Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia
Variations in the size of animals of the same species but of different sex are called sexual size dimorphism. The aim of this study was to compare the biometrics between males and females of the Sanmartinero creole bovine, of Colombia, to establish if sexual dimorphism appears in the breed. A total...
- Autores:
-
Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño
Pere M. Parés-Casanova
Mauricio Vélez-Terranova
Germán Martínez-Correal
David Eduardo Rangel-Pachón
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2024
- Institución:
- Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UCC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/56281
- Palabra clave:
- anatomical structures
body size
morphology
sexual dimorphism
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
| id |
COOPER2_d51fa9b736e1f245e6c1082138baaf9c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/56281 |
| network_acronym_str |
COOPER2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio UCC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| title |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| spellingShingle |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia anatomical structures body size morphology sexual dimorphism |
| title_short |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| title_full |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| title_fullStr |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| title_sort |
Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño Pere M. Parés-Casanova Mauricio Vélez-Terranova Germán Martínez-Correal David Eduardo Rangel-Pachón |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño Pere M. Parés-Casanova Mauricio Vélez-Terranova Germán Martínez-Correal David Eduardo Rangel-Pachón |
| dc.contributor.researcher.none.fl_str_mv |
Arcesio Salamanca Carreño, Pere M. Parés-Casanova, Mauricio Vélez-Terranova, Germán Martínez-Correal, David Eduardo Rangel-Pachón |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.none.fl_str_mv |
Los Araucos |
| dc.subject.agrovoc.none.fl_str_mv |
anatomical structures body size morphology sexual dimorphism |
| topic |
anatomical structures body size morphology sexual dimorphism |
| description |
Variations in the size of animals of the same species but of different sex are called sexual size dimorphism. The aim of this study was to compare the biometrics between males and females of the Sanmartinero creole bovine, of Colombia, to establish if sexual dimorphism appears in the breed. A total of 94 animals (16 uncastrated males and 78 females, average age of 4.3 ± 1.4 and 4.2 ± 2.3 years, respectively) from three different farms were measured. A total of 21 linear variables were obtained using standard morphometric methods and live weight. A one-way NPMANOVA was used to evaluate between sexes, ages, and farms, a Principal Component Analysis was used to detect the most discriminating variables, and a multivariate regression used age as an independent value. Statistically significant differences were reflected between sexes (p = 0.033) and not by age and farms. The variables that differentiated the most between males and females were those related to size (thoracic circumference, body length, dorso-sternal diameter, height at the withers, height at the rump, and horn length), variables that were biased toward males, although only the height at the withers and the rump were the ones that presented statistically significant differences. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-11T00:07:30Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-11T00:07:30Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-05 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv |
Salamanca-Carreño, Parés-Casanova, Vélez-Terranova, Martínez-Correal, Rangel-Pachón. Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(7), 304; 1-12 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2306-7381 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/56281 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11070304 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2306-7381 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Salamanca-Carreño, Parés-Casanova, Vélez-Terranova, Martínez-Correal, Rangel-Pachón. Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(7), 304; 1-12 2306-7381 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/56281 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11070304 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
