Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Undiagnosed congenital heart disease in the prenatal stage can occur in approximately 5 to 15 out of 1000 live births; more than a quarter of these will have critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Late postnatal diagnosis is associated with a worse prognosis during childhood, and ther...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24053
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17989.1
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24053
Palabra clave:
Critical congenital heart disease
Newborn
Oximetry
Physical examination
Screening
Sensitivity
Specificity
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_041d4e39414be260e8bd755f159da87b
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24053
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Critical congenital heart disease
Newborn
Oximetry
Physical examination
Screening
Sensitivity
Specificity
title_short Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Oximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Critical congenital heart disease
Newborn
Oximetry
Physical examination
Screening
Sensitivity
Specificity
topic Critical congenital heart disease
Newborn
Oximetry
Physical examination
Screening
Sensitivity
Specificity
description Background: Undiagnosed congenital heart disease in the prenatal stage can occur in approximately 5 to 15 out of 1000 live births; more than a quarter of these will have critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Late postnatal diagnosis is associated with a worse prognosis during childhood, and there is evidence that a standardized measurement of oxygen saturation in the newborn by cutaneous oximetry is an optimal method for the detection of CCHD. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis comparing the operational characteristics of oximetry and physical examination for the detection of CCHD. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on the following databases including published studies between 2002 and 2017, with no language restrictions: Pubmed, Science Direct, Ovid, Scopus and EBSCO, with the following keywords: oximetry screening, critical congenital heart disease, newborn OR oximetry screening heart defects, congenital, specificity, sensitivity, physical examination. Results: A total of 419 articles were found, from which 69 were selected based on their titles and abstracts. After quality assessment, five articles were chosen for extraction of data according to inclusion criteria; data were analyzed on a sample of 404,735 newborns in the five included studies. The following values were found, corresponding to the operational characteristics of oximetry in combination with the physical examination: sensitivity: 0.92 (CI 95%, 0.87-0.95), specificity: 0.98 (CI 95%, 0.89-1.00), for physical examination alone sensitivity: 0.53 (CI 95%, 0.28-0.78) and specificity: 0.99 (CI 95%, 0.97-1.00). Conclusions: Evidence found in different articles suggests that pulse oximetry in addition to neonatal physical examination presents optimal operative characteristics that make it an adequate screening test for detection of CCHD in newborns, above all this is essential in low and middle-income settings where technology medical support is not entirely available.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:08:04Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:08:04Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17989.1
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 20461402
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24053
url https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17989.1
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24053
identifier_str_mv 20461402
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 242
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv F1000Research
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 8
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv F1000Research, ISSN:20461402, Vol.8,(2019); pp. 242-
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070955536&doi=10.12688%2ff1000research.17989.1&partnerID=40&md5=9fe1b4cd85e15fc1863b1ffb19edc971
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv NLM (Medline)
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7ddcc91e-c730-49d8-90be-951188cdc8a7/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a4d6e24a-3be2-433a-a6d6-07f2d0ab46f8/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/06f2c7e6-9ef7-4f0e-8ee0-0f591b17ddfe/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d19e77dfb34c37e6e4779beb9118fec6
0d7ce69416e3a201f795bd5483e40f47
3def8d7a61c61d982a705c90943cbbf3
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390694484574208
spelling ca69b500-82f8-4319-a416-3385db427206-182cb31db-146d-4b22-a5ee-b80277751439-128c6bd9c-2a06-40e4-8bec-8d623c31bc73-14c76fc28-9e2e-4941-a08a-7c7a580e4d5f-1ef30ad76-9c63-4ec6-b568-812ef15ac963-15bc29444-91f6-4e0c-aff0-fe35d15713b5-1fe7fd977-e55a-4a57-bc92-0e8cdc6f35bf-1a8750e00-456b-4e3e-bf37-b7e976ec29bc-1791481066002020-05-26T00:08:04Z2020-05-26T00:08:04Z2019Background: Undiagnosed congenital heart disease in the prenatal stage can occur in approximately 5 to 15 out of 1000 live births; more than a quarter of these will have critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Late postnatal diagnosis is associated with a worse prognosis during childhood, and there is evidence that a standardized measurement of oxygen saturation in the newborn by cutaneous oximetry is an optimal method for the detection of CCHD. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis comparing the operational characteristics of oximetry and physical examination for the detection of CCHD. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on the following databases including published studies between 2002 and 2017, with no language restrictions: Pubmed, Science Direct, Ovid, Scopus and EBSCO, with the following keywords: oximetry screening, critical congenital heart disease, newborn OR oximetry screening heart defects, congenital, specificity, sensitivity, physical examination. Results: A total of 419 articles were found, from which 69 were selected based on their titles and abstracts. After quality assessment, five articles were chosen for extraction of data according to inclusion criteria; data were analyzed on a sample of 404,735 newborns in the five included studies. The following values were found, corresponding to the operational characteristics of oximetry in combination with the physical examination: sensitivity: 0.92 (CI 95%, 0.87-0.95), specificity: 0.98 (CI 95%, 0.89-1.00), for physical examination alone sensitivity: 0.53 (CI 95%, 0.28-0.78) and specificity: 0.99 (CI 95%, 0.97-1.00). Conclusions: Evidence found in different articles suggests that pulse oximetry in addition to neonatal physical examination presents optimal operative characteristics that make it an adequate screening test for detection of CCHD in newborns, above all this is essential in low and middle-income settings where technology medical support is not entirely available.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17989.120461402https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24053engNLM (Medline)242F1000ResearchVol. 8F1000Research, ISSN:20461402, Vol.8,(2019); pp. 242-https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070955536&doi=10.12688%2ff1000research.17989.1&partnerID=40&md5=9fe1b4cd85e15fc1863b1ffb19edc971Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCritical congenital heart diseaseNewbornOximetryPhysical examinationScreeningSensitivitySpecificityOximetry and neonatal examination for the detection of critical congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysisarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Aranguren Bello, Hernán CamiloLondoño Trujillo, DarioTroncoso Moreno, Gloria AmparoDominguez Torres, Maria TeresaTaborda Restrepo, AlejandraFonseca, AlejandraSandoval Reyes, NestorChamorro, Cindy LorenaDennis Verano, Rodolfo JoséORIGINALb3d53019-6005-4459-aaa8-1ca0e2774bfc_17989.pdfapplication/pdf2512214https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7ddcc91e-c730-49d8-90be-951188cdc8a7/downloadd19e77dfb34c37e6e4779beb9118fec6MD51TEXTb3d53019-6005-4459-aaa8-1ca0e2774bfc_17989.pdf.txtb3d53019-6005-4459-aaa8-1ca0e2774bfc_17989.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain44844https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a4d6e24a-3be2-433a-a6d6-07f2d0ab46f8/download0d7ce69416e3a201f795bd5483e40f47MD52THUMBNAILb3d53019-6005-4459-aaa8-1ca0e2774bfc_17989.pdf.jpgb3d53019-6005-4459-aaa8-1ca0e2774bfc_17989.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4333https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/06f2c7e6-9ef7-4f0e-8ee0-0f591b17ddfe/download3def8d7a61c61d982a705c90943cbbf3MD5310336/24053oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/240532022-05-02 07:37:14.894009https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co