Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population

La Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida (SWLS), desarrollada por Diener, Emmons, Larsen y Griffin en 1985, consta de cinco ítems con siete opciones de respuesta en términos de acuerdo-desacuerdo. Recientemente, se ha sugerido reducir las opciones de respuesta del SWLS para optimizar su aplicabilidad e...

Full description

Autores:: Martín Carbonell, Marta de la Caridad
Espejo Tort, Begoña
Checa, Irene
Paternina Avilés, Yadid Esther
Fernández Daza, Martha Patricia
Higuita Martínez, Juan David
Albarracín, Angela
Cerquera Córdoba, Ara Mercedes

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Repositorio:: Repositorio UCC

Idioma:

id	COOPER2_dcb7e05b407768f98c1e78a88beb68f7
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/52525
network_acronym_str	COOPER2
network_name_str	Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
title	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
spellingShingle	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population Satisfaction with life scale Response options Psychometric properties Confirmatory factor analysis Well-being assessment Measurement invariance Structural equation modeling
title_short	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
title_full	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
title_fullStr	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
title_full_unstemmed	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
title_sort	Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Martín Carbonell, Marta de la Caridad Espejo Tort, Begoña Checa, Irene Paternina Avilés, Yadid Esther Fernández Daza, Martha Patricia Higuita Martínez, Juan David Albarracín, Angela Cerquera Córdoba, Ara Mercedes
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Martín Carbonell, Marta de la Caridad Espejo Tort, Begoña Checa, Irene Paternina Avilés, Yadid Esther Fernández Daza, Martha Patricia Higuita Martínez, Juan David Albarracín, Angela Cerquera Córdoba, Ara Mercedes
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv	Satisfaction with life scale Response options Psychometric properties Confirmatory factor analysis Well-being assessment Measurement invariance Structural equation modeling
topic	Satisfaction with life scale Response options Psychometric properties Confirmatory factor analysis Well-being assessment Measurement invariance Structural equation modeling
description	La Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida (SWLS), desarrollada por Diener, Emmons, Larsen y Griffin en 1985, consta de cinco ítems con siete opciones de respuesta en términos de acuerdo-desacuerdo. Recientemente, se ha sugerido reducir las opciones de respuesta del SWLS para optimizar su aplicabilidad en diferentes contextos culturales. El estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las propiedades psicométricas del SWLS con cinco opciones de respuesta en la población colombiana. En concreto, se estudió la dimensionalidad, la invarianza por género y edad (entre un grupo de adolescentes y adultos emergentes menores de 25 años y un grupo de adultos de edad intermedia y edad adulta establecida menor de 59 años), validez convergente (con optimismo) y divergente ( con pesimismo) y validez concurrente con otras medidas de bienestar (afectos florecientes, positivos y negativos). Este proyecto fue un estudio transversal utilizando una muestra no probabilística de la población general. Se incluyeron participantes que se identificaran como colombianos y tuvieran al menos 18 años de edad. La muestra final estuvo compuesta por 1.255 participantes. La edad promedio fue de 25,62 años (DE = 8,60) oscilando entre 18 y 67 años, y el 35,8% de los participantes fueron hombres. Además de SWLS, utilizamos la Escala Floreciente (FS), la Prueba de Orientación de Vida Revisada (LOT-R) y la Escala de Experiencia Positiva y Negativa (SPANE).
publishDate	2022
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-13
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2023-08-23T16:27:15Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2023-08-23T16:27:15Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículos Científicos
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	22962565
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.767534 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52525
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.none.fl_str_mv	Espejo, B., Martín-Carbonell, M., Checa, I., Paternina, Y., Fernández-Daza, M., Higuita, J. D., ... & Cerquera, A. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Diener satisfaction with Life Scale with five response options Applied to the colombian Population. Frontiers in public health, 9, 767534.
identifier_str_mv	22962565 Espejo, B., Martín-Carbonell, M., Checa, I., Paternina, Y., Fernández-Daza, M., Higuita, J. D., ... & Cerquera, A. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Diener satisfaction with Life Scale with five response options Applied to the colombian Population. Frontiers in public health, 9, 767534.