12 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
7 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
1 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.none.fl_str_mv |
11 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.none.fl_str_mv |
Veterinary Sciences |
| dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv |
Francesch, A.; Villalba, I.; Cartañà, M. Methodology for morphological characterization of chicken and its application to compare Penedesenca and Empordanesa breeds. Anim. Genet. 2011, 48, 79–84. [CrossRef] 2. Benítez, H.A.; Püschel, T.A. Modelando la varianza de la forma: Morfometría geométrica aplicaciones en biología evolutiva. Int. J. Morphol. 2014, 32, 998–1008. [CrossRef] 3. Hunter, J. An account of an extraordinary pheasan (Chapter 4). In The Works of John Hunter; Palmer, J.F., Ed.; The Royal Society Publishing: London, UK, 1837; Chapter 4, p. 45. 4. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed.; D. Appleton: London, UK, 1871. 5. Liñán, G.E.; Gámez-Vintaned, J.A.; Gutierrez, R.G.; Dies, M.E.; Chirivella, J.B.; Esteve, J.; Zamora, S.; Zhuravlev, A.Y.; Andrés, J.A.; Mayoral, E. Las especies de “paradoxides” del yacimiento cámbrico de Murero y el hallazgo de dimorfismo sexual en los trilobites. Nat. Aragonesa 2009, 23, 4–11. 6. Punzalan, D.; Hosken, D.J. Sexual Dimorphism: Why the Sexes Are (and Are Not) Different. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 972–973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 7. Angel, L.P.;Wells, M.R.; Rodríguez-Malagón, M.A.; Tew, E.; Speakman, J.R.; Arnould, J.P.Y. Sexual size dimorphism and body condition in the Australasian Gannet. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142653. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 8. Motani, R.; Huang, J.; Jiang, D.Y.; Tintori, A.; Rieppel, O.; You, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, R. Separating sexual dimorphism from other morphological variation in a specimen complex of fossil marine reptiles (Reptilia, Ichthyosauriformes, Chaohusaurus). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14978. [CrossRef] 9. Abdel-Rahman, E.H.; Taylor, P.J.; Contrafatto, G.; Lamb, J.M.; Bloomer, P.; Chimimba, C.T. Geometric craniometric analysis of sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic variation: A case study based on two geographically disparate species, Aethomys ineptus from southern Africa and Arvicanthis niloticus from Sudan (Rodentia: Muridae). Mamm. Biol. 2009, 74, 361–373. [CrossRef] 10. Lemic, D.; Benítez, H.A.; Bažok, R. Intercontinental effect on sexual shape dimorphism and allometric relationships in the beetle pest Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Zool. Anz. 2014, 253, 203–206. [CrossRef] 11. Dale, J.; Dunn, P.O.; Figuerola, J.; Lislevand, T.; Székely, T.; Whittingham, L.A. Sexual selection explains Rensch’s rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274, 2971–2979. [CrossRef] 12. Parés-Casanova, P.M.; Kataba, A.; Mwaanga, E.S.; Simukoko, H. Skull Sexual Monomorphism in the Gwembe Dwarf Goat Breed from Zambia. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 2014, 1, 301. 13. Bidau, C.J.; Martinez, P.A. Sexual size dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in Canidae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 119, 816–830. [CrossRef] 14. Martinez, P.A.; Marti, D.A.; Molina, W.F.; Bidau, C.J. Bergmann’s rule across the equator: A case study in Cerdocyon thous (Canidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 2013, 82, 997–1008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Liao,W.B.; Liu,W.C.; Merilä, J. Andrew meets Rensch: Sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Oecologia 2015, 177, 389–999. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Clutton-Brock, T. Reproductive competition and sexual selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2017, 372, 20160310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Wong-Muñoz, J.; Córdoba-Aguilar, A.; Cueva del Castillo, R.; Serrano-Meneses, M.A.; Payne, J. Seasonal changes in body size, sexual size dimorphism and sex ratio in relation to mating system in an adult odonate community. Evol. Ecol. 2011, 25, 59–75. [CrossRef] 18. Camargo, O. Sexual Dimorphism and deviation en the proportion of sexes in preimplantory embryos. Ces. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2012, 7, 100–114. 19. Rensch, B. Die Abhängigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergrösse. Bonn. Zool. Beiträge 1950, 1, 58–69. 20. Remes, V.; Szekely, T. Domestic chickens defy Rensch’s rule: Sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 2754–2759. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 21. Martínez, P.A.; Ferreira Amado, T.; Bidau, C.J. Una aproximación filogenética al estudio del dimorfismo sexual de tamaño en Felidae y la evaluación de la regla de Rensch. Ecosistemas 2014, 23, 27–36. 22. Jáuregui, R.; Parés-Casanova, P.M. Size sexual monomorphism in Barroso-Salmeco cattle from Guatemala. Rev. CES Med. Zootec. 2020, 15, 22–30. [CrossRef] 23. Parés-Casanova, P.M. Discrete Sexual Size Dimorphism in Domestic Sheep. Ann. Biol. Res. 2015, 6, 43–48. 24. van der Heide, E.M.M.; Lourenço, D.A.L.; Chen, C.Y.; Herring, W.O.; Sapp, R.L.; Moser, W.D.; Tsuruta, S.; Masuda, Y.; Ducro, B.J.; Misztal, I. Sexual Dimorphism in Livestock Species Selected for Economically Important Traits. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 3684–3692. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Martínez, C.G.; Gonzalez, H.F. El ganado criollo Sanmartinero (SM) y su potencial productivo. Anim. Genet. Resour. 2000, 28, 7–17. [CrossRef] 26. Martínez, C.G.; Flórez, D.H.; Martínez-Villate, G.C. El ganado criollo colombiano Sanmartinero, su conservación y aporte sostenible a la producción bovina en la Orinoquia colombiana. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 2020, 28, 69–86. 27. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS). Available online: https://www.fao.org/dad-is/browse-by-country-and-species/en/ (accessed on 7 January 2024). 28. Flórez, H.; Martínez, G.; Ballesteros, H.; León, L.M.; Castañeda, S.; Moreno, E.; Arias, L.E.; Torres, J.C.; Rodríguez, C.A.; Peña, F.; et al. Rendimiento en carne de bovinos criollos y europeos y sus cruces con cebú en las condiciones de la Orinoquia colombiana. Actas Iberoam. Conservación Anim. 2014, 4, 12–15. 29. Rodríguez, M.; Fernández, G.; Silveira, C. Caracterización morfológica del ganado bovino criollo uruguayo del Parque Nacional San Miguel. Rev. Soc. Med. Vet. Uy. 2004, 39, 39–42. 30. Abreu, U.G.P.; Santos, S.A.; Sereno, J.R.B.; Comastri-Filho, J.A.; Ravanelli, M.S. Caracterización morfométrica de los bovinos Pantaneiros del núcleo de conservación in situ de Nhumirim. Arch. Zootec. 2005, 54, 2011–2016. 31. Chirinos, Z.; Contreras, G.; Zambrano, S.; Molero, E.; Paéz, A. Caracterizacion del dimorfismo sexual en ganado criollo limonero mediante medidas corporales. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ) 2011, 28, 554–564. 32. Fuentes-Mascorro, G.; Carmona, M.M.A.; Chirinos, Z. Caracterización del dimorfismo sexual en ganado criollo de Oaxaca, mediante medidas corporales. Actas Iberoam. Conservación Anim. 2011, 1, 94–96. 33. Salamanca-Carreño, A.; Crosby-Granados, R.A. Estudio fenotípico del bovino criollo Casanare biotipo Araucano. Análsisi zoométrico. Zootec. Trop. 2013, 31, 201–208. 34. Cabezas Congo, R.; Barba Capote, C.; González Martínez, A.; Cevallos Falquez, O.; León Jurado, J.M.; Aguilar Reyes, J.M.; García Martínez, A. Estudio biométrico del bovino criollo de Santa Elena (Ecuador). Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2019, 10, 819–836. [CrossRef] 35. Martínez-Villate, G.C.; Martínez-Correal, G.; Manrique-Perdomo, C. Estimación de parámetros genéticos de características de crecimiento predestete del bovino criollo de raza Sanmartinera (sm). Rev. Orinoquia 2010, 13, 101–112. [CrossRef] 36. Salamanca-Carreño, A.; Parés-Casanova, P.M.; Vélez-Terranova, M.; Martínez-Correal, G.; Rangel-Pachón, D.E. Early Cannon Development in Females of the “Sanmartinero” Creole Bovine Breed. Animals 2024, 14, 527. [CrossRef] 37. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST v. 2.17c. Palaeontol. Elect. 2001, 4, 1–229. 38. Batubara, A.; Noor, R.R.; Farajallah, A.