Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial
Purpose: Intensive care triage practices and end-user interpretation of triage guidelines have rarely been assessed. We evaluated agreement between providers on the prioritization of patients for ICU admission using different triage guidelines. Materials and methods: A multi-centered randomized stud...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22319
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.012
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22319
- Palabra clave:
- Adult
Article
Cancer model
Cancer patient
Consensus
Controlled study
Critically ill patient
Emergency health service
Entropy
Female
Human
Intensive care unit
Kappa statistics
Male
Multicenter study
Oncology
Physician
Practice guideline
Randomized controlled trial
Resource allocation
Vignette
Guidelines
Intensive care unit triage
Oncology
Variability
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_05802153ca419c4cc51299a5676e6db2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22319 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
7c5b734b-8aad-4d94-aa08-561b4f1de357-1056705b2-8214-49ac-94ff-40600f4c4c5b-1bd976a83-96c3-4f4c-8fc4-492304e8ff32-13827d509-f256-4b0f-9eb0-bee93b3de390-1514894cf-e8c6-49b8-b25f-9a645fb453d2-1be48088e-61fc-41eb-bebb-e6019008b6b2-17f5d68b0-3aa2-4812-96f2-5a4ce514a975-1735e3df7-100d-4f2c-b57a-d1a08eb5d1f4-199cd3819-c49a-46fa-bf4c-5b3c95df3855-10f51347d-41a1-4312-80c9-5d33f0c6231e-11f7f37ca-dcb8-404d-a90b-29d57ed20c58-1e3c19c73-d5e4-4c64-9130-f7b76444b60d-1917cc660-6b55-466a-8552-34608d0f2770-17f375624-6e1e-4314-b53a-d6ef60a44627-158e586c6-dda4-43c0-a268-e843535dd817-12020-05-25T23:56:05Z2020-05-25T23:56:05Z2019Purpose: Intensive care triage practices and end-user interpretation of triage guidelines have rarely been assessed. We evaluated agreement between providers on the prioritization of patients for ICU admission using different triage guidelines. Materials and methods: A multi-centered randomized study on providers from 18 different countries was conducted using clinical vignettes of oncological patients. The level of agreement between providers was measured using two different guidelines, with one being cancer specific. Results: Amongst 257 providers, 52.5% randomly received the Society of Critical Care Prioritization Model, and 47.5% received a cancer specific flowchart as a guide. In the Prioritization Model arm the average entropy was 1.193, versus 1.153 in the flowchart arm (P = .095) indicating similarly poor agreement. The Fleiss' kappa coefficients were estimated to be 0.2136 for the SCCMPM arm and 0.2457 for the flowchart arm, also similarly implying poor agreement. Conclusions: The low agreement amongst practitioners on the prioritization of cancer patient cases for ICU admission existed using both general triage guidelines and guidelines tailored only to cancer patients. The lack of consensus on intensive care unit triage practices in the oncological population exposes a potential barrier to appropriate resource allocation that needs to be addressed. © 2019 Elsevier Inc.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.0128839441https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22319engW.B. Saunders2418Journal of Critical CareVol. 53Journal of Critical Care, ISSN:8839441, Vol.53,(2019); pp. 18-24https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066465897&doi=10.1016%2fj.jcrc.2019.05.012&partnerID=40&md5=bd714e1ed6e9ec9a91168c613ba75b3cAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAdultArticleCancer modelCancer patientConsensusControlled studyCritically ill patientEmergency health serviceEntropyFemaleHumanIntensive care unitKappa statisticsMaleMulticenter studyOncologyPhysicianPractice guidelineRandomized controlled trialResource allocationVignetteGuidelinesIntensive care unit triageOncologyVariabilityVariability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trialarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Rathi N.K.Haque S.A.Morales F.Kaul B.Ramirez R.Ovu S.Feng L.Dong W.Price K.J.Ugarte S.Raimondi N.Quintero A.Cardenas Y.R.Nates J.L.on behalf of the LACCTIN and ONCCC-R-NET groups10336/22319oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/223192022-05-02 07:37:20.348223https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
title |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
spellingShingle |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial Adult Article Cancer model Cancer patient Consensus Controlled study Critically ill patient Emergency health service Entropy Female Human Intensive care unit Kappa statistics Male Multicenter study Oncology Physician Practice guideline Randomized controlled trial Resource allocation Vignette Guidelines Intensive care unit triage Oncology Variability |
title_short |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Adult Article Cancer model Cancer patient Consensus Controlled study Critically ill patient Emergency health service Entropy Female Human Intensive care unit Kappa statistics Male Multicenter study Oncology Physician Practice guideline Randomized controlled trial Resource allocation Vignette Guidelines Intensive care unit triage Oncology Variability |
topic |
Adult Article Cancer model Cancer patient Consensus Controlled study Critically ill patient Emergency health service Entropy Female Human Intensive care unit Kappa statistics Male Multicenter study Oncology Physician Practice guideline Randomized controlled trial Resource allocation Vignette Guidelines Intensive care unit triage Oncology Variability |
description |
Purpose: Intensive care triage practices and end-user interpretation of triage guidelines have rarely been assessed. We evaluated agreement between providers on the prioritization of patients for ICU admission using different triage guidelines. Materials and methods: A multi-centered randomized study on providers from 18 different countries was conducted using clinical vignettes of oncological patients. The level of agreement between providers was measured using two different guidelines, with one being cancer specific. Results: Amongst 257 providers, 52.5% randomly received the Society of Critical Care Prioritization Model, and 47.5% received a cancer specific flowchart as a guide. In the Prioritization Model arm the average entropy was 1.193, versus 1.153 in the flowchart arm (P = .095) indicating similarly poor agreement. The Fleiss' kappa coefficients were estimated to be 0.2136 for the SCCMPM arm and 0.2457 for the flowchart arm, also similarly implying poor agreement. Conclusions: The low agreement amongst practitioners on the prioritization of cancer patient cases for ICU admission existed using both general triage guidelines and guidelines tailored only to cancer patients. The lack of consensus on intensive care unit triage practices in the oncological population exposes a potential barrier to appropriate resource allocation that needs to be addressed. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:56:05Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:56:05Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.012 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
8839441 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22319 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.012 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22319 |
identifier_str_mv |
8839441 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
24 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
18 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Critical Care |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 53 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Critical Care, ISSN:8839441, Vol.53,(2019); pp. 18-24 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066465897&doi=10.1016%2fj.jcrc.2019.05.012&partnerID=40&md5=bd714e1ed6e9ec9a91168c613ba75b3c |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
W.B. Saunders |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167721664839680 |