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.767534 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52525
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv	https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.767534/full
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.none.fl_str_mv	Front. Public Health
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Landes X. Building happiness indicators some philosophical and political issues. Les ateliers l'éthique. (2016) 10:4–37. doi: 10.7202/1035325ar Kushlev K, Drummond DM, Diener E. Subjective well-being and health behaviors in 2.5 million Americans. Appl Psychol Heal Well-Being. (2020) 12:166–87. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12178 Cobo-Rendón R, Pérez-Villalobos M V., Páez-Rovira D, Gracia-Leiva M. A longitudinal study: affective wellbeing, psychological wellbeing, self-efficacy and academic performance among first-year undergraduate students. Scand J Psychol. (2020) 61:518–26. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12618 Nangoy R, Mursitama TN, Setiadi NJ, Pradipto YD. Creating sustainable performance in the fourth industrial revolution era: the effect of employee's work well-being on job performance. Manag Sci Lett. (2020) 10:1037–42. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.006 Kusier AO, Folker AP. The satisfaction with life scale: philosophical foundation and practical limitations. Heal Care Anal. (2021) 29:21–38. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00420-y Forgeard MJC, Jayawickreme E, Kern ML, Seligman MEP. Doing the right thing: measuring well-being for public policy. Int J Wellbeing. (2011) 1:79–106. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15 Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. (1984) 95:542–75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 Kobau R, Sniezek J, Zack MM, Lucas RE, Burns A. Well-being assessment: an evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Appl Psychol Heal Well Being. (2010) 2:272–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01035.x Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. (1985) 49:71–5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychol Assess. (1993) 5:164–72. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164 Sumner LW. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1999). Atienza FL, Martinez N, Silva C. Life satisfaction and self-rated health in adolescents: the relationships between them and the role of gender and age. Span J Psychol. (2020) 23:1–9. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.10 Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In: Diener E, editor. Assessing Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. 117, Chapter xi, 274 Pages. Triwidyati H, Tentama F. Validity and reliability construct of subjective well-being scale. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. (2020) 51:191–200. Available online at: http://eprints.uad.ac.id/20150/ Jebb AT, Morrison M, Tay L, Diener E. Subjective well-being around the world: trends and predictors across the life span. Psychol Sci. (2020) 31:293–305. doi: 10.1177/0956797619898826 Diener E, Inglehart R, Tay L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc Indic Res. (2013) 112:497–527. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y Kim ES, Delaney SW, Tay L, Chen Y, Diener E, Vanderweele TJ. Life satisfaction and subsequent physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health in older adults. Milbank Q. (2021) 99:209–39. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12497 Blais MR Vallerand RJ Pelletier LG Brière Brière NMThe satisfaction scale: Canadian-French validation of the satisfaction with life scale. Can J Behav Sci. (1989) 21:210–23. doi: 10.1037/h0079854 Glaesmer H, Grande G, Braehler E, Roth M. The German version of the satisfactionwith life scale (SWLS) psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. Eur J Psychol Assess. (2011) 27:127–32. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058 Sancho P, Galiana L, Gutierrez M, Francisco EH, Tomás JM. Validating the portuguese version of the satisfaction with life scale in an elderly sample. Soc Indic Res. (2014) 115:457–66. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-9994-y Durak M, Senol-Durak E, Gencoz T. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish University students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Soc Indic Res. (2010) 99:413–29. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4 Bai X, Wu C, Zheng R, Ren X. The psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale using a nationally representative sample of China. J Happiness Stud. (2011) 12:183–97. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9186-x Wilson JF, Embree J, Guthmann D, Sligar SR, Titus JC, Taylor KC. Satisfaction with life scale in American sign language: validation and normative data. J Am Deaf Rehabil Assoc. (2020) 53:1–10. doi: 10.1037/t80262-000 Emerson SD, Guhn M, Gadermann AM. Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale: reviewing three decades of research. Qual Life Res. (2017) 26:2251–64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2 Schutte L, Negri L, Delle Fave A, Wissing MP. Rasch analysis of the satisfaction with life scale across countries: findings from South Africa and Italy. Curr Psychol. (2019) 40:4908–17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00424-5 Bernal H, Wooley S, Schensul J. The challenge of using Likert-type scales with low-literate ethnic populations. Nurs Res. (1997) 46 3:179–81. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199705000-00009 Flaskerud JH. Cultural bias and likert-type scales revisited. Issues Ment Health Nurs. (2012) 33:130–2. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2011.600510 Simms LJ, Zelazny K, Williams TF, Bernstein L. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychol Assess. (2019) 31:557–66. doi: 10.1037/pas0000648 Claveria O. A new metric of consensus for Likert-type scale questionnaires: an application to consumer expectations. J Bank Financ Technol. (2021) 5:35–43. doi: 10.1007/s42786-021-00026-5 Matas A. Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Rev Electron Investig Educ. (2018) 20:38–47. doi: 10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347 Hernández-Baeza A, Muñiz J, García-Cueto E. Comportamiento del modelo de respuesta graduada en función del número de categorías de la escala. Psicothema. (2000) 12:288–91. Available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72797068.pdf Vázquez C, Duque A, Hervás G. Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: validation and normative data. Span J Psychol. (2013) 16:E82. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.82 Cabañero-Martínez MJ, Richart-Martínez M, Cabrera-García J, Orts-Cortés MI, Reig-Ferrer A, Tosal-Herrero B. Fiabilidad y validez de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puérperas. Psicothema. (2004) 16:449–55. Available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72716318.pdf Núñez JL, Martín-Albo J, Domínguez E. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en sujetos practicantes de actividad física. Rev Psicol del Deport. (2010) 19:291–304. Available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2351/235116352009.pdf Atienza FL, Pons D, Balaguer I, García-Merita M. Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en Adolescentes. Psicothema. (2000) 12:314–9. Available online at: https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/7597 Atienza FL, Balaguer I, Garcia-Merita ML. Satisfaction with life scale: analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Pers Individ Dif. (2003) 35:1255–60. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X Pons D, Atienza FL, Balaguer I, García-Merita ML. Satisfaction with life scale: analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Percept Mot Skills. (2000) 91:62–8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.62 Álvarez CA, Briceño AM, Álvarez K, Abufhele M, Delgado I. Transcultural adaptation and validation of a satisfaction with life scale for chilean adolescents. Rev Chil Pediatr. (2018) 89:51–8. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062018000100051 Calderón-De la Cruz G, Lozano-Chávez F, Cantuarias-Carthy A, Ibarra-Carlos L. Validación de la Escala Satisfacción con la Vida en trabajadores peruanos. Lib Rev Peru Psicol. (2018) 24:249–64. doi: 10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n2.06 Blanco M, Salazar M. Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida para adultos mayores de Emmons, Larsen, y Griffin. In: Compendio de Instrumentos de Medición IIP-2014. p. 227–231. González-Rivera JA, Rosario-Rodríguez A. Psychometric characteristics of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of puerto ricans adults. Rev Puertorriquena Psicol. (2020) 1:128–39. Available online at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7872123 López-Ortega M, Torres-Castro S, Rosas-Carrasco O. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): secondary analysis of the Mexican health and aging study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2016) 14:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0573-9 Hernández-Mateus LV, Salamanca-Chacón SA, Umbarila-Contréras LI, Venegas Muñoz CF, Riveros-Munévar F. Validez de constructo y confiabilidad de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida, en escolares de zonas rurales y urbanas de Cundinamarca. Actual en Psicol. (2018) 32:71. doi: 10.15517/ap.v32i125.29848 Bernal-Romero T, Daza-Pinzón CD, Jaramillo-Acosta PK. Satisfacción con la vida y resiliencia en jóvenes en edad escolar. Rev Iberoam Psicol Cienc y Tecnol. (2015) 8:43–53. doi: 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.8204 Sanín-Posada A, Salanora M, Vera-Villarroel P. Satisfacción con la Vida: El rol de la Felicidad en el Trabajo y la Vida. Rev Interam Psicol Ocup. (2019) 38:54–66. doi: 10.21772/ripo.v38n1a05 Vinaccia-Alpi S, Parada N, Quiceno JM, Riveros-Munévar F, Vera-Maldonado LA. Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): validity, reliability and assessment analysis in college students from Bogotá (Col) as sample. Psicogente. (2019) 22:1–13. doi: 10.17081/psico.22.42.3468 Ruiz FJ, Suárez-Falcón JC, Flórez CL, Odriozola-González P, Tovar D, López-González S, et al. Validity of the satisfaction with life scale in Colombia and factorial equivalence with spanish data. Rev Latinoam Psicol. (2019) 51:58–65. doi: 10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n2.1 Muñiz J, Elosúa P, Padilla JL, Hambleton RK. Test adaptation standards for cross-lingual assessment. In: Wells CS, Faulkner-Bond M. Educational Measurement. From Foundations to Future. New York, NY: Guilford Press. p. 291–304. Bailey TC, Eng W, Frisch MB, Snyder CR. Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction. J Posit Psychol. (2007) 2:168–75. doi: 10.1080/17439760701409546 Lucas RE, Diener E, Suh E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1996) 71:616–28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616 Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess. (1991) 57:149–61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17 Diener E, Heintzelman SJ, Kushlev K, Tay L, Wirtz D, Lutes LD, et al. Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Can Psychol. (2017) 58:87–104. doi: 10.1037/cap0000063 Keyes CLM, Annas J. Feeling good and functioning well: distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. J Posit Psychol. (2009) 4:197–201. doi: 10.1080/17439760902844228 Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, et al. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. (2010) 97:143–56. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y Checa I, Perales J, Espejo B. Spanish validation of the flourishing scale in the general population. Curr Psychol. (2018) 37:949–56. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9581-0 Martín-Carbonell M, Espejo B, Checa I, Fernández-Daza M. Adaptation and measurement invariance by gender of the flourishing scale in a Colombian sample. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052664 Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1994) 67:1063–78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 Valdelamar-Jiménez J, Sánchez-Pedraza R. Traducción y adaptación transcultural de la escala life orientation test-revised para medir optimismo disposicional en cuidadores de pacientes con cáncer en Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. (2017) 35:2016–24. doi: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a06 Zenger M, Finck C, Zanon C, Jimenez W, Singer S, Hinz A. Evaluation of the Latin American version of the life orientation test-revised. Int J Clin Heal Psychol. (2013) 13:243–52. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70029-2 Ventura-León J, Peña-Calero BN. The world should not revolve around Cronbachfs alpha ≥ .70. Adicciones. (2021) 33:369–72. doi: 10.20882/adicciones.1576
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv	Atribución – No comercial
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución – No comercial http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.coverage.temporal.none.fl_str_mv	9
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Santa Marta
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv	Psicología
dc.publisher.place.none.fl_str_mv	Santa Marta
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Santa Marta
institution	Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/9816973f-904b-4b98-b7e7-6fa3261a613c/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/f0056973-e417-4d1f-b1b0-ea06113d2cac/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/48790a89-6cbe-4e3c-8a6e-7a04a844bea9/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/94747f4d-7a79-4a32-ab67-48454b2bcb7a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	112872f35558aa857207040e6462b729 3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45 2d22ff52721094df17a5aa1cac98ccd6 c930605c6f7ef636a24a9512ff5d57e8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1811565143403790336
spelling	Martín Carbonell, Marta de la CaridadEspejo Tort, BegoñaCheca, IrenePaternina Avilés, Yadid Esther Fernández Daza, Martha PatriciaHiguita Martínez, Juan David Albarracín, AngelaCerquera Córdoba, Ara Mercedes92023-08-23T16:27:15Z2023-08-23T16:27:15Z2022-01-1322962565https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.767534https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52525Espejo, B., Martín-Carbonell, M., Checa, I., Paternina, Y., Fernández-Daza, M., Higuita, J. D., ... & Cerquera, A. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Diener satisfaction with Life Scale with five response options Applied to the colombian Population. Frontiers in public health, 9, 767534.La Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida (SWLS), desarrollada por Diener, Emmons, Larsen y Griffin en 1985, consta de cinco ítems con siete opciones de respuesta en términos de acuerdo-desacuerdo. Recientemente, se ha sugerido reducir las opciones de respuesta del SWLS para optimizar su aplicabilidad en diferentes contextos culturales. El estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las propiedades psicométricas del SWLS con cinco opciones de respuesta en la población colombiana. En concreto, se estudió la dimensionalidad, la invarianza por género y edad (entre un grupo de adolescentes y adultos emergentes menores de 25 años y un grupo de adultos de edad intermedia y edad adulta establecida menor de 59 años), validez convergente (con optimismo) y divergente ( con pesimismo) y validez concurrente con otras medidas de bienestar (afectos florecientes, positivos y negativos). Este proyecto fue un estudio transversal utilizando una muestra no probabilística de la población general. Se incluyeron participantes que se identificaran como colombianos y tuvieran al menos 18 años de edad. La muestra final estuvo compuesta por 1.255 participantes. La edad promedio fue de 25,62 años (DE = 8,60) oscilando entre 18 y 67 años, y el 35,8% de los participantes fueron hombres. Además de SWLS, utilizamos la Escala Floreciente (FS), la Prueba de Orientación de Vida Revisada (LOT-R) y la Escala de Experiencia Positiva y Negativa (SPANE).The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), developed by