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Doloksaribu, M. Morphometric and phylogenic analysis of six population Indonesian local goats. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2011, 34, 165–174. [CrossRef] 39. Delph, L.F. Procesos que limitan y facilitan la evolución del dimorfismo sexual. Am. Nat. 2005, 166, S1–S4. [CrossRef] 40. Clutton-Brock, T. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 2007, 318, 1882–1885. [CrossRef] 41. Li, Y.-P.; Huang, Z.-P.; Yang, Y.; He, X.-B.; Pan, R.-L.; He, X.-M.; Yang, G.-W.;Wu, H.; Cui, L.-W.; Xiao,W. Ontogenetic Development of Sexual Dimorphism in Body Mass of Wild Black-and-White Snub-Nosed Monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti). Animals 2023, 13, 1576. [CrossRef] 42. Bruner, E.; Costantini, D.; Fanfani, A.; Dell’Omo, G. Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism of the cephalic scales in Lacerta bilineata. Acta Zool. 2005, 86, 245–254. [CrossRef] 43. Escobar, C.; Villalobos, A.; Núnez, J. Medidas zoométricas del ganado bovino criollo de Panamá. Investig. Pensam. Crítico 2014, 2, 26–33. [CrossRef] 44. Martín-Vivaldi, M.; Cabrero, J. Selección Sexual. In Evolución. La base de la Biología; Soler, M., Ed.; Proyecto Sur: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2002; Chapter 13, pp. 235–259. 45. Carranza, J. Sexual Selection for Male Body Mass and the Evolution of Litter Size in Mammals. Am. Nat. 1996, 148, 81–100. [CrossRef] 46. Selander, R.K. Sexual Selection and Dimorphism in Birds. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man; Campbell, B.G., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 180–230. Chávez-García, D.; Andrade-Yucailla, V.; Quevedo-Pinos, N.; Acosta-Lozano, N.; Duque-Chávez, B. Descripción del entorno social de los bovinos criollos y sus características morfométrica y fanerópticas en condiciones del litoral ecuatoriano. Arch. Zootec. 2023, 72, 52–58. 48. Borczyk, B. Sexual dimorphism in skull size and shape of Laticauda colubrina (Serpentes: Elapidae). PeerJ 2023, 11, e16266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 49. Watson, N.L.; Simmons, L.W. Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry. Proc. R. Soc. B 2010, 277, 2035–2040. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 50. Clutton-Brock, T.H.; Huchard, E. Social competition and selection in males and females. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2013, 368, 20130074. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 51. Herrera, M.; Luque, M. Morfoestructura y sistemas para el futuro en la valoración morfológica. In Valoración Morfológica de los Animales Domésticos; Sañudo, C., Ed.; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino: Madrid, Spain, 2009; pp. 79–109. 52. Aguirre-Riofrio, E.L.; Abad-Guamán, R.M.; Uchuari-Pauta, M.L. Morphometric Evaluation of Phenotypic Groups of Creole Cattle of Southern Ecuador. Diversity 2019, 11, 221. [CrossRef] 53. Lizon Ferrufino, F.; Barrientos Gómez, M.A.; Pereira, J.A.; Loza Vega, A. Caracterización Fenotípica y Genotípica del ganado bovino criollo Pasorapeño Cochabamba, Bolivia. Rev. Científica Investig. INFO-INIAF 2016, 1, 80–86. 54. Martínez, R.; Fernández, E.; Abbiati, E.; Broccoli, A. Caracterización zoométrica de bovinos criollos: Patagónicos vs. Noroeste argentino. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2007, 12, 1042–1049. [CrossRef] 55. Alderson, L. The categorization of types and breeds of cattle in Europe. Arch. Zootec. 1992, 41, 325–334. 56. Padian, K.; Horner, J.R. The evolution of ‘bizarre structures’ in dinosaurs: Biomechanics, sexual selection, social selection or species recognition? J. Zool. 2010, 283, 3–17. [CrossRef] |
| dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
| dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
1-12 |
| dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.temporal.none.fl_str_mv |
Orinoquia colombiana |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI (Suiza) |
| dc.publisher.place.none.fl_str_mv |
Villavicencio |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI (Suiza) |
| institution |
