The Uruguayan laws construction in social and solidarity economy in the framework of the progressive Governments of the Frente Amplio

This article analyzes the legislative contributions regarding the themes of cooperativism and social and solidarity economy (ess) in the framework of the first three progressive governments of the Frente Amplio. Theyemphasize in the first government of Tabaré Vázquez (2005-2010), the legislation in...

Full description

Autores:
Guerra, Pablo
Reyes, Sergio
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/11959
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/co/article/view/2625
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/11959
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:This article analyzes the legislative contributions regarding the themes of cooperativism and social and solidarity economy (ess) in the framework of the first three progressive governments of the Frente Amplio. Theyemphasize in the first government of Tabaré Vázquez (2005-2010), the legislation in social cooperatives, andthe concretion of an old yearning of the cooperative movement, that is, a general law of the cooperative system.Under the mandate of José Mujica (2010-2015), the creation of the Fondo para el Desarrollo (Fondes) is fundamentally aimed at promoting self-managed experiences. In the third mandate of the fa (2015-2020), againunder the presidency of Vázquez, Fondes is formalized in law and continue the debate of legislation in ess. Itwill be of fundamental importance to understand the political-ideological context from which these norms areconstructed. It is thus that we try to answer the following questions: What reasons explain the passage froma merely cooperative model to a broader one in terms of ess? How were these issues being advanced in thebroader agenda of the Frente Amplio? What are the different orientations that weigh in the configuration of thebills currently in parliamentary debate?