Diener, Emmons, Larsen, and Griffin in 1985, comprises five items with seven response options in terms of agreement–disagreement. Recently, there has been a suggestion to reduce the response options of the SWLS to optimize its applicability in different cultural contexts. The study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the SWLS with five response options in the Colombian population. Specifically, we studied the dimensionality, invariance by gender and age (among a group of adolescents and emerging adults under 25 years and a group of adults of intermediate age and established adulthood under 59 years), onvergent validity (with optimism), and divergent (with pessimism) and concurrent validity with other measures of well-being (flourishing, positive, and negative affects). This project was a cross-sectional study using a non-probabilistic sample of the general population. Participants were included if they identified themselves as Colombian and were at least 18 years of age. The final sample comprised 1,255 participants. The average age was 25.62 years (SD = 8.60) ranging from 18 to 67 years of age, and 35.8% of the participants were men. In addition to SWLS, we used the Flourishing Scale (FS), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE).https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001561776https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6337-577Xmartha.martinc@campusucc.edu.coUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Santa MartaPsicologíaSanta Martahttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.767534/fullFront. Public HealthLandes X. Building happiness indicators some philosophical and political issues. Les ateliers l'éthique. (2016) 10:4–37. doi: 10.7202/1035325arKushlev K, Drummond DM, Diener E. Subjective well-being and health behaviors in 2.5 million Americans. Appl Psychol Heal Well-Being. (2020) 12:166–87. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12178Cobo-Rendón R, Pérez-Villalobos M V., Páez-Rovira D, Gracia-Leiva M. A longitudinal study: affective wellbeing, psychological wellbeing, self-efficacy and academic performance among first-year undergraduate students. Scand J Psychol. (2020) 61:518–26. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12618Nangoy R, Mursitama TN, Setiadi NJ, Pradipto YD. Creating sustainable performance in the fourth industrial revolution era: the effect of employee's work well-being on job performance. Manag Sci Lett. (2020) 10:1037–42. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.006Kusier AO, Folker AP. The satisfaction with life scale: philosophical foundation and practical limitations. Heal Care Anal. (2021) 29:21–38. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00420-yForgeard MJC, Jayawickreme E, Kern ML, Seligman MEP. Doing the right thing: measuring well-being for public policy. Int J Wellbeing. (2011) 1:79–106. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. (1984) 95:542–75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542Kobau R, Sniezek J, Zack MM, Lucas RE, Burns A. Well-being assessment: an evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Appl Psychol Heal Well Being. (2010) 2:272–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01035.xDiener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. (1985) 49:71–5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychol Assess. (1993) 5:164–72. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164Sumner LW. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1999).Atienza FL, Martinez N, Silva C. Life satisfaction and self-rated health in adolescents: the relationships between them and the role of gender and age. Span J Psychol. (2020) 23:1–9. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.10Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In: Diener E, editor. Assessing Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. 117, Chapter xi, 274 Pages.Triwidyati H, Tentama F. Validity and reliability construct of subjective well-being scale. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. (2020) 51:191–200. Available online at: http://eprints.uad.ac.id/20150/Jebb AT, Morrison M, Tay L, Diener E. Subjective well-being around the world: trends and predictors across the life span. Psychol Sci. (2020) 31:293–305. doi: 10.1177/0956797619898826Diener E, Inglehart R, Tay L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc Indic Res. (2013) 112:497–527. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-yKim ES, Delaney SW, Tay L, Chen Y, Diener E, Vanderweele TJ. Life satisfaction and subsequent physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health in older adults. Milbank Q. (2021) 99:209–39. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12497Blais MR Vallerand RJ Pelletier LG Brière Brière NMThe satisfaction scale: Canadian-French validation of the satisfaction with life scale. Can J Behav Sci. (1989) 21:210–23. doi: 10.1037/h0079854Glaesmer H, Grande G, Braehler E, Roth M. The German version of the satisfactionwith life scale (SWLS) psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. Eur J Psychol Assess. (2011) 27:127–32. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058Sancho P, Galiana L, Gutierrez M, Francisco EH, Tomás JM. Validating the portuguese version of the satisfaction with life scale in an elderly sample. Soc Indic Res. (2014) 115:457–66. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-9994-yDurak M, Senol-Durak E, Gencoz T. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish University students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Soc Indic Res. (2010) 99:413–29. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4Bai X, Wu C, Zheng R, Ren X. The psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale using a nationally representative sample of China. J Happiness Stud. (2011) 12:183–97. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9186-xWilson JF, Embree J, Guthmann D, Sligar SR, Titus JC, Taylor KC. Satisfaction with life scale in American sign language: validation and normative data. J Am Deaf Rehabil Assoc. (2020) 53:1–10. doi: 10.1037/t80262-000Emerson SD, Guhn M, Gadermann AM. Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale: reviewing three decades of research. Qual Life Res. (2017) 26:2251–64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2Schutte L, Negri L, Delle Fave A, Wissing MP. Rasch analysis of the satisfaction with life scale across countries: findings from South Africa and Italy. Curr Psychol. (2019) 40:4908–17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00424-5Bernal H, Wooley S, Schensul J. The challenge of using Likert-type scales with low-literate ethnic populations. Nurs Res. (1997) 46 3:179–81. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199705000-00009Flaskerud JH. Cultural bias and likert-type scales revisited. Issues Ment Health Nurs. (2012) 33:130–2. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2011.600510Simms LJ, Zelazny K, Williams TF, Bernstein L. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychol Assess. (2019) 31:557–66. doi: 10.1037/pas0000648Claveria O. A new metric of consensus for Likert-type scale questionnaires: an application to consumer expectations. J Bank Financ Technol. (2021) 5:35–43. doi: 10.1007/s42786-021-00026-5Matas A. Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Rev Electron Investig Educ. (2018) 20:38–47. doi: 10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347Hernández-Baeza A, Muñiz J, García-Cueto E. Comportamiento del modelo de respuesta graduada en función del número de categorías de la escala. Psicothema. (2000) 12:288–91. Available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72797068.pdfVázquez C, Duque A, Hervás G. Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: validation and normative data. Span J Psychol. (2013) 16:E82. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.82Cabañero-Martínez MJ, Richart-Martínez M, Cabrera-García J, Orts-Cortés MI, Reig-Ferrer A, Tosal-Herrero B. Fiabilidad y validez de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puérperas. Psicothema. (2004) 16:449–55. Available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72716318.pdfNúñez JL, Martín-Albo J, Domínguez E. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en sujetos practicantes de actividad física. Rev Psicol del Deport. (2010) 19:291–304. Available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2351/235116352009.pdfAtienza FL, Pons D, Balaguer I, García-Merita M. Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en Adolescentes. Psicothema. (2000) 12:314–9. Available online at: https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/7597Atienza FL, Balaguer I, Garcia-Merita ML. Satisfaction with life scale: analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Pers Individ Dif. (2003) 35:1255–60. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-XPons D, Atienza FL, Balaguer I, García-Merita ML. Satisfaction with life scale: analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Percept Mot Skills. (2000) 91:62–8. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.62Álvarez CA, Briceño AM, Álvarez K, Abufhele M, Delgado I. Transcultural adaptation and validation of a satisfaction with life scale for chilean adolescents. Rev Chil Pediatr. (2018) 89:51–8. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062018000100051Calderón-De la Cruz G, Lozano-Chávez F, Cantuarias-Carthy A, Ibarra-Carlos L. Validación de la Escala Satisfacción con la Vida en trabajadores peruanos. Lib Rev Peru Psicol. (2018) 24:249–64. doi: 10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n2.06Blanco M, Salazar M. Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida para adultos mayores de Emmons, Larsen, y Griffin. In: Compendio de Instrumentos de Medición IIP-2014. p. 227–231.González-Rivera JA, Rosario-Rodríguez A. Psychometric characteristics of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of puerto ricans adults. Rev Puertorriquena Psicol. (2020) 1:128–39. Available online at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7872123López-Ortega M, Torres-Castro S, Rosas-Carrasco O. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): secondary analysis of the Mexican health and aging study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2016) 14:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0573-9Hernández-Mateus LV, Salamanca-Chacón SA, Umbarila-Contréras LI, Venegas Muñoz CF, Riveros-Munévar F. Validez de constructo y confiabilidad de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida, en escolares de zonas rurales y urbanas de Cundinamarca. Actual en Psicol. (2018) 32:71. doi: 10.15517/ap.v32i125.29848Bernal-Romero T, Daza-Pinzón CD, Jaramillo-Acosta PK. Satisfacción con la vida y resiliencia en jóvenes en edad escolar. Rev Iberoam Psicol Cienc y Tecnol. (2015) 8:43–53. doi: 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.8204Sanín-Posada A, Salanora M, Vera-Villarroel P. Satisfacción con la Vida: El rol de la Felicidad en el Trabajo y la Vida. Rev Interam Psicol Ocup. (2019) 38:54–66. doi: 10.21772/ripo.v38n1a05Vinaccia-Alpi S, Parada N, Quiceno JM, Riveros-Munévar F, Vera-Maldonado LA. Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): validity, reliability and assessment analysis in college students from Bogotá (Col) as sample. Psicogente. (2019) 22:1–13. doi: 10.17081/psico.22.42.3468Ruiz FJ, Suárez-Falcón JC, Flórez CL, Odriozola-González P, Tovar D, López-González S, et al. Validity of the satisfaction with life scale in Colombia and factorial equivalence with spanish data. Rev Latinoam Psicol. (2019) 51:58–65. doi: 10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n2.1Muñiz J, Elosúa P, Padilla JL, Hambleton RK. Test adaptation standards for cross-lingual assessment. In: Wells CS, Faulkner-Bond M. Educational Measurement. From Foundations to Future. New York, NY: Guilford Press. p. 291–304.Bailey TC, Eng W, Frisch MB, Snyder CR. Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction. J Posit Psychol. (2007) 2:168–75. doi: 10.1080/17439760701409546Lucas RE, Diener E, Suh E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1996) 71:616–28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess. (1991) 57:149–61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17Diener E, Heintzelman SJ, Kushlev K, Tay L, Wirtz D, Lutes LD, et al. Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Can Psychol. (2017) 58:87–104. doi: 10.1037/cap0000063Keyes CLM, Annas J. Feeling good and functioning well: distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. J Posit Psychol. (2009) 4:197–201. doi: 10.1080/17439760902844228Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, et al. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. (2010) 97:143–56. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-yCheca I, Perales J, Espejo B. Spanish validation of the flourishing scale in the general population. Curr Psychol. (2018) 37:949–56. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9581-0Martín-Carbonell M, Espejo B, Checa I, Fernández-Daza M. Adaptation and measurement invariance by gender of the flourishing scale in a Colombian sample. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052664Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1994) 67:1063–78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063Valdelamar-Jiménez J, Sánchez-Pedraza R. Traducción y adaptación transcultural de la escala life orientation test-revised para medir optimismo disposicional en cuidadores de pacientes con cáncer en Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. (2017) 35:2016–24. doi: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a06Zenger M, Finck C, Zanon C, Jimenez W, Singer S, Hinz A. Evaluation of the Latin American version of the life orientation test-revised. Int J Clin Heal Psychol. (2013) 13:243–52. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70029-2Ventura-León J, Peña-Calero BN. The world should not revolve around Cronbachfs alpha ≥ .70. Adicciones. (2021) 33:369–72. doi: 10.20882/adicciones.1576Satisfaction with life scaleResponse optionsPsychometric propertiesConfirmatory factor analysisWell-being assessmentMeasurement invarianceStructural equation modelingPsychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian PopulationArtículos Científicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleAtribución – No comercialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2PublicationORIGINAL2022_psychometric_properties 2022_psychometric_properties Artículoapplication/pdf308408https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/9816973f-904b-4b98-b7e7-6fa3261a613c/download112872f35558aa857207040e6462b729MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/f0056973-e417-4d1f-b1b0-ea06113d2cac/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD52TEXT2022_psychometric_properties .txt2022_psychometric_properties .txtExtracted texttext/plain73232https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/48790a89-6cbe-4e3c-8a6e-7a04a844bea9/download2d22ff52721094df17a5aa1cac98ccd6MD53THUMBNAIL2022_psychometric_properties .jpg2022_psychometric_properties .jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg14940https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/94747f4d-7a79-4a32-ab67-48454b2bcb7a/downloadc930605c6f7ef636a24a9512ff5d57e8MD5420.500.12494/52525oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/525252024-08-10 09:36:36.025restrictedhttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.comVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgQ09PUEVSQVRJVkEgREUgQ09MT01CSUEKUkVQT1NJVE9SSU9TIElOU1RJVFVDSU9OQUxFUwpMSUNFTkNJQSBERSBVU08KClBvciBtZWRpbyBkZWwgcHJlc2VudGUgZG9jdW1lbnRvLCBlbCBBdXRvcihlcyksIG1heW9yIChlcykgZGUgZWRhZCwgcXVpZW4gZW4gYWRlbGFudGUgc2UgZGVub21pbmFyw6EgZWwgQVVUT1IsIGNvbmZpZXJlIGEgbGEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgQ09PUEVSQVRJVkEgREUgQ09MT01CSUEsIGNvbiBOSVQuIDg2MC0wMjk5MjQtNywgdW5hIExJQ0VOQ0lBIERFIFVTTyBkZSBvYnJhLCBiYWpvIGxhcyBzaWd1aWVudGVzIGNvbmRpY2lvbmVzLgoKQ0zDgVVTVUxBUwoKUFJJTUVSQS4gT2JqZXRvLiBFTCBBVVRPUiBwb3IgZXN0ZSBhY3RvIGF1dG9yaXphIGxhIHV0aWxpemFjacOzbiBkZSBsYSBvYnJhLCBkZSBjb25mb3JtaWRhZCBjb24gbG8gZXN0aXB1bGFkbyBhIGNvbnRpbnVhY2nDs246IAoKKGEpIFBhcmEgZWZlY3RvcyBkZSBsYSBwcmVzZW50ZSBsaWNlbmNpYSBzZSBhdXRvcml6YSBsYSByZXByb2R1Y2Npw7NuIGRlIGxhIG9icmEgYW50ZXJpb3JtZW50ZSBjaXRhZGEsIGxhIGN1YWwgc