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/d4edbe5e-ff0c-4be5-b06e-d1d00f91c4f8/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/76ddd4bd-2ff4-4561-8791-2c1c5f374225/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/5d059309-94f6-4a43-8013-502ace11d44b/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/cf3714f0-3e86-4eb9-a51d-b90ed015f2e6/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/845501b9-eb5d-4712-b712-99fca4be6105/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/13b7f386-b86b-4b5a-8a63-a15232325110/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/67233881-897f-4fcb-bf94-3bee874d0817/download https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/c9a12901-3197-45bf-a0a3-de24ee0c73ff/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
465c8925d1b2d70668a28220c9a728a0 765a77f8fbb843086cfc6f7ee8c1deb7 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45 1dbe63b19b9b07342f5c9406d7daf516 2c97769fe00865a9a285647d8eb7244b c62a4eb1929d5eaae8825f5d89e9cb8e 246c26f867ed382d646b741d9dc9106c |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1814247231783436288 |
| spelling |
Arcesio Salamanca-CarreñoPere M. Parés-CasanovaMauricio Vélez-TerranovaGermán Martínez-CorrealDavid Eduardo Rangel-PachónArcesio Salamanca Carreño, Pere M. Parés-Casanova, Mauricio Vélez-Terranova, Germán Martínez-Correal, David Eduardo Rangel-PachónLos AraucosOrinoquia colombiana2024-07-11T00:07:30Z2024-07-11T00:07:30Z2024-07-05Salamanca-Carreño, Parés-Casanova, Vélez-Terranova, Martínez-Correal, Rangel-Pachón. Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian Orinoquia. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(7), 304; 1-122306-7381https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/56281https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci110703042306-7381Variations in the size of animals of the same species but of different sex are called sexual size dimorphism. The aim of this study was to compare the biometrics between males and females of the Sanmartinero creole bovine, of Colombia, to establish if sexual dimorphism appears in the breed. A total of 94 animals (16 uncastrated males and 78 females, average age of 4.3 ± 1.4 and 4.2 ± 2.3 years, respectively) from three different farms were measured. A total of 21 linear variables were obtained using standard morphometric methods and live weight. A one-way NPMANOVA was used to evaluate between sexes, ages, and farms, a Principal Component Analysis was used to detect the most discriminating variables, and a multivariate regression used age as an independent value. Statistically significant differences were reflected between sexes (p = 0.033) and not by age and farms. The variables that differentiated the most between males and females were those related to size (thoracic circumference, body length, dorso-sternal diameter, height at the withers, height at the rump, and horn length), variables that were biased toward males, although only the height at the withers and the rump were the ones that presented statistically significant differences.Nutrición y Producción Animal Sostenible1-12application/pdfengMDPI (Suiza)Villavicenciohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Size Gynomimicry in the Sanmartinero Creole Bovine of the Colombian OrinoquiaArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion127111Veterinary SciencesFrancesch, A.; Villalba, I.; Cartañà, M. Methodology for morphological characterization of chicken and its application to compare Penedesenca and Empordanesa breeds. Anim. Genet. 2011, 48, 79–84. [CrossRef] 2. Benítez, H.A.; Püschel, T.A. Modelando la varianza de la forma: Morfometría geométrica aplicaciones en biología evolutiva. Int. J. Morphol. 2014, 32, 998–1008. [CrossRef] 3. Hunter, J. An account of an extraordinary pheasan (Chapter 4). In The Works of John Hunter; Palmer, J.F., Ed.; The Royal Society Publishing: London, UK, 1837; Chapter 4, p. 45. 4. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed.; D. Appleton: London, UK, 1871. 5. Liñán, G.E.; Gámez-Vintaned, J.A.; Gutierrez, R.G.; Dies, M.E.; Chirivella, J.B.; Esteve, J.; Zamora, S.; Zhuravlev, A.Y.; Andrés, J.A.; Mayoral, E. Las especies de “paradoxides” del yacimiento cámbrico de Murero y el hallazgo de dimorfismo sexual en los trilobites. Nat. Aragonesa 2009, 23, 4–11. 6. Punzalan, D.; Hosken, D.J. Sexual Dimorphism: Why the Sexes Are (and Are Not) Different. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 972–973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 7. Angel, L.P.;Wells, M.R.; Rodríguez-Malagón, M.A.; Tew, E.; Speakman, J.R.; Arnould, J.P.Y. Sexual size dimorphism and body condition in the Australasian Gannet. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142653. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 8. Motani, R.; Huang, J.; Jiang, D.Y.; Tintori, A.; Rieppel, O.; You, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, R. Separating sexual dimorphism from other morphological variation in a specimen complex of fossil marine reptiles (Reptilia, Ichthyosauriformes, Chaohusaurus). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14978. [CrossRef] 9. Abdel-Rahman, E.H.; Taylor, P.J.; Contrafatto, G.; Lamb, J.M.; Bloomer, P.; Chimimba, C.T. Geometric craniometric analysis of sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic variation: A case study based on two geographically disparate species, Aethomys ineptus from southern Africa and Arvicanthis niloticus from Sudan (Rodentia: Muridae). Mamm. Biol. 2009, 74, 361–373. [CrossRef] 10. Lemic, D.; Benítez, H.A.; Bažok, R. Intercontinental effect on sexual shape dimorphism and allometric relationships in the beetle pest Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Zool. Anz. 2014, 253, 203–206. [CrossRef] 11. Dale, J.; Dunn, P.O.; Figuerola, J.; Lislevand, T.; Székely, T.; Whittingham, L.A. Sexual selection explains Rensch’s rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274, 2971–2979. [CrossRef] 12. Parés-Casanova, P.M.; Kataba, A.; Mwaanga, E.S.; Simukoko, H. Skull Sexual Monomorphism in the Gwembe Dwarf Goat Breed from Zambia. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 2014, 1, 301. 13. Bidau, C.J.; Martinez, P.A. Sexual size dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in Canidae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 119, 816–830. [CrossRef] 14. Martinez, P.A.; Marti, D.A.; Molina, W.F.; Bidau, C.J. Bergmann’s rule across the equator: A case study in Cerdocyon thous (Canidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 2013, 82, 997–1008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Liao,W.B.; Liu,W.C.; Merilä, J. Andrew meets Rensch: Sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Oecologia 2015, 177, 389–999. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Clutton-Brock, T. Reproductive competition and sexual selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2017, 372, 20160310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Wong-Muñoz, J.; Córdoba-Aguilar, A.; Cueva del Castillo, R.; Serrano-Meneses, M.A.; Payne, J. Seasonal changes in body size, sexual size dimorphism and sex ratio in relation to mating system in an adult odonate community. Evol. Ecol. 2011, 25, 59–75. [CrossRef] 18. Camargo, O. Sexual Dimorphism and deviation en the proportion of sexes in preimplantory embryos. Ces. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2012, 7, 100–114. 19. Rensch, B. Die Abhängigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergrösse. Bonn. Zool. Beiträge 1950, 1, 58–69. 20. Remes, V.; Szekely, T. Domestic chickens defy Rensch’s rule: Sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 2754–2759. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 21. Martínez, P.A.; Ferreira Amado, T.; Bidau, C.J. Una aproximación filogenética al estudio del dimorfismo sexual de tamaño en Felidae y la evaluación de la regla de Rensch. Ecosistemas 2014, 23, 27–36. 22. Jáuregui, R.; Parés-Casanova, P.M. Size sexual monomorphism in Barroso-Salmeco cattle from Guatemala. Rev. CES Med. Zootec. 2020, 15, 22–30. [CrossRef] 23. Parés-Casanova, P.M. Discrete Sexual Size Dimorphism in Domestic Sheep. Ann. Biol. Res. 2015, 6, 43–48. 24. van der Heide, E.M.M.; Lourenço, D.A.L.; Chen, C.Y.; Herring, W.O.; Sapp, R.L.; Moser, W.D.; Tsuruta, S.; Masuda, Y.; Ducro, B.J.; Misztal, I. Sexual Dimorphism in Livestock Species Selected for Economically Important Traits. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 3684–3692. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Martínez, C.G.; Gonzalez, H.F. El ganado criollo Sanmartinero (SM) y su potencial productivo. Anim. Genet. Resour. 2000, 28, 7–17. [CrossRef] 26. Martínez, C.G.; Flórez, D.H.; Martínez-Villate, G.C. El ganado criollo colombiano Sanmartinero, su conservación y aporte sostenible a la producción bovina en la Orinoquia colombiana. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 2020, 28, 69–86. 27. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS). Available online: https://www.fao.org/dad-is/browse-by-country-and-species/en/ (accessed on 7 January 2024). 28. Flórez, H.; Martínez, G.; Ballesteros, H.; León, L.M.; Castañeda, S.; Moreno, E.; Arias, L.E.; Torres, J.C.; Rodríguez, C.A.; Peña, F.; et al. Rendimiento en carne de bovinos criollos y europeos y sus cruces con cebú en las condiciones de la Orinoquia colombiana. Actas Iberoam. Conservación Anim. 2014, 4, 12–15. 29. Rodríguez, M.; Fernández, G.; Silveira, C. Caracterización morfológica del ganado bovino criollo uruguayo del Parque Nacional San Miguel. Rev. Soc. Med. Vet. Uy. 2004, 39, 39–42. 30. Abreu, U.G.P.; Santos, S.A.; Sereno, J.R.B.; Comastri-Filho, J.A.; Ravanelli, M.S. Caracterización morfométrica de los bovinos Pantaneiros del núcleo de conservación in situ de Nhumirim. Arch. Zootec. 2005, 54, 2011–2016. 31. Chirinos, Z.; Contreras, G.; Zambrano, S.; Molero, E.; Paéz, A. Caracterizacion del dimorfismo sexual en ganado criollo limonero mediante medidas corporales. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ) 2011, 28, 554–564. 32. Fuentes-Mascorro, G.; Carmona, M.M.A.; Chirinos, Z. Caracterización del dimorfismo sexual en ganado criollo de Oaxaca, mediante medidas corporales. Actas Iberoam. Conservación Anim. 2011, 1, 94–96. 33. Salamanca-Carreño, A.; Crosby-Granados, R.A. Estudio fenotípico del bovino criollo Casanare biotipo Araucano. Análsisi zoométrico. Zootec. Trop. 2013, 31, 201–208. 34. Cabezas Congo, R.; Barba Capote, C.; González Martínez, A.; Cevallos Falquez, O.; León Jurado, J.M.; Aguilar Reyes, J.M.; García Martínez, A. Estudio biométrico del bovino criollo de Santa Elena (Ecuador). Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2019, 10, 819–836. [CrossRef] 35. Martínez-Villate, G.C.; Martínez-Correal, G.; Manrique-Perdomo, C. Estimación de parámetros genéticos de características de crecimiento predestete del bovino criollo de raza Sanmartinera (sm). Rev. Orinoquia 2010, 13, 101–112. [CrossRef] 36. Salamanca-Carreño, A.; Parés-Casanova, P.M.; Vélez-Terranova, M.; Martínez-Correal, G.; Rangel-Pachón, D.E. Early Cannon Development in Females of the “Sanmartinero” Creole Bovine Breed. Animals 2024, 14, 527. [CrossRef] 37. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST v. 2.17c. Palaeontol. Elect. 2001, 4, 1–229. 38. Batubara, A.; Noor, R.R.; Farajallah, A.; Tiesnamurti, B.; Doloksaribu, M. Morphometric and phylogenic analysis of six population Indonesian local goats. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2011, 34, 165–174. [CrossRef] 39. Delph, L.F. Procesos que limitan y facilitan la evolución del dimorfismo sexual. Am. Nat. 2005, 166, S1–S4. [CrossRef] 40. Clutton-Brock, T. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 2007, 318, 1882–1885. [CrossRef] 41. Li, Y.-P.; Huang, Z.-P.; Yang, Y.; He, X.-B.; Pan, R.-L.; He, X.-M.; Yang, G.-W.;Wu, H.; Cui, L.-W.; Xiao,W. Ontogenetic Development of Sexual Dimorphism in Body Mass of Wild Black-and-White Snub-Nosed Monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti). Animals 2023, 13, 1576. [CrossRef] 42. Bruner, E.; Costantini, D.; Fanfani, A.; Dell’Omo, G. Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism of the cephalic scales in Lacerta bilineata. Acta Zool. 2005, 86, 245–254. [CrossRef] 43. Escobar, C.; Villalobos, A.; Núnez, J. Medidas zoométricas del ganado bovino criollo de Panamá. Investig. Pensam. Crítico 2014, 2, 26–33. [CrossRef] 44. Martín-Vivaldi, M.; Cabrero, J. Selección Sexual. In Evolución. La base de la Biología; Soler, M., Ed.; Proyecto Sur: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2002; Chapter 13, pp. 235–259. 45. Carranza, J. Sexual Selection for Male Body Mass and the Evolution of Litter Size in Mammals. Am. Nat. 1996, 148, 81–100. [CrossRef] 46. Selander, R.K. Sexual Selection and Dimorphism in Birds. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man; Campbell, B.G., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 180–230. Chávez-García, D.; Andrade-Yucailla, V.; Quevedo-Pinos, N.; Acosta-Lozano, N.; Duque-Chávez, B. Descripción del entorno social de los bovinos criollos y sus características morfométrica y fanerópticas en condiciones del litoral ecuatoriano. Arch. Zootec. 