., örnborg, J., & Andersson, M. (1998a). Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1395), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0315Andersson, S., örnborg, J., & Andersson, M. (1998b). Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1395), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0315Badyaev, A. V., & Hill, G. E. (2003). Avian Sexual Dichromatism in Relation to Phylogeny and Ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132441Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C., & Norris, K. J. (1994). Sexual Selection and the Mismeasure of Color. The American Naturalist, 144(5), 848-860. https://doi.org/10.1086/285711Bergeron, Z. T., & Fuller, R. C. (2018). Using Human Vision to Detect Variation in Avian Coloration: How Bad Is It? The American Naturalist, 191(2), 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1086/695282Biagolini-Jr, C., & Perrella, D. F. (2020). Bright coloration of male blue manakin is not connected to higher rates of nest predation. Acta Ethologica, 23(3), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00352-9Birkhead, T. R. (1998). Sexual selection in the zebra ®nch Taeniopygia guttata: Condition, sex traits and immune capacity. 13Björklund, M. (1984). The Adaptive Significance of Sexual Indistinguishability in Birds: A Critique of a Recent Hypothesis. Oikos, 43(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544167instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURSelección sexualEspecies monomórficasSexado molecularBiología574600Sexual selectionMonomorphic speciesMolecular sexingCharacterization of the sexual dimorphism in oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis)Caracterización del dimorfismo sexual en guácharos (Steatornis caripensis)bachelorThesisArtículoTrabajo de gradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fORIGINALRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2022.pdfRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2022.pdfapplication/pdf675011https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6723de91-9370-498b-a933-813e3aa53158/download1088990d8361f2273d14aa6e276fe1eaMD51RobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-1-2022.pdfRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-1-2022.pdfLaboratory methods - wild individuals (feathers)application/pdf73846https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/917fccc5-7ff5-4ccf-914d-a644d5826542/downloadfbe05654b97c4bdedff1100aae7c9819MD52RobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2-2022.pdfRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2-2022.pdfLaboratory methods - Museum individualsapplication/pdf95053https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/3e8be56d-c626-43e2-b1be-aea5d81c6055/download31b4682e075e146f548407fedd76a078MD53CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/61f0cfb1-7a52-4185-9fe9-0696d3ee1dc7/download217700a34da79ed616c2feb68d4c5e06MD55LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain1475https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/162245e7-7537-481d-98b6-acf79e4d0c18/downloadfab9d9ed61d64f6ac005dee3306ae77eMD54TEXTRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2022.pdf.txtRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2022.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain36045https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6cc6f3dc-e5fe-4ac8-bcaa-93c97e2ac4e5/downloadf87c83698d457589580513b6281076acMD56RobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-1-2022.pdf.txtRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-1-2022.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain2662https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/b34869a4-fa66-43f3-969c-76fe24083030/download606560e1dafeef009916077f0c4a53ddMD58RobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2-2022.pdf.txtRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2-2022.