2UgYWxvamFyw6EgZW4gZm9ybWF0byBkaWdpdGFsIGVuIGxhcyBwbGF0YWZvcm1hcyBvIHJlcG9zaXRvcmlvcyBhZG1pbmlzdHJhZG9zIHBvciBsYSBVTklWRVJTSURBRCBvIGVuIG90cm8gdGlwbyBkZSByZXBvc2l0b3Jpb3MgZXh0ZXJub3MgbyBww6FnaW5hcyB3ZWIgZXNjb2dpZG9zIHBvciBsYSBVTklWRVJTSURBRCwgcGFyYSBmaW5lcyBkZSBkaWZ1c2nDs24geSBkaXZ1bGdhY2nDs24uIEFkaWNpb25hbG1lbnRlLCBzZSBhdXRvcml6YSBhIHF1ZSBsb3MgdXN1YXJpb3MgaW50ZXJub3MgeSBleHRlcm5vcyBkZSBkaWNoYXMgcGxhdGFmb3JtYXMgbyByZXBvc2l0b3Jpb3MgcmVwcm9kdXpjYW4gbyBkZXNjYXJndWVuIGxhIG9icmEsIHNpbiDDoW5pbW8gZGUgbHVjcm8sIHBhcmEgZmluZXMgcHJpdmFkb3MsIGVkdWNhdGl2b3MgbyBhY2Fkw6ltaWNvczsgc2llbXByZSB5IGN1YW5kbyBubyBzZSB2aW9sZW4gYWN1ZXJkb3MgY29uIGVkaXRvcmVzLCBwZXJpb2RvcyBkZSBlbWJhcmdvIG8gYWN1ZXJkb3MgZGUgY29uZmlkZW5jaWFsaWRhZCBxdWUgYXBsaXF1ZW4uCgooYikgU2UgYXV0b3JpemEgbGEgY29tdW5pY2FjacOzbiBww7pibGljYSB5IGxhIHB1ZXN0YSBhIGRpc3Bvc2ljacOzbiBkZSBsYSBvYnJhIG1lbmNpb25hZGEsIGVuIGFjY2VzbyBhYmllcnRvLCBwYXJhIHN1IHV0aWxpemFjacOzbiBlbiBsYXMgcGxhdGFmb3JtYXMgbyByZXBvc2l0b3Jpb3MgYWRtaW5pc3RyYWRvcyBwb3IgbGEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQuCgooYykgTG8gYW50ZXJpb3IgZXN0YXLDoSBzdWpldG8gYSBsYXMgZGVmaW5pY2lvbmVzIGNvbnRlbmlkYXMgZW4gbGEgRGVjaXNpw7NuIEFuZGluYSAzNTEgZGUgMTk5MyB5IGxhIExleSAyMyBkZSAxOTgyLgoKClNFR1VOREEuIE9yaWdpbmFsaWRhZCB5IHJlY2xhbWFjaW9uZXMuIEVsIEFVVE9SIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGxhIE9CUkEgZXMgb3JpZ2luYWwgeSBxdWUgZXMgZGUgc3UgY3JlYWNpw7NuIGV4Y2x1c2l2YSwgbm8gZXhpc3RpZW5kbyBpbXBlZGltZW50byBkZSBjdWFscXVpZXIgbmF0dXJhbGV6YSAoZW1iYXJnb3MsIHVzbyBkZSBtYXRlcmlhbCBwcm90ZWdpZG8gcG9yIGRlcmVjaG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yKSBwYXJhIGxhIGNvbmNlc2nDs24gZGUgbG9zIGRlcmVjaG9zIHByZXZpc3RvcyBlbiBlc3RlIGFjdWVyZG8uIEVsIEFVVE9SIHJlc3BvbmRlcsOhIHBvciBjdWFscXVpZXIgYWNjacOzbiBkZSByZWl2aW5kaWNhY2nDs24sIHBsYWdpbyB1IG90cmEgY2xhc2UgZGUgcmVjbGFtYWNpw7NuIHF1ZSBhbCByZXNwZWN0byBwdWRpZXJhIHNvYnJldmVuaXIuCgpURVJDRVJBLiBDb250cmFwcmVzdGFjacOzbi4gRWwgQVVUT1IgYXV0b3JpemEgYSBxdWUgc3Ugb2JyYSBzZWEgdXRpbGl6YWRhIGRlIGNvbmZvcm1pZGFkIGNvbiBsYSBjbMOhdXN1bGEgUFJJTUVSQSBkZSBmb3JtYSBncmF0dWl0YSwgZXMgZGVjaXIsIHF1ZSBsYSB1dGlsaXphY2nDs24gZGUgbGEgbWlzbWEgbm8gZ2VuZXJhIG5pbmfDum4gcGFnbyBvIHJlZ2Fsw61hcyBlbiBmYXZvciBkZSBlc3RlLgoKQ1VBUlRBLiBUaXR1bGFyaWRhZCBkZSBkZXJlY2hvcy4gRWwgcHJlc2VudGUgY29udHJhdG8gbm8gdHJhbnNmaWVyZSBsYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZCBkZSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgcGF0cmltb25pYWxlcyBzb2JyZSBsYXMgb2JyYXMgYW50ZXJpb3JtZW50ZSBtZW5jaW9uYWRhcyBhIGxhIFVOSVZFUlNJREFELiDDmm5pY2FtZW50ZSBoYWNlIHJlbGFjacOzbiBhIHVuYSBsaWNlbmNpYSBubyBleGNsdXNpdmEgZW4gbG9zIHTDqXJtaW5vcyB5IGNvbmRpY2lvbmVzIGFudGVyaW9ybWVudGUgcGFjdGFkb3MuCgpRVUlOVEEuIENyw6lkaXRvcy4gTGEgVU5JVkVSU0lEQUQgc2UgY29tcHJvbWV0ZSBhIGRhciBhbCBBVVRPUiwgZWwgcmVjb25vY2ltaWVudG8gZGVudHJvIGNhZGEgZm9ybWEgZGUgdXRpbGl6YWNpw7NuIGVuIGxhIG9icmEuIExvcyBjcsOpZGl0b3MgZGViZW4gZmlndXJhciBlbiBjYWRhIHVubyBkZSBsb3MgZm9ybWF0b3MgbyByZWdpc3Ryb3MgZGUgcHVibGljYWNpw7NuLiBObyBjb25zdGl0dWlyw6EgdW5hIHZpb2xhY2nDs24gYSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgbW9yYWxlcyBkZWwgYXV0b3IgbGEgbm8gcmVwcm9kdWNjacOzbiwgY29tdW5pY2FjacOzbiBvIGRlbcOhcyB1dGlsaXphY2lvbmVzIGRlIGxhIG9icmEuIExhIHV0aWxpemFjacOzbiBvIG5vIGRlIGxhIG9icmEsIGFzw60gY29tbyBzdSBmb3JtYSBkZSB1dGlsaXphY2nDs24gc2Vyw6EgZmFjdWx0YWQgZXhjbHVzaXZhIGRlIGxhIFVOSVZFUlNJREFELgogClNFWFRBLiBEdXJhY2nDs24geSB0ZXJyaXRvcmlvLiBMYSBwcmVzZW50ZSBsaWNlbmNpYSBkZSB1c28gcXVlIHNlIG90b3JnYSBhIGZhdm9yIGRlIGxhIFVOSVZFUlNJREFEIHRlbmRyw6EgdW5hIGR1cmFjacOzbiBlcXVpdmFsZW50ZSBhbCB0w6lybWlubyBkZSBwcm90ZWNjacOzbiBsZWdhbCBkZSBsYSBvYnJhIHkgcGFyYSB0b2RvcyBsb3MgcGHDrXNlcyBkZWwgbXVuZG8uCgpTw4lQVElNQS4gVXNvIGRlIENyZWF0aXZlIENvbW1vbnMuIEVsIEFVVE9SIGF1dG9yaXphcsOhIGxhIGRpZnVzacOzbiBkZSBzdSBjb250ZW5pZG8gYmFqbyB1bmEgbGljZW5jaWEgQ3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucyBhdHJpYnVjacOzbiA0LjAgaW50ZXJuYWNpb25hbCwgcXVlIGRlYmVyw6EgaW5jbHVpcnNlIGVuIGVsIGNvbnRlbmlkby4gCgpPQ1RBVkEuIERlcmVjaG8gZGUgZXhjbHVzacOzbi4gQ2FkYSBhdXRvciBwdWVkZSBpbmRpY2FyIGVuIGVsIG1vbWVudG8gZGUgZGVww7NzaXRvIGRlbCBjb250ZW5pZG8gcXVlIGVsIHRleHRvIGNvbXBsZXRvIGRlIGxhIHByb2R1Y2Npw7NuIGFjYWTDqW1pY2EgbyBjaWVudMOtZmljYSBubyBlc3RlIGNvbiBhY2Nlc28gYWJpZXJ0byBlbiBlbCBSZXBvc2l0b3JpbyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsIHBvciBtb3Rpdm9zIGRlIGNvbmZpZGVuY2lhbGlkYWQsIHBvcnF1ZSBzZSBlbmN1ZW50cmUgZW4gdsOtYXMgZGUgb2J0ZW5lciB1biBkZXJlY2hvIGRlIHByb3BpZWRhZCBpbmR1c3RyaWFsIG8gZXhpc3RpciBhY3VlcmRvcyBwcmV2aW9zIGNvbiB0ZXJjZXJvcyAoZWRpdG9yaWFsZXMsIHJldmlzdGFzIGNpZW50w61maWNhcywgb3RyYXMgaW5zdGl0dWNpb25lcykuIEVsIGF1dG9yIHNlIGNvbXByb21ldGUgYSBkZXBvc2l0YXIgbG9zIG1ldGFkYXRvcyBlIGluZm9ybWFyIGVsIHRpZW1wbyBkZSBlbWJhcmdvIGR1cmFudGUgZWwgY3VhbCBlbCB0ZXh0byBjb21wbGV0byB0ZW5kcsOhIGFjY2VzbyByZXN0cmluZ2lkby4gCgpOT1ZFTkEuIEVsIEFVVE9SIGFsIGFjZXB0YXIgZXN0YSBsaWNlbmNpYSBhZHVjZSBxdWUgZXN0YSBwcm9kdWNjacOzbiBzZSBkZXNhcnJvbGzDsyBlbiBlbCBwZXJpb2RvIGVuIHF1ZSBzZSBlbmN1ZW50cmEgY29uIHbDrW5jdWxvcyBjb24gTGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWQuCgpEw4lDSU1BLiBOb3JtYXMgYXBsaWNhYmxlcy4gUGFyYSBsYSBpbnRlcnByZXRhY2nDs24geSBjdW1wbGltaWVudG8gZGVsIHByZXNlbnRlIGFjdWVyZG8gbGFzIHBhcnRlcyBzZSBzb21ldGVuIGEgbGEgRGVjaXNpw7NuIEFuZGluYSAzNTEgZGUgMTk5MywgbGEgTGV5IDIzIGRlIDE5ODIgeSBkZW3DoXMgbm9ybWFzIGFwbGljYWJsZXMgZGUgQ29sb21iaWEuIEFkZW3DoXMsIGEgbGFzIG5vcm1hcyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsZXMgcXVlIGFwbGlxdWVuLgoKTGEgcHJlc2VudGUgbGljZW5jaWEgc2UgYXV0b3JpemEgZW4gbGEgZmVjaGEgZGUgcHVibGljYWNpw7NuIGVuIGxvcyByZXBvc2l0b3Jpb3MgaW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbGVzLgo=

Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population

Publicaciones similares