2023, 72, 52–58. 48. Borczyk, B. Sexual dimorphism in skull size and shape of Laticauda colubrina (Serpentes: Elapidae). PeerJ 2023, 11, e16266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 49. Watson, N.L.; Simmons, L.W. Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry. Proc. R. Soc. B 2010, 277, 2035–2040. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 50. Clutton-Brock, T.H.; Huchard, E. Social competition and selection in males and females. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2013, 368, 20130074. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 51. Herrera, M.; Luque, M. Morfoestructura y sistemas para el futuro en la valoración morfológica. In Valoración Morfológica de los Animales Domésticos; Sañudo, C., Ed.; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino: Madrid, Spain, 2009; pp. 79–109. 52. Aguirre-Riofrio, E.L.; Abad-Guamán, R.M.; Uchuari-Pauta, M.L. Morphometric Evaluation of Phenotypic Groups of Creole Cattle of Southern Ecuador. Diversity 2019, 11, 221. [CrossRef] 53. Lizon Ferrufino, F.; Barrientos Gómez, M.A.; Pereira, J.A.; Loza Vega, A. Caracterización Fenotípica y Genotípica del ganado bovino criollo Pasorapeño Cochabamba, Bolivia. Rev. Científica Investig. INFO-INIAF 2016, 1, 80–86. 54. Martínez, R.; Fernández, E.; Abbiati, E.; Broccoli, A. Caracterización zoométrica de bovinos criollos: Patagónicos vs. Noroeste argentino. Rev. MVZ Córdoba 2007, 12, 1042–1049. [CrossRef] 55. Alderson, L. The categorization of types and breeds of cattle in Europe. Arch. Zootec. 1992, 41, 325–334. 56. Padian, K.; Horner, J.R. The evolution of ‘bizarre structures’ in dinosaurs: Biomechanics, sexual selection, social selection or species recognition? J. Zool. 2010, 283, 3–17. [CrossRef]anatomical structuresbody sizemorphologysexual dimorphismPublicationORIGINALGinomimicria de tamaño Sanmartinero vetsci-11-00304.pdfGinomimicria de tamaño Sanmartinero vetsci-11-00304.pdfapplication/pdf2693286https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/d4edbe5e-ff0c-4be5-b06e-d1d00f91c4f8/download465c8925d1b2d70668a28220c9a728a0MD51Licencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Ginomimicria Sanmartinero.pdfLicencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Ginomimicria Sanmartinero.pdfapplication/pdf209547https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/76ddd4bd-2ff4-4561-8791-2c1c5f374225/download765a77f8fbb843086cfc6f7ee8c1deb7MD52CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/5d059309-94f6-4a43-8013-502ace11d44b/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/cf3714f0-3e86-4eb9-a51d-b90ed015f2e6/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD54TEXTGinomimicria de tamaño Sanmartinero vetsci-11-00304.pdf.txtGinomimicria de tamaño Sanmartinero vetsci-11-00304.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain54196https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/845501b9-eb5d-4712-b712-99fca4be6105/download1dbe63b19b9b07342f5c9406d7daf516MD55Licencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Ginomimicria Sanmartinero.pdf.txtLicencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Ginomimicria Sanmartinero.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain6220https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/13b7f386-b86b-4b5a-8a63-a15232325110/download2c97769fe00865a9a285647d8eb7244bMD57THUMBNAILGinomimicria de tamaño Sanmartinero vetsci-11-00304.pdf.jpgGinomimicria de tamaño Sanmartinero vetsci-11-00304.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg15462https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/67233881-897f-4fcb-bf94-3bee874d0817/downloadc62a4eb1929d5eaae8825f5d89e9cb8eMD56Licencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Ginomimicria Sanmartinero.pdf.jpgLicencia de uso RI Ver5 - 9-07-2021 Ginomimicria Sanmartinero.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13101https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/c9a12901-3197-45bf-a0a3-de24ee0c73ff/download246c26f867ed382d646b741d9dc9106cMD5820.500.12494/56281oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/562812024-08-20 16:22:12.943http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.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 |