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain2893https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/bc9ef0fe-8d25-41ea-a08c-f7982eb5e33d/download6bd2b4dbee3ae3c421073a7c2abb4a7aMD510THUMBNAILRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2022.pdf.jpgRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2022.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2202https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/2c99149a-5d98-4c7c-9c72-94e1580eed28/downloadd1c58dd44ddd524a61ce1a259dee55c4MD57RobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-1-2022.pdf.jpgRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-1-2022.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3783https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/6633a98c-12a1-4bec-a3bf-74c40cc7a600/downloadf4776d7fabc4338173a2722130b566e4MD59RobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2-2022.pdf.jpgRobayoSalek-AndrésFelipe-2-2022.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3732https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/3eae7522-0946-42b8-90d6-05b7289f2f5b/download2f6bb7cfd241ff20def9e69c27d16824MD51110336/34812oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/348122022-09-13 14:43:56.414http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiahttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.coRUwoTE9TKSBBVVRPUihFUyksIG1hbmlmaWVzdGEobWFuaWZlc3RhbW9zKSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBvYmpldG8gZGUgbGEgcHJlc2VudGUgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBlcyBvcmlnaW5hbCB5IGxhIHJlYWxpesOzIHNpbiB2aW9sYXIgbyB1c3VycGFyIGRlcmVjaG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yIGRlIHRlcmNlcm9zLCBwb3IgbG8gdGFudG8gbGEgb2JyYSBlcyBkZSBleGNsdXNpdmEgYXV0b3LDrWEgeSB0aWVuZSBsYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZCBzb2JyZSBsYSBtaXNtYS4gCgpQQVJHUkFGTzogRW4gY2FzbyBkZSBwcmVzZW50YXJzZSBjdWFscXVpZXIgcmVjbGFtYWNpw7NuIG8gYWNjacOzbiBwb3IgcGFydGUgZGUgdW4gdGVyY2VybyBlbiBjdWFudG8gYSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgZGUgYXV0b3Igc29icmUgbGEgb2JyYSBlbiBjdWVzdGnDs24sIEVMIEFVVE9SLCBhc3VtaXLDoSB0b2RhIGxhIHJlc3BvbnNhYmlsaWRhZCwgeSBzYWxkcsOhIGVuIGRlZmVuc2EgZGUgbG9zIGRlcmVjaG9zIGFxdcOtIGF1dG9yaXphZG9zOyBwYXJhIHRvZG9zIGxvcyBlZmVjdG9zIGxhIHVuaXZlcnNpZGFkIGFjdMO6YSBjb21vIHVuIHRlcmNlcm8gZGUgYnVlbmEgZmUuIAoKRUwgQVVUT1IsIGF1dG9yaXphIGEgTEEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgREVMIFJPU0FSSU8sICBwYXJhIHF1ZSBlbiBsb3MgdMOpcm1pbm9zIGVzdGFibGVjaWRvcyBlbiBsYSBMZXkgMjMgZGUgMTk4MiwgTGV5IDQ0IGRlIDE5OTMsIERlY2lzacOzbiBhbmRpbmEgMzUxIGRlIDE5OTMsIERlY3JldG8gNDYwIGRlIDE5OTUgeSBkZW3DoXMgbm9ybWFzIGdlbmVyYWxlcyBzb2JyZSBsYSBtYXRlcmlhLCAgdXRpbGljZSB5IHVzZSBsYSBvYnJhIG9iamV0byBkZSBsYSBwcmVzZW50ZSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuLgoKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KClBPTElUSUNBIERFIFRSQVRBTUlFTlRPIERFIERBVE9TIFBFUlNPTkFMRVMuIERlY2xhcm8gcXVlIGF1dG9yaXpvIHByZXZpYSB5IGRlIGZvcm1hIGluZm9ybWFkYSBlbCB0cmF0YW1pZW50byBkZSBtaXMgZGF0b3MgcGVyc29uYWxlcyBwb3IgcGFydGUgZGUgTEEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgREVMIFJPU0FSSU8gIHBhcmEgZmluZXMgYWNhZMOpbWljb3MgeSBlbiBhcGxpY2FjacOzbiBkZSBjb252ZW5pb3MgY29uIHRlcmNlcm9zIG8gc2VydmljaW9zIGNvbmV4b3MgY29uIGFjdGl2aWRhZGVzIHByb3BpYXMgZGUgbGEgYWNhZGVtaWEsIGNvbiBlc3RyaWN0byBjdW1wbGltaWVudG8gZGUgbG9zIHByaW5jaXBpb3MgZGUgbGV5LiBQYXJhIGVsIGNvcnJlY3RvIGVqZXJjaWNpbyBkZSBtaSBkZXJlY2hvIGRlIGhhYmVhcyBkYXRhICBjdWVudG8gY29uIGxhIGN1ZW50YSBkZSBjb3JyZW8gaGFiZWFzZGF0YUB1cm9zYXJpby5lZHUuY28sIGRvbmRlIHByZXZpYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhY2nDs24gIHBvZHLDqSBzb2xpY2l0YXIgbGEgY29uc3VsdGEsIGNvcnJlY2Npw7NuIHkgc3VwcmVzacOzbiBkZSBtaXMgZGF0b